[CTRL] Fwd: "Quo Warranto" defense = marijuana possession dismissal?

[Kris Millegan]

-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- Howdy,
NY pot activist, Dana Beal's daughter was ticketed with possession of marijuana by one of Eugene's finest. Dana knew of my "defense" and asked I speak with his daughter.  I told her of my experience in California of getting my marijuana arrest dismissed and of my local public pronouncements of "Quo Warranto," challenging the "presumptive" jurisdiction and legislative authority concerning prohibitory statutes. She felt akin to my thoughts on the matter and used the "Quo Warranto" defense and presented the court with that argument.

The court dismissed that argument but when the matter came to court, the charge was dismissed. The reason -- nonappearance of the police officer. If the prosecuter/court wanted the police officer there, he would have been there, the police station is in the same building. If one believes the law has authority, proving possession of a "baggie" with "unlawful" vegetable material and getting a "conviction" is not a hard task. The realization and the groundwork laid at public meetings and getting it published in a paper of record is sinking in. Without the Constitutional authority shield, local officials may be taken to court on civil charges for denial of civil liberties. Possession of marijuana is a civil liberty guaranteed mightily under the US and Oregon Constitutions. The laws against cannabis possession are "ab initio."

Stand up for your rights.

You might be amazed. 

Peace,
Om
Kris Milegan
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om 2">
--- End Message ---