-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/8/99 8:58:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Not true. The only time I will resort to name calling is if it is resorted
to
by others first and I never want to stifle "honest debate".
Jim: Nope, this is not supported by any post I
, but they were all that
way. Jim Condit Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Teo One Thousand
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] List Participation
-Caveat Lector
-Caveat Lector-
Hi
I'm new here and this is my first post. I would say that my first impression
is to run and hide, because it all seems quite aggressive, sometimes personal
and that's a problem for me as I'm a survivor of abuse, but also have interest
in conspiracy theory, especially cult /
-Caveat Lector-
-Original Message-
From: Teo One Thousand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] List Participation
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:13:20 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL
-denominator. Jim Condit Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Jim Norman
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 12:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] List Participation
-Caveat Lector-
Teo One Thousand wrote
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/3/99 5:24:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hi
I'm new here and this is my first post. I would say that my first impression
is to run and hide, because it all seems quite aggressive, sometimes personal
and that's a problem for me
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/3/99 10:01:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Teo1000
Are you trying to get support to open up another list for personal
debates? If so will you come out in the open, say so and get the other list
started.
Laura
AKA The Pied
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/3/99 11:07:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I wondered what happened to Hawk. His replies (the ones I saw) so
thoroughly showed up the fallacies of the arguments of the people he was
debating that I'm not overly surprised he
-Caveat Lector-
I am for seeing more substantive discussion. I would like to see more people
getting involved here and posting their comments on things conspiratorial.
There are certain few who seem to dominate the list with certain pet areas of
concern (this is not bad because we get a lot of
Teo One Thousand wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
I am for seeing more substantive discussion. I would like to see
more people
getting involved here and posting their comments on things conspiratorial.
There are certain few who seem to dominate the list with certain pet
areas of
concern (this is not bad
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:13:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"In addition I make pretty dogmatic pronouncements myself
which tend to cause others to think twice before posting comments that I am
likely to take an opposite stance on (such as the UFO
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:13:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This was the first thing I noticed about this list. I Only had to read 5
post to
realize this. I've read a number of your post. Expecially with Hawk, and
anybody
else who's ideas are
-Caveat Lector-
Teo One Thousand wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/2/99 10:13:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This was the first thing I noticed about this list. I Only had to read 5
post to
realize this. I've read a number of your post.
13 matches
Mail list logo
