-Caveat Lector-
I agree that follow-ups on in-hand intelligence might have saved lives on 9-11.
Kerry is/was not a law enforcement official, he's a legislator. He passed the material
he was given to the proper authorities and DID indeed follow-up on it as the
complaining party admits.
He did
-Caveat Lector-
Well, I think follow ups would have been worth 3,000 lives - what do you
think? M Maurer - a soldier for Jesus Christ
- Original Message -
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
-Caveat Lector-
Right...Kerry's responsibility equal's the Bush Administration?
Was Kerry supposed to psychically know that this security issue would turn into the
9-11 attacks?
Bush, on the other hand, receieved daily warnings about terrorist threats and did
little or nothing with the
-Caveat Lector-
WASHINGTON - A third federal aviation-security agent, one still with the government,
has stepped forward to say he also warned Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry about security
lapses at Boston's Logan International Airport before the 9-11 hijackings there.
Earlier this week, two
-Caveat Lector-
I've seen this article all over right-wing message boards..it proves...what? That
Senator Kerry sent the material he was provided up the proper chain of command to
people whose job it was to investigate the allegations.
The Right seems to think that this disgruntled ex-employee
-Caveat Lector-
Both Kerry and the White House are responsible. If Kerry was warned and
passed them on as you put it then he sould have followed up and made sure
he did everything possible to prevent this tragedy. People`s lives don`t
get passed on and then be forgotten. You seem more concerned
