Note this item in 1993 the bomb went off very close to the vault in
which it was said an amount exceeding a billion dollars, was on deposit
- many different bankers involved.
Used to be in ancient days (and I will send item on this) temples were
looted for the Gold - look at the pyramids.
Now this is conspiracy list right? What if like the Brinks job the
goal it to steal the gold at the bottom of these Temples? There are
twelve Federal Reserve Districts in the United States - maybe even
representing the 12 tribes, if set up on masonic keys.
The pyramid on the dollar bill with the ever vigilant (and I am question
this ever vigilant) eye? All speaks to Temples of Mannon.....
It is said you cannot serve God and Mannon therefore the dollar bill is
a paradox unto itself - In God We Trust?
This thing with John Gotti - and a dead body found in the lot also makes
me wonder - the billions of dollars in contracts when in fact there is a
Contract on America.
Under subect matter you can get the lay of the land from the tunnels,
etc., to the gold buried.....was this the reason the World Trade Center
was downed? And we know the Pentagon holds so many treasures some of
which I saw way back when my relative served on Joint Chief but they
have billions in diamonds.
So who knows and who holds the key to the small Kingdom known once, as
the great World Trade Center - and why this need to call them the Twin
Towers - ominous warnings but this masonic stuff I always find
fascinating.
Gold at feet of Temples of Mannon? How many people knew of this gold
and why is there so little concern re same...is there a gigantic plot to
rob this site or has it already been sacked.
Here is item dating way back - maybe Doomsdayers got their revenge for
this, is the year of the Millennium, not last year.
Just a few thoughts - for after all the love of money is the root of all
evil or is it the lack of money? That bible one day I started counting
up some of the gold and hey even Jerry Falwell refers to gold, etc., in
the Liberty Bible and we are now going through the days of Jerimiah and
Isaiah we are almost through - but the days grow short and it is the
Hunter chasing the Scorpion - after the attack.....said Scorpion always
just out of reach of the Hunter - for it was planned this way, they are
never on the same stage together (or are they from time to time and we
do not know it).
So who is Mr. Big it is Mammon who rules in this world - right?
Am reproducing one item and other if you want info on the gold, check
under subject matter.
Who has keyes to this kingdom?
Saba
THE KORAN
AND
THE KAFIR
- A. GHOSH -
CHAPTER 12
IMPERIALISM IN THE GARB OF ICONOCLASM
Islam's injunctions to its followers to destroy and insult the other
religions are well-known. Churches and synagogues in Southern Europe and
Middle Eastern countries that have been desecrated by the Moslems in the
name of Islam are too many to cite.
The story did not change in the case of the subcontinent of India
either. Their houses of worship were destroyed, desecrated, the deities
stolen and carried away to be ground to dust or placed below the steps
leading to mosques to be trod upon by Moslem pilgrims. the idea has been
to insult the kafirs.
Of late the followers of Islam seem to have a second thought on the
pheonomenon. A new breed has appeared on the scene who can be called
apologists or public relations men for Islam. In the early days, Islam
did not need any apologists.
Anything done in the name of Islam was already justified and there was
no room for any guilt complex. When Aurangzib executed the sufi holy man
Sarmad, he knew that no apologies were required. When he tortured the
mullahs that had advised his son to rebel against the father, Aurangzib
was certain that no apologies were needed.
But times have changed and people dc think on their own, more so among
non-Moslems. Among the Moslems, however, free thinking is taboo, where
Islam is concerned. This explains why this religion did not have any
reformers or thinkers to purify the creed as human civilization
progressed. Whatever was supposed to have been said by the prophet more
than a thousand years ago is supposed to hold good today in its
entirety.
One such apologist of Islam writes in his 'The Life and Times of Sultan
Mahmud of Ghazna': "The critics who accuse the Sultan of wanton
bloodshed and reckless spoliation of Hindu temples forget that these
so-called barbarities were committed in the course of legitimate
warfare, when such acts were sanctioned by the practice of all the great
conquerors of the world.
***********
Spoils captured from a defeated enemy have always been considered lawful
property of the victorious army.
*************
In India, however, wealth was accumulated not only in the coffers of the
kings, as in other countries, but also in the vaults of the temples,
which were consecrated in the service of various deities.
The consequence was that, while elsewhere the capture of the defeated
monarch's treasury usually gratified the conqueror's lust for Mammon, in
India temples were also ransacked to secure the piles of gold and
precious stones In fume. The religious considerations rarely carry
weight with a conqueror, and the Sultan does not appear to have been
nfluenced by them in his schemes of conquest".
Quite clearly the apologist calls a simple but ferocious raider a
conqueror. A raider raids and goes away but a conqueror adds to the
conquered country's new system of government, commerce and industry.
William the Conqueror, Napoleon, Alexander the Great were conquerors who
contributed considerable developments to the conquered countries. Not so
with Islamic conquerors. They built mosques on top of the destroyed
temples. They violated the women, took slaves, killed noncombattants.
The breed of Islamic raiders cannot be called conquerors in the true
sense of the word. They were grabbers and could not grow anything
themselves. The spirit of robbery, greed, intolerance toward people of
other faiths, characterize these raiders as a special breed of people
and time has come to look upon them as such and take proper precautions
before it is too late.
All non-Moslems have been extremely tolerant toward the Moslems. The
offending mosques built on the foundations of destroyed temples, have
been allowed to remain and the Hindus have built new temples near by for
a Hindu is reluctant to destroy the house of worship of anyone.
Unfortunately, such behavior is translated by many Moslems as proven
super~or~ty of their religion.
They can destroy someone else's house of worship but others cannot do
the same to theirs.
During the Pakistani attack on East Pakistan's Hindus, they destroyed
many Hindu temples. It was not to rob the vaults of the temples but to
spite the kafirs and prove the superiority of Islam. The inherent
difference between Islam as a religion and any other religion is to be
recognized. It is the behavior of the Moslem and his holy book that can
provide the key to the Moslem psyche and his attitude to the non-Moslem
world.
The attack on the kafir's religion has not been limited to physical
demolition of the non-Moslem edifices only. The onslaught has been
carried out at the spiritual level as well. The gods and goddesses of
the kafirs have been vilified in grossest terms by the exponents of
Islam. The editor of the Moslem Daily 'Morning News' of Calcutta once
wrote a leading article on Lord Krishna, the Hindu God of preservation.
Krishna was described as 'the Gay Lothario of Vrindaban' alluding to so
called amorous associations between Krishna and the girls from many
cow-herds' families.
The not so informed Moslem editor did not bother to find out that the
escapades he referred to could not be possible for Krishna was only
twelve year old at the time. How precocious can a twelve year old be?
Take the case of Jesus Christ for instance. The greatness of Christ lies
in his gentleness. His advice to turn the other cheek is the epitome of
Christian behavior.
But Khomeini of Iran has announced, on more than one occasion, in his
speeches to the believers, that the Christians are erroneous in
attributing these qualities to Jesus Christ. Christ, according to
Khomeini, could never have advised to turn the other cheek for no true
prophet is foolish enough to say such a thing. This was all concocted by
the imperialist and Satanic infidels of Europe and America to subjugate
the peoples of other lands.
The Moslems on the other hand cannot tolerate it if anyone doubts the
words and deeds of their prophet, finds his moral behavior objectionable
vis-'a-vis women or his words irreconcitable to his deeds, etc. If
anyone expresses doubt on Mohammed's climbing to Islam's paradise on the
back of the winged horse called Barq, then it becomes a blasphemy.
The Moslem blames everyone for some kind of idolatry The Hindus have
their gods and goddesses from a big pantheon of deities. The Christians
have their trinity and they call Jesus the son of God. To a Moslem these
are sacrilegeous attributes.
But when it comes to adoring the hair of the prophet which is said to be
stored in the Hazratbal mosque in Kashmir then it is all right. No one
can call it idolatry then!
But for a Buddhist to show his veneration in front of the temple in
Ceylon that houses the toe-nails of Buddha, is 'kufr'.
Naturally, it becomes very difficult to comprehend the psychology of the
followers of Islam in these days of logic and reason.
<<< Chapter 11
Index Page
Chapter 13 >>>
© 2001 Sword of Truth. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/World_Trade_Center
