-Caveat Lector-

Front Page
http://www.atimes.com

IRAQ AND AL-QAEDA
Why al-Qaeda votes Bush
By Pepe Escobar

Sheikh Terror are the new underground sensation in ever-swingin' London. Their
rap video called "The Dirty Infidels" has been sent by e-mail to the
Arab-language newspaper al-Sharq al-Awsat. The paper says the video - unlikely
to end up on MTV - may have been produced in a London studio by young, radical
Muslims, but mosque talk in London and northern England has attributed it to ...
al-Qaeda. Sheikh Terror rap in favor of the "fight against the infidels", praise
Osama bin Laden and ask for British Prime Minister Tony Blair to be "burned",
while images switch from September 11 to shots of George W Bush, President
General Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and a Russian
soldier executed by a Chechen guerrilla with a Kalashnikov.

Bin Laden may not be cornering the rap market just yet, but this only goes to
show how the al-Qaeda brand has taken in the collective consciousness of many. A
few months ago, the Rand Corp - a think-tank sympathetic to the US
industrial-military complex that boasts Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as one of
its former directors - published an analysis of al-Qaeda by Bruce Hoffman. This
was the heart of the system debating whether al-Qaeda was a concept or a virus;
an army or an ideology. The author compared al-Qaeda to a bunch of fast, easily
adaptable sharks. In essence, al-Qaeda was defined as an indestructible enemy
because it's impossible to circumscribe it precisely. By describing the threat
as inexorable, the Rand Corp could then justify relentless, inexorable
repression.

This is the way in which the Bush administration also sees it. But is pure
repression working against an al-Qaeda now configured as a mutant virus - a
constellation of autonomous cells constantly morphing into new shapes and
tactics?

It's no secret for anyone following Islamist movements that since the early
1980s in Pakistan, bin Laden has been instrumentalized by the real masters of
what would become al-Qaeda. These were the key operatives at the Maktab
al-Khidamat in Peshawar: Egyptians from the Muslim Brotherhood, Saudis and
Kuwaitis such as Ayman al-Zawahiri, Mohamed Atef, Abu Zubaida, Suleyman Abu
Graith and Sayf al-Adl. These people were all inspired by the most extreme
ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood: Sayyed Qotb. Their ultimate objective was
to provoke a fissure between the Muslim world and the West, and then recapture
power in Islamic lands. Previous experiments had been a total failure - as in
Egypt - or a partial failure - as in Sudan. This until Pakistan-Afghanistan in
the early 1980s became the perfect platform, with Osama - flush with money and
charisma - incarnating the perfect marriage of medium and message.

These people were all Sunni Muslims. Suicide bombing was never welcomed by Sunni
Islam. But it was very much part of the Shi'ite cult of martyrdom. Shi'ites
sanction suicide because it represents expiation for the martyrdom of the first
Shi'ite imams. Hezbollah in Lebanon used suicide bombing with great success to
force the departure of the Israeli occupation force. Suicide bombing then became
popular with the Palestinian struggle and all over the Sunni world. But as the
years rolled by there was still an infinite abyss to close. Palestinians
fighting an occupier who reduced their lives to hell needed no lecture to become
suicide bombers. But what about educated Muslims living in comfort - how do they
choose to die for a symbol and for a goal that may never materialize?

It's a testimony to the level of Islamic rage against the West that al-Qaeda
managed to steer this large-scale conversion. September 11, 2001 - with its
small army of aerial suicide bombers - indeed turned history upside down. But
then the whole US intelligence matrix simply could not admit that the country
had been struck by a small sect - and not by a sinister, global multinational
with unlimited reach.

The al-Qaeda myth

Alain Chouet, a high-level expert at the French Ministry of Defense, is one
among many to sustain that this is how the al-Qaeda myth was born - encouraged
by the Bush administration spin machine and fully embraced, for the opposite
reasons, by the Arab-Muslim world. But now there's a different situation: as
Chouet puts it: "Bin Laden only existed by the interaction between his
personality and the al-Qaeda capacity of being a nuisance." With the Taliban out
of power in Afghanistan, but now plotting a comeback, and most of al-Qaeda's
leaders captured or killed, what happens to bin Laden is now largely irrelevant.

The looming big issue in Afghanistan and Pakistan is the spring offensive
planned by the Pentagon to capture bin Laden, al-Zawahiri and the remaining
al-Qaeda leadership in the tribal areas of Pakistan, most probably Waziristan,
where they are thought to be hiding. Asia Times Online has identified extreme
skepticism about the operation, in Europe as well as in South Asia. For the Bush
administration, as well as for Musharraf's government, the current status quo is
the best option. If bin Laden is killed, he instantly becomes a martyr - and
mini-bin Ladens, post-bin Ladens and crypto-bin Ladens will pop up like
mushrooms all over Islam. This would also mean the end of the "war on terror",
which is the Bushite passport for global intervention. If bin Laden is captured
alive, like Saddam Hussein, he has to be judged: a trial would not only enhance
his charisma, but reveal the explosive convergence of objectives between
successive US administrations, the Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence and
so-called radical Islam.

Alain Chouet maintains that since September 11, only 30 percent of all attacks
and suicide bombings - invariably attributed by the Bush administration to
al-Qaeda - "can be really linked to the activity of debris of al-Qaeda". So the
bulk of what is defined as "international terrorism" is now in fact linked to
"the internal context of the country where the attacks take place, and nothing
links them to al-Qaeda". The targets may be international, as in Iraq, but the
motivation and the objectives are local: in the case of Iraq, the end of the
occupation by any means necessary. The attackers or suicide bombers may be
radical Islamists, but they have nothing to do with Islam and don't even relate
their actions to Islam.

Many in the European intelligence community now agree: political violence in the
Arab-Muslim world has entered a new phase. It has nothing to do with Islam as a
whole. It has nothing to do with a common threat. It has nothing to do with a
messianic project. But it has everything to do with unresolved, and strictly
local, political, economical and social problems. That's the case in Iraq: a
nationalist movement fighting foreign occupation, just like Palestinians
fighting Ariel Sharon's Israel.

Al-Qaeda may have given the neo-conservatives in the Bush administration the
perfect motive for bombing Afghanistan and then invading Iraq. But even
seriously disabled, al-Qaeda benefits enormously, although not directly. The
fact is that the US military machine now rules over more than 50 million Muslims
in Afghanistan and Iraq. Untold numbers are turning to a myriad Islamist
radicals groups and sub-groups all over the Muslim world - which they identify
as the only force, although incoherent, capable of at least facing and
demoralizing bit by bit the American empire.

As for a weakened, disabled al-Qaeda, it is definitely voting Bush next
November. Al-Qaeda wants the Iraq occupation to be prolonged, with or without a
puppet government: there could not be a better advertisement for rallying
Muslims against the arrogance of the West. Al-Qaeda's and the Bush
administration's future are interlocked anyway. European intelligence sources
confirm that al-Qaeda has no capability of carrying out a major terrorist attack
on US soil remotely similar to September 11. This hypothetical attack would
certainly generate a strong backlash against the Bushite regime for being unable
to prevent it. But al-Qaeda could certainly organize something like a
small-scale suicide bombing in New York, Washington or Miami during the
presidential campaign, with a few American casualties. This would be like help
from above for the Bushites.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for information on our sales and syndication policies.)

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to