-Caveat Lector-

G8 Owes Us An Answer
 New Research Shows That Economic Growth Worldwide Has Actually Slowed
 During The Era of Globalization
 by Jonathan Steele

 The G8 summit in Genoa will be remembered for its police brutality and the
clashes, mostly peaceful
 but sometimes violent, between protesters and the Italian security forces.

 Yet, paradoxically, on one issue most demonstrators were united with the rich
nations' leaders. In
 the streets as well as the suites there was a general belief that globalization
has accelerated the
 world's economic growth.

 Some protesters argued that the growth has been grotesquely uneven, with little
trickling down to
 Africa. Some said it has increased the inequalities of income within countries,
as well as between
 poor and rich ones. Some attacked the fact that faster growth has been
environmentally unsound,
 creating excessive carbon emissions and destroying natural habitats.

 While the criticisms vary, the underlying assumption is that overall economic
growth has been
 speeding up. This was also the message proclaimed by the UN development
program, which
 published its annual human development report on the eve of Genoa.

 "Thirty years of impressive progress," it trumpeted. "Too few people recognize
that the impressive
 gains in the developing world in the past 30 years demonstrate the possibility
of eradicating
 poverty."

 It was the UNDP which first elaborated the concept of a human development index
as a progressive
 step away from assessing people's welfare purely by income measurements. The
UNDP added other
 standards such as infant mortality, literacy, and gender empowerment.

 So it is surprising that its latest report should also push the complacent line
about general growth.
 How did its authors decide that the last 30 years is the right period for
assessing progress?

 In a powerful new paper, The Emperor Has No Growth, a group of researchers in
Washington
 challenges the conventional view of history. They have drawn up a globalization
scorecard which
 compares the period from 1980 to 2000 - the era of Reaganite neo-liberal
globalization when the
 drive for capital deregulation, privatization, and the lifting of barriers to
international investment
 was at its height - with the period from 1960 to 1980 when most developing
countries had a more
 restrictive and inward-looking economy.

 The comparison is dramatic. The researchers took all the UNDP's indicators and
found that between
 1980 and 2000 there was "a very clear decline in progress". The poorest
countries went from a per
 capita growth rate of 1.9% annually in the 1960-1980 period to a decline of
0.5% a year between 1980
 and 2000. The middle group of countries did worse, dropping from annual growth
of 3.6% to growth
 of just under 1% after 1980. The world's richest countries also showed a
slowdown.

 For life expectancy, the picture was similar. Only the richest countries showed
a higher rate of
 improvement in the past 20 years. Among middle-income and poor countries
progress in reducing
 child mortality and raising school enrollments was faster before 1980.

 Impressive though their evidence is, the paper's authors draw deliberately
modest conclusions.
 They say they cannot prove the liberalization of trade and capital flows has
caused the decline in
 progress.

 Nor can they link it to particular policy prescriptions by the International
Monetary Fund and the
 World Bank, such as public spending cuts, user fees for health and education,
and increased
 foreign exchange requirements. But they do insist the burden of proof must be
squarely placed on
 those who claim success for the neo-liberal experiment.

 Their call is welcome. It chimes in with the views of other non-governmental
organizations, such as
 the British-based World Development Movement, as well as many developing
countries'
 governments.

 The G8 wants the next big push for its version of globalization to come in
November when the
 World Trade Organization is due to meet in Qatar. After Genoa, Clare Short,
Britain's development
 minister, used the unworthy tactic of trying to dismiss the protesters as
middle-class European
 interferers in contrast to informed African leaders.

 She seemed unaware that on the eve of Genoa, 30 African countries, including
the regional giants
 South Africa and Nigeria, signed a declaration in Addis Ababa rejecting new
powers for the WTO.

 They also called for existing trade agreements to be implemented fully rather
than in their partial
 form, which discriminates in favor of the EU and other rich countries. Their
position has more
 support from the developmental NGOs than from the G8. So let us have a bit more
humble pie from
 the G8, and an honest review of the reasons for their poor record on growth and
social progress
 before they plunge further into error.

 • The Emperor Has No Growth, Center for Economic and Policy Research, available
at
 www.cepr.net

 • If it's broke, fix it, available from the World Development Movement at
www.wdm.org.uk

                   Copyright 2001 Guardian Newspapers Limited

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to