-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.jordantimes.com/Wed/features/features2.htm

}}}>Begin
Jordan Times (Features Section)

Iraq — 11 years on

By Dr. Omar Al Taher





IT HAS been exactly eleven years ago today since the US and its
allies launched their largest military campaign since World War II
with the ostensible aim of ejecting Iraqi troops from Kuwait. This
objective was attained within 42 days of unrelenting aerial
bombardment, but Iraq has since been placed under a sanctions regime
designed to cripple it economically and subdue it politically. Over
those eleven long years, over 600,000 Iraqi children have died as a
direct result of the sanctions. This prompted three top UN officials,
Dennis Halliday, Hans Von Sponeck and Bolghardt, to resign in protest
at what they termed “the slow and silent death of an entire nation”;
the UN has not known a rebellion like this in its 55-year history.

Having visited Iraq lately, I couldn't help noticing that the very fabric of Iraqi 
society is gradually disintegrating. Mass migration from the country to urban areas 
has transformed the once great and prosperous cities o
f Baghdad and Basra into huge shantytowns; corruption, prostitution and beggary are 
commonplace. Eleven years of sanctions have eroded the previously resilient and 
vibrant middle class, rendering it destitute and helpless
. The far-reaching implications of the embargo are destined to continue to impact 
Iraqis' lives for decades to come.

Almost everything is denied the people of Iraq, including food, clothing and medicine. 
As far back as 1994, reports out of Iraq, compiled by Western agencies, spoke of 
widespread chronic malnutrition and death among young
 children; an unprecedented human rights disaster. The result of this “collateral 
damage”, as US and British officials wish to call it, is that over half a million 
Iraqi children under the age of five have been killed; tw
ice the number of those killed by the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and 
Nagasaki in 1945.

A quick glance at the list of items that Iraq is denied reveals the absurdity and the 
ugly face of the much-celebrated “new world order”. The list includes: books, pencils, 
paper, soap, light bulbs, clean water, anaesthet
ic, lifesaving drugs, X-ray machines and films, heart and lungs machine, vaccines, 
firefighting equipment, etc. The pretext is that such items have a potential for 
military application. Frankly, everything has the potenti
al for dual usage, and one is genuinely surprised that the list does not include 
nails, which could be used in nail bombs, and Pepsi bottles, which could be used for 
Molotov cocktail bombs!

The effects of the embargo against Iraq stand as a stark indictment of the Americans 
and the British and everything they claim to stand for. One is inclined to point to 
peoples, as opposed to governments, because these tw
o countries are supposed to be democratic and free, governed by democratically elected 
officials who are accountable to their respective electorates, i.e., decisions made by 
these officials are in essence the decisions of
 their electorates. Their relationship is likened to the relationship that exists 
between a principal and an agent, which entails that the principal cannot escape 
liability for the acts and omissions of his agent.

By contrast, the Iraqis could in no way be blamed for the policies of Saddam Hussein 
because, put simply, the Iraqis never voted Saddam in office. Here lies the difference 
between the West and Iraq. Punishing the Iraqi pe
ople for Saddam's actions is akin to punishing an innocent child for an offence 
committed by his father. So much for Western fairness, equity and fair play!

Experts on the Middle East fear that this state of affairs is a recipe for disaster in 
so far as the future of the Middle East is concerned. Historically, Iraq has been a 
key player in the region, and it logically follows
 that it would always have a crucial role to play by virtue of the dictates of 
geopolitics. US and British officials talk, day in and day out, of a Middle East 
living in peace and harmony. What harmony would be expected f
rom a county that has been singled out and placed under the most comprehensive 
sanctions regime in modern history? The effects of this genocidal war are likely to 
backfire, derailing all what the US and its underling, the
 UK, are working towards.

George Bush's and Tony Blair's sugar-coated speeches that the “quarrel is not with the 
Iraqi people but with the Iraqi leader” is neither here nor there. The resentment one 
senses in discussions with Iraqis is directed to
wards the two countries and, by implication, the two peoples, the Americans and the 
British. The fear, which is shared by many who have studied the Middle East, is that 
by antagonising and humiliating an entire nation, th
e likelihood of transforming every Iraqi into a Saddam is very much a possibility, not 
to say a probability.

When confronted with the fact that over 4,000 Iraqi children are dying every month due 
to the embargo, Madeleine Albright, then US secretary of state, retorted without a 
qualm: “Well, we think the price is worth it.” Furt
hermore, on innumerable occasions, she went on record stating that even if the UN 
Disarmament Committee's report gave Iraq a clean bill of health, the US position is 
not to lift the sanctions so long as Saddam remained in
 power. This candour, which borders on insolence, explains Iraq's non-cooperative 
stance. The Iraqi leadership is aware that if all its weaponry (from biological 
weapons to even hand grenades) are accounted for and decomm
issioned, the sanctions are there to stay. So, why cooperate?

One cannot help recalling the eerie words of James Baker, former US secretary of 
state, during his eleventh hour meeting in Geneva in January 1991 with Tareq Aziz, the 
then Iraqi foreign minister, that Iraq “risks being r
elegated to a pre-industrial age status” if it doesn't pull out of Kuwait by Jan. 15. 
Well, this objective was fulfilled with the ejection of Iraqi troops from Kuwait on 
Feb. 28, 1991. Why does the West continue its aggre
ssive foreign policy towards Iraq?

The answer lies in that following the collapse of the Soviet Union — the Arab world's 
traditional ally — the US resolved that the time was ripe to redraw the map of the 
Middle East. The Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 has o
utlived its validity, and the area was in need for a new arrangement, this time to 
accommodate Israel's long-term designs. Iraq, with its huge potential and nationalist 
aspirations, regardless of its government, was the s
tumbling block that needed to be sorted out, so to speak. In an
interview a couple of years ago, Tareq Aziz stated that Iraq favours
military strikes to the status quo. After all, war is governed by the
Geneva Convention, while the silent war that has been waged over the
past eleven years, which killed hundreds of thousands of civilians,
continues to go unnoticed and doesn't make news headlines.

However, the pressing question remains: How many more Iraqis need to
perish before the American and the British peoples react and put a
stop to the atrocities committed in their name?

The writer, a holder of a PhD degree in international affairs and an
LLB degree from the UK, is currently a legal trainee at a law firm in
Amman. He contributed this article to The Jordan Times.
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to