-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Euphorian)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 1:31am (EST-1)
SHOULD THE CHURCHES BE TAXED?
Absolutely not---taxation is theft, tribute paid to a conquering
authority called government. There is noting wrong with paying for
services rendered such as the common
In a message dated 2/24/02 9:15:45 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SHOULD THE CHURCHES BE TAXED?
Of course they should be.
Bill.
-Caveat Lector-
think churches should not be taxed with one exception. When they
engage in political activity, they are no longer a church established
for spiritual needs,
Harry Anslingner once wrote and as for the Mafia, pull up one string of
spagetti (hey, how is that for discrimination,
-Caveat Lector-
On 24 Feb 2002 at 10:05, Bob Swanlund wrote:
Absolutely not---taxation is theft, tribute paid to a conquering
authority called government.
Absolutely. Yet, as long as the rest of us get taken, everyone ought to play.
Unless, of course, we all declare ourselves tax-exempt for
I agree, The501c3 whore houses should kick
back unto thier master. Most churches at the pleasure of the State.
BillK
SHOULD THE CHURCHES BE TAXED?Of course they
should be. Bill.
-Caveat Lector-
On 24 Feb 2002 at 11:21, Saba wrote:
think churches should not be taxed with one exception. When they
engage in political activity, they are no longer a church established
for spiritual needs,
But churches have been political activities ever since they've been in
-Caveat Lector-
BFI believe that religion, when it remains non-profit and non-political, should be
allowed
the priviledge of exemption. Remember than many of us tithe. This helps our religious
organizations, and also finds its way to charities that help the needy. It is a Divine
Commandment,
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: Man on the Run [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Rendering Unto Caesar Some Greens
-Caveat Lector-
BFI believe that religion, when it remains non-profit and non-political
AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Rendering Unto Caesar Some Greens
-Caveat Lector-
BFI believe that religion, when it remains non-profit and non-political,
should be allowed
the priviledge of exemption. Remember than many of us tithe. This helps
our religious
organizations, and also finds its
-Caveat Lector-
Should religion be taxed?
Only to fund its complete dissolution.
Free your mind and your ass will follow.
St George
NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Euphorian)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 10:53am (EST-1)
Yet, as long as the rest of us get taken, everyone ought to play.
The flaw in the notion that because some are serfs all should be serfs
is that it can only benefit the nobility. This distracts those
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Kalivas)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 10:57am (EST-1)
The 501c3 whore houses should kick back unto their master...
This is an important point, all corporations serve their master---and
pass the costs on to their customers. Collecting more money for the
-Caveat Lector-
True, it wouldn't serve liberty to tax the church. It might however cause
donations for buildings, the Socialist World Council of Churches, TV
stations, trips to the Holy Land, and other ridiculous matters to cease.
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Kalivas)
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Man on the Run)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 10:50pm (EST-3)
I believe that religion, when it remains non-profit and non-political,
should be allowed the privilege of exemption
One's household is non-profit and non-political and yet subject to
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Man on the Run)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 11:02pm (EST-3)
...The State must not interfere beyond its bounds
Here one assumes that the State is an entity. As such it's a figment
of one's imagination, the State is merely a group of men who have
-Caveat Lector-
should the churches be taxed?
Of course they should be.
agreed.
they should be treated as businesses, for that is what they are, and
subjected to all the same taxes that your average small business is
subjected to. if they are a large church, file them under a corporation..
-Caveat Lector-
Corruption should not be allowed. However, to
deny tax exempt status when other non-profits have it would be unfair and
gross.
can you explain your position that the church is a non-profit organization?
i'm not getting that.
inri
np:
http://chat.carleton.ca/~jparent2/
-Caveat Lector-
At 05:34 PM 2/24/02 , you wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Man on the Run)
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2002, 11:02pm (EST-3)
...The State must not interfere beyond its bounds
Here one assumes that the State is an entity. As such it's a figment
of one's
-Caveat Lector-
On 24 Feb 2002 at 17:10, Bob Swanlund wrote:
The flaw in the notion that because some are serfs all should be serfs
is that it can only benefit the nobility.
Mmmm ... the problem with this is entrusting special status to a select few who then
run errands/interference for the
-Caveat Lector-
From http://www.deism.com/tax_religions.htm
This becomes even more relevant when even I can think of at least two religions
that make contributions to religious centres in foreign countries that have little or
no
interest in supporting or defending the Constitution of the U.S.
-Caveat Lector-
WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!
Rendering unto Caesar
--
--
2001 WorldNetDaily.com
I've been pilloried by Christians for the last week for opposing
21 matches
Mail list logo
