On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:53 PM, wrote:
> Here is the build log from our library: http://pastebin.com/srRGzy2D
>
> We have not modified the cryptopp script in anyway so the output would look
> the same as if you called it with static lean.
>
> The interesting thing here
Apologies for replying so late. Work got a bit busy. I was able to solve
this by removing bench.cpp from our folder for compiling. It seems that it
was left over after an update.
Patrick
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 1:57:49 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:40
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:20 PM, wrote:
> I have my library, which is static, linked with a static cryptopp library.
> I have cryptopp set to build lean and have the flags for -ffunctions and
> -fdata-sections in my make file as well. However, when I call strip on the
>
I have my library, which is static, linked with a static cryptopp library.
I have cryptopp set to build lean and have the flags for -ffunctions and
-fdata-sections in my make file as well. However, when I call strip on the
final product nothing is actually stripped and the cryptopp library
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:16 PM, wrote:
> Here is the build script we use to build our library with the arguments of
> static: http://pastebin.com/yeH8xBNs
>
> and we are using the cryptopp GNUmakefile-cross with static lean as the
> arguments.
I need to see the build
Here is the build script we use to build our library with the arguments of
static: http://pastebin.com/yeH8xBNs
and we are using the cryptopp GNUmakefile-cross with static lean as the
arguments.
Patrick
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 2:50:40 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13,
Here is the build log from our library: http://pastebin.com/srRGzy2D
We have not modified the cryptopp script in anyway so the output would look
the same as if you called it with static lean.
The interesting thing here is that it says -dynamic not specified and
-dead_strip is ignored.
Patrick