Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but ... X-UA-Compatible response header

2008-03-07 Thread Ingo Chao
Setting the X-UA-Compatible response header has some aspects I find remarkable. meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=6 or meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=5 ... - content=IE=5 or content=IE=6 throws IE8b1 in quirksmode, even if the document has a standards Doctype. while -

Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but ... X-UA-Compatible response header

2008-03-07 Thread Peter-Paul Koch
So the meta-switch is able to take precedence over the doctype switch in any case. Definitely! That's by design. Doctype switching will continue to work as usual; you can choose between Quirks (IE5.5) and Standard (IE8). However, any meta switch will ALWAYS overrule any doctype. Setting

Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but ... X-UA-Compatible response header

2008-03-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Ingo Chao wrote: - content=IE=5 or content=IE=6 throws IE8b1 in quirksmode, even if the document has a standards Doctype. The real IE5 and IE6 have many differences in their support and interpretation of CSS in quirks mode. Does IE8 reflect these differences - as the meta-number suggests? So

Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but ... X-UA-Compatible response header

2008-03-07 Thread liorean
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Ingo Chao wrote: - content=IE=5 or content=IE=6 throws IE8b1 in quirksmode, even if the document has a standards Doctype. The real IE5 and IE6 have many differences in their support and interpretation of CSS in quirks mode. Does IE8 reflect these

Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but ... X-UA-Compatible response header

2008-03-07 Thread Peter-Paul Koch
Based on the Versioning and Internet Explorer Modes whitepaper, making the assumption that Microsoft just kept the old IE7 Quirks mode, it seems like we have four modes: IE7 Quirks (versions7), IE7 Standards (version=7), IE8 Standards (version =8) and Best possible (version=edge), with