as some other
security measures like SSL did.
-- Roop
Roop Mukherjee wrote:
The fact that someone can break open his box/software and sucessfully
invalidate their verification scheme does not mean that there is no value in
copy marks. Initial
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
If it were possible, it would indeed raise the bar. The problem is, it
would seem, that it is not possible to have a provably strong means of
copy protection, publicly known or otherwise. The SDMI charter can say
what it wants, but that doesn't mean
I have being trying to read about formally proving security protocols. I
have seen the work of Needham, Paulson et. al., Meadows among others.
I was wondering if anyone here has seen a comparison between these
approaches to evaluate things like ease of use and effectiveness. I mean
something
Could this not use most of the code from the Onion Router itself. I am
assuming that the code was made freely available and someone has a copy if
it?
-- roop
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ben Laurie wrote:
Ben.
[1] FWIW, I'd be willing to work on that, but not
