-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2002/567/in3.htm

}}}>Begin
Al-Ahram Weekly Online
3 - 9 January 2002
Issue No.567
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875
Current issue | Previous issue | Site map

Elementary, my dear Musharraf

The second "war on terror" in the space of a few months is gaining
momentum, drawing in nuclear arch-rivals India and Pakistan. Beneath
the rhetoric lies a classic murder-mystery. Who did it? Mukul
Devichand puts on his detective hat



Who staged 13 December's spectacular attack on India's parliament?
The prime suspects, Kashmiri militants Jaish-e- Mohamed and Lashkar-e-
Toiba, may be backed by more sinister paymasters. Pakistan's
intelligence agency is in the dock, as is the Al-Qa'eda "terror
network" and -- in one conspiracy theory -- India's electioneering
government itself.

Our first clue lies in recent history -- in this case, history repeating. The "war on 
terror" blueprint, fashioned in Washington and the Afghan hills, is now being played 
out in the subcontinent.

Start with a master-crime against a cultural symbol, this time 13 December's gun 
attack on India's parliament. Loss of life notwithstanding -- 13 died at the Lok 
Sabha, 3,000 at the World Trade Centre -- the offended admi
nistration in both cases invoked images of an Islamist global terror network 
flourishing, so India claimed, in dictatorship Pakistan. New Delhi has already made 
the familiar demand that Islamabad "close the terror bases d
own." Now the world is hoping that India's bluff -- backed by massive troop 
deployments and sanctions, matched by Pakistan -- will not be called.

What's being obscured by these mists of regional politics, however, is the evidence at 
the scene of the attack.

The crime itself was positively theatrical, in tune with the era of apparent master- 
villains like Osama Bin Laden. The scene opens with a pearly white car rolling up to 
parliament. Five men emerge, clad in military green
 commando fatigues and armed to the teeth. What follows is worthy of any Bollywood 
movie: a pitched gun- battle lasting 45 minutes, in which security forces narrowly 
save the day, sacrificing themselves in the fight. The
foiled gunmen commit collective suicide.

Within 48 hours, Indian police announce that the five gunmen were from Pakistan-based 
Jaish and Lashkar and New Delhi started verbal conflict with Islamabad. Wedged in by 
"war on terror" rhetoric, Pakistani President Mush
arraf offered a joint inquiry and asked for evidence. New Delhi's obstinate refusal to 
cough up information matches Washington's rejection of the Taliban's similar request. 
But do we really know beyond doubt that Jaish an
d Lashkar did it? Al- Ahram Weekly called India's Cairo embassy and asked precisely 
that.

"There has been accumulated evidence of the involvement of these groups not only in 
the attack on the Parliament but in previous incidents," was the response from the 
embassy spokesman. India is drawing parallels between
this incident and past attacks by the same groups, but detailed evidence linking Jaish 
and Lashkar to 13 December is not being shared -- with the public or Pakistan.

Still, we are left with a few pieces of credible evidence. Some of the five were 
Pakistani nationals, Delhi police say, and they used cell-phones to call a Delhi 
Arabic lecturer who, in turn, called militants in Pakistan.
 "The markings on the weapons received from the site of attack point to their links to 
organisations across border, " the Indian embassy spokesman told us.

A sixth man was also apparently involved but has now escaped to Kashmir. With their 
usual flair, Indian newspapers are describing him as criminal mastermind "Gazi Baba," 
now on the run with his wife Zamrooda, alias "Baby.
" Gazi Baba may, in fact, be a code name used by the head of Jaish's Kashmir 
operations. "He seems to have become a sort of a local Osama Bin Laden for India," 
reported Indian news-site Tehelka.com.

Pakistan's swift freeze on Jaish and Lashkar assets may further implicate them -- 
although US pressure is more likely the cause. Pakistan has placed Jaish chief Maulana 
Masood Azhar and 20 followers under arrest. Urdu dai
ly Ausaf was quick to claim that President Musharraf was simply grabbing a golden 
opportunity to jail his domestic critics. When we asked, Pakistan's Cairo embassy 
spokesman told the Weekly that Azhar's offence was simply
 "possession of illegal weapons."

But if the men in commando fatigues were in fact members of Lashkar or Jaish, we still 
face a deeper -- and important -- mystery. Were the attackers acting alone or 
following orders from above?

The Indian government, eager to fight a "war on terror," are claiming that both 
Al-Qa'eda and Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had a hand to play in the 
attack. Pakistan, for its part, strongly denies that Kas
hmiri militants were trained in the former Afghan "terror" camps. "Between Afghanistan 
and Kashmir are some of the world's highest peaks and mountain ranges in addition to 
700,000 vigilantes of the occupation forces," the
 Pakistani embassy spokesman told the Weekly, referring to the Indian army in Kashmir. 
India claims it has 125,000 troops in the valley. "Mujahidin fighting in Kashmir need 
no foreign training or backing or else their her
oic struggle would long ago have been crushed by the brute force of Indian military 
might," the Pakistani spokesman added.

On the other hand, the Indian press is busily reporting evidence from post- Taliban 
Afghanistan that Kashmiri militants are connected to Al-Qa'eda. At the former 
Al-Qa'eda base of Rishkor, Northern Alliance Commander Popa
l was quoted by the Indian Express as saying that his troops had "come across many 
documents which prove that Laskhar-e- Toiba men were here with the Arabs and 
Pakistanis." On 27 December, the Hindustan Times said 30 Paki
stanis captured in Tora Bora admitted they were en route to Kashmir, and that Indian 
police had arrested Ghulam Qadir Najar, Al-Qa'eda's pointman in Kashmir.

Another reason to suspect Afghan connections has to do with Jaish leader Maulana 
Masood Azhar. No stranger to incarceration, the Maulana was released from an Indian 
jail in 1999 after a group of mystery hijackers took an
Indian passenger flight and demanded his release. The plane was allowed to land at the 
then Taliban-held city of Kandahar -- suggesting connections between Jaish, Al- Qa'eda 
and the Taliban.

So the claim that Jaish and Lashkar are in some sense connected to Al-Qa'eda is a 
strong possibility. Still, with his fighters currently running amuck in Tora Bora, it 
is unlikely that Bin Laden orchestrated the attack fr
om any secret cave. More tenuous, however, is the controversial Indian idea that 
Pakistan's ISI somehow gave the order for 13 December's attack.

Indian police were pursuing this line of inquiry on 22 December when they detained 
Mohamed Sharif Khan, a staffer at the Pakistani High Commission in New Delhi. 
Pakistan's Dawn reported that Khan had been "severely beaten
 and tortured" by Indian police for procuring information on the Indian parliament's 
security arrangements.

Al-Ahram Weekly put these claims to the Indians. "It is not true that any Pakistan 
High Commission staff member was beaten up," the Indian embassy spokesman said. "This 
staffer had been engaged in activities inconsistent
with his legitimate sphere of activity," the spokesman said, adding that Khan was 
ordered to leave India.

Pakistan itself flatly denied that the ISI was linked to the militants. They told the 
Weekly it was "more than evident that Pakistan or ISI has never supported any 
terrorist activity." Nevertheless, the ISI's historical c
onnection with 1970s Afghan Mujahidin and the recent pro-Pakistani shift amongst 
Kashmiri militants suggest at least some form of communication with the agency. The 
Pakistani government has an antagonistic relationship wi
th Islamist groups, who it cannot simply crush because they have popular support. The 
ISI offers a way to communicate with and control these movements.

Although the ISI might have dealings with Lashkar and Jaish, Pakistani President 
Musharraf's precarious situation after the US "war on terror" makes it unlikely that 
he would order 13 December's attack.

The only suspect left is the Indian government itself.

The conspiracy theory -- that India's BJP-led coalition ordered the attack against its 
own parliament to stir up a war -- abounded in the Pakistani press after 13 December, 
and the war option is certainly firing up Indian
 voters ahead of crucial state elections next month. Nevertheless, serious observers 
on both sides of the border see the theory as extremely far-fetched.

As "war on terror" fever continues to grip the subcontinent, asking who exactly 
started the trouble may be a hypothetical question. War is brewing. The Pakistani 
embassy spokesman told the Weekly: "Pakistan believes in pe
aceful relations.. but it would also not take the Indian bullying
lying down." The Indians sent equally mixed signals: India does not
want war but it is being thrust on the country. The world, already
frightened by one "war on terror," will be hoping that both countries
get what they want.

Recommend this page

© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to