[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, and thanks for the reply David. > > Thanks for pointing out the basic error from me to miss the DOCTYPE. Putting > that in seems to have fixed the problem. >
RE: <http://www.trystandsamthewedding.com/home.htm> Hmm. ...depends on what you consider the problem(s), I guess. FWIW: not sure if this what you are after-- <http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/untitled.html> Quick tested: +3 font-scaling @ 800 & 1680 in safari, firefox , opera text-size "largest" font-scaling @ 800 & 1280 in ie7.0 and ie6.0. markup & css validated Best, ~dL ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
