Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Well, you can't combine keywords with anything that
isn't, i.e. 'top
5%' or 'top 4px' are invalid (IIRC), and the keywords are correctly
interpreted because they are mutually exclusive (except for center,
but it doesn't matter in which order center center is
From: Rafael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Although top 5% is invalid, that's only because the
horizontal position
must come first if one of the values is not a keyword;
so 5% top or left
23px are valid. However, for clarity, I tend to use
either
I want to display comments on my blog so that the color of the container for
each comment is 50% opaque while the content in the box is at 100%. It seems
if I set it up where it's nested div's - the comments will appear at 50%
opaque too. How do I build this so I can accomplish both the
At 5:18 AM +0200 9/6/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
You have provided anyone with interest in this subject - the
image-scaling problem under certain conditions - with ways to solve the
problem if they experience it in a real-world case. That may be
extremely useful for some, so I say *thank you* for
On 04-Sep-07, at 7:24 PM, Tigdh Glesain wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/ver3-b/
Hallo Rahul,
I'm using Safari 2 and it looks grand...
Two comments...
1) There is a misspelt word on your 'projects' page - 'resarch'
instead of 'research'
2) I wonder if you haven't 'hidden' too much of
On 04-Sep-07, at 8:10 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/ver3-b/
Sorry. Dunno. Don't care. The intentional clipping of your name
comes off as an error (personal opinion).
Didn't get past that.
Best,
~dL
David,
Thank you for your feedback. Several
I haven't done a new table-based layout in years. That said, we have two
key pages that are truly wire-frame in nature, by that I mean that the
individual cells of content vary substantially in size at each rendering
(based on database contents), and these variances in size need to adjust the
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Divs are semantically neutral, which doesn't necessarily equate to
meaningless when used to replicate a table.
lol. That does seem a bit of circular logic to me. Nevertheless, I do
appreciate your interesting links and discussion of my question. It
does seem though
You are not using tables to structure the
page, only what can be reasonably considered tabular data on the page.
Then the same could be said of a simple definition list. I would like
to agree with you, but am not quite comfortable with that argument.
--
E. Michael Brandt
www.divaHTML.com
At 3:09 AM -0500 9/6/07, Rafael wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Although top 5% is invalid, that's only because the horizontal position
must come first if one of the values is not a keyword; so 5% top or left
23px are valid. However, for clarity, I tend to use either just keywords or
just
After years of css+standards+tables must diepurity I started using
tables again for certain specific layout issues.
I tend to favor less code. So if I can do something instantly with a
table that would take many extra lines of containing blocks and css,
(not to mention extra math and
On 9/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only font-size quirks you are likely to find in today's browsers, is
that 'em' and '%' can give +/- 1px deviation between browsers because
they don't use exactly the same tip-over values when they re-calculate
to screen-pixels.
I am
Recently I've seen some stylesheets where the ID and class of the
same element is combined into a single selector; e.g.,
body#about-us.level2 #banner {background: #900 url(../images/
bnr_sec01.jpg) no-repeat 0 15px;}
body#ask.level2 #banner {background: #900 url(../images/
bnr_sec02.jpg)
It does seem though that non-table solutions to my specific problem use so
much code, and add so much complexity, that I still lean towards the
more straightforward table.
It may appear that non table solutions use so much code, but that's
just not the case when you consider that external
snip
Yes, there's a steep learning curve with css layouts (and it seems
you're considering avoiding that climb) but once you've gotten over
the hump you'll never look back. CSS is a different way of thinking.
Once the language is learned it's actually, in most ways, less complex
than table
Hi Folks,
This my first review request. Would those of you with the time and
inclination please have a look at this 'test' site, and offer your
professional opinion.
I am yet to be supplied with some of the 'artwork' (images, header
images, etc..) I've run the XHTML and CSS through the
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Are table-based layouts still needed
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Divs are semantically neutral, which doesn't necessarily equate to
meaningless when used to replicate a table.
lol. That does seem a bit of circular logic to me.
bj
Thanks for your comments, but it might have been more useful had they
not been generic. Eric was soliciting specific table challenges and
their css alternatives. I asked about a particular situation on one page
on one site. There is no caching issue, there is no nesting of tables,
there
Hi Folks,
This my first review request. Would those of you with the time and
inclination please have a look at this 'test' site, and offer your
professional opinion.
I am yet to be supplied with some of the 'artwork' (images, header
images, etc..) I've run the XHTML and CSS through the
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Are table-based layouts still needed
the issue was a 5 col layout that had equal lengths.
Actually, Ian - I *think( that might have been me. I believe the
original question was just a question. I was one of the early
responders to
At 12:06 PM -0400 9/6/07, E Michael Brandt wrote:
Rather I asked a question and now find that to suggest a table might be
an acceptable alternative to css for my particular problem seems to have
prompted personal attack. Why I do not know.
It's the nature of the topic. This thread has
Allison Kelly wrote:
I am wondering if anyone can help me with this font-size quirk. I
have body {font-size: small;} and I use percentages for my h1, h2, h3
sizes, which is working everywhere I need it to (Firefox, IE7, IE6)
except for one instance. When my IE6 browser is not maximized to
From: Peter Weil
Does the selector:
body#about-us.level2
combine the body ID about-us and and the body class level2?
From: Michael Geary
Yes. It matches the body element if that element has both the
specified ID and class.
If so, where is this technique documented?
Then the same could be said of a simple definition list. I would like
to agree with you, but am not quite comfortable with that argument.
You're saying you're uncomfortable using tables to present tabular data
even though that is what tables are for?
I ask this becouse I still see many famous
Even if I'm interpreting this correctly, it leaves open the question of which
browsers do or don't support it, which is all that
really matters in the end.
Testing this Style sheet:
p#blue {color: blue;}
p.red {color: red;}
p#blue.red {color: green;}
p.red#blue {color: yellow;}
with this
Thank you for your assistance.
I¹m using the Spry drop horizontal drop down menu feature in Dreamweaver CS.
It works fine in Explorer, Netscape, Firefox, Opera, Safari and AOL on the
PC. On the Mac in AOL and Explorer there are issues. In AOL, the drop down
menus will appear for only one top
Hi David
On 05/09/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why won't this site work in IE6 please?
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/wp-content/themes/bassetts/style.css
I see now you did include the javascript for IE6 and down. However, the
Hi All
I am trying to take a table based layout into a full css layout.
Having problems with the rounded corner effect. You can see the issue
here:
http://devoncyclehire.cregy.co.uk/wordpress/
http://devoncyclehire.cregy.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/themes/devon/style.css
Just in case it is not
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:47:27 -0400, Michael S. Kirkpatrick wrote:
I want to display comments on my blog so that the color of the container for
each
comment is 50% opaque while the content in the box is at 100%. It seems if I
set it up
where it's nested div's - the comments will appear at 50%
...a project which we started designing for IE6, then proceeded to
demo on IE7 compatability, which broke most of the IE6
compatabilities.
Now, I have to make the design cross browser (IE6, IE7 and Firefox)...
I recently went through this. What helped me was realizing that
if
color:#00
I'm having a bit of a problem here. For some reason the red square
bullet before About won't show up in IE, however the bullet for
Career and Education shows up fine. Any suggestions?
Below is the markup and the css:
http://www.liquidscience.net/andrew/testercopy.html
Got an IE 6 problem -- it's putting a 3px gap between my two divs - left one
is floated, right one is set at a left margin to equal the photo plus
border. http://www.language-works.com/CSS_Stuff/specialreport.htm
Have tried a variety of things to close the gap but nothing works. Any
ideas on
Anne E. Shroeder wrote:
Got an IE 6 problem -- it's putting a 3px gap between my two divs - left one
is floated, right one is set at a left margin to equal the photo plus
border. http://www.language-works.com/CSS_Stuff/specialreport.htm
Have tried a variety of things to close the gap but
Eric A. Meyer wrote:
Actually, Nick's right and the horizontal value has to come first
...snip...
center' (and 'center left').
Wow! Great info. :)
Thanks Eric, I really appreciate the clarification. Very interesting read.
:: saving thread to archives ::
Have a great day/night all!
From: Anne E. Shroeder
Sent: Friday, 7 September 2007 2:31 p.m.
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] 3px IE6 gap
Got an IE 6 problem -- it's putting a 3px gap between my two divs -
left one
is floated, right one is set at a left margin to equal the photo plus
border.
Hallo Folks, link corrected...
http://www.webdevout.net/articles/beware-of-xhtml#what_is_xhtml
Ta!
--
TAG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo Folks,
I am just a little foncused. This may seem like an 'off-topic'
subject, but I think I'm correct in saying it effects the way in
which we code our CSS to a degree. If this topic has been covered
before, then I apologise and would ask for a pointer towards the
resource.
This
Hi All,
Quick question about wrapping parent divs around a child div. I know, by
default, that the parent div will extend the width of the viewport, but
is there any way to change that so that it only span the width of the
child div within?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Spell
38 matches
Mail list logo
