Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-05 Thread Bill Stewart
At 11:32 AM 04/03/2003 -0800, Bill Frantz wrote: Ah yes, I haven't updated my timings for the new machines that are faster than my 550Mhz. :-) The only other item is importance is that the exhaustive search time isn't the time to reverse one IP, but the time to reverse all the IPs that have been

Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-04 Thread Ben Laurie
Bill Frantz wrote: At 6:16 PM -0800 4/2/03, Seth David Schoen wrote: Bill Frantz writes: The http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm URL says: Low resolution data in most cases is intended to be sufficient for marketing analyses. It may take the form of IP addresses that have been subjected to a

Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-03 Thread Bill Frantz
At 6:16 PM -0800 4/2/03, Seth David Schoen wrote: Bill Frantz writes: The http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm URL says: Low resolution data in most cases is intended to be sufficient for marketing analyses. It may take the form of IP addresses that have been subjected to a one way hash, to

Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-03 Thread Roop Mukherjee
Could this not use most of the code from the Onion Router itself. I am assuming that the code was made freely available and someone has a copy if it? -- roop On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ben Laurie wrote: Ben. [1] FWIW, I'd be willing to work on that, but not

Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-03 Thread Ben Laurie
John Young wrote: Ben, Would you care to comment for publication on web logging described in these two files: http://cryptome.org/no-logs.htm http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities of servers to log or not, and other means for

Re: Logging of Web Usage

2003-04-02 Thread Bill Frantz
At 2:58 PM -0800 4/2/03, John Young wrote: Ben, Would you care to comment for publication on web logging described in these two files: http://cryptome.org/no-logs.htm http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities of servers to log or