-Caveat Lector- >>ADD: A fellow student says that shortly after Sept.11, the boy read a >>paper in class about 9/11, in which he expressed his deep >>disappointment. Presumably this disappointment was not the result of the >>fact that part of the financial district in NYC was still left standing. >>Yet, a few months later, there he is, no longer disappointed about the >>tragedy, flying a plane into a building.
Last night on First Edition, it was reported that teachers and classmates have also said that the kid expressed great dismay regarding the 9/11 attacks and support for the 'war on terrorism'...which seems to contradict what we are being told is in the note... A note which so far the public has not been able to read for itself... >>ADD: And oh yes, the note in his pocket, officials say, stated that he >>was "acting alone." As I noted in my previous post, it's pretty strange for someone intent on committing suicide to put into their suicide note that they are acting alone... >>ADD: From what can so far be gleaned, I would say that someone got to >>this kid. Got to his mind. Or got to his plane, and took over control and remotely steered it into the Bank of America building... >>ADD: Of course, this just happens to be the Florida area where all those >>flying schools are located that have been training "terrorist Saudis." Not only that, but it just happens to be Tampa, where the guy who was the FBI chief of terrorism-response plans for NYC just happened to 'forget' his briefcase containing the Top Secret plans and left them behind in a Tampa hotel conference room, where they were 'stolen', to be mysteriously 'found' intact a few hours later...this was the guy who 'just happened' to leave the employ of the FBI this past August to start working as head of security for the World Trade Center, and who conveniently died in the attack on 9/11... >>ADD: I'm surprised we don't have magically shot video of the kid >>crashing his plane into the B of A skyscraper, as we did in NYC on the >>morning of 9/11 when the first jetliner smashed into the first WTC tower. >> >>ADD: If you think it's perfectly natural that we DO have video of the >>first 9/11 hit, just try to find video of the Murrah building explosion >>in OKC, on April 19, 1995. Go ahead. Living in the NYC metro broadcast area, I'm not particularly suspicious that someone just happened to be shooting video in lower Manhattan that morning and managed to capture the first plane hitting the WTC; I'm not saying that it may not have been planned, only that in and of itself it is not enough to form a substantive conclusion... You have all of the major media outlets in NYC, and literally dozens of minor stations, both TV broadcast, TV cable, and radio, who broadcast in the area; add to that the fact that the city hosts any number of businesses which specialize in shooting video for the private sector (training videos, documentaries, etc.) and the other fact that it was the day of the mayoral primaries, and that there were a couple of important polling places in lower Manhattan, and it is obvious that it would have been more noteworthy if there HADN'T been anyone shooting video down there that morning... (And if there hadn't been, we'd probably then be reading any number of conspiracy theories purporting that that would have been 'proof' that the media had been tipped off) But there is one valid point in the above post -- the fact that no video from security cameras have been made public, either from the businesses surrounding the Murrah Building in OKC or from the businesses in lower Manhattan in the vacinity of the WTC... Immediately following a major earthquake, TV is full of videos of the event captured on the security cameras of private businesses who decided to make them available to the media -- probably for a nice fee; one would expect that the media would be clamoring for the chance to broadcast any of these videos from 9/11, so why haven't we seen any security camera videos from that day? >>ADD: And how do we interpret Bush's repeat statement, delivered by the >>Man a couple of days ago, in reply to a schoolchild's question, that he >>saw on TV the 9/11 crash of the first plane into the WTC moments before >>addressing kids at a Florida school? >> >>ADD: We are being told to believe that the president saw this crash, and >>THEN sauntered into the classroom where he chatted and read to the kids. >>Bush claims that, when he saw the plane crash into the WTC, he had two >>thoughts: It was a commercial plane off course, or it was an act of terrorism. I've pointed out before that people are reading too much into this statement; even if Shrub DID say he watched the first plane hit, it would have been impossible, based on the time of both planes hitting... Shrub went in to read to the kiddies shortly after 9am...so if he DID watch a plane hitting the WTC at around 9am, it would have to have been the SECOND plane, which hit the 2nd tower at 9:03am... The first plane hit the first tower at approx. 8:45am, some 15 minutes BEFORE the time Shrub said he was watching TV... So what really seems to have happened is that as Shrub was waiting to go in to read to the kiddies someone turned on the TV, which was showing the first WTC tower burning...as they watched, the 2nd plane hit the WTC at 9:03...Shrub then went in to read to the kiddies, and shortly after that an aide came in and whispered in his ear that a 2nd plane had hit the WTC; this was confirmation that indeed a 2nd plane had hit... Whether Shrub pondered if this was an unfortunate accident occuring twice, or an act of terrorism, also doesn't prove anything one way or another....Bryant Gumbel on CBS was questioning on the air for some time after the 2nd plane hit about "what's gone wrong with the air traffic control system, to allow 2 planes to go so off-course like that?"... In other words, not everyone immediately surmised it was an act of terrorism, even after the 2nd plane hit... >>ADD: Strange. Very strange. A kind of blithe indifference. As if the >>crash were not real. I know a number of interpretations have been put on >>his behavior, but here is another one: The president is, on some level, >>out of touch with reality. Has there ever been any doubt on this matter, regardless of the subject/topic? So was his father... >>ADD: He is in "dupe mode." He is, in certain circumstances, not able to >>act on his own. At these times, he is a puppet. Some of us woul <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
