-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.sntp.net/education/sutton_1.htm
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.sntp.net/education/sutton_1.htm";>Skull &
Bones Society Controls Education: Yale,…</A>
-----


Skull & Bones Society: How The Order Controls Education

by Antony C. Sutton



This is taken from Antony C. Sutton's book, America's Secret Establishment:
An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones.

How The Order Controls Education

Memorandum Number One: It All Began At Yale

The first volume of this series introduced The Order, presented three
preliminary hypotheses with examples of the evidence to come.

We also asserted that any group that wanted to control the future of American
society had first to control education, i.e., the population of the future.
This volume will outline the way in which education has been controlled by
The Order.

It all began at Yale. Even the official Yale history is aware of Yale's power
and success:



"The power of the place remain(s) unmistakable. Yale was organized. Yale
inspired a loyalty in its sons that was conspicuous and impressive. Yale men
in after life made such records that the suspicion was that even there they
were working for each other. In short, Yale was exasperatingly and
mysteriously successful. To rival institutions and to academic reformers
there was something irritating and disquieting about old Yale College."

"Yale was exasperatingly and mysteriously successful," says the official
history.

And this success was more than obvious to Yale's chief competitor, Harvard
University. So obvious, in fact, that in 1892 a young Harvard instructor,
George Santanyana, went to Yale to investigate this "disturbing legend" of
Yale power. Santanyana quoted a Harvard alumnus who intended to send his son
to Yale - because in real life "all the Harvard men are working for Yale men.

But no one has previously asked an obvious question - Why? What is this "Yale
power"?

A Revolutionary Yale Trio

In the 1850s, three members of The Order left Yale and working together, at
times with other members along the way, made a revolution that changed the
face, direction and purpose of American education. It was a rapid, quiet
revolution, and eminently successful. The American people even today, in
1983, are not aware of a coup d'etat.

The revolutionary trio were:

Timothy Dwight ('49) Professor in the Yale Divinity School and then 12th
President of Yale University.

Daniel Coit Gilman ('52), first President of the University of California,
first President of the Johns Hopkins University and first President of the
Carnegie Institution.

Andrew Dickson White ('53), first President of Cornell University and first
President of the American Historical Association.

This notable trio were all initiated into The Order within a few years of
each other (1849, 1852, 1853). They immediately set off for Europe. All three
went to study philosophy at the University of Berlin, where post-Hegelian
philosophy had a monopoly.





*   Dwight studied at the Universities of Berlin and Bonn between 1856 and
1858,

*   Gilman was at the University of Berlin between 1854 and 55 under Karl von
Ritter and Friedrich Trendelenberg, both prominent "Right" Hegelians, and

*   White studied at the University of Berlin between 1856 and 1858.



Notably also at the University of Berlin in 1856 (at the Institute of
Physiology) was none other than Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental
psychology in Germany and the later source of the dozens of American Ph.D.s
who came back from Leipzig, Germany to start the modern American education
movement.

Why is the German experience so important? Because these were the formative
years, the immediate post-graduate years for these three men, the years when
they were planning the future, and at this period Germany was dominated by
the Hegelian philosophical ferment.

There were two groups of these Hegelians. The right Hegelians, were the roots
of Prussian militarism and the spring for the unification of Germany and the
rise of Hitler. Key names among right Hegelians were Karl Ritter (at the
University of Berlin where our trio studied), Baron von Bismarck, and Baron
von Stockmar, confidential adviser to Queen Victoria over in England.
Somewhat before this, Karl Theodor Dalberg (1744-1817), arch-chancellor in
the German Reich, related to Lord Acton in England and an Illuminati (Baco v
Verulam in the Illuminati code), was a right Hegelian.

There were also Left Hegelians, the promoters of scientific socialism. Most
famous of these, of course, are Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Heinrich Heine,
Max Stirner and Moses Hess.

The point to hold in mind is that both groups use Hegelian theory of the
State as a start point, i.e., the State is superior to the individual.
Prussian militarism, Naziism and Marxism have the same philosophic roots.

And it left its mark on our trio.

Gilman wrote his sister from St. Petersburg in April, 1854:

And what do you think I am "keeping' for? Tell me, some day when you write,
for every year makes me feel that I must draw nearer to a point. When I go
home to America I must have some definite notions. Day and night I think of
that time, and in all I see and do I am planning for being useful at home. I
find my wishes cling more and more towards a home in New England, and I long
for an opportunity to influence New England minds. If I am an editor, New
York is the place; but, to tell the truth, I am a little afraid of its
excitements, its politics, its money-making whirl. I look therefore more and
more to the ministry as probably the place where I can do more good than
anywhere else; that is to say, if I can have a congregation which



Daniel C. Gilman

Senior at Yale

Notice the Skull &

Bones Pin   will let me preach such things as we have talked over so many
times in our upstairs confabs. I am glad you remember those talks with
pleasure, for I look upon them as among the greatest "providences" of my
life. If ever I make anything in this world or another I shall owe it to the
blessed influences of home. For me, it seems as though new notions and wider
views of men and things were crowding upon me with wonderful rapidity, and
every day and almost every hour I think of some new things which I wish to
have accomplished in America.... I find my thoughts, unconsciously, almost,
dwelling on the applications of Christianity or the principles of the New
Testament to business, study, public education, political questions, travel,
and so forth. I had a long talk with Mr. Porter in Berlin (it was three days
long with occasional interruptions) on topics related to such as I have
named, and he assures me that there are many places in New England ripe for
the advocacy of some such views upon these questions as I have often hinted
to you at home. I toldhim a great deal about my thoughts on such things,
talking quite as freely and perhaps more fully than I have ever done with you
girls at home. He seemed exceedingly interested .... He told me that the kind
of preaching I spoke of was the kind now needed - the kind which would be
most influential of good - and on the whole he encouraged me to attempt it. I
feel more and more desirous to do so, and shall keep on, in all I see and
hear abroad, with the examination of every influence now working upon men -
churches and schools, politics and literature...

Daniel Coit Gilman is the key activist in the revolution- of education by The
Order. The Gilman family came to the United States from Norfolk, England in
1638. On his mother's side, the Coit family came from Wales to Salem,



Daniel C. Gilman in

his early 70s as

president of the

University of California    Massachusetts before 1638.

Gilman was born in Norwich, Connecticut July 8, 1831, from a family laced
with members of The Order and links to Yale College (as it was known at that
time).

Uncle Henry Coit Kingsley (The Order '34) was Treasurer of Yale from 1862 to
1886. James 1. Kingsley was Gilman's uncle and a Professor at Yale. William
M. Kingsley, a cousin, was editor of the influential journal New Englander.

On the Coit side of the family, Joshua Coit was a member of The Order in 1853
as well as William Coit in 1887.

Gilman's brother-in law, the Reverend Joseph Parrish Thompson ('38) was in
The Order.

Gilman returned from Europe in late 1855 and spent the next 14 years in New
Haven, Connecticut - almost entirely in and around Yale, consolidating the
power of The Order. His first task in 1856 was to incorporate Skull & Bones
as a legal entity under the name of The Russell Trust. Gilman became
Treasurer and William H. Russell, the cofounder, was President. It is notable
that there is no mention of The Order, Skull & Bones, The Russell Trust, or
any secret society activity in Gilman's biography, nor in open records. The
Order, so far as its members are concerned, is designed to be secret, and
apart from oneor two inconsequential slips, meaningless unless one has the
whole picture. The Order has been remarkably adept at keeping its secret. In
other words, The Order fulfills our first requirement for a conspiracy -
i.e., IT IS SECRET.

The information on The Order that we are using surfaced by accident. In a way
similar to the surfacing of the Illuminati papers in 1783, when a messenger
carrying Illuminati papers was killed and the Bavarian police found the
documents. All that exists publicly for The Order is the charter of the
Russell Trust, and that tells you nothing.

On the public record then, Gilman became assistant Librarian at Yale in the
fall of 1856 and "in October he was chosen to fill a vacancy on the New Haven
Board of Education." In 1858 he was appointed Librarian at Yale. Then he
moved to bigger tasks.

The Sheffield Scientific School

The Sheffield Scientific School, the science departments at Yale, exemplifies
the way in which The Order came to control Yale and then the United States.

In the early 1850s, Yale science was insignificant, just two or three very
small departments. In 1861 these were concentrated into the Sheffield
Scientific School with private funds from Joseph E. Sheffield. Gilman went to
work to raise more funds for expansion.

Gilman's brother had married the daughter of Chemistry Professor Benjamin
Silliman (The Order, 1837). This brought Gilman into contact with Professor
Dana, also a member of the Silliman family, and this group decided that
Gilman should write a report on reorganization of Sheffield. This was done
and entitled "Proposed Plan for the Complete Reorganization of the School of
Science Connected with Yale College."

While this plan was worked out, friends and members of The Order made moves
in Washington, D.C., and the Connecticut State Legislature to get state
funding for the Sheffield Scientific School. The Morrill Land Bill was
introduced into Congress in 1857, passed in 1859, but vetoed by President
Buchanan. It was later signed by President Lincoln. This bill, now known as
the Land Grant College Act, donated public lands for State colleges of
agriculture and sciences . . . . and of course Gilman's report on just such a
college was ready. The legal procedure was for the Federal government to
issue land scrip in proportion to a state's representation, but state
legislatures first had to pass legislation accepting the scrip. Not only was
Daniel Gilman first on the scene to get Federal land scrip, he was first
among all the states and grabbed all of Connecticut's share for Sheffield
Scientific School! Gilman had, of course, tailored his report to fit the
amount forthcoming for Connecticut. No other institution in Connecticut
received even a whisper until 1893, when Storrs Agricultural College received
a land grant.

Of course it helped that a member of The Order, Augustus Brandegee ('49), was
speaker of the Connecticut State Legislature in 1861 when the state bill was
moving through, accepting Connecticut's share for Sheffield. Other members of
The Order, like Stephen W. Kellogg ('46) and William Russell ('33), were
either in the State Legislature or had influence from past service.

The Order repeated the same grab for public funds in New York State. All of
New York's share of the Land Grant College Act went to Cornell University.
Andrew Dickson White, a member of our trio, was the key activist in New York
and later became first President of Cornell. Daniel Gilman was rewarded by
Yale and became Professor of Physical Geography at Sheffield in 1863.

In brief, The Order was able to corner the total state shares for Connecticut
and New York, cutting out other scholastic institutions. This is the first
example of scores we shall present in this series - how The Order uses public
funds for its own objectives.

And this, of course, is the great advantage of Hegel for an elite. The State
is absolute. But the State is also a fiction. So if The Order can manipulate
the State, it in effect becomes the absolute. A neat game. And like the
Hegelian dialectic process we cited in the first volume, The Order has worked
it like a charm.

Back to Sheffield Scientific School. The Order now had funds for Sheffield
and proceeded to consolidate its control. In February 1871 the School was
incorporated and the following became trustees:

Charles J. Sheffield

Prof. G.J. Brush (Gilman's close friend)

Daniel Coit Gilman (The Order, '52)

W.T. Trowbridge

John S. Beach (The Order, '39)

William W. Phelps (The Order, '60)

Out of six trustees, three were in The Order. In addition, George St. John
Sheffield, son of the benefactor, was initiated in 1863, and the first Dean
of Sheffield was J.A. Porter, also the first member of Scroll & Key (the
supposedly competitive senior society at Yale).

How The Order Came To Control Yale University

>From Sheffieli Scientific School The Order broadened its horizons.

The Order's control over all Yale was evident by the 1870s, even under the
administration of Noah Porter (1871-1881), who was not a member. In the
decades after the 1870s, The Order tightened its grip. The Iconoclast
(October 13, 1873) summarizes the facts we have presented on control of Yale
by The Order, without being fully aware of the details:



"They have obtained control of Yale. Its business is performed by them. Money
paid to the college must pass into their hands, and be subject to their will.
No doubt they are worthy men in themselves, but the many whom they looked
down upon while in college, cannot so far forget as to give money freely into
their hands. Men in Wall Street complain that the college comes straight to
them for help, instead of asking each graduate for his share. The reason is
found in a remark made by one of Yale's and America's first men: 'Few will
give but Bones men, and they care far more for their society than they do for
the college.' The Woolsey Fund has but a struggling existence, for kindred
reasons."

"Here, then, appears the true reason for Yale's poverty. She is controlled by
a few men who shut themselves off from others, and assume to be their
superiors . . ."

The anonymous writer of Iconoclast blames The Order for the poverty of Yale.
But worse was to come. Then-President Noah Porter was the last of the
clerical Presidents of Yale (1871-1881), and the last without either
membership or family connections to The Order.

After 1871 the Yale Presidency became almost a fiefdom for The Order.

>From 1886 to 1899, member Timothy Dwight ('49) was President, followed by
another member of The Order, Arthur Twining Hadley (1899 to 1921). Then came
James R. Angell (1921-37), not a member of The Order, who came to Yale from
the University of Chicago where he worked with Dewey, built the School of
Education, and was past President of the American Psychological Association.

>From 1937 to 1950 Charles Seymour, a member of The Order, was President
followed by Alfred Whitney Griswold from 1950 to 1963. Griswold was not a
member, but both the Griswold and Whitney families have members in The Order.
For example, Dwight Torrey Griswold ('08) and William Edward Schenk Griswold
('99) were in The Order. In 1963 Kingman Brewster took over as President. The
Brewster family has had several members in The Order, in law and the ministry
rather than education.

We can best conclude this memorandum with a quotation from the anonymous Yale
observer:



"Whatever want the college suffers, whatever is lacking in her educational
course, whatever disgrace lies in her poor buildings, whatever embarrassments
have beset her needy students, so far as money could have availed, the weight
of blame lies upon this ill-starred society. The pecuniary question is one of
the future as well as of the present and past. Year by year the deadly evil
is growing. The society was never as obnoxious to the college as it is today,
and it is just this ill-feeling that shuts the pockets of nonmembers. Never
before has it shown such arrogance and self-fancied superiority. It grasps
the College Press and endeavors to rule in all. It does not deign to show its
credentials, but clutches at power with the silence of conscious guilt."

It is very important to understand the change in philosophy which occurred in
the mid-to-late 1800s. Previously religion had largely controlled the
direction of societies, often with direct association with governments. The
State had a notorious history in Europe of backing a specific religion,
promoting it to the exclusion of all others, and oppressing the rest. The
1800s marked a point in history where thinking men correctly saw the problems
religion had where it aligned with the State and exerted force over thought
and behavior.

The reaction against the previous tendency of religion, metaphysics and
philosophy was the complete support of "science". Results and responses have
taken the form of humanism, atheism, pragmatsim, egalitarianism, and other
philosophies which tend to deny Man as anything more than a fancy animal. It
may seem that it is a case of either the correctness of "religion" or the
validity of "science". The use of religion was wrong and destructive and the
use of science (as applied to human beings and societies) is equally wrong
and destructive. What they both have in common is the use of the State to
forward and enforce upon the people an arbitrary belief system about the
nature of Man, and his relationship to others and to the universe around him.

People should granted the right to accept and believe whatever they choose,
and this applies to religion and to the products of what is called modern
science. But this is impossible when modern governments support, promote and
enforce modern psychiatric and psychological theories on their people. The
views of modern "scientific" psychiatry and psychology are the result of a
belief system which conceives Man as an indiviudal to be unimportant, and
"society" to be everything. These subjects also view Man as an "animal",
solely biological in nature, and ignore Man's entire "mental" realm. The
underlying beliefs and assumptions of these two subjects (along with the
entire trend of "modern science") consider man to be an animal, a biological
organism alone, with no awareness or consciousness. Man is to be controlled
using behaviorism, belief manipulation (through education and the media),
genetics, electric shock, drugs and microchip brain implants (the future of
psychiatry and social control).

See Materialism & Psychiatry Function As Ideologies and Orthodoxy.

Many of these wealthy and well-educated folks really believed they were at
the dawn of a new wonderful age where science and reason would finally solve
the many questions about Man and his activities. Largely, their intentions,
in part, may even have been lofty, but something very much went wrong.
"Science" did not solve the problems, and in fact, is acting to cause more
and more problems as regards Man and his societies. There is a reason for
this.

Science has largely been a success when applied to "dead" things such as
matter and energy - electronics, mechanics, civil engineering, physics and
chemistry. It has been a complete failure when applied to individuals (i.e.
psychiatry, modern psychology) and societies (sociology, group psychology,
mass manipulation, behavioral control). While this is covered fully in other
sections, this is due to the fact that Man is and functions primarily as a
mind. Each and every one of us has a mind which directs attention, imagines,
conceptualizes, intends, desires, chooses, and it is within a mind alone
where all responsibility, self-determinsim, creativity, morality, and decency
originate. "Science" has NEVER examined this with a goal to understanding it,
or developing ways to improve upon it's capabilities. The "science" of modern
psychology has nothing to do with a mind, understanding it, or improving it.
See the Definition of Psychology for more on this.

Instead, "science", working with governments and "advertizers" have primarily
spent all their time and energy figuring out how to control and manipulate
minds, to forward their ideas of "order", "social harmony", and "peace". The
current wealthy world controllers probably largely believe they are doing
what is right, because they accept these basic ideas:

1) Man is of the nature of matter completely - denies all aspects and
functions of Man's mind.

2) All life and social structure is evolving due to force against force
(Hegel's dialectic).

3) The individual is a cog in the wheel of the all-important social machine.

4) "Science" and reason applied to Man will solve the "problem" of Man. It
will seem to do this, at least in a very distorted sense, as long as they
resort to force (which is all they ever do) - drugs, shock treatments,
trickery, deceit, disinformation, guns and oppression. It is common today to
believe social "order" and "harmony" to be desireable. Most of us do. The
concepts of "order" and "harmony" have their source in observations of matter
and energy - atoms, molecules, the solar system, and organic structures and
functioning - or in analysing pure concepts, such as mathematics and logic.

But a mind isn't of the nature of matter, doesn't follow the rules of matter
(unless forced to), is the originator of all concepts, and it is basically a
dumb idea to consider or believe the concepts that people should be "in
harmony" or "well-ordered". What do these terms even actually mean? Really!
Try to write down what these concepts mean - no two people will agree. These
terms are extremely vague concepts, and nothing more. "Order" and "harmony"
may be fine for atoms, your living room furniture, or a china cabinet, but it
is an insane analogy when forced upon conscious, living beings and societies.

The above assumptions are all false. These are ideas and concepts, which are
really only cute theories about Man and life. They are not fundamentally
true. They are believed and accepted by certain elitists (and many others).
They are often very complex, and seem very "intelligent" (both the concepts
and the elitists). That these theories had their source in and continue to be
presented by the "best colleges" and universities, such as Harvard, Yale,
Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Princeton, etc. simply goes to show 1) how lacking in
honesty and intelligence "intelligent" people actually can be, and 2) that
the views and beliefs of these major educational institutions have been
controlled for at least 100 years by people who find these ideas useful for
their own purposes.

For a more involved study of Man, what he is, belief, reality and force, see
An Essay On Reality, Belief and The Mind.

It may be all a conspiracy, it may be only ill-informed people (which no
secret plans or designs) continuing to propagate false theories and concepts,
or it may be somewhere in between these two extremes. Regardless, the results
have been disastrous on people and society.

The best in Man has been systematically denied, and is being eradicated by
the theories and practices of modern psychology and psychiatry. Education has
been largely destroyed. Man's ability to think has also been further
compromised by attacking it with "legal" psychiatric drugs and illegal drugs.
As long as you are looked at as a cog in the larger, and more important,
State machinery, you will be ignored, oppressed, and harmed. There is no
"good" communism, socialism, fascism, capitalism, or any "ism" when the State
is viewed as senior in importance to the individual which makes it up and
where any type of force is used to enact anything. They all, every time, and
in every case, will act to control and deny the individual. And this always
involves denying and attempting to control Man's inherent nature and
abilities - all of which reside within the mind. Coupled with materialism,
which basically considers man to be an animal and ignores his mind entirely,
this is a lethal combination.

Past religions, which aligned with the State, oppressed Man and his mind, and
modern "scientific" psychological and social theories, which correctly
attacked the past tendencies of religions, have severely erred, and are now
doing exactly the same thing - oppressing Man and his mind. They are playing
the same game. There is no conflict of "religion" versus "science". It's all
an illusion. In fact, they have been both, practically speaking, entirely
materialistic - forcing Man further away from his capabilities as a conscious
mind, and only towards his biological, animal nature. If Man is treated like
an animal he will act like one - just like so many goats or cows to be bred,
herded, controlled, and brought to slaughter. Modern theories and practices
do exactly this. But if Man is treated like a mind, with intelligence,
intention, creativity, responsibility, morality and decency, then he will
come to display these things.

This has never been done in the history of planet Earth, except in small
isolated cases. The educated elite say they have studied Man in all his past
forms, and know what he is and how to "help" Man evolve. It's rubbish. They
have studied Man only at his worse, under the worse circumstances, and always
under direct force or the threat of force. By omitting Man's mind, all it is,
and all it does, they take right out of the equation what makes Man different
from all other life forms. What makes him "better". What makes him
responsible, able to be moral, creative, and intelligent. They deny his
awareness and consciousness. Denying this denies all decency and life itself.
This is the 20th century. This is the results of "modern physical sciences"
as applied to the individual and groups, when Man is conceived to be nothing
more than a biological beast. It is soon to be the 21st century unless many
of us wake up real fast and do something about it.



Get The Book!



America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
by Antony C. Sutton - the complete book with more details & facts about the
hidden forces behind modern public education, psychology, economics, politics
and world chaos. Covers Yale University's link to a secret German society,
the Bush Family (i.e. George), and much more. Very well reserached and
written.

Suggested Reading List - the Demise of the Educational System - OBE
(Outcome-Based Education), NEA (National Education Association), educational
psychology, German psychology & influences, demise of public education,
educational sabotage, Wundt, Pavlov, Dewey, Skinner, Watson.

Say NO To Psychiatry!

Back to Education Main Page

Back to Main SNTP Page

Pursuing Truth in all subjects...

©Gene Zimmer 1999 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDvvtfzgALL, vvtsutton02, say no to
psychiatry, FTR, Foundation for Truth in Reality
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to