-Caveat Lector-

from -
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/uctr/20020320/cm/from_little_boy_to_big_brother_in_180_days__1.html

Wednesday March 20 08:52 PM EST
FROM LITTLE BOY TO BIG BROTHER IN 180 DAYS:
By Ted Rall
George W. Bush's Perpetual Warfare

by Ted Rall

NEW YORK-I began working on a graphic-novel update and parody of "1984" a
few years ago. An awful lot had changed since Orwell posited his dystopian
vision of the future from his late-1940s deathbed, and I accounted for those
differences in my own version, 2001's "2024." In order to acknowledge the
collapse of Soviet Communism and the failure of fascism to reemerge as a
potent political force, I ditched Orwell's oppressive totalitarian state in
favor of an entertainment-fueled nihilism in which dimwitted citizens
frittered away their lives watching web TV and working at slightly overpaid
jobs to buy worthless junk...on web TV, natch. Where Orwell envisioned
endless rows of soldiers marching in perfect unison to the strains of the
Two-Minute Hate, I saw a world where nations had been replaced by trading
blocs and the objects of hatred were the immigrants in our midst.

The six months following The Really Bad Thing That Happened have made clear
that I wasn't the only guy boning up on Orwell.

In "1984" the elite Inner Party rules the rattled and irradiated citizens of
Oceania through three conduits of fear and intimidation: surveillance,
terrorism and perpetual warfare.

The Oceanians had their two-way telescreens; we suffer a 10,000-employee
National Security Agency that relies on automated voice-recognition and
keyword software (Echelon, not to be confused with the more picayune and
widely-reported Carnivore system) to monitor millions of e-mails, faxes and
phone calls each day. But few Americans give much thought to this wholesale
violation of their privacy; only those who are doing something wrong, they
tell themselves, have anything to worry about.

The first eight months of the Bush Administration were characterized by
political insecurity. Bush, widely derided as unintelligent and oafish, had
carried less than half of the popular vote in 2000, and many Democrats
believed that he had bullied his way into the Oval Office. Jim Jeffords'
defection from the GOP, partially a reaction to Bush's hard turn to the
right after his inauguration, cost Republicans control of the Senate. Most
analysts expected big Democratic gains in the 2002 Congressional elections,
due both to the stagnating economy and to historical trends against
incumbency in mid-term.

The White House saw September 11th as a golden opportunity. The first
catastrophic terrorist attack on American soil sparked an unprecedented case
of leadership projection: desperate for protection and answers (why do they
hate us? can we kill them before they kill us?), Americans wishfully
compared Bush to FDR and Churchill. Approval ratings hit 92 percent. But
Bush's political advisors knew that peaking early wouldn't guarantee
reelection in 2004. Bush's father had been turned out of office just 20
months after the Gulf War (news - web sites) ratcheted his score up to 91.

The Bushies have lifted their reelection strategy straight out of "1984,"
and not just by creating ominous-sounding agencies like the Office of
Homeland Security, the supposedly-closed Office of Strategic Information,
and a "Shadow Government." As in "1984," the Bush regime tolerates zero
dissent-a two-party system in name only has been distilled to one in which
only Republicans express acceptable opinions. And an absence of follow-up
attacks has been met by endless alerts, advisors and empty hysterics in the
name of security, most recently culminating with Tom Ridge's much-mocked
color-code warning system. But Americans don't seem to miss their Democratic
Party very much; after all, Clinton spent more time sucking up to big
business than worrying about the fact that ordinary people can't afford to
see a doctor. And unless Bush resorts to the Orwellian tactic of setting off
bombs to kill his own citizens, the passage of time will inevitably yield to
the complacency that could cost him `04.

That leaves "1984"'s most potent political tool: perpetual warfare. Just as
Oceania was always at war with Eurasia or Eastasia-who could keep track?-the
"war on terror," we are told, will continue indefinitely.

Indefinitely is just another word for forever.

Thus hundreds, possibly thousands, of American troops are headed to the
Philippines to fight a rag-tag outfit of 80 jungle bandits. Our boys are
scouring the back hills of far-flung Yemen in search of Al Qaeda fighters on
the lam from our ongoing war in Afghanistan (news - web sites). We've set up
bases in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan to fight Central Asia's
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan-never mind that the world hasn't heard from
them since they kidnapped four American mountain climbers in 2000. China,
Indonesia, the former Soviet republic of Georgia, the Axis of Evil, you name
it...we're targeting alleged terrorists in 50-to-60 countries with tens of
thousands of soldiers and tens of billions of dollars. "So long as there's
Al Qaeda anywhere, we will help the host countries root them out," Bush
says. "If we expect to kill every terrorist in the world, that's going to
keep us going beyond doomsday," responds Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV).

Best of all for Bush, the more we go after Islamist extremists, the more
they'll go after us. The war on terror begets more terror begets more war.

The truth is that Bush isn't considering his post-apocalyptic future-at this
point November 2004 will do nicely. But by '04 Cheney or some other GOP
big-wig will be gearing up for '08, and after that there'll be a reelection
campaign in '12...old George Orwell, it turns out, wasn't that far off the
mark.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to