-Caveat Lector-

Corporate rule

Democracy is in hock to an idea of economic and technical progress
that ignores people's true concerns

Special report: globalisation

Zac Goldsmith
Wednesday April 18, 2001
The Guardian

On the big issues of the day, three virtually identical political
parties will be competing at the forthcoming general election. There
are, of course, differences between them. But we live in an age of
dangerous consensus, in which every mainstream party supports the
same model of deregulated corporate economics that renders their
differences virtually irrelevant.

All, for instance, regard attracting "foreign direct investment" as a
prime economic goal, and it is through flirting with big business
that they hope to achieve it. Yet just 100 companies control more
than a third of all such investments, with the result that we are
experiencing a global "race to the bottom" - a lowering of every
conceivable standard in an international contest for corporate
affections. What we are seeing, in fact, is the hijacking of
democracy by business - and one result is the death of choice for us
all.

Such globalisation centralises power in the hands of vast
multinational companies which increasingly dominate politics. It is
this system which homogenises cultures and places, kills off local
businesses, leads to increased traffic and pollution as its goods are
transported across the world, destroys local democracy, and ravages
the environment.

Yet nowhere in the electoral debates will we see discussion or even
acknowledgement of the biggest problems that confront us today. The
future of the environment, for example, will merit barely a whisper.
Climate change, pollution, the cancer epidemic, the centralisation of
economic power by fewer and fewer corporations, the death of the high
street: these are issues that confront ordinary people every day, yet
politicians rarely mention them.

Why? Probably because to do so would necessitate an examination of
the root causes - the global economic system that all parties
unquestioningly support.

Last weekend the Guardian released some of the results of a sweeping
opinion poll commissioned by the Ecologist magazine. Combined, the
results are astonishing, and will shock our political leaders. A
striking pattern emerged. For one only had to wonder how each of the
main political parties would respond to the questions asked to
understand how very wide has the gulf between politicians and the
public become. The people have spotted this - and they are way ahead
of the politicians.

Most people (87%), for instance, would like to see measures applied
which would protect small producers from corporate predators - a
practice that is currently illegal under the rules of the World Trade
Organisation, which all three parties endorse.

A huge majority of respondents (89%) would prefer to buy British food
if it were available - which is at odds with the political consensus
that increased international trade is our nation's primary objective.

Almost half of all respondents (49%) believe advances in science and
technology will harm more than they will benefit society - a view at
odds with the government's massive investment in biotechnology and
obsession with technological "progress".

On other issues, too, the public want action taken that no major
party seems prepared to deliver. For instance, 77% believe there is a
clear link between the devastating floods last year and climate
change. To that end, 61% believe our money should be spent on
alternatives to roads, and 72% believe the rail networks should be
renationalised.

Yet this, too, fails to match up to the policies of either Labour or
the Conservatives, the former having pledged to invest less into
renewable energies than it recently invested into a single giant
incinerator.

Asked if the government should spend more on researching organic
agriculture than it spends on biotechnology, 66% agreed. Only 7% felt
biotechnology should receive more. As things stand today, organic
food research is allocated a mere 2% of the total budget, while
biotechnology receives 30%. Furthermore, nearly half (45%) of those
questioned want a complete ban on the import, testing and sale of all
genetically modified products.

What is also clear from these results is the astonishing lack of
trust with which people view their leaders. More than half (54%)
would like to see an end to the corporate purchase of our political
system. Still more (72%) do not believe the government when it
assures the public that something is safe. And 73% would like to
remove big decision-making from government altogether, with the use
of national referendums.

This is not the picture of a people satisfied with the manner in
which their taxes are being spent and their futures dictated, but
rather a public with a healthy scepticism towards politicians,
corporations and even the current definition of "progress". Rather,
it is a picture of a public that cares a lot about issues that don't
even appear on the radar screens of most politicians - and a public
that wants something done about them.

• Zac Goldsmith is editor of the Ecologist magazine

www.theecologist.org


Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001



http://www.guardian.co.uk/globalisation/story/0,7369,474432,00.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to