Re: prime proofs

2003-03-10 Thread Anton Stiglic

The contribution of Pratt was to be the first to publish a proof
that the certificate can be verified in polynomial time (thus proving
that PRIMES is in NP).

--Anton

- Original Message -
From: Richard Schroeppel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: prime proofs


 Dave Wagner writes
   ...  Here's a simple method, due to Pratt.  ...

 People were doing this fourty years before Pratt's paper.
 See, for example, Dick Lehmer's 1933 paper Hunting Big Game
 in the Theory of Numbers, where he describes proving primality
 for a 19 digit divisor of 2^95+1.  It's on my web page at

 http://www.cs.arizona.edu/~rcs/biggame4

 Or see Math. Comp. in the early 1970s for examples with more
 depth in the recursions.

 Rich Schroeppel[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -
 The Cryptography Mailing List
 Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


prime proofs

2003-03-08 Thread Richard Schroeppel
Dave Wagner writes
  ...  Here's a simple method, due to Pratt.  ...

People were doing this fourty years before Pratt's paper.
See, for example, Dick Lehmer's 1933 paper Hunting Big Game
in the Theory of Numbers, where he describes proving primality
for a 19 digit divisor of 2^95+1.  It's on my web page at

http://www.cs.arizona.edu/~rcs/biggame4

Or see Math. Comp. in the early 1970s for examples with more
depth in the recursions.

Rich Schroeppel[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]