-Caveat Lector-
Gee, nurev (josh2), you have no end of tolerance for anything if that
"anything" supports a certain faction, and no end of intolerance and abuse
if that "anything" questions or criticizes a certain faction. Jim Condit
Jr.
On Friday, December 11, 1998 9:17 PM, nurev [SMTP:[EMAIL
-Caveat Lector-
Oh, Jerry Harp, what a disgustingly hypocritical post! Would you be writing
the same sentence is the "Dutch" court had but a ban on anyone publishing
something supporting the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary ??? I think
not. Jim Condit Jr.
On Friday, December 11, 1998 9:53
-Caveat Lector-
Is this a subject that falls under revisionism and therefore can only be
discussed from one side on this list? Looks like we have a de facto state
religion forming in Amsterdam and elsewhere -- together with is own
"dogmas" that cannot be questioned without penalties and maybe
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/10/98 3:15:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch court on Wednesday slapped a ban on all
publications questioning the authenticity of Jewish teenager Anne Frank's
wartime diary, saying they insulted and
-Caveat Lector-
Sir, are you really as ignorant as you sound? I guess either you haven't read
my posts on the subject or for some reason you wish to continue this line of
reasoning. Do you support the nazi lies? Go join the nazis and take your
serious ignorance with you. Quite boring.
Om
K
-Caveat Lector-
"Jim Condit Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a subject that falls under revisionism and therefore can only be
discussed from one side on this list? Looks like we have a de facto state
religion forming in Amsterdam and elsewhere -- together with is own
"dogmas" that
-Caveat Lector-
"Jim Condit Jr." wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Is this a subject that falls under revisionism and therefore can only be
discussed from one side on this list? Looks like we have a de facto state
religion forming in Amsterdam and elsewhere -- together with is own
"dogmas" that
