-Caveat Lector-

>>>So here we have it (as far back as at least 1999): *Why*, of all places, would this
apparent stranger (if what they found to be driving directions around MD are indeed 
his) go
to the Land of Mary to start dropping people?  Perhaps I'm reading too much into this 
but if
someone wanted easy prey, it might be that which cannot defend itself.  So, we've got 
the
MD AG :  "Curran (D), the state's chief lawyer, wants Maryland lawmakers to ... 
prohibit
people from carrying concealed weapons in public places..."

So every time there's a loose cannon (!), the Merrie Landers have to wait for a cop to 
come
to their rescue, something they've so far proven to be ineffective if not impossible.

A<>E<>R <<<

>From http://www.psychops.com/Headlines/Maryland_Gun_Laws/maryland_gun_laws.html

Tough Laws For Guns Proposed In Maryland
Attorney General Says Goal Is Ban

By Daniel LeDuc
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 20, 1999; Page A01

Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran is proposing a wide-ranging package of laws
that would make the state's gun control regulations among the strictest in the nation 
and
says his ultimate goal is a ban on handguns.

Curran (D), the state's chief lawyer, wants Maryland lawmakers to tighten background
checks on potential gun owners, prohibit people from carrying concealed weapons in 
public
places and ease liability laws to make it easier to sue gunmakers. He is considering
whether to sue gun manufacturers for the violence caused by their products.

"Our public policy goal must be to rid our communities of handguns," Curran says in a
report he is releasing today outlining his proposals.

State leaders said they had yet to review the attorney general's proposals. But 
Curran's
recommendations come at a time when Gov. Parris N. Glendening (D) has put gun control
on the forefront of his legislative agenda this winter with a push for "smart gun" 
technology
that would prevent handguns from being fired by anyone but their owners.

The attorney general said he supports the governor's proposal, as well as legislation 
that
would make illegal gun possession and sales a felony. They are misdemeanors now. He
also wants to give police officers additional powers to investigate gun trafficking.

Curran said he was prompted by the gun violence that has troubled the nation over the 
past
year. He cited shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, an Atlanta brokerage 
house,
a Los Angeles day-care center and a Fort Worth church that left 32 dead.

In an interview, Curran said he had not ruled out taking legal action against gun
manufacturers. Nearly 20 cities and counties throughout the nation have sued gunmakers 
to
recoup the cost of treating gunshot victims. None have come to trial. A judge recently 
threw
out a suit filed by Cincinnati, handing gunmakers a victory. But in the face of the new
litigation, Colt's Manufacturing Co., the venerable Connecticut gunmaker, has said it 
is
discontinuing many of its handguns.

Curran said he wanted to make a legislative push before suing and hoped that enactment 
of
his legislative proposals would be the first step in what he acknowledged could be a 
more-
than-decade-long effort to restrict handguns.

"Handguns should be the province of the military or law enforcement or a special 
segment
of people" such as some sporting enthusiasts or shopkeepers needing protection, he 
said.
As for his legislative proposals, he said, "For every solution to a major problem, 
there has
to be a beginning."

Curran, a longtime gun control advocate, was reelected to a fourth term in November. He
backed a push for banning Saturday night specials while serving in the legislature in 
1986
and cites his own experience: His father, while serving on the Baltimore City Council 
in
1976, was shot at by a gunman who invaded City Hall; his father was not wounded but
suffered a heart attack in the incident, Curran said.

A spokesman for Glendening said the governor would be briefed on the details of 
Curran's
report today. The governor plans to push hard on his smart-gun proposal and welcomes
"all other proposals in the debate over how we make our communities safer," said
spokesman Michael Morrill.

Initial reaction to Curran's proposals from Maryland legislative leaders was mixed. 
Senate
President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Prince George's) said gun control legislation 
would
be based on "common sense" and could include new requirements for safety locks, but he
did not commit to anything more stringent. House Speaker Casper R. Taylor Jr. (D-
Allegany) was more receptive and said he expected delegates to pass the governor's
smart-gun proposal.

"We are realizing as a society and as a nation we can't continue to not just condone 
but
enhance and promote a life of violence. I definitely see something happening" on gun
control, said Taylor, who represents a rural district in Western Maryland where such
measures are not popular.

Opponents of gun control are already girding for the battle.

"Violent crime is coming down, and he picks this time to say, 'Ban firearms'?" said 
Sanford
Abrams, vice president of the Maryland Licensed Firearms Dealers Association Inc. 
Curran,
he said, "wants a police state. If you only let police officers have weapons, then 
citizens are
their subjects, not their controllers."

Greg Costa, the Maryland liaison for the National Rifle Association, said any change in
liability law would be a boon for trial lawyers but would do little to help anyone 
else. And he
called any effort to increase licensing requirements beyond the current seven- day 
waiting
period "unreasonable."

"We still have a constitutional right to own firearms," he said. The NRA is willing to 
work
with Glendening on his push for smart-gun technology, Costa said, but will oppose any
effort to mandate its use, which would effectively ban the sale of any handgun that 
didn't
employ the technology.

Gun control was last a major issue in Maryland in 1996, when Glendening championed
legislation limiting people to buying one handgun a month. In recent years, there has 
been
a steady decline in handgun purchases in Maryland, according to the state police. Sales
peaked in 1994 at 41,726 but by last year had fallen to 19,440.

Under current law, Maryland residents have to wait seven days and undergo a background
check before purchasing a handgun. No license or registration is required to own a gun.
Carrying a concealed handgun, however, requires a permit that entails a more stringent
background check and proof that the user has had safety training.

Curran began work on his 58-page report not long after the Columbine shootings. In it, 
he
cited studies showing that in 1994, 200 people hospitalized for fatal gunshot wounds 
cost
the state nearly $200 million in medical and police expenses.

In addition to the financial analysis, Curran compares the recent shootings in this 
country
with those at a school in Scotland, which prompted Britain to ban handguns, and in
Australia, which led to a ban on semiautomatic weapons.

After Columbine, Atlanta, Los Angeles and Fort Worth, he writes, "now it is our turn."

© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's 
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to