-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
-----
Spy vs. Spy


America Washes Its Hands of Torpedo Sleuth


You got caught; no need to Squall about it.

NEW YORK - Of all the riddles that surround the destruction of the Russian
submarine Kursk, perhaps the most baffling concerns a stooped and ailing
American professor who has spent the past five months in Moscow's notorious
Lefortovo prison.
His name is Edmond Pope and, if there is even a shred of truth to the
whispers about what he was doing when Russian secret policeman arrested him
with a satchel containing $US40,000 ($93,962) in cash, the former United
States Navy officer may well be the unluckiest of souls: an amateur spy whose
masters have decided to leave him out in the cold.
Wherever the truth may lie, one thing is certain: apart from the Russian
technicians who designed and built it, Pope is probably the world's foremost
authority on one of the most remarkable weapons ever hoisted on board a ship
of war. The Russians call it Squall - a wedge-shaped, rocket-powered torpedo
with a blunt, boxy nose that US defence analysts are convinced can break the
sound barrier underwater. According to Moscow prosecutors, Pope was trying to
purchase the torpedo's blueprints when he was taken into custody on April 3.
His wife, Cheri, insists Pope is innocent in every sense - nothing more
sinister than a tweedy physicist who made the mistake of placing too much
faith in his Russian hosts.
That is one view. The other perspective, that of the Pentagon and the CIA,
sheds even less light for it is nothing but an embarrassed silence.
"Washington has abandoned us," Cheri Pope lamented recently. "My husband
served his country for 25 years in the Navy and now, well, he's a non-person.
Apart from our local Pennsylvania congressmen, nobody who could help wants to
know about him, or offer the slightest assistance to get Ed home."
At the State Department, the official silence on the case is even more
telling. Asked by a reporter if the 55-year-old Pope is indeed a spy, the
department's senior spokesman refused to be drawn. "It is our practice not to
get into confirming or denying intelligence issues," he said. If the Russians
had been tempted to let Pope leave, that answer probably banished the thought
forever.
There can be no denying, however, that US naval analysts would dearly love to
know a lot more about the Squall - the same weapon that is being blamed in
some quarters for sending the Kursk to the bottom. Though Moscow has floated
several theories of its own - that the Kursk collided with a British
submarine, that it was hit by a stray missile fired by a sister ship on the
surface, even that it struck a Second World War mine - not one of them comes
close to providing an adequate answer.
So, in the absence of hard facts, attention has centred on the Squall, a new
version of which many in Washington believe was being readied for a test
firing when it exploded in the sub's forward torpedo room. The pieces
certainly fit: if the wonder weapon really was responsible for last month's
tragedy, it would explain why Moscow at first refused to let foreign rescue
teams lend a hand. Why grant potential enemies an opportunity to learn more
about a torpedo fast enough to leave an F-16 fighter plane in its wake?
The West first learned about Squall's technology more than 20 years ago, when
Soviet officials neglected to classify a research paper that described how a
torpedo could be made to speed beneath the waves inside a bubble of
high-pressure gas. With only the nose actually coming in contact with the
water, drag would be so low that the projectile could cover as much as a
kilometre every second.
To Cold War submariners, such a weapon would have been irresistible.
"It is a gunfighter's weapon," a former US Navy weapons consultant explained
last week. "Picture a Russian submarine being hunted by one of ours: The
Ruski hears our guy fire a torpedo and responds by squeezing off a bunch of
Squalls. One Squall takes out the incoming torpedo and the rest kill the US
sub before it can get off another salvo."
In the context of an all-out war, those Squalls would have given the Russian
captain just enough time to launch his nuclear missiles at American cities.
"The Russian isn't going to make it back to port - and he knows it," the
analyst continued. "All those rocket-powered fish would have given away his
position, like screaming out: 'I'm over here. Nuke me!' But in the few
minutes he had until the next attack, he would be free to incinerate Boston."
The problem with the Squall - at least the early versions that the Americans
know about - was that it could not be steered since there was almost no
contact with the surrounding water. The theory about the Kursk is that the
sub was about to test an updated Squall, perhaps one that could be remotely
controlled by funneling exhaust gases from the rocket engine through portals
in the weapon's bow.
The unfortunate Pope was already behind bars when the Kursk went down, so the
Russians cannot accuse him of playing a direct part in its destruction. All
the same, they must have been intrigued by his background, which is a good
deal more interesting than the bland haze of biographical data released by
the US Navy.
According to the Americans, Pope is a former seaman who retired with the rank
of captain and landed a teaching job at a Pennsylvania college better known
for its bucolic setting than academic achievements. Even the name of his
hometown - State Farm - is so bland it might have been lifted from a bad
novel.
The truth, however, is that Pope was one of the Navy's leading experts on
Soviet naval hardware, and that the physics department at the university
where he found work receives most of its research funding from the Pentagon.
It has also come to light that he speaks fluent Russian and had made more
than 30 trips to the country in search of Russian high-tech gear, much of it
military.
If there is a man qualified to unravel the Squall's secrets, Pope would have
to fit the bill.
Whatever he was up to when the Russians busted him, Pope's situation is dire.
His family says he is suffering from cancer, has lost 18kg since his arrest,
and is being fed little more than boiled potatoes.
Though he is tentatively scheduled to go on trial next month, his wife
suspects that he has suffered a nervous breakdown and may not live to see the
inside of a courtroom.
Back in Washington, where Cheri Pope recently complained that President Bill
Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore have refused to lift a finger on her
husband's behalf, you cannot help but suspect that there are some who might
regard Pope's death as the happiest outcome.
As downed U2 spy-plane pilot Francis Gary Powers discovered almost 40 years
ago, the only thing more embarrassing than a captured spy is a live captured
spy.
New Zealand Herald, September 24, 2000 @Åt:î  )5â

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to