-Caveat Lector-

as the author states, Fuller was no conspiracy extremist but noted well the
development and maintenance of control by the elite.

However, it should also be noted that Bucky Fuller was the ultimate
globalist, calling for a worldwide power grid which would be much more
efficient than the one currently in place. Using technology globally to
improve human existence was the theme of his life and inventions.

from http://www.freedomdomain.com/orig13th04.html

The Creation of Financial and Judicial Nobility

A conspiracy theorist might find some rich material in this chain of events:
as the Titles of Nobility Amendment speeds its way through the State
legislatures, acquiring twelve of the thirteen needed ratifications by the
end of 1812, war clouds gather and conflict with Great Britain appears
inevitable. Yet for what reason would the British want to engage their
former colonies in another expensive war? Their naval victory at Trafalgar
in 1805 guaranteed them near-absolute control of the world's shipping and
oceanic commerce, something they had dominated for the previous forty years.


In 1809 the British had secured a treaty with the Sikhs in northern India,
and in 1811 they occupied the spice island of Java. Their commercial power
was growing well, resting on the strength of their naval forces. That power
was apparent in the wealth added to the royal family of the King. However,
for an accurate understanding of the value of their technological advances,
it is crucial to read what R. Buckminster Fuller said about Great Britain,
in his 1981 book, "Critical Path."

"In our tracing of the now completely invisible world power structures",
said Fuller, "it is important to note that, while the British Empire as a
world government lost the American Revolution, the power structure behind it
did not lose the war. The most visible of the power-structure identities was
the East India Company, an entirely private enterprise, whose flag as
adopted by Queen Elizabeth in 1600 happened to have thirteen red and white
horizontal stripes with a blue rectangle in its upper left-hand corner. The
blue rectangle bore ... the superimposed crosses of St. Andrew and St.
George."

As Fuller, the inventor of the geodesic dome and the Dymaxion car, viewed
history, those Virginia landholders were crucial to Britain: "international
trading became the most profitable of all enterprises, and great
land-"owners" with clear-cut king's "deeds" to their land went often to
international gold moneylenders. The great land barons underwrote the
building of enterprisers' ships with their cattle or other real wealth, the
regenerative products of their lands, turned over to the lender as
collateral.

"If the ship did come back, both the enterpriser and the bankers realized a
great gain. The successful ship venturer paid the banker back, and the
banker who had been holding the cattle as collateral returned them to their
original proprietor. [However] the cattle that were born while the
collateral was held by the banker were to belong to the banker."

"It was the financing of such international voyaging, trading, and
individual travel as well as of vaster games of governmental takeovers that
built the enormous wealth-controlling fortunes of early European private
banking families."

Here then, from the pen of a world-renowned inventor, architect and
professor -- not some rightward-leaning Populist lunatic or a radio preacher
-- is the identification of the true powers behind the British and Dutch
royal families. Many of the older British claims in our new Republic were
not settled until 1825. The state of Rhode Island was unable to shed its
English Charter until 1842, requiring numerous constitutional conventions
and ending in a full-fledged insurrection, led by the supporters of "The
People's Constitution" and the Suffrage Association.
So, while the banking families and the money factors of Europe looked
increasingly to international trade, and spent their money on improving
their ships, boats and naval weaponry (as fronted for them by the
nation-states and their royal families), the new Republic in northern
America was growing rich in landholdings. Alexander Hamiliton and his allies
in New York society identified themselves with those powers, although
Hamilton himself disdained titles of nobility. The several States were
developed from the Colonies, with deeds and royal land grants remaining
intact.

Buckminster Fuller analyzed this situation, and wrote of it in the following
way:
"deed-processing produced a vast number of court decisions and legal
precedent based on centuries and centuries of deed inheritances. Thus,
landlord's deeds evolved from deeds originally dispensed from deeds of war.
Then the great landlords loaned parcels of their lands to sharecropping
farmers, who had to pay the landlord a tithe, or rent, and 'interest' out of
the wealth produced by nature within the confines of the deeded land."

In a second bold and masterful stroke, Fuller identifies the principal
allies employed by the international bankers, their money factors and their
royalist front operations:" a vast number of court decisions" required a
vast number of lawyers, judges, and attorneys at the Bar. There is no
indication that Thomas Jefferson or James Madison considered the appellation
of "Esquire" to be a functioning title of nobility -- nor did the members of
the Academy of Languages and Belles-Lettres, as noted previously.

There is, however, every indication that both the federalists and the
Democratic-Republicans feared the rise of a great military leader, whose
prowess might corrupt the American citizenry with a mighty array of gold
medals, silver arrows, ribbons and privileges, including grants of land. The
excesses of democracy in revolutionary France, and the destruction of those
republican states created during Napoleon's rise to power were foremost in
the concerns of the men of the new United States. Only the Madisonian
faction also had the measure of the secret British policies of this era,
which were seemingly designed to cause New England to secede en masse.

<end>

When people discard the notion that ownership is important, they will not be
burdened with possessions. The less we own, the greater our mobility.
--R. Buckminster Fuller

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to