-Caveat Lector-

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,853260,00.html

Britain and US step up bombing in Iraq

Ministry of Defence reveals 300% rise in ordnance dropped over southern
no-fly zone

Richard Norton-Taylor
Wednesday December 4, 2002
The Guardian

The total amount of bombs dropped by British and American aircraft on
targets in southern Iraq has increased dramatically over the past few
months, in a clear indication that the no-fly zone is being used to destroy
the country's air defence systems in anticipation of an all-out attack.
Ordnance dropped on southern Iraq in response to threats has increased by
300% since March this year, according to figures released by the Ministry of
Defence today in response to questions from the Liberal Democrat spokesman
on foreign affairs, Menzies Campbell.

The total tonnage of ordnance released over Iraq between March 1 and
November 13 this year was 126.4 tonnes. This is an average of nearly 15
tonnes a month - a 60% increase over last year.

For every threat detected in April and May 2002, about one third of a tonne
of bombs was dropped on Iraq; between September and November, every threat
was met with an average of 1.3 tonnes.

Ordnance weighing 0.3 tonnes was dropped in April, a figure which rose
dramatically to more than 54 tonnes in September.

Whitehall officials have admitted privately that the "no-fly" patrols,
conducted by RAF and US aircraft from bases in Kuwait, are designed to
weaken Iraq's air defence systems and have nothing to do with their stated
original purpose of defending the marsh Arabs and the Sh'ia population of
southern Iraq.

"The figures require further explanation. It appears that there has been a
marked increase in the destructive power of the bombs dropped while the
number of recorded threats has remained about the same", Mr Campbell said
yesterday.

He added: "The inference is that these operations have little to do with
humanitarian purposes but are being carried out to soften up Iraq air
defence systems. There must be a risk that escalation of this kind could
provoke wider military action at a time when the inspectors still appear to
be able to carry out their work."

Washington has said that the Iraqi response to the patrols - for example, by
locking radar on to the aircraft, could amount to a "material breach" of the
UN resolution mandating the weapons inspectors now in Iraq.

However, the foreign secretary, Jack Straw, has distanced himself from the
Bush administration, making it clear that Britain separates the issue of the
no-fly zones from the UN inspectors and UN demands for Iraq to rid itself of
weapons of mass destruction. The southern no-fly zone patrols are not
covered by a UN resolution.

In recent weeks British and US pilots have been aiming at a wider range of
targets, including communications systems, covering a larger area. British
military sources say they are concerned in particular about Iraq's
carbon-fibre communications network linking Baghdad's military command and
control centres with the rest of the country.

Last month Britain and America stepped up the hidden air war over Iraq, with
RAF fighters based in Saudi Arabia supporting US navy attack aircraft in
practice bombing runs on Iraqi targets.

US navy Super Hornets from the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln, which is in
the Gulf, carried out mock attacks on airfields, control towers, and other
military sites.

The New York Times reported American commanders as saying that the aircraft
were "acquainting themselves" with targets they may be called on to attack
and were being supported by RAF aircraft.

Earlier this week, Iraqi officials said four people had been killed by
western warplanes.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to