-Caveat Lector-

Time to KEEP PUSHING as Monsanto gives way to public opinion!


Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart
==========================================
http://ens.lycos.com/ens/oct99/1999L-10-06-02.html


Monsanto Puts Terminator Seeds on the Shelf

ST. LOUIS, Missouri, October 6, 1999 (ENS) - The agricultural biotech firm
Monsanto has announced it will not commercialize technologies that render
seeds sterile. In an open letter to Rockefeller Foundation president Gordon
Conway on Monday, Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro pledged, "I am writing to let
you know that we are making a public commitment not to commercialize sterile
seed technologies, such as the one dubbed "Terminator."


Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro in 1997 addressing the Microcredit Summit (MS)
(Photo courtesy MS)
"We are doing this based on input from you and a wide range of other experts
and stakeholders, including our very important grower constituency," Shapiro
wrote.
The prospect of plants that produce sterile seeds that cannot be replanted
but must be purchased anew for each year's crop has caused widespread
protests in developing countries. Farmers fear not being able to harvest
viable seeds will threaten food security.

Shapiro told a Greenpeace conference in London today via a video link from
the United States that Monsanto is now seeking to move from "debate" to
"dialogue" on transgenic crop issues. This shift, he said, is behind the
company's withdrawal of plans to commercialize sterile seeds.

Shapiro admitted to the Greenpeace conference that the company has failed to
listen enough to criticisms of its development of genetically modified (GM)
crops and pledged the firm to engage in discussions "openly, honestly and
non-defensively."

But Shapiro's olive branch to critics cut no ice with the head of Greenpeace
UK, Peter Melchett, who responded with strong criticisms of Monsanto. The
company behaved as a "bully" and was offering a "failed vision," Melchett
said.

"Everything we have actually seen of GM food and farming so far is bad, and
is taking us in the wrong direction," said Melchett. Greenpeace would
happily work with Monsanto, he said, but only if it would "stop developing
GM crops, get out of producing pesticides, and reject the idea of patenting
life forms."


Chickpea germplasm (Photo courtesy International Crops Research Institute
for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT))
In his open letter to the Rockefeller Foundation president, Shapiro
explained, "...sterile seed technology is one of a class of so-called 'gene
protection systems.' This is a group of technologies, all still in the
conceptual or developmental stage, that could potentially be used to protect
the investment companies make in developing genetically improved crops, as
well as possibly providing other agronomic benefits. Some would work by
rendering seeds from such crops sterile, while others would work by other
means, such as deactivating only the value added biotech trait. One of the
sterile seed technologies was developed and patented jointly by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture and Delta & Pine Land, with which we announced our
intent to merge in the spring of 1998.
Delta & Pine Land co-owns the prototype Terminator patent with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, U.S. patent number 5,723,765. Monsanto holds a
second patent, WO 9744465, published November 27, 1997.

Still, Shapiro wrote in his open letter, "Monsanto does not yet actually own
a sterile seed technology."

"It is also important to understand that the technical and business utility
of sterile seed technology is speculative," Shapiro wrote. "The specific
technology over which Monsanto would gain ownership through its pending
merger with Delta & Pine Land is developmental, at least five years away
from any possible commercialization, and may or may not prove workable in a
commercial setting."


Farmer in Burkina-Faso examines his sorghum crop. (Photo courtesy ICRISAT)
At the Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI) in Winnipeg,
Canada, the Monsanto announcement was greeted with applause, not for the
company, but for the people who pressured the company to renounce the
Terminator technology. "Congratulations should go to the civil society
organizations, farmers, scientists, and governments all over the world who
have waged highly effective anti-Terminator campaigns during the past 18
months," said Pat Mooney, executive director of RAFI. "The public
unanimously rejected Terminator because it's bad for farmers, food security,
and the environment," he said.
RAFI is a non-profit international organization which for 20 years has
worked on the social and economic impact of new technologies on rural
societies.

"Monsanto would never have abandoned the profit generating potential of
sterile seeds just because it was an immoral technology," said RAFI's
research director, Hope Shand. "The company finally realized that Terminator
will never win public acceptance. Terminator has became synonymous with
corporate greed, and it was met with intense opposition all over the world."

Shapiro did not rule out the development of other gene protection
technologies. "Monsanto holds patents on technological approaches to gene
protection that do not render seeds sterile and has studied one that would
inactivate only the specific gene(s) responsible for the value-added biotech
trait. We are not currently investing resources to develop these
technologies, but we do not rule out their future development and use for
gene protection or their possible agronomic benefits," he wrote.

Monsanto is the second large biotech firm to back away from sterile seed
technology. In June of this year, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity
received a letter from UK based AstraZeneca announcing that it would not
commercialize seed sterility technologies.

"In all, more than a dozen companies and public institutes have at least 31
patents that include claims involving seed sterilization," Mooney says.

The National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences is
planning an international study of these issues.

{ENDS Environment Daily contributed to this article. Environmental Data
Services Ltd, London. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Website:
http://www.ends.co.uk/envdaily}


© Environment News Service (ENS) 1999. All Rights Reserved.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to