What did Clinton do? He encouraged and often tried
to intimidate Israel into making peace, meaning "give in to the tyrants." His
phony peace initiatives conned the world into believing that both sides were
morally equivalent. As designed, this fueled a Palestinian aggression that aimed
to annihilate Israel. This is only one small aspect of Clinton’s political
pathology, being an early convert to feminism. He is still connected to our
tumultuous future.
The "no energy policy" of the Clinton
administration was carefully crafted to make our country weak and dependent on
foreign oil. Clearly this policy created a dependency on America-hating Islamic
oil producers. These are the same dictators who yearn to drive a spear through
our hearts. They fear the redeeming power of America and Israel. They dream of
overcoming us but lack the military strength to do so. So, like all spiders who
are not fighters, they set web-traps for America to fall into. The oil trap is
only the beginning.
In the Balkans the same Clinton/Blair treachery was
at work when they took the wrong side in favor of what we were told were "ethnic
Albanians." Actually they were Muslims out to populate and take over Kosovo,
setting the stage for the real prize, a later invasion of Europe. This trail of
father-hating blood can be traced around the world. But the corpse is here in
America.
What would you call Mexican nationals who
out-populate American citizens in a few western states? The media call them
Immigrants, often painting the picture that they are only looking for a chance
to escape poverty. What many of them really want is to establish their own
communist government in Southern California! The border policy, especially
during Clinton’s term, showed that government refused to see this problem for
what it was, an act of war. By bombing Yugoslavia, perhaps Bill Clinton
unwittingly set a precedent. What should we do in the event that "ethnic
Mexicans" want to claim California as Mexican territory? If we defend ourselves,
we would then look like the aggressor. What then? Easy answer, a United Nations
intervention with all those foreign generals itching to get onto American soil.
The hell that begins with a man’s abuse of woman is
global in its implications. Western-style democracy collapsed in Iran, allowing
the Ayatollah to rise to power. Zimbabwe, formerly Rhodesia, crumbled into a
murderous anarchy. South Africa descended into a violent, AIDS-ravaged,
despotic, black-communist, racist dictatorship. The United Kingdom is mostly a
country of broken homes, where children can’t read or write, and where crime is
out of control. Europe is degenerating into a nation of socialist states, all
hushed by the same propaganda. America is not far behind the disintegrating
European alliance.
Our fall accelerated when we lost the war in
Vietnam. Our returning sons were degraded and spat upon by media-poisoned
Americans. Little was said about the slaughter of one million pro-American South
Vietnamese. A vile and violent socialism is now working behind the scenes there
and elsewhere. Communism is not dead as we are told. Its work to corrupt all of
our institutions is near complete, having turned us against our founding
fathers.
Clinton was America’s Manchurian candidate,
financed by American-bred betrayers who recognized early on that his background
and woman-centered personality would serve their purposes well. Who do you
suppose financed his rise to power? And who do you suppose saved him from
impeachment? Surely you can now see the media flaunting their victory it in our
faces, daily.
Bill Clinton, like most men who have no masculine
reference, remains unconscious of what drives him. He still feels what his
mother, now his wife, feels toward everything masculine. There is no real Bill
Clinton, as God made him at birth; he has been displaced. He is both the
manipulator and manipulated. He is controlled through his need to be reassured,
and controls others through reassuring them. He derived his base of political
power through rewarding an irresponsible electorate of passive- aggressive men
and women. He placed many of his most devious co-haters in positions of power,
especially in the judiciary.
When President Clinton was first elected, a shock
ran throughout the body of this writer, for I knew we had elected a
conscienceless sociopath. Those who feared and hated Clinton had good cause to
be concerned. We could never have survived as a Democratic Republic for another
four years under puppet President Gore.
Bill Clinton has never known who he is. He has
never been true to himself. He has never had his own identity or his own
feelings toward anything. As such he befriends and is befriended by every
low-life, treacherous, Third World opportunist who sympathizes with his hatred
toward the spirit of American manliness. Ex-President Bill Clinton is not
finished yet. He may now be more dangerous to America than when he was in
office.
Honed political skill, polished from the qualities
of a clever, seductive woman Clinton has become part man, part woman and part
devil. His man-hating side compels him to continue the work of those who live to
lay traps for the nation of his birth. The idea of loyalty is an irksome concept
for him and his leftist brethren. His appetite for contempt has grown so large
that nothing can satisfy it, even if the whole world were sacrificed to him, it
still would not be enough.
It may never be known or divulged what a swath of
havoc Clinton has left behind as his legacy. He has betrayed us to our enemies.
He has been well compensated for his loss of character and selfhood with a
seductive charm and power. He commands tax-paid subordinates, all of whom are
weak and submissive to his will.
What rules Clinton is his secret sympathy for a
devil on the outs with God. America’s enemies, some of them now seen as friends,
came to service and glorify Clinton’s need, which they could see from afar. In
exchange he betrayed us, the nation they hated and feared. All this he did while
showing that believable face of false compassion to the camera.
This is the face that set our military up to fail
while kissing and pretending to love little children. Unfortunately this is the
same kind of compassion his mother used to twist, bend and shape little Clinton.
This is the compassion that made him a perverted slave of sex, an attractive,
amiable rogue, and political operative.
It is through this lens that we must now gaze at
the current war against boys. This is the heart of the insane hatred against the
Boy Scouts. This is the power behind the decline of men and fathers in the home.
Bill Clinton and friends are getting even with America for what he believes
American men and God have done to him, his mother and all the angry people of
the world. This group is too commonly referred to as "the left." Such casual
misnaming is at the root of America’s apathy. No one believes that hell is
actively eroding America’s underpinnings.
Psychosexually mothered, the left is like a drug
addict who will surrender his life as well as his family’s for a fix. So did
Bill Clinton’s psyche compel him to betray his country. Such a man is never
attracted to real women. Real women will not play his game. Clinton’s type, and
government is full of them, is always attracted to manipulating, man-hating
women who hate all good, especially America’s good.
You might think that compassionate Bill Clinton
hates drunken bums and violent men. On the contrary, he has inherited both his
mother’s compassion toward them and his mother's contempt. Like Clinton, the
Left’s social programs are designed to breed this kind for the purpose of
demoralizing this country with an unending call for compassion. But this
compassion is warped. What they all hate the most are noble citizens. Such men
threaten the power of the Clinonites’ despotic and malevolent existence.
Free-thinking men terrify the Left. You see, if all men were sovereign and knew
it, they could not be exploited, nor would they fail their women and children.
An ideal family provides a child with a secure
environment in which he or she can form attachments. Mother, in the early stage,
is the most important figure. Freud was partially right in that the child’s
initial attachment to mom is sexual. In a perverse sense men are drawn to having
sex with their mothers, via women who duplicate their mother’s nature. Freud's
pupil, Albert Adler, proposed that man is born with a desire to relate to others
-- beginning with mother and father, extending to social relationships and group
identification.
The strength of attachment that young animals form
with a mother figure is easily observed. The gosling follows the goose; a baby
monkey muzzles mother’s breast. Psychologists call this compulsive attachment,
imprinting. It occurs early at a critical period of a baby's development. Could
the imprinting done by Clinton’s mother be the clue to his and many other men’s
addiction to women? What if broken homes produce dysfunctional mothers who
produce men who rush back to something deep within mama, especially under any
kind of duress.
If the bonding of a man to a woman is based upon
the reinforcement of childhood imprinting, then what does it say about manhood?
Surely this fact is known to savvy politicians worldwide. They have grown astute
at exploiting men and women for political gain. If the love of man for woman is
merely an essential need for mama, then perhaps romantic love at first sight is
really love at first bite.
Laws that encourage promiscuity and easy divorce
result in embittered single mothers turning out more and more children who are
angry with their fathers and moms’ abusive boyfriends. From here arise
generations of men who hate their mothers, most secretly. They grow up abusive
to women who turn their children against manhood and their fathers, a vicious
circle.
Are most women doomed to play the role of
dysfunctional mother? I think most women will agree that men from broken homes
often unconsciously require them to play this role. And what happens if a woman
awakens and refuses to play this game? You can now see the cause of the rage men
experience, when he is deprived of his "motherly comforts." They feel betrayed
as if the ground of their security has been taken away. This is the reason for
infidelity. Men hop from one bed to another seeking what will only further a
mutual misery. Every child needs a noble father just as every wife needs an
unfailing, noble husband.
One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to see
our clear and present danger. Nor is it difficult to see that our now
globe-hopping ex-president is still in the geo political mix. With little doubt,
we need a national debate around the definition of real manhood. We must hash
out what constitutes true love. If this does not occur sometime soon, the
illusion of peace and prosperity, under which nearly everyone now exists, will
cease. If we continue in this blindness we can kiss our country good-bye.
Psalm 33:12 says,
"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord..." Archibald Bard
ICQ 83834746 |