-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:05:17 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
one for which the Clintons should be faulted.
This is an important point. So far, the Clinton's have been responsive to
recent criticism: they are going to pay half for the gifts
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:48:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's considered an honor to have an item accepted to be part of
the White House collection...it's
considered a gift to the country as a whole, not to any one person who
happens
-Caveat Lector-
On 6 Feb 01, at 5:38, Prudence L. Kuhn wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:48:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's considered an honor to have an item accepted to be
part of the White House collection...it's
considered
http://www.wnd.com/frame/direct.asp?SITE=www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/polit
ics/A26094-2001Feb4.html
Gifts Were Not Meant for Clintons, Some Donors Say
By George Lardner Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, February 5, 2001 ; Page A03
Among the gifts that former president Bill Clinton
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 02/05/2001 6:14:36 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Among the gifts that former president Bill Clinton says he is keeping as
personal presents he accepted last year are $28,000 worth of furnishings
that documents and interviews indicate
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/5/01 5:14:36 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
It was not clear how the Clinton furnishings might have been included on the
White House gifts office list when the Park Service had them on its list. A
former White House aide who asked
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Prudence L. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody know how all that stuff Nancy Reagan took was routed? If she had to
pay a million in back taxes, there must have been a bale of it, and I'm
really curious.
If I'm not mistaken, the majority of Reagan's haul (and believe me,
