-Caveat Lector- [radtimes] # 169 An informally produced compendium of vital irregularities. "We're living in rad times!" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send $$ to RadTimes!! --> (See ** at end.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents: --'Monopoly' anarchists plan May Day havoc in bid to wreck polling --Bombs in Iraq Raid Fell Wide Of Targets --Intelligence Chief Details Threats Facing America --Coalition raises questions about anti-riot funding --Business Roundtable Calls For End To Export Controls --Wearing a T-shirt makes you a terrorist --Starlight reveals billions of Earths =================================================================== Sunday 18 February 2001 'Monopoly' anarchists plan May Day havoc in bid to wreck polling By David Bamber, Home Affairs Correspondent THOUSANDS of anarchists plan to take over London streets on May Day in a violent version of Monopoly, seizing hotels and company headquarters in an effort to disrupt the expected general election. Police have uncovered plans for more than 15,000 extremists to converge on London from all over Europe on May 1, two days before the country is likely to go to the polls. Ministers are bracing themselves for what could be one of Britain's worst outbreaks of mass anarchist violence. The Metropolitan Police has cancelled all leave and forces around the capital and the Army could be drafted in to quell riots. Activists have drawn up what detectives are calling "the Monopoly Board mayhem" strategy, in which they will target well-known streets and areas such as Park Lane and Mayfair. The plan, obtained by the police and seen by The Telegraph, spells out the tactics to use London as a giant board game. It says: "This year we want to celebrate May Day by playing a game of Monopoly on the streets of London on May 1." It advises activists to "consider the possibilities" and seize the headquarters of companies involved in debt, privatised railways and utilities such as gas and electricity. The plans instruct activists to target "above all, the streets and areas in which the daily business of capitalism continues, normally unhindered". A booklet, designed to look like the Monopoly board game with the familiar illustrations, is to be produced to help the protesters identify targets. Sir John Stevens, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, is believed to be convinced that the anarchists' main aim is to disrupt the general election. A senior police insider said: "Their aim is clear. They want a violent and bloody conflagration on the streets. They want to disrupt polling and cause anarchy. If they could affect the general election it would be the greatest possible propaganda coup". Sir John has promised to "meet, match and beat" the anarchists, but he is clearly worried that the capital could lurch out of control. Reports are being sent to Jack Straw, the Home Secretary, this week outlining the seriousness of the threat. Street confrontations might cause polling stations to close and wreck voting in at least three constituencies. Sir John has set up a special unit to tackle the rioters under David Veness, an assistant commissioner, who tracked down David Copeland, the Nazi nailbomber. If police cannot keep control, it would be damaging for Tony Blair's reputation for law and order as voters go to the polls. One police insider said: "You can imagine the capital opposition parties would make out of that." Planning for the May Day protests has been going on for at least nine months. Anarchists aim to make this year's demonstrations even more disruptive than the four-day protest last year that resulted in huge damage in the capital and the vandalism of Sir Winston Churchill's statue. This time more than 15,000 dedicated, hardened activists from all over Europe will descend on just one target, central London. Websites will tell protesters where to gather, and police expect that they will choose a main Tube station such as Tottenham Court Road. Among the anarchists who are likely to attend are those from the Black Flag movement and German terrorists. These are the same people who caused trouble at the meeting of the G8 group of economic powers last year at Seattle in America. =================================================================== Bombs in Iraq Raid Fell Wide Of Targets <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36729-2001Feb21.html?GXHC_gx_session_id_FutureTenseContentServer=5a488bf9dec93e60&referer=email> New Navy Weapon Blamed for Misses By Thomas E. Ricks Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, February 22, 2001; Page A01 Most of the bombs dropped by U.S. warplanes on Iraqi radar stations during last week's airstrikes missed their mark, Pentagon officials disclosed yesterday, with most of the misses blamed on a new and expensive Navy guided bomb. About 25 of the guided bombs, which were first used in combat two years ago, were dropped in the attack, and the majority fell "tens of yards" from their "aimpoints," a Navy official said. Another official said he had been told the bombs missed by an average of more than 100 yards, an unsatisfactory performance for a modern precision-guided weapon. Pentagon officials' assessment of Friday's airstrikes against the Iraqi anti-aircraft system, which involved U.S. and British warplanes, was initially glowing. But the disclosure of the guided weapon's failure rate stunned defense officials yesterday and led them to scale back their assessment of the damage done in the attack. "We feel we had a good effect. Was it perfect? No. Did every weapon system perform perfectly? No, but they never do," said Rear Adm. Craig Quigley, a Pentagon spokesman. The guided bombs were fired at about 25 parts of Iraqi radar stations, radar dishes, communications bunkers and other components, and the Pentagon has been able to confirm damage to only eight of these targets, one official said. About another eight targets escaped damage, while satellite imagery has not produced usable pictures of the remaining radar targets, the official said. In a second part of the raid, communications nodes connecting the Iraqi anti-aircraft system were hit with two other types of smart weapons, about five AGM-130 guided missiles and about 10 Standoff Land Attack Missiles. One or two of the AGM-130s also missed their targets, but the communications nodes were destroyed by the bombs that did hit, an official said. "Everything they were fired at was destroyed or heavily damaged," he said about the AGM-130s. The communications nodes were considered the most important targets because they linked large radars around Baghdad to surface-to-air missile batteries in southern Iraq. In the past, those batteries used their own radar to guide missiles toward U.S. and British aircraft patrolling the southern "no-fly" zone. But U.S. radar-seeking missiles have proven so lethal against the batteries the Iraqis turned off those radars. Instead, they moved to a new system of using the large radars stationed outside the "no fly" zone to locate aircraft and then fire at allied planes from missile batteries in the south. It was the communications links tying together the new system that were attacked Friday. Almost all the Navy guided bombs, known as the AGM-154A "Joint Standoff Weapon," that missed on Friday did so in the same way, veering to the left of where they were supposed to hit, officials said. The consistency of this error has led Navy officials to believe that it is likely a software glitch threw off the bombs' guidance systems. The weapon receives data from global positioning satellites as it glides as far as 40 miles to its target. But officials also are looking at whether the bombs were mishandled or otherwise damaged before they were put on F/A-18 jets flying from the USS Harry S. Truman, an aircraft carrier that was in the Persian Gulf. "It could be a mechanical problem, it could be a software problem," a Navy official said. He emphasized that a bomb that misses its "aimpoint"the actual spot where it is supposed to strike, still can damage its target as it explodes and sends fragments flying for hundreds of yards. "Most of those which were assessed as missing their aimpoints still damaged their targets," he said. "They missed by tens of yards when they were sent from 30 to 40 miles away." But others said the Navy was embarrassed over the weapon's poor performance and taken aback by how many radar stations escaped damage. "There is great concern with how these things performed," a Navy officer said. The Joint Standoff Weapons range in cost from about $250,000 to about $700,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists. The new Iraqi air defense system hasn't succeeded in downing a U.S. warplane. But a new fiber-optic communications system that Pentagon officials say was being installed threatened to dramatically increase the speed with which aircraft could be targeted accurately. "We were going after the brains," a Pentagon official said yesterday. Pentagon officials contend that Chinese advisers were helping install the fiber-optics network. They said the airstrikes were timed to occur on the Muslim Sabbath of Friday, when no major construction work is done in Iraq, to reduce the chances of injuring or killing the Chinese. The United States has protested the presence of the Chinese advisers in Iraq several times. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell met yesterday with China's new ambassador, Yang Jiechi, who was presenting his credentials, and expressed U.S. displeasure over the matter, a State Department spokesman said. Powell "took this occasion to convey a message, and the message was that we're concerned about the issue of Chinese workers in Iraq," said State Department spokesman Richard Boucher. The United States maintains that such outside assistance is not permitted under U.N. Security Council resolutions. The United Nations office that administers the oil-for-food program for Iraq said it had received three requests last year, two involving French firms and one involving a Russian firm, to release money for Iraq to buy fiber-optic cables, allegedly for its telecommunications industry. The committee of nations running the program did not approve the sales requests, a U.N. official said. =================================================================== Intelligence Chief Details Threats Facing America By Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON, Feb. 22, 2001 -- The world is in transition from the Cold War to something new and the top military intelligence officer expects the next 10 to 15 years to be "at least as turbulent, if not more so" as the past 10. Navy Vice Adm. Thomas Wilson, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Feb. 7. In his written statement to the committee he said the basic forces bringing stress and disorder to the world will continue. "No power, circumstance, or condition is likely to emerge capable of overcoming these [forces] and creating a more stable global environment," Wilson said. "Within this environment, the 'Big C' issues especially counter drug, counter intelligence, counter proliferation, counter terrorism … will remain key challenges for the United States." Driving all, according to Wilson, is globalization. On one side globalization means the increasing flow of ideas, money, people, information and technology around the world. The European Union broke down barriers in Europe. The North American Free Trade Pact can do the same here. The Internet and the explosion of information available at the click of a mouse has fueled this drive toward globalization. But it also has a dark side, Wilson said. "Globalization is generally a positive force that will leave most of the world's people better off," he said. "But in some ways, globalization will exacerbate local and regional tensions, increase the prospects and capabilities for conflict and empower those who would do us harm." The transfer of information and technology increases the dangers from weapons of mass destruction. Wilson said this trend "will increasingly accord smaller states, groups, and individuals destructive capabilities previously limited to major world powers." Wilson analyzed the state of the world today and detailed some of the threats he sees facing the United States. Sometime during the next two years he predicts a "major terrorist attack against United States interests, either here or abroad, perhaps with a weapon designed to produce mass casualties." He said this type of terrorist attack remains the most likely threat to the United States. If conditions worsen in the Middle East this could lead to an expansion of Israeli-Palestinian violence. A breakdown in the Middle East peace process could cause an increased risk of anti-American violence, an increased risk of a wider regional conflict and intensified Iraqi efforts to exploit the conflict to gain relief from sanctions, Wilson said. Within the next two years, the United States must closely monitor the Korean peninsula. A breakdown in the growing rapprochement between North and South Korea may mean war. On the other hand, the United States must prepare for an accelerated move toward reunification whose impact catches regional powers unprepared. The United States must guard against an expanded military conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. This is more serious now since both India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them. "Both sides operate from 'zero-sum perspectives,' retain large forces, in close proximity, across a tense line of control," he said. "The potential for mistake and miscalculation remains relatively high." In the next two years there may be intensifying disagreements with Russia over National Missile Defense and its implications on the Anti-ballistic Missile Treaty, European security moves and so on. These disagreements are "spurred by President Putin's more assertive and potentially confrontational foreign policy," Wilson said. There is a possibility of conflict between China and Taiwan "resulting from increased pressure by Beijing for reunification or a more assertive stance from Taiwan on independence." There is a possibility of more violence in the Balkans. Wilson said the violence could be between Serbia and Montenegro and/or Kosovo as these smaller territories continue their demands for increased autonomy or independence. =================================================================== Council's anti-protest measures questioned <http://starbulletin.com/2001/02/22/news/story8.html> Security gear is funded for the Asian Development Bank's May meeting, sure to draw protesters By Gordon Y.K. Pang Star-Bulletin A local coalition calling itself ADBwatch-Hawaii is warning city officials not to overreact to demonstrations and protests that are anticipated to accompany the Asian Development Bank meeting in May. The organization appeared at a City Council meeting yesterday, raising questions about a $750,000 appropriation to the Police Department for anti-riot and other security gear. ADBwatch-Hawaii also raised objections to several pieces of legislation designed to help law enforcement in riot situations now making their way through the Council. "We're very afraid the ADB meeting is being used as an excuse to redefine the aloha spirit," said Stephanie Fried, senior scientist for the group Environmental Defense, before yesterday's meeting. Despite the objections, the equipment appropriation was approved unanimously, while the four riot-related measures moved through the second of three required votes. The only dissenting vote came from Councilman Andy Mirikitani on a bill related to the homeless and sleeping in public parks. Officials from both the Police Department and Hawaii Tourism Authority say they do not want to discourage protest, only ensure that it is peaceful. Assistant Police Chief Boisse Correa said, "If we could, we'd give everybody a lei." Nonetheless, he said, "we have to plan for the worst-case scenario." Correa said he wants to talk with those opposed to the Asian Development Bank to "have some meeting of minds." The purpose of the bank is to eliminate poverty in Asia. Environmentalists and human rights groups oppose the globalization policies of the 60-nation organization. Police have estimated some $6 million to $7 million will be needed to meet safety and traffic concerns at the conference, which is expected to draw President Bush and finance ministers from around the world. Most of that money, Council members were told yesterday, will be paid back to the city. But ADBwatch-Hawaii members warned that spending an enormous amount of money and enacting laws designed to prevent violent demonstrations and protests only serve to heighten tensions between authorities and those seeking to express their views. Carolyn Hatfield said what is happening locally is similar to what has occurred in mainland cities where authorities have created "an intimidating atmosphere" and divided the community. "I don't think our intention at the City Council or the Honolulu Police Department is to stifle speech," Councilman Jon Yoshimura said. "We want to protect against civil disruption and public disturbances. We have no intention of impinging upon people's free-speech rights." The four "mass demonstration" bills that now go to public hearing would: -Allow the arrest of people camping in a park when and where camping is not allowed, and more clearly define "camp" and "camping." -Ban "possession with intent to use" any device capable of emitting an "obnoxious substance." -Prohibit the wearing of a mask or disguise "in order to conceal oneself while perpetrating a crime or to escape lawful detention or custody." -Allow police to arrest people "who deposit any glass, nail, tack, can or other substance that is likely to injure any person, animal or vehicle on a highway." Cha Smith said the proposed ordinances are "a militarization of activities." She added, "This is a total outrage and violation of our civil rights." Hatfield called herself "one of the people who definitely are going to be out there protesting." She described the Asian Development Bank's policies as "immoral and inhumane." ----- Tourism Authority to help fund security The Hawaii Tourism Authority, which believes the ADB meeting and others like it will benefit island tourism and boost the state's economy, also plans to contribute to the security funding. The HTA board will vote tomorrow on a measure to provide $518,600 to help the Honolulu Police Department purchase equipment and supplies for security around the ADB meeting. The motion, which is expected to pass, says the tourism promotion agency wants to support safety for all residents and visitors within the City and County of Honolulu, "specifically in response to illegal mass demonstrations or protests on public sidewalks, streets or other public areas." Robert Fishman, HTA chief executive, said that while the initial purpose is to help security for the ADB visitors, security equipment will be useful for similar events in the future. =================================================================== Business Roundtable Calls For End To Export Controls By William New National Journal's Technology Daily February 21, 2001 In a well-timed report on the efficacy of export controls, the CEO-level Business Roundtable this week made a forceful call for an end to controls that it deemed ineffective. The report echoes recent analyses favoring a business-friendly approach to ensuring the nation's security vis-a-vis exports. In general, it suggests shifting more of the onus for export controls to the president. For instance, it makes a strong recommendation that unilateral controls be "disfavored" unless the president sends a report to Congress justifying a certain measure. "Unilateral restrictions, especially on commodities and technologies that cannot be effectively controlled, generally fail to accomplish their objective and needlessly penalize U.S. businesses," the report said. The Business Roundtable joined the chorus of calls for an end to the current computer export-control system that uses the congressionally mandated millions of theoretical operations per second (MTOPS) standard. The technology industry views that standard as being outdated. The group also said Congress should require the president to weigh the costs and benefits of allowing exports of dual-use products that can be used for both civilian and military purposes. Specifically, the group wants the president to weigh national security and foreign policy goals against costs to "economic security." It proposed that items on the government control list for dual-use products, such as high-performance computers, be reviewed regularly and items removed if there is not a new justification for continued control. The Business Roundtable also called for a broad license exemption for the transfer of products, technologies and services within and between a U.S. company and its subsidiaries if the transfers are for internal use. The group also wants to channel more funds to the export licensing body to help streamline the licensing process. The report further called for the strengthening of the foreign-availability exemption that recognizes that U.S. firms are hindered when they cannot export products widely available from foreign competitors. The group also suggested a confidentiality provision for proprietary information, which was the subject of recent lawsuits related to the Freedom of Information Act. In a separate section, the report addressed the defense export-control system, calling for pared-down restrictions on, and a streamlined system for controlling, technologies used in defense. The Business Roundtable also demanded a change to sanctions-based trade controls that have done little to change the behavior of target countries. =================================================================== Wearing a T-shirt makes you a terrorist <http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,441334,00.html> Anything with a slogan could put you outside the law now George Monbiot Thursday February 22, 2001 The Guardian Britain, Tony Blair announced at Labour's spring conference on Sunday, is on the brink of "the biggest progressive political advance for a century". To prepare for this brave new world, two days before his speech Mr Blair bombed Baghdad. On Monday, the progressive era was officially launched, with the implementation of an inclusive piece of legislation called the Terrorism Act 2000. Terror, in the new progressive age, is no longer the preserve of the aristocracy of violence. Today almost anyone can participate, just as long as she or he wants to change the world. Beating people up, even killing them, is not terrorism, unless it is "designed to influence the government" or conducted "for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause". But since Monday you can become a terrorist without having to harm a living being, provided you believe in something. In that case, causing "serious damage to property" or interfering with "an electronic system" will do. Or simply promoting or encouraging such acts, or associating with the people who perform them, or failing to tell the police what they are planning. Or, for that matter, wearing a T-shirt or a badge which might "arouse reasonable suspicion" that you sympathise with their activities. In his speech on Sunday, Tony Blair called for a "revolution" in our schools, and spoke of "noble causes... asking us to hear their cry for help and answer by action". So perhaps we should not be surprised to learn that you can can now become a terrorist by supporting government policy. British subjects writing pamphlets or giving lectures demanding a revolution in Iraq can be prosecuted under the new act for "incitement" of armed struggles overseas. The same clause leaves the government free to bomb Baghdad, however, as "nothing in this section imposes criminal liability on any person acting on behalf of, or holding office under, the crown." By such means, our new century of progressive politics will be distinguished from those which have gone before. There will be no place, for example, for violent conspiracies like the Commons Preservation Society. The CPS launched its campaign of terror in 1865, by hiring a trainload of labourers to dismantle the railings around Berkhamstead Common, thus seriously damaging the property of the noble lord who had just enclosed it. The CPS later split into two splinter groups called the Open Spaces Society and the National Trust. Under the new legislation, these subversive factions would have been banned. Nor will the state tolerate dangerous malefactors such as the woman who claimed "there is something that governments care far more for than human life, and that is the security of property, and so it is through property that we shall strike the enemy" and "the argument of the broken windowpane is the most valuable argument in modern politics". Emmeline Pankhurst and her followers, under the act, could have been jailed for life for damaging property to advance a political or ideological cause. Indeed, had the government's new progressive powers been in force, these cells could have been stamped out before anyone had been poisoned by their politics. The act permits police to cordon off an area in which direct action is likely to take place, and arrest anyone refusing to leave it. Anyone believed to be plotting an action can be stopped and searched, and the protest materials she or he is carrying confiscated. Or, if they prefer, the police can seize people who may be about to commit an offence and hold them incommunicado for up to seven days. Under the new act, the women who caused serious damage to a Hawk jet bound for East Timor could have been intercepted and imprisoned as terrorists long before they interfered with what Mr Blair described on Sunday as his mission to civilise the world. So could the desperados seeking to defend organic farmers by decontaminating fields of genetically modified maize. Campaigners subjecting a corporation to a fax blockade become terrorists by dint of interfering with an electronic system. Indeed, by writing articles in support of such actions, I could be deemed to be "promoting and encouraging" them. Which makes me a terrorist and you, if you were foolish enough to copy my articles and send them to your friends, party to my crime. I don't believe the government will start making use of these new measures right away: after all, as Mr Blair lamented on Sunday, "Jerusalem is not built overnight". But they can now be deployed whenever progress demands. Then, unmolested by dangerous lunatics armed with banners and custard pies, the government will be free to advance world peace by bombing Baghdad to its heart's content. =================================================================== Starlight 'reveals billions of Earths' <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=004393973300780&rtmo=3Sm33xuM&atmo=rrrrrrrq&pg=/et/01/2/21/waa21.html> By David Derbyshire, Science Correspondent, in San Francisco THE Galaxy is teeming with billions of Earth-like planets, some capable of supporting life, according to a study. An analysis of light from hundreds of nearby stars suggests that at least half contain iron left after collisions with asteroids. And the astronomers behind the study believe that where there are asteroids with unstable orbits, there are rocky planets like Mars, Venus and Earth. Only a few years ago, astronomers were unable to say whether planetary systems like our solar system were rare or common. But studies of the "wobble" of stars, caused by the gravitational tugs of large planets, has provided evidence of 55 giant planets outside the solar system. Researchers also believe that they have seen such a giant planet passing in front of a star, reducing its brightness temporarily. The search for iron that might have been devoured by stars in collisions with metal-rich asteroids offers a third technique for spotting possible solar systems. Dr Norman Murray, of the University of Toronto, examined the light signature from 466 Sun-like stars and another 20 that were entering old age within 325 light years of the Sun. "What I found is evidence that there is terrestrial type material orbiting most of the stars in the solar neighbourhood," he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in San Francisco. "The implication, if this result holds up, is that there are Earth-like bodies in orbit around most of the stars in the galaxy." Because stars naturally contain iron, just looking for evidence of the metal is not enough to prove the existence of rocky asteroids. Instead, he looked for clues that the iron had been added to the stars long after they were formed. A small star will devour iron deposited on its surface, mixing it in thoroughly with stellar gas. But the largest stars have more stable outer layers and will retain higher levels of accreted iron away from their interiors. Dr Murray found that iron concentrations jumped when stars reached a certain size, suggesting that their iron could have been deposited by rocky asteroids. Other means of adding iron to stars were unlikely or impossible. He also found that iron levels in the stars known to have orbiting planets were much higher than average. If rocky material was orbiting stars, then over time it would clump together to form rocky planets. And if asteroids were flying into the suns, it is likely that the gravitational pull of planets was sending them into their chaotic orbits. Dr Murray, who is keen to repeat the study, said: "If there are terrestrial bodies around these stars, then at least the probability that there is life that is similar to what we consider to be life has to be more likely. "If there weren't any terrestrial planets, there wouldn't be terrestrial-based life. So it is one more indication that life might be common in the galaxy, but we don't know that." =================================================================== "Anarchy doesn't mean out of control. It means out of 'their' control." -Jim Dodge ====================================================== "Communications without intelligence is noise; intelligence without communications is irrelevant." -Gen. Alfred. M. Gray, USMC ====================================================== "It is not a sign of good health to be well adjusted to a sick society." -J. Krishnamurti ====================================================== "The world is my country, all mankind my brethren, and to do good is my religion." -Thomas Paine ______________________________________________________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe or for a sample copy or a list of back issues, send appropriate email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ______________________________________________________________ **How to assist RadTimes: An account is available at <www.paypal.com> which enables direct donations. If you are a current PayPal user, use this email address: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to contribute. If you are not a current user, use this link: <https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=resist%40best.com> to sign up and contribute. The only information passed on to me via this process is your email address and the amount you transfer. Thanks! <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
