-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/18/01 9:25:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh brother. Here we go. Possible nuclear war with just WHO Steve??? A
bunch
of Afghani herdsmen with AK-47's? Please. Granted, great guerilla fighters
they may be. But nuclear capability? C'mon. That's a
-Caveat Lector-
On 18 Sep 01, at 10:37, foxter wrote:
Or how about one of those misnamed suitcase nukes? OK. Let's consider that
scenario. Suitcase nuke goes off in a major US city, doing massive damage,
albeit in an extrememly limited area (approx. 1 mile radius). Fallout is
minimal
-Caveat Lector-
From: radtimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
September 16, 2001-On Friday, the Senate voted 98-0 for a war resolution.
It says: The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriat
force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines
planned, authorized,
-Caveat Lector-
On 18 Sep 01, at 9:16, Don Capps wrote:
Oh please...cry me a friggin' river! It's payback time baby! I say we nuke
'em. Can't hide in tunnels from radiation sickness.
That would be very. Tunnels and caves would be a relatively good way to
avoid radiation, and radiation would
-Caveat Lector-
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be very. Tunnels and caves would be a relatively good way to
avoid radiation, and radiation would contaminate the environment and lead to
further escalation including possible nuclear war.
Oh brother. Here we go. Possible nuclear war
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:48
AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] September
11...(5)
-Caveat Lector-From: "Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be very. Tunnels and caves would be a relatively good way
toavoid radiation, and radiation would c
-Caveat Lector-
Don Capps wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be very. Tunnels and caves would be a relatively good
way to
avoid radiation, and radiation would contaminate the environment and
lead to
further escalation including possible nuclear war.
Oh
22:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] September 11...(5)
-Caveat Lector-
Don Capps wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be very. Tunnels and caves would be a
relatively good
way to
avoid radiation, and radiation would contaminate
-Caveat Lector-
From: Paul Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After the collapse of the soviet union, weapons grade plutonium, was
reported to be less heavily guarded than potatoes. There have also already
being reports the Bin Laden's organisation has as many as 20 tactical
nuclear devices. I
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/18/01 4:21:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After the collapse of the soviet union, weapons grade plutonium, was
reported to be less heavily guarded than potatoes. There have also already
being reports the Bin Laden's organisation has as many as 20
-Caveat Lector-
On 18 Sep 01, at 9:48, Don Capps wrote:
Oh brother. Here we go. Possible nuclear war with just WHO Steve??? A bunch
of Afghani herdsmen with AK-47's? Please. Granted, great guerilla fighters
they may be. But nuclear capability? C'mon. That's a stretch, even by the
incredibly
-Caveat Lector-
On 18 Sep 01, at 10:37, foxter wrote:
Or how about one of those misnamed suitcase nukes? OK. Let's consider that
scenario. Suitcase nuke goes off in a major US city, doing massive damage,
albeit in an extrememly limited area (approx. 1 mile radius). Fallout is
minimal
Unfortunately I was
not the author of this.
Foxter
- Original Message -
From:
Steve
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:05
AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] September
11...(5)
-Caveat Lector-On 18 Sep 01, at 10:37, foxter
wrote: Or how about
13 matches
Mail list logo
