Title: Re: [CTRL] Cashill: Iraq downed TWA Flight 800
-Caveat Lector-
It is extremely convenient and thus suspect. But that does not mean it isnt true.
on 11/19/02 10:55 PM, William Shannon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it a little too convenient to be pinning the blame for all
-Caveat Lector-
It is extremely convenient and thus suspect. But that does not
mean it isn't true.
It means nothing, one way or the other. Only forensic evidence has meaning.
But if you want to speculate, read this:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/30.html
A
-Caveat Lector-
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article
which follows. To view this item online, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29704
Tuesday, November 19, 2002
No longer an accident!
Posted: November 19, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Jack
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 11/19/2002 12:00:37 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The jury is in on TWA Flight 800, and the verdict is clear: There is absolutely no
evidence of either a mechanical failure, or of a bomb planted in the fuselage. Indeed, all
available
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: William Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Cashill: Iraq downed TWA Flight 800
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 11/19/2002 12:00:37 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 11/19/2002 9:52:53 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 11/19/2002 12:00:37 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The jury is in on TWA Flight 800, and the verdict is clear: There is
absolutely no
evidence of
