Bill Stewart writes:
On Thursday, Mar 13, 2003, at 21:45 US/Eastern, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
The Xbox will not boot any free kernel without hardware modification.
The Xbox is an IBM style peecee with some feeble hardware and software
DRM.
But is the Xbox running Nag-Scab or whatever
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 05:12, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Microsoft's point with regard to DRM has always been that Palladium had
other uses besides that one which everyone was focused on. Obviously
Of course it's useful. Does the usefulness outweigh the
All video game
consoles are sold under cost today.
This is wrong. Cf, http://www.actsofgord.com/Proclamations/chapter02.html
/r$
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to
Anish asked for references to Palladium.
Using a search engine to find things with palladium cryptography
wasabisystems
or palladium cypherpunks will find a bunch of pointers to articles,
some of them organized usefully.
On Thursday, Mar 13, 2003, at 21:45 US/Eastern, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
The
Eugen Leitl writes:
Unfortunately no one can accept in good faith a single word coming out of
Redmond. Biddle has been denying Pd can be used for DRM in presentation
(xref Lucky Green subsequent patent claims to call the bluff), however in
recent (of this week) Focus interview Gates
AARG!, having burned the nym with the moderator of this list and who is
therefore now posting via the Hermes remailer commented on Microsoft,
which similarly burned the Palladium name, claims:
Hopefully this will shed light on the frequent claims that
Palladium will limit what programs people
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Microsoft's point with regard to DRM has always been that Palladium had
other uses besides that one which everyone was focused on. Obviously
Of course it's useful. Does the usefulness outweigh the support for
special interests (DRM, governments, software
Jeroen C. van Gelderen schrieb am Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:38:14AM -0500:
[...]
Obviously a vendor can restrict what kind of software runs on the
hardware he sells, either by contract or trough technical means. In the
latter case the consumer is of course free to circumvent the barriers,
Unfortunately no one can accept in good faith a single word coming out of
Redmond. Biddle has been denying Pd can be used for DRM in presentation
(xref Lucky Green subsequent patent claims to call the bluff), however in
recent (of this week) Focus interview Gates explicitly stated it does.
This
On Thursday, Mar 13, 2003, at 21:45 US/Eastern, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Hermes Remailer wrote:
The following comes from Microsoft's recent mailing of their awkwardly
named Windows Trusted Platform Technologies Information Newsletter
March 2003. Since they've abandoned the
Hi all,
I would be really glad to know more on Pallidium .I have tried to get some info but
havent been able to get much.
I would be really thankful if some one could give me some pointers.This is inspite of
having sat through two lectures one from Graeme Proudler(H.P. Research Labs),and
Hermes Remailer wrote:
Hopefully this will shed light on the frequent claims that Palladium will
limit what programs people can run, [...]
That's a strawman argument. The problem is not that Palladium will
*itself* directly limit what I can run; the problem is what Palladium
enables. Why are
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Hermes Remailer wrote:
The following comes from Microsoft's recent mailing of their awkwardly
named Windows Trusted Platform Technologies Information Newsletter
March 2003. Since they've abandoned the Palladium name they are forced
to use this cumbersome title.
13 matches
Mail list logo
