Re: [CTRL] Snvel snivel was Re: Echoes from the Past

1998-12-29 Thread Teo1000

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/28/98 11:52:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 you seem to be stuck on dealing with the symptoms rather than the problem.
 comparable to putting a band-aid on a car wreck. you are right but you
 could be righter. your stand seems to subtract from the greater issues and
 irregardless of where you stand on this, you should be aware of who you
 are standing next to and mindful of whose company your opinions are
 keeping with. you are mostly right but there is a more central position.

 a warier eye

 chris 

My problem is perhaps jumping the gun too much when I see people making stupid
comments in support of someone about which they know nothing and refuse to see
the truth.  People can label me all they want, but I am not a right winger,
not racist, not any of the things mentioned above.  I don't give a crap what
people label me as.  I just can't stand stupidity and sycophantic support.  A
more central view is one that would condemn all of this activity on all sides
as I MOST DEFINITELY do.  Much of what Jerry had to say, was probably correct
in someone's viewpoint but I tend to just go after the stupidity.  I can
certainly get a handle on the idea that right wing radicals were behind the
60's "Jim Crow south", it is a fair characterization.  It would also be a fair
characterization to say that it was the "liberals" who did something to change
that sorry state of affairs.  BUT and here is the big issue for me. . .IT IS
SHEER LUNACY to automatically support and sustain people simply because of
idiotic notions of political parties and so-called social agenda BECAUSE some
liberals were racist, and some radical right wing types were not.  This is
just one example, of many I could mention.  Closer to this issue is; Why do
the supporters of Clinton continue to support him in light of all of the evil
surrounding him?  ALSO; Why do so many who want to see him hang concentrate so
much on the stupid issues of lying and sex charges and not on the real issues
(in effect toting the Republican party line)?  I am not a republican, and I
support no agenda, sometimes I just respond too quickly to ridiculous and
stupid comments from ass kissing idiots.
Republicans are no better.  Why don't we have referendum to remove all the
assholes right now?  Why aren't we pushing for in depth investigations on all
of the traitors and treasonous scum who are in office right now (of which a
majority are probably REPUBLICAN, if for no other reason than that they are
the majority in office at this time, but more probably due to the fact that
most democrats are in reality republican in philosophy, bearing in mind that
these characterizations "republican" and "democrat" are just ways of
describing a stereotypical philosophical viewpoint and in no way correspond to
reality)?  Why aren't the Hyde's and the Livingston's dragged screaming out
into the light as well?  There are agendae here that is a certainty and some
radical right wingers are definitely after Clinton.  That bothers me.  I would
like to tackle one problem at a time please.  Let us get rid of Clinton, a
person we very definitely have the goods on, THEN we can start again and go
down the list till we get rid of all the mother***kers in office.
In the end result though, nothing will happen and it will be business as
usual, and really what good will it do to have Clinon removed?  I am a big
"principle" man, but I am also growing weary of this crap too.
Does that clear things up about my position?
Teo1000

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] (no subject)

1998-12-29 Thread Agent Smiley

 -Caveat Lector-

 A HREF="A:\disgrace.htm"Click here: A:\disgrace.htm/A

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] (no subject)

1998-12-29 Thread Agent Smiley




From: Ben Masel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs
Date: 09 Jun 93 16:58 PDT
Subject: 4th Amendment Card
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

During the 6 mos last summer and fall during which i could not get
my tailight to stay fixed i was pulled over a total of 14 times,
asked for permission to search 11. I refused each time.  I always
had a large supply of the "Notice to Law Enforcement Officers"
cards appended below, and explained to the officer that after
producing and distributing thousands of them i could not set a bad
example by consenting myself. Result... not one search.

It helps that my long hair is streaked w grey. Cops tend to defer
to the superior legal knowledge of anyone older than they are.  It
also helps to present an ACLU membership card, casting you as
someone refusing not because of something to hide, but because of
a fanatic dedication to the Constitution.
__

NOTICE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

I do not consent to a search of my person, belongings, home, or
vehicle. I retain my 4th Amendment Rights, and all other Rights
under the US and State Constitutions.

Signature 

Date, time of notice (optional) 

___

The 4th Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses,
papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and siezures
shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to
be siezed.

_









Re: [CTRL] Kenn Thomas talk in Los Angeles (spread the word)

1998-12-29 Thread Kenn Thomas

 -Caveat Lector-

Kenn Thomas to appear at Kindred Spirits bookstore near LA.

The author of Flying Saucers Over Los Angeles and the upcoming Maury
Island UFO
publisher of Steamshovel Press, the conspiracy magazine, will give a
lecture/slide presentation on the connection between UFO lore and the
history of covert intelligence, starting with the 1947 Maury Island UFO
case, through Jim Garrison's investigation of the JFK assassination, to
the Inslaw/Promis scandal of the 1990s. Learn how a closely tied group
of covert operatives have figured into the most prominent events of
parapoltical maniuplation of the 20th century. Thomas will also be on
hand after the talk to answer questions and dialogue on all things
conspiratorial. Copies of his book, Flying Saucers Over Los Angeles, and

the latest issue of Steamshovel Press will be on sale.

Saturday, January 9, 7:00 PM
at the Kindred Spirits store at Ralph's Shopping Center, 813 W. Foothill

Blvd.
on the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Mountain Ave.
in Claremont, about 35 miles east of Los Angeles, surrounded by La
Verne, Pomona, Montclair, Upland and Ontario.  (see below for further
directions)
No admission charge.

Call for more information:

Kindred Spirits at 909-626-2434.
or Greg Wright of the Art Bell Chat Club at
909-596-4968.---

From Los Angeles, go east on the I-10 to Towne Ave., exit and turn
left,
go north to
Foothill Blvd., turn right and go east to Mountain Ave. (the next light;

CAUTION: Avoid the Mountain Ave. that intersects Foothill Blvd. in
Upland*), turn left and immediately turn left again into the shopping
center parking lot. Kindred Spirits is on the right.

* To undescore:  the "Claremont" Mountain Ave. is between Towne Ave. and

Indian Hill Blvd., which are exits from the San Bernardino = I-10
Freeway.)

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Brown Germany

1998-12-29 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

Whatever "was" was ...


From wsws.org

""  "The new consists in the fact that everything stays as it was"
(Fischer, in an interview with the weekly newspaper Die Zeit).  ""

WSWS : News  Analysis : Europe : Germany

The mask falls: Germany's Red-Green government and the bombing of Iraq

By Ulrich Rippert
29 December 1998

Nothing has more clearly revealed the true nature of the German Red-Green
(Social Democratic Party-Green Party) governing coalition than its support
for the American bombing terror attack against Iraq. This action alone
belies all the descriptions of the coalition as a "left government".

What can one expect from a government which justifies the bombing of a
former colonial land which has been bled white by years of economic
sanctions, and repeats the most stupid and outrageous propaganda lies of
the aggressor? How will such a government deal with its own people?

According to the US Pentagon, during the 70 hours of air strikes over four
nights, 100 targets were bombed. Some 415 cruise missiles were fired,
including 325 Tomahawks from US war ships and 90 from fighter planes--more
missiles than were launched in the entire gulf war of 1991. In addition,
hundreds of bombs were dropped. The first estimates from the US military
reported 28 targets destroyed and another 46 severely damaged. Iraqi
officials claimed heavy civilian casualties.

On the second day of the bombardment German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder
declared that the military intervention was "the result of the stubborn
refusal of Saddam Hussein to collaborate with the UN inspectors in
controlling weapons of mass destruction". And further: "Our solidarity with
our NATO partners is without question." The chairman of the Social
Democratic (SPD) fraction in the Reichstag, Peter Struck, declared the
military action to be "regrettable, but necessary".

As to whether the German government would be prepared to give more
extensive, active support, Defence Minister Sharping (SPD) declared there
had been no requests in that direction and therefore such additional
support was not a current issue for the government. However the chairman of
the defence committee, Wieczorek (SPD), did not exclude the possibility of
"logistical support".

Anyone who expected criticism of the military action by the leading
politicians of the Green Party was quickly disappointed. On the second day
of bombing, during an official visit to Dublin, Foreign Minister Joseph
Fischer appeared before cameras, furrowed his brow and assumed his very
best posture as statesman. He proceeded to repeat the exact formulation
used by then-Chancellor Helmut Kohl in 1991 to justify German support for
the gulf war: "Saddam Hussein bears full responsibility". His state
minister, Ludger Vollmer, reckoned to be a "left" in the Greens, said on
the same morning: " The government regrets that it has come to this
military confrontation. Nevertheless, we say very clearly that the ultimate
responsibility is born by Saddam Hussein."

In its edition of December 18 the conservative newspaper Tagesspiegel
commented: "As well the defence politician Angelika Beer, up until recently
reckoned to be strongly left-orientated, framed her criticism in vocabulary
faithful to the line of the coalition: apprehension, reservations, regret."

The opportunism of the Greens is virtually boundless and takes increasingly
bizarre forms. Twenty years ago this party appealed to many young people as
an ecological and pacifist opposition movement. Now it is ready to agree to
anything and everything. Even two years ago, if someone had predicted that
the next German foreign minister would be called Fischer and that in his
second month in office he would agree to an American attack on Iraq, that
person would have been ridiculed and Fischer himself would have protested.

Who does not recall the innumerable resolutions and endless debates in
which the Greens emphasised their "pacifist principles" and pledged
themselves to non-violence? "Make peace without weapons!" "Blue helmets
yes--Green helmets no!" "Peace maintenance, but no peace at the price of
military force!" etc., etc. Even their party programme of this year, agreed
at their conference in Magdeburg, states: "Bundnis 90/The Greens refuse to
support military peace missions and war interventions".

Since their participation in the government, the Greens have demonstrated
the hollowness of their protest politics of the past. They have no
independent answer to the complex problems of society and adapt without a
quiver to the political machinery in Bonn and Berlin. The same party that
loudly proclaimed prior to the elections: "The change is to Green",
declared after the election: "The new consists in the fact that everything
stays as it was" (Fischer, in an interview with the weekly newspaper Die
Zeit).

Fischer is well acquainted with the strategic interests pursued by the
American government with its provocative offensive. During the gulf war
seven 

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-29 Thread Jim Condit Jr.

 -Caveat Lector-

Hey, Jerry! Polling is a "discipline"??? A discipline in high risk, high
stakes deception maybe -- when practised by the Big 5 TV networks (FOX now
aboard in that elite group). Also, your assertion that "the American
people" "elected" Clinton twice is merely an act of faith on your part, as
it has been made illegal in every state but New Hampshire to exersize
citizen checks and balances on the computerized vote count. That's right,
just like in tin horn dictatorships, or Communist countries, any American
citizen who tries to double check the vote at the neighborhood precinct
will be met with police power and eventually arrested if they insist.

First to polling:

Who are these polling "practitioners" who know the "ins and outs"?? Please
read SuperPollsters: How They Measure and Manipulate Public Opinion in
America by David W. Moore, who himself has been a pollster for 26 years.
The book is endorsed by David Broder of the Washington Post, so it can
hardly be dismissed by people like yourself, who believe that the polls are
"scientific." Here is a sentence from the concluding paragraphs of the
book: "There is still a tendency for media polls to create the illusion of
public opinion, by asking forced-choice questions on some topics that are
unfamiliar to most people. And public opinion about most topics is not as
fully explored as it was for the Persian Gulf War, often resulting in
misleading conclusions about its stability and precision." end of quote.
 And then the concluding sentence ends with, " . . . polling can, indeed,
provide a continuous monitoring of the elusive pulse of democracy. More or
less."

This is the polling industry speaking. I charge without doubt that the
polling by the 5 Big TV networks on Clinton is weighted and dishonest. Who
are they polling? Exactly how is the poll conducted? It's permissable to
question and scrutinize ANYTHING in the election process EXCEPT 1) How
polls are done and who is polled; 2) how the votes are "counted" by the
computer programs (I have yet to talk to one county official who signs
election results as "true" who can even name the person who programmed the
computer which counted the votes!!!)  and yet, we are supposed to run
our entire country based on these daily polls, and the computerized vote
counting, -- and also on that complete hoax known as "exit polling" 
 The ENTIRE argument of the sorry rabble of Clintonistes on the talk shows
is -- THE POLLS and the COMPUTERIZED VOTE COUNTS of the last two
Presidential elections. What a gullible nation we have become.

I'm sorry to have to refer to my own website, but www.networkamerica.org
contains much much more information on the unverifiable and riggable nature
of exit polls and computerized voting, as well as numerous referrals to
experts and articles (some in the establishment press) which back up the
position I have stated above. I list 4 or 5 of them below for those who
won't have time to do further research. Furthermore:

Howard Phillips of Conservative Caucus published that his wife was called
for a poll on Clinton, -- but the pollsters exited the phone call after she
answered to one of the "lead in" questions/comments by stating that she was
not "the lady head of the house", but her husband was head of the house. A
caller on WLW radio (50,000 watt clear channel voice, Cincinnati, Ohio) on
Saturday morning December 26 relayed that his sister in Georgia was called
for a poll about Clinton, but hung up on when she said she had not voted
for Clinton. These are anecdotal, but one would be stretching to dismiss
them out of hand.

Is any rational person supposed to believe that while 60% of the voting
public voted against Clinton, that 70% now support him even after he's
shown to be an adulterer, liar, perjurer . . .? Right. WHO ARE THE BIG
MEDIA-paid POLLSTERS POLLING? The Big Media really blew its cover when it
published on the day after the first wave of recent Iraq bombings -- that
70% of the people thought there was no connection between the imminent
impeachment vote and the sudden Iraq bombings Right. Who in hades are
these big media-paid pollsters polling?

And, you are on a conspiracy research list, and you're putting out the bunk
that Clinton is the one responsible for the economy? He's giving the
Alan Greenspan crowd, The Ruling Elite, what they want, and Greenspan keeps
the interest rates down. Also, the economy is only great for the Vultures
on Wall Street, the average working man is groaning under unnecessary debt
artificially created by even the "low" interest rates we have, and the
ungodly tax burden.

Back to Polls, -- It's now come out that Congressional mail in most offices
is running 2 to 1 FOR impeachment/removal! Every "call in" poll from AOL to
talk show stations which I've heard about --  reports a 2 to 1 margin for
impeachment/removal. Oh, I forgot, these polls are "unscientific." I say
they are MORE scientific than the BIg Media Polls because at least 

Re: [CTRL] Brown Germany

1998-12-29 Thread Jim Condit Jr.

 -Caveat Lector-

Germany's occupational government's support of the Iraq bombing just shows
that the dominant worldwide Jewish Lobby controls Germany, along with the
government of Great Britain, the USA, and Canada. That's all. Don't get too
bogged down with whether the government is superficially called, Democrat,
Republican, a combination of the two, Social Democrat, Green-Red, etc.
Don't be afraid to emulate the Scare Crow in the Wizard of OZ, pull back
the curtain and see who's really animating the Great OZ (these
governments). It must also be mentioned that much credit and thanks must be
given to those Jewish scholars and groups bucking the Judeo-Masonic Ruling
Elite, such as those who put out the excellent MER list on the internet.
Jim Condit Jr.

On Tuesday, December 29, 1998 1:33 AM, Alamaine Ratliff
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-

 Whatever "was" was ...


 From wsws.org

 ""  "The new consists in the fact that everything stays as it was"
 (Fischer, in an interview with the weekly newspaper Die Zeit).  ""

 WSWS : News  Analysis : Europe : Germany

 The mask falls: Germany's Red-Green government and the bombing of Iraq

 By Ulrich Rippert
 29 December 1998

 Nothing has more clearly revealed the true nature of the German Red-Green
 (Social Democratic Party-Green Party) governing coalition than its
support
 for the American bombing terror attack against Iraq. This action alone
 belies all the descriptions of the coalition as a "left government".

 What can one expect from a government which justifies the bombing of a
 former colonial land which has been bled white by years of economic
 sanctions, and repeats the most stupid and outrageous propaganda lies of
 the aggressor? How will such a government deal with its own people?

 According to the US Pentagon, during the 70 hours of air strikes over
four
 nights, 100 targets were bombed. Some 415 cruise missiles were fired,
 including 325 Tomahawks from US war ships and 90 from fighter
planes--more
 missiles than were launched in the entire gulf war of 1991. In addition,
 hundreds of bombs were dropped. The first estimates from the US military
 reported 28 targets destroyed and another 46 severely damaged. Iraqi
 officials claimed heavy civilian casualties.

 On the second day of the bombardment German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder
 declared that the military intervention was "the result of the stubborn
 refusal of Saddam Hussein to collaborate with the UN inspectors in
 controlling weapons of mass destruction". And further: "Our solidarity
with
 our NATO partners is without question." The chairman of the Social
 Democratic (SPD) fraction in the Reichstag, Peter Struck, declared the
 military action to be "regrettable, but necessary".

 As to whether the German government would be prepared to give more
 extensive, active support, Defence Minister Sharping (SPD) declared there
 had been no requests in that direction and therefore such additional
 support was not a current issue for the government. However the chairman
of
 the defence committee, Wieczorek (SPD), did not exclude the possibility
of
 "logistical support".

 Anyone who expected criticism of the military action by the leading
 politicians of the Green Party was quickly disappointed. On the second
day
 of bombing, during an official visit to Dublin, Foreign Minister Joseph
 Fischer appeared before cameras, furrowed his brow and assumed his very
 best posture as statesman. He proceeded to repeat the exact formulation
 used by then-Chancellor Helmut Kohl in 1991 to justify German support for
 the gulf war: "Saddam Hussein bears full responsibility". His state
 minister, Ludger Vollmer, reckoned to be a "left" in the Greens, said on
 the same morning: " The government regrets that it has come to this
 military confrontation. Nevertheless, we say very clearly that the
ultimate
 responsibility is born by Saddam Hussein."

 In its edition of December 18 the conservative newspaper Tagesspiegel
 commented: "As well the defence politician Angelika Beer, up until
recently
 reckoned to be strongly left-orientated, framed her criticism in
vocabulary
 faithful to the line of the coalition: apprehension, reservations,
regret."

 The opportunism of the Greens is virtually boundless and takes
increasingly
 bizarre forms. Twenty years ago this party appealed to many young people
as
 an ecological and pacifist opposition movement. Now it is ready to agree
to
 anything and everything. Even two years ago, if someone had predicted
that
 the next German foreign minister would be called Fischer and that in his
 second month in office he would agree to an American attack on Iraq, that
 person would have been ridiculed and Fischer himself would have
protested.

 Who does not recall the innumerable resolutions and endless debates in
 which the Greens emphasised their "pacifist principles" and pledged
 themselves to non-violence? "Make peace without weapons!" "Blue helmets
 yes--Green helmets no!" 

[CTRL] FW: MER Magazine - July 1997 - [MER FlashBack]

1998-12-29 Thread Jim Condit Jr.

 -Caveat Lector-

Thought some of you might like to know how to get info from the MER (Mid-East 
Realities) group.
-Original Message-
From:   MER FlashBack [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Monday, December 28, 1998 5:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:MER Magazine - July 1997 -   [MER FlashBack]

_   M  I  D  -  E  A  S  T R  E  A  L  I  T  I  E  S :
   IF YOU DON'T GET IT, YOU DON'T GET IT!

   "THE MOST UNIQUE, INTERESTING AND WORTHWHILE MIDDLE EAST
PUBLICATION ON THE INTERNET."

 Read the hundreds of Readers' Comments from Throughout the World at:
 http://WWW.MIDDLEEAST.ORG/commentsx.htm

**
NOTE TO READERS:  Many of the thousands of persons and organizations
now receiving MER began doing so in recent months. We have now
arranged past MER articles into monthly on-line magazines; and during
this period when regular pubication of MER is suspended we will be
publishing Monthly Table of Contents from the past. Just click on the
link indicated and you can easily read any of the articles mentioned.
**

  M E R M O N T H L Y M A G A Z I N E
  J U L Y1  9  9  7
http://www.MiddleEast.Org/july97.htm


 T  A  B  L  E  O  F  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S :

 "SlaughterHouse" in Persian Gulf Predicted
 "Watch Me Bleed" - Palestinian Poem
 Israeli Mole In Washington?
 Bibi YES, Edward Said NO
 War Ahead In Mid-East?
 Algeria - Gross Injustice Prevails: MER Editorial
 What To Do? - MER Editorial
 Hey Newt! What's That About Nazi Behavior?
 America - Tormenter of the Palestinians
 Surprise Attack Coming?
 Israeli Torture Systematic and "Legal"
 Trump, Jerusalem  Miss Universe
 Jordanian 'Democracy' A Myth...and Rami Khouri
 Free Vanunu Now


**
  To find out how to receive MER regularly email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
POBOX 18367  - Washington, DC 20036
202 362-5266  Fax: 202 362-6965
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Web: http://WWW.MIDDLEEAST.ORG

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] CHRISTMAS WISHES

1998-12-29 Thread Jim Condit Jr.

 -Caveat Lector-

On Sunday, December 27, 1998 9:39 AM, KA [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-

 On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Jim Condit Jr. wrote:
 over by the Roman Catholic Church . . . with the result that the world
 became civilized.

 THAT's debatable!

Debatable, yes, but I submit we're coasting on the civilization brought to
the world by the Roman Catholic Church between 4th and 14th century (one
hundred years or so before Apostate priest Luther started changing the
Bible which the Catholic monks of the Middle ages had preserved after the
Catholic Popes (Damascus I to Gregory the Great) compiled and St. Jerome
translated.) Now, as paganism revives, civilization is in a free-fall.



 And now the forces of neo-paganism with their birth
 prevention (anti-baby) pills, abortion, "mercy" killing and the whole
mix,

 Hogwash.  I know plenty of 'neo pagans', including Wiccans, who don't
 believe in abortion nor euthanasia...and plenty of Roman Catholics who
 do...


I know you're right about the traitorous, apostate Roman Catholics (many
too dumb and shallow to know of their infidelity) and don't know any
Wiccans ---  but as I understand it, both are simply in contradiction of
their professed group's doctrine.

 Are you telling us you are against birth control pills, too?


Absolutely. Better to call them birth prevention pills, or anti-baby pills.
They do tremendous harm to women, too. This is where the many Protestant
religions bit the dust (again) in following the demonic Margaret Sanger,
while the Roman Catholic Church has been consistent and held firm. (All
Protestant religions in the USA, except the liberal plants like
Unitarianism) were anti-birth control in 1930, for instance.

 Many neo-pagans think they have a great "find" when they reveal that
many
 cultures have the story of a Savior, and mother and child "team" like
Jesus
 and Mary, etc. Did it ever occur to any of these neo-pagans that the
ONLY
 way these "legends" could have appeared in so many cultures is that they
 have a common source? And that source was the promise of a Savior for
 mankind passed on by Noah after the great flood.

 Then explain to us the flood legends which come to us from civilizations
 which PRE-DATE Noah?  ;-)

OK. I should have said that Adam and Eve were promised a Savior, and that
the promise they passed on got distorted in many cultures up to the time of
Noah -- but you have to sometimes try to cut these posts short when you
think you've made the essential point.

 Let alone the 'saviour' legends which also come from those pre-Noah
 cultures...


Same deal -- or are you suggesting that "evolution" planted these notions
in widely diverse peoples, all getting the idea independently, or what are
you suggesting regarding the prevalence of the Savior or the Mother/Child
team legends found in so many cultures?


 And those who believe that Jesus is a myth, might try to explain the
Shoud
 of Turin, which still defies all explanations despite Ruling Elite
attempts

 There are as many scientific studies debunking the shroud as supporting
 the theory that it's Jesus' actual shroud...it all boils down to FAITH...

I don't think so. They can't reproduce the shroud today, despite much
high-falutin bunk that hopes you infer that they can. Also, the Shroud had
certain pollens in it that were only found in the Mid-east area.


 It is by FAITH alone that one is saved, not by turning THINGS into icons
 and worshipping them...


Here, here; so true. Who said anything about worshiping icons? Material
things or signs are sometimes given to strengthen Faith. But, check out St.
Paul, you need to believe with a Divine Faith, and you need to believe what
Christ taught " . . . he who hears the Church (singular), hears Me." It's
in St. Mark and elsewhere. It is blasphemy to believe that the Holy Ghost
inspires dozens of "churches" which contradict themselves on the most basic
points, such as what it takes to be saved. God is truth, and not a bundle
of contradictions. One Faith, one Church, one magisterial voice, one flock,
one Shepherd.

 Incorruptibles, (see book by Joan Carroll), etc. and so on. As Joe
Sobran
 said, if you think that Jesus was a hoax, consider that His words are
still
 be quoted 2000 years later ---

 And how long have the Buddha's words been quoted...or those of the
 Hindus...or of Confuscius, or Lao-Tze?  All those religions have been
 around much longer than Christianity...

Good point. But I believe all those religions are based on real men, not on
hoaxes. It's only Christ that claims to have risen from the dead. The
others didn't dare, or didn't think to make such claims. :^)Jim Condit
Jr.


 June
#
  #####
     #  #
 ###  ##   ##    #   ###  ##
  ##  ####     ###
 #### ## ##  # #  
 

Re: [CTRL] Larry Flynt on MSNBC Cable

1998-12-29 Thread KA

 -Caveat Lector-

   Flynt: “... As far as the investigators that I have on the payroll,
if they know people in the White House, that’s a very possibility, but I
have no contact with the White House.”

So he can truthfully say he has no contact with the White House -- while
those whom he employs CAN possibly have contact...he sounds like he went
to the same parsing English classes as the prez...

It's highly unlikely that anyone at the WH has direct contact with
Penthouse or Flynt, either...but that's not to say that those whom the WH
employs to conduct it's 'dirty tricks' don't...


   Flynt: “Look, all I know is that we hired a firm in Washington that
is made up of former FBI and CIA operatives, that are assisting in the
investigation, and we have two of the most respected investigative
journalists in the business, but they would only take this assignment with a
deal of anonymity.”

And one has to wonder if this investigative firm has contacts in/with the
WH...


   Flynt: “I’ve never met Clinton. I’ve never been to the White House. I
have no contacts with the White House.

But his employees DO...


June

 ===
   Ring out the old, ring in the new,
 Ring happy bells, across the snow;
 The year is going, let him go;
   Ring out the false, ring in the true.

 -- Tennyson:  In Memoriam
 ===

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Snvel snivel was Re: Echoes from the Past

1998-12-29 Thread KA

 -Caveat Lector-

On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smooth move from republicans and lying and blow jobs to sixties liberals
fighting against the dreaded "Jim Crow south."

Especially considering that those very same Jim Crow laws were kept in
effect by southern Democrats, who firmly controlled the south...


June

 ===
   Ring out the old, ring in the new,
 Ring happy bells, across the snow;
 The year is going, let him go;
   Ring out the false, ring in the true.

 -- Tennyson:  In Memoriam
 ===

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Armand Hammer

1998-12-29 Thread Linda Minor

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar_olympus_2537.html

On the role of U.S. Vice-President Al Gore, see Jonathan Broder, "Who Lost
Russia?" in Salon magazine, Sept. 1, 1998. Through his father, former
Senator Al Gore, and his father's sponsor, triply "designated personality"
Armand (e.g., named as "Arm-and-Hammer," as in baking soda, or Socialist
Labor Party) Hammer, Gore has close connections to the creation of Russia's
present financier oligarchy. Hammer, long a triple agent of the U.S.A., the
British monarchy, and the Soviet apparatus, was a key connection to the
faction of the late Yuri Andropov and Andropov's Hammer-linked protégé,
Mikhail Gorbachev. The source featured by Salon, is Stephen Cohen, a
specialist on the subject of one-time Soviet dictator N. Bukharin. Cohen et
al., recognize that Gore's current Russia policies are a continuation of
former President George Bush's; Cohen makes implicitly clear that he sees
the onrushing doom of Chernomyrdin's policies as an echo of the downfall of
the Soviet NEP, dictator Bukharin, and Bukharin's leading U.S. agent, Jay
Lovestone, at the close of the 1930s.


from:
http://www.salonmagazine.com/news/1998/09/01newsa.html

Who Lost Russia?
-
BY JONATHAN BRODER
snip
No one in Washington has yet publicly raised the question of who lost
Russia, but scholars and experts who follow Russia for a living accept with
a sort of weary resignation that such a debate is now inevitable and could
claim victims in the administration. If it comes to that, some of these
scholars say, the first to wear a scarlet "R" on his forehead will be Vice
President Al Gore, the administration's most outspoken proponent of the
reforms that have decimated the Russian economy and fomented the current
political crisis.

"The front guy in the administration is Gore," Cohen said in an interview
with Salon, noting the vice president co-chairs the U.S.-Russia commission
on reform with now-acting Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin. "That's been
his baby. Of course you can't find him now. He's hiding. This will hurt him
in the presidential primaries when Democratic challengers say this policy
was Gore's and he'll have to take responsibility."

Other scholars reject the question itself. "Russia was never ours to lose,"
says Marshall Goldman, a Russian specialist at Harvard University. "It's the
Russians who lost Russia. We worked on the margins. We gave them advice. But
we didn't force them to adopt it. We always do this, torture ourselves about
who lost Russia, who lost China. It's a mistake."

Cohen says Russia probably will have to return to some form of
state-controlled economy to weather the current crisis. During the Great
Depression, he notes, President Franklin Roosevelt used the government to
put Americans back to work, and it is not unreasonable for Russia to do the
same. The problem today arises, he says, when these practical solutions run
up against the "monetarist orthodoxy" that has become the ideological
fashion of the times.

"The danger is that the United States will start screaming, 'Communism!
communism!'" Cohen says. "That kind of a debate will be completely
dysfunctional. We have to open our mind and say to the Russians, 'OK, the
policy that we recommended to you failed. Let us hear what you propose.
We'll try to help you. We will not scream that this is a return to communism
because we realize that the Russian state has got to reenter the world
economy. It's got to come back from this crisis and stabilize things."

But even as Cohen and other scholars warn against the dangers of an
ideological debate over Russia, they cannot resist some finger-pointing
themselves.

The story of America's current involvement with Russia, they note, goes back
to the Bush administration, which formulated the policies when the Soviet
Union collapsed in 1991. In the wake of that historic moment, then-Secretary
of State James Baker toured the former Soviet republics and got the leaders
of those countries to sign onto a 14-point "bill of rights" that allowed
them to qualify for American assistance.

But American aid back then was counter-productive, says Barry Ickes, a
Russian expert at Penn State. "It consisted of subsidies for imported food,
which Russia didn't need," he says. "At that point, a ruble stabilization
fund would have helped. But that would have had to have been combined with
policies that closed down money-losing industries. And that simply didn't
happen."

While American champions of Russian reform like Harvard's Jeffrey Sachs
argued strenuously for greater loans from the International Monetary Fund
for ruble stabilization, experts like Goldman argued against it. "They
couldn't have absorbed it," he said, reflecting on conditions in Russia back
then. "They didn't have the institutions. There would have been even more
capital flight."

Joining Goldman were scholars like Cohen and Peter Reddaway at George
Washington University, who warned against a 

[CTRL] Review: Dossier--Secret History of Armand Hammer

1998-12-29 Thread Linda Minor

 -Caveat Lector-

Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer - by Edward Jay Epstein




From   Stefan Lemieszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date   Wed, 18 Mar 1998 11:13:25 GMT
Newsgroups soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.europe
Message-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Among other things, Armand Hammer is also known for delivering out of
the Soviet Union, the KGB-forged Trawniki identification card used in
the
John Demjanjuk case. Armand Hammer was a philanthopist, KGB agent,
money launderer, executive at Occidental Petroleum, and "great
pretender."
Armand Hammer's father, Julius Hammer, was a co-founder of the
Communist Party - USA.

"Hammer not only lived a lie; he died one."

Below is a book review by Tony Allen-Mills of  "Dossier: The Secret
History
of  Armand Hammer" written by Edward Jay Epstein.

Stefan Lemieszewski


-

March 15 1998

The Sunday Times
BOOK REVIEWS

The great pretender

Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer
by Edward Jay Epstein
Onion business £14.99 pp 418

By Tony Allen-Mills

In May 1977, the Prince of Wales attended the opening in
London of an exhibition of Sir Winston Churchill's paintings and
watercolours. He was introduced to the gallery's owner, a
formidable American business tycoon, art collector and
philanthropist named Armand Hammer, then 79 years old.
Hammer promptly offered the Prince one of his Churchill
paintings as a gift for the Queen's Silver Jubilee fund. It was the
beginning of an unusual friendship between the heir to the
British throne and a man who would later be exposed as one of
the great frauds of the 20th century.

As soon as Hammer learnt that one of Charles's hobbies was
painting watercolours, he arranged for the prince to take lessons
from a well-known American artist. The multi-millionaire oilman,
head of Occidental Petroleum, began to make large donations
to charitable causes supported by Charles. He proudly
described their relationship as "a deeply cherished and
wide-ranging friendship".

When, two years later, Charles's beloved Uncle Dickie - his
great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten - was murdered by the IRA,
Hammer stepped in to help the prince realise one of the earl's
last unfulfilled dreams. Both Charles and Mountbatten had been
avid supporters of the United World Colleges, the international
campuses that combine academic study with
outward-bound-style physical training. Mountbatten had long
been trying to raise enough money to open a new campus in
the United States. Now Hammer opened his wallet to assist the
grieving prince. In September 1982, Charles boarded Hammer's
private jet to fly to Montezuma, New Mexico for the grand
opening of the Armand Hammer United World College of the
American West. It had cost Hammer nearly $5m to complete
the project, but his reward was beyond price. He had become a
close friend of the future King of England and his new bride,
Diana. There was even talk of Hammer becoming a godfather to
the couple's first child.

What Charles could not have known was that much of the
money for the school he called his "impossible dream" came
from a slush fund established to pay bribes to the corrupt
middlemen who had arranged Occidental's oil concessions in
Libya. Nor can the prince have been aware that his wealthy
American friend was a KGB stooge, whose art and business
empires had long provided a convenient conduit for the
laundering of Kremlin funds used to finance Soviet espionage
activities.

All this and much more is laid bare in Dossier: The Secret
History of Armand Hammer, by Edward Jay Epstein. Hammer
died of cancer aged 92 in 1990, fondly imagining that the sordid
details of his astonishing life of myth, fakery and deceit would
be buried with him in his family mausoleum in Los Angeles. He
reckoned without Epstein's audacious sleuthing through almost
a century's worth of family papers, government archives, court
files and secret tapes, not to mention the bitter recollections of
some of the mistresses and illegitimate children Hammer
discarded along the way.

The result is one of the great demolition jobs of modern
biography: a jaw-dropping exposé of a ruthless charlatan who
bullied and betrayed his way to an imposing reputation as a
billionaire patron of the arts with a long list of powerful friends.
Epstein's painstaking research strips layer after layer of criminal
sham and pretence from a bogus tycoon's self-aggrandising
perfidy. If it is any consolation to Buckingham Palace, the
Prince of Wales was far from alone in being played by Hammer
as a sucker.

Hammer first became known in American business circles as
the Soviet Union's "First Capitalist". His father, Julius Hammer,
was born in the Jewish ghetto of Odessa. Moving from Czarist
Russia to New York in 

[CTRL] Gore Sr. was Armand Hammer's Lawyer

1998-12-29 Thread Linda Minor

 -Caveat Lector-

"Elder Gore's Legacy"




From   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (True Facts)
Organization   Pencils for Lenin
Date   Sat, 5 Dec 1998 17:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.politics.media
Message-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Gore Sr. was Armand Hammer's Lawyer.

Gore Sr. negotiated for Occidental's purchase of Oil from the then
unknown Muammar Qaddafi in Libya. This involved deals with
ROGER TAMRAZ.

Gore Sr. kept shady big-bucks oil man Armand Hammer out of trouble on
more than one occasion.  Consider the following from "The Dark Side of
Power, the Real Armand Hammer" by Blumay  Edwards, Simon  Schuster,
ISBN 0-671-70053-7

"...Senator Albert Gore, Sr. of Tennessee, a loyal friend who
had defended Armand against acussations of attempted bribery on
the floor of the U.S. Senate." p. 57

"Senator Albert Gore Sr. became a close friend and business
associate [of Armand Hammer], and was rewarded when he left office
with a highly paid executive position at Occidental"
(The above is part of the caption under a picture in the center of
the book of the entire Gore family sitting at pool side with Mr. Hammer)


In 1989 a class-action suit was filed against Occidental,
and look who shows up in the middle of it:

"The Wall Street Journal reported that the committee
was chaired by former Senator Albert Gore, Sr., and that Gore
`appears to have misunderstood the project' and those `facts' that
had surfaced during litigation." p. 448


side-note; Anyone have a copy of Armand Hammer's autobiography?
  I threw mine away in disgust at its self-praising
  tone...anyway in that book Armand said that when Love Canal
  news broke he needed his best lawyer on that job...who did
  he send? Tree-hugger Algore's dad that's who!  This needs
  looking into and would make great ad spots during Algore's
  bid for the presidency.

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] The Real Al Gore Sr.

1998-12-29 Thread Linda Minor

 -Caveat Lector-

And you want Al Gore Jr. for your president?




From   Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization   ISPNews http://ispnews.com
Date   Sun, 27 Dec 1998 20:16:45 -0800
Newsgroups talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc
Message-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Boy are we in a world of shit!
__

The Real Al Gore Sr.


  Some people will no doubt object to this
  column. After all, you're not supposed to
  speak ill of the dead -- especially the
  recent dead. But with all the flowery
  tributes to Al Gore Sr. in the last few days,
  I figure somebody has to speak the truth
  about this man who, in his lifetime,
  collaborated with and profited handsomely
  from evil.

  Vice President Al Gore eulogized his
  father Tuesday as a politician driven by
  "conscience" who never forgot his humble
  upbringing and always tried to help others.

  "Dad, your whole life has been an
  inspiration,'' Gore said, his voice cracking
  slightly.

  I believe Al Jr. when he says that. And it
  scares the hell out of me.

  To appreciate what I'm about to tell you
  with regard to Al Gore Sr., you first must
  familiarize yourself with a man by the
  name of Armand Hammer -- worth more
  than a few columns himself.

  Hammer was a personal friend of V.I.
  Lenin. He was known as Lenin's "path" to
  America's financial resources -- in other
  words, the guy who would sell us the rope
  with which we would be hanged. Hammer
  was the first Western businessman to
  participate in KGB-controlled joint
  ventures in the Soviet Union. The son of
  Julius Hammer, a founder of the Socialist
  Labor Party and later the Communist Party
  USA who served time in Sing Sing for
  performing illegal abortions, Armand was
  called the "Capitalist Prince" by the KGB.
  Hammer dutifully served the Soviets for
  seven decades and became the first -- and
  only -- American capitalist to be awarded
  the Order of Lenin.

  Edward J. Epstein's "Dossier: The Secret
  History of Armand Hammer" is must
  reading for anyone who wants to
  understand how so-called "capitalists"
  like Hammer can serve as willing and able
  tools of revolutionary Marxists and global
  socialists.

  Lenin told Stalin about Hammer: "This is a
  small path leading to the American
  'business' world, and this path should be
  made use of in every way." To the Soviet
  Union in his day, Hammer was a figure
  with much in common with the
  contemporary spy-cum-billionaire
  Mochtar Riady -- doing the bidding of
  socialist tyrants -- and making a bundle in
  the process.

  Hammer was part-time spy, part-time
  money-launderer, part-time industrialist --
  but a full-time traitor to the United States
  of America.

  But I digress. The story for today is how
  Hammer's corrupt, evil career was aided
  in numerous ways by Vice President Al
  Gore's Daddy, who was a partner in
  various Hammer enterprises for more than
  four decades. As Epstein documents in
  "Dossier," the elder Gore helped Hammer
  make connections with a series of U.S.
  presidents and used his influence to help
  Hammer's Occidental Petroleum company
  gain access to foreign political leaders.
  But, most importantly, it was Gore who
  helped stop the FBI from pursuing an
  investigation of the industrialist as a
  Soviet agent of influence.

  It seems Al Gore Sr. knew something
  about "controlling legal authorities" and
  obstruction of justice himself. Like father,
  like son.

 

[CTRL] Hoffman/LaRouche--Same Line

1998-12-29 Thread Linda Minor

 -Caveat Lector-

Hoffman Wire has been "hammering" Gore much longer than LaRouche.  Here's a
copy of something he put out in February:

==

Re: Trent Lott Speaks of "Sellout," but he's guilty of it




From   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark C. Craig)
Organization   Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date   26 Feb 1998 19:03:33 GMT
Newsgroups
alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.conspiracy,alt.journalism,talk.politics.mide
ast,soc.culture.palestine,alt.revisionism
Message-ID 6d4ea5$7ng$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References 1





DON'T FORGET THE OIL COMPANIES!

In a previous article, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael A. Hoffman II)
says:

THE HOFFMAN WIRE. Feb. 26, 1998. Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor
--

   Trent Lott and his Prey

The Republican "opposition" led by Senate leader Trent Lott of Mississippi
is trying to surpass the Democrats in slavish devotion to foreign policy
in the Israeli interest.

Lott calls the UN-brokered agreement with Saddam "a sellout."

When did we last hear those stirring words from Republicans? Surely not
when the U.S. and Britain sold out the white republic of South Africa.

But then that sellout happened to be approved by Harry Oppenheimer of
DeBeers Inc. and Joe Slovo, the Yiddish-speaking Communist who
masterminded the ANC's terror-bombing campaign.

Having the kosher stamp of approval, the reversion of South Africa to the
Dark Ages was fine with the U.S. Republican leadership. No chin jutting
declarations, no lines in the sand drawn there.

But all the cliches of jingoism are being reanimated by the Republican
neo-cons now, as they make fidelity to Zionist interests with regard to
Iraq, the top priority of the United States of America--even as they claim
to be tax-cutters and "fiscal conservatives."

According to the Feb. 26 New York Times:

"Deputy Defense Secretary John Hamre told reporters Wednesday morning that
the military buildup in the gulf has cost the Pentagon $600 million more
than it had budgeted for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1.

"But that figure is still rising. The administration is expected to
request next month that Congress approve an emergency supplemental
appropriation of at least $1.2 billion for military operations in
Bosnia and the Persian Gulf." [End quote]

Of course it doesn't "cost the Pentagon," it costs the taxpayers and "$600
million more" doesn't tell us what the operation has cost from the
beginning. The establishment media have been reluctant to report the full
price tag. This writer has heard a figure of $100 million a day.

Now an additional $1.2 billion is to be sought.

How ironic that the Republicans, with their solecistic hectoring in the
Senate of Lilliput, mimic the rhetoric of defiant patriotism in service to
their party's boot-licking fealty to Israeli interests.

The Founders never intended for our Republic to be the Policeman of the
World. Heck, we can't even police our border with Mexico. But we police
Israel's with the zeal of a lap dog.

Americans are being told we can't any longer afford quality medical care,
social security, mass transit passenger trains or even to properly
maintain the monuments of our past, such as the Gettysburg National
Battlefield.

But we can always afford serving as Sugar-Daddy to the Zionists.

Trent Lott may rattle his macho saber and yammer about a "sellout" all he
likes. In truth, he's the one selling us out, as he pees in his pants
before the power of the Jewish lobby.

"Here relentless ruffians lay,
And here the fell Republican prowls for prey,
Here a falling nation thunders on your head,
And here a media pundit talks you dead."

[with apologies to Samuel Johnson]
--

Now available-Michael A. Hoffman II's Revisionist History #5

  HAMMERED!

The Inside Story of the Top Communist Operative
Who Groomed Al Gore to Rule a Soviet America

This is the most comprehensive investigative report on Armand Hammer and
Al Gore Jr. in print. Section headings include: I. KGB Asset Al Gore Sr.
II. Gore, Hammer and Gadhafi. III. Learning Lenin's Iron Law of
Conspiracy. IV. Operation Elders of Zion. V. Zion's Stealth Candidate.

As the Clinton administration sinks under a load of scandal, all eyes are
focused on his possible successor. But the skeletons in Gore's own closet
may prove to be the far greater liability.

Not available online. Hardcopy only. Revisionist History newsletter Issue
#5. "Hammered!" $6.50 postpaid. Independent History, Box 849, Coeur
d'Alene, ID 83816. (Overseas send U.S.$10).
==
The preceding information is courtesy of THE HOFFMAN WIRE.
Michael A. 

Re: [CTRL] FW: 'Holiday' greetings

1998-12-29 Thread MShrum

 -Caveat Lector-

Beautiful! I love you, Jim! The same to you!

Godspeed!
  The OUTLAWLADY

Jim Condit Jr. wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 -Original Message-
 From:   Kalivas [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent:   Sunday, December 27, 1998 8:54 AM
 To: (Recipient list suppressed)
 Subject:'Holiday' greetings

 Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit,  our
 best wishes for an environmentally conscious,  socially
 responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral
 celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within
 the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion
 or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the
 religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others,
 or their choice not to practice religious or secular
 traditions at all . . .

 and...  a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling, and
 medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the
 generally accepted calendar year 1999, but not without due
 respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose
 contributions have helped make America great (not to imply
 that America is necessarily greater than any other country
 or is the only "AMERICA" in the western hemisphere), and
 without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical
 ability, religious faith, or choice of computer platform of
 the wishee.

 (By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms:
 This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It
 implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any
 of the wishes,  and is revocable at the sole discretion of
 the wisher.)

 This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the
 usual application of good tidings for a period of one year,
 or until the  issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting,
 whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to
 replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the
 discretion of the wisher.)

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] LaRouchies On Warpath Against Algore

1998-12-29 Thread Brian Redman

 -Caveat Lector-

From Wash. Times Politics Section, 12/29/98


LaRouche resurfaces

Lyndon LaRouche's movement will release a dossier today exposing
   Vice President Al Gore's "co-presidency plot" as a threat to national
 security.
  LaRouche backers will hold a noon rally outside Friends of Al
   Gore Inc., at 1800 K Street NW, shouting slogans like "Stop the coup!"
  and "Al Gore and Tony Blair must go!" and "Bring in LaRouche as
  President Clinton's economics adviser!"
A peek inside the dossier reveals, "Why Al Gore is unelectable in
   2000."

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Social Security system ready for Year 2000 - NOT!

1998-12-29 Thread flw

 -Caveat Lector-

Interesting essay regarding SSA and Y2K.
flw


Social Security at Risk from the Y2K Domino Effect
By Jim Lord  June1, 1998

Every enterprise is dependent on the Y2K compliance of
its suppliers and service providers and the Social Security
Administration (SSA) is no exception.  Among all federal agencies, SSA
is universally recognized as the Y2K leader within the US government.
They started their Year 2000 repair efforts in 1989 after a major system
failed. As a result of this early start, they will almost certainly have
their computers completely ready for the date change deadline. This is,
of course, great news for tens of millions of people who are dependent
on Social Security for their basic income.  Or is it?
The fact is, because of the way they do business, the Y2K readiness of
the Social Security Administration might not matter. You see, SSA
doesn't make payments directly to Grandma or any of the other 50 million
Social Security beneficiaries. Instead, they send a list over to another
agency called the Financial Management Service (FMS), a little known
part of the Treasury Department.  FMS sends the actual checks or, if
payment is made by direct deposit, they electronically send the money to
Grandma's bank account. According to an article in the April 1, 1998
issue of the Year 2000 Law Report here's what Treasury Secretary Robert
Rubin said about the FMS in testimony before a House Subcommittee:
"(T)he only bureau left with truly serious (Y2K) issues is (FMS). That
bureau, which handles a wide range of financial transactions for almost
every government agency - including the administration of the Electronic
Federal Tax Payment System - continues to be 'the area we're most
concerned about.'"  Well, those aren't very comforting words. Even
worse, that's just half of the equation - the output side. Take a look
at the input to the SSA "engine." You know all that money you've been
paying into Social Security all these years? Well, it doesn't go to the
Social Security Administration at all, it just goes into the General
Fund, which includes income tax money and other revenues. And every
dollar of it has to go through those REALLY old computers over at the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The ones that GAO says are among the
most serious Y2K risks in the entire federal government.
Even if SocialSecurity gets their computers fixed the system might fail
because there isn't any money coming in or there's no way to get the
payments out.
It doesn't matter what any government agency (or business for that matter)
says about their own internal Y2K readiness. If they haven't tested
their systems with all of their interconnections and dependencies on
customers, suppliers, vendors, and service providers, they are not yet
prepared for the date The fact is, because of the way they do business,
the Y2K readiness of the Social Security Administration might not
matter.
You see, SSA doesn't make payments directly to Grandma or any of
the other 50 million Social Security beneficiaries. Instead, they send a
list over to another agency called the Financial Management Service
(FMS), a little known part of the Treasury Department.  FMS sends the
actual checks or, if payment is made by direct deposit, they
electronically send the money to Grandma's bank account. According to an
article in the April 1, 1998 issue of the Year 2000 Law Report here's
what Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin said about the FMS in testimony
before a House Subcommittee:  "(T)he only bureau left with truly serious
(Y2K) issues is (FMS). That bureau, which handles a wide range of
financial transactions for almost every government agency - including
the administration of the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System -
continues to be 'the area we're most concerned about.'"  Well, those
aren't very comforting words. Even worse, that's just half of the
equation - the output side. Take a look at the input to the SSA
"engine." You know all that money you've been paying into Social
Security all these years? Well, it doesn't go to the Social Security
Administration at all, it just goes into the General Fund, which
includes income tax money and other revenues. And every dollar of it has
to go through those REALLY old computers over at the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS). The ones that GAO says are among the most serious Y2K
risks in the entire federal government.
Even if Social Security gets their computers fixed the system might fail
because there isn't any money coming in or there's no way to get the
payments out.  It doesn't matter what any government agency (or business for
that matter) says
about their own internal Y2K readiness. If they haven't tested their
systems with all of their interconnections and dependencies on
customers, suppliers, vendors, and service providers, they are not yet
prepared for the date change

ARGUS

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. 

[CTRL] Cong.Testimony of David C. Hall, CARA Corp. Re: Y2K

1998-12-29 Thread flw

 -Caveat Lector-

Subject: House Testimony of David C. Hall, Senior Consultant, CARA
Corporation




   HOUSE COMMITTEE ON  GOVERNMENT
REFORM AND OVERSIGHT
 Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology
 Field Hearing on Year 2000 Efforts
   September 3, 1998
Chicago, Illinois
 Testimony of David C. Hall, Senior Consultant, CARA
Corporation


 Subject:  Infrastructure and Embedded Systems Year 2000 Efforts

 Today I will limit my testimony to a few statements that, in my
opinion, describe the state
 of the Infrastructure and Embedded Systems efforts to date.  The
written testimony
 provides some additional information.  The statements are as follows:

 1.  Fewer than 10% of the enterprises in the world have begun
serious embedded
 systems and equipment testing.

 2.  The test results thus far agree with the original estimates of
the magnitude of the
 embedded systems problem-that anywhere from 1% to 15% of the
microprocessors-based
 embedded systems and items of equipment exhibit some type of Year 2000
impact.  These
 impacts range from minor to catastrophic.

 3.  These impacts are showing up on an individual basis, that is,
by serial number rather
 than by model number.

 4.  This means that every microprocessor-based embedded system and
equipment
 item must be individually tested to be sure of its Year 2000 status

 5.  There is insufficient time and trained resources to test every
microprocessor-based
 embedded system and equipment item in the United States, much less
every one in the
 world.

 6.  Therefore, we must assume that not all Year 2000 impacts will
be found
 and fixed by January 1, 2000, and should expect disruptions and
disturbances from Year
 2000 embedded systems and equipment impacts.

 7.  How many disruptions and disturbances and how serious they are
will depend
 entirely upon how much work is accomplished, both in remediation and
contingency
 planning, before January 1, 2000.
 8.  Since we cannot find and fix all the impacts, we should make a
concerted effort to
 find and fix those that pose the most serious risks to public health,
safety and the
 environment.


  Global Implications of the Year 2000 Embedded Systems
 Problem
 By:
  David C. Hall
Senior Consultant
Year 2000 Infrastructure and Embedded Systems Engineering
CARA Corporation
  August 1998

 The part of the Year 2000 Problem caused by embedded systems
(anything
 containing a microprocessor of microcontroller) will be the most
extensive and expensive
 part of the Year 2000 Problem.  The world has spent the better part of
five decades
 automating, networking, centralizing, and integrating our facilities,
plants, public and private
 infrastructures, communications, financial systems, health systems,
and
just about
 everything else.  With over 10 billion microprocessors sold worldwide
in the last five years
 alone, we have a tremendous job  of finding, testing and fixing to
accomplish in less than
 two years.  The bottom line to this
 problem is that wherever on or in the globe there is an electronic
device, there may be Year
 2000 problems and risk.

 The Whole Issue
 The Year 2000 Problem was originally seen as just an Information
Technology (IT) problem,
 affecting only the old legacy mainframe software programs. However,
over the past few
 years it has become known as a Business Problem, because it affects
the
reliability of all
 computer-based systems and equipment used, be they Information
Technology systems,
 desktop computing systems, or facility environmental control systems.
In each of these
 cases, the reliability of information is the most important
consideration about Year 2000
 problems.
  In human terms, bad information may cause us to make a wrong
decision.
In machine
 terms, bad information may cause a malfunction, a total shutdown, or
produce the wrong
 result.  The difference is that humans can often interpret bad
information, through
 application of  intelligence, and compensate.  Machines cannot
compensate, they will do
 exactly what they have been programmed to do.

 As a country, community, or person, we are part of a global
neighborhood that has come to
 depend upon many different types of computers to process data, manage
information,
 communicate, and control all types of processes.  Our modern society
depends upon
 these computers for every facet of our social structure. 

[CTRL] Fw: Y2k and Asia (Second Falling Shoe?)

1998-12-29 Thread flw

 -Caveat Lector-

Date: Saturday, December 26, 1998 3:39 PM
Subject: Y2k and Asia



http://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/foc1226a.htm

When the chips are down

Anxious pundits predict the Y2K bug will trigger a second
economic meltdown in the region, writes PETER ALFORD.


IMAGINE that in 12 months, just as the battered East Asian economies
begin to right themselves, they are knocked over again by a second
recession.

Suppose China stops being a regional sheet anchor and is engulfed by
the new emergency. Think about the social chaos in Indonesia today and
then picture that kind of havoc breaking out elsewhere as
impoverishment sweeps across the region for the second time in three
years.

Imagine, finally, that the storm waves from this next Asian crisis
don't lap relatively harmlessly on Australia's shore but break over us
with full force. This, rather than the millennialist panic stories
about planes falling from the skies and electricity grids collapsing,
is the kind of scenario that keeps year 2000 experts awake at night.

East Asia, a region with more than one-third of the world's
population, one-quarter of its manufacturing capacity – and, to be
selfish about it, most of Australia's markets – is uniquely exposed to
the millennium bug. All the region's developed and semi-developed
countries, except Singapore, are running at least six months behind
Australia and the handful of other leading countries in Y2K
preparedness. With barely 12 months to run to the critical date – plus
the fact Y2K problems will start snowballing from midyear as
computerised systems begin routinely looking into the 1999-2000
financial year – that could prove to be a fatal gap.

We've had fair warning of the ramifications, says Phil Dodd. The 1997
Asian currency crisis, which has cascaded into emerging economies
everywhere and at one point drove the Australian dollar down to US55c
for no apparent reason except proximity, illustrates the hazards of
worldwide interconnectedness.

What we face is much more dangerous, says Dodd, who heads the Unisys
Asia-Pacific year 2000 project. Left uncorrected, the elementary but
incredibly pervasive programming glitch that is the Y2K bug will
affect not just capital flows but banking systems, physical trade,
information transfers, energy supplies and transport.

"To me, the currency crisis is a precursor, a warning," he says. "It's
the tremor before the earthquake."

The East Asian problem has two sets of ramifications for Australia. In
the short run, Y2K-related breakdowns in Asian hub cities could
disrupt telecommunications links, air transport and shipping. These
problems might take several months to overcome.

In the long run, the really worrying prospect is that cascading Y2K
breakdowns in banking systems, communications, electricity and other
utilities will plunge the region into a second recession – a recession
that may be worse than the current one.

The economic crisis in Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, The
Philippines, even Hong Kong, is one reason East Asia is so exposed to
the bug.

Engrossed by week-to-week survival during the past 18 months, most
industries and governments, until about six months ago, had given only
distracted attention to Y2K rectification.

China's approach is similarly under-developed and even Taiwan, with
its sophisticated information technology industries, is in poor shape.

Japan, the second largest and second most technically advanced
economy, is especially worrying: "Large parts of corporate Japan,
including the banks, still seem to be in denial," says one analyst.

Y2K programs are the only technology expenditures that have been
maintained throughout the region during the Asian recession, says
Gartner Group's Hong Kong research director Joe Sweeney, but they were
belated and badly under-funded at the outset.

Gartner's next status report on international Y2K preparedness will
show every economically significant East Asian country except
Singapore still in what Sweeney describes as "the danger zone".

Gartner, a Connecticut-based consultancy that has been a leader in
raising Y2K awareness, has identified a new hazard: the "Y2K speed
bump".

Sweeney says there is clear evidence most customers in developed
countries, recognising East Asia's dangerous unpreparedness, are
planning to order extra goods and materials next year as several
months' buffer against supply failures in early 2000.

"Asian suppliers are going to see all their orders take off, they're
going to think the recession is over and then they're going to run
into two or three months when there are no orders at all – that's
where their businesses are going to fail," says Sweeney.

"The Y2K speed bump has nothing to do with technology, really; it is
the way economies work. And it's definitely going to happen."

Dodd also strongly makes the point that Y2K is fundamentally a
business problem, with significant ramifications for the international
economy. He is astounded that, at this 

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-29 Thread Gerald Harp

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/28/98 7:30:19 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


  If you do the math, the percentage of the actual population of the
  United States represented in the polls works out to .027%. That
  doesn't sound very "representative" to me!

Statistical samplig, especially when stratified, can yield highly accurate
results from a relatively small number of respondents.

Jerry

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Paper Links Boston Museum To Looted Antiquities (Reuters)

1998-12-29 Thread Robert Tatman

 -Caveat Lector-

Paper Links Boston Museum To Looted Antiquities

BOSTON (Reuters) - The Boston Museum of Fine Arts, already embroiled in
several controversies, apparently acquired scores of Greek and Roman
antiquities looted from Italian archaeological sites, the Boston Globe
reported Sunday.

The newspaper said the museum seemed to have acquired the objects in the
14 years since it says it abandoned dealings in the illicit art market. The
Globe said the questionable objects included three valuable Greek vases
apparently excavated illegally from 2,300-year-old grave sites in the Apulian
region of southern Italy and smuggled out of the country.

In what the Globe called ``a telltale admission,'' the Museum of Fine Arts
described the three vases as among a ''host'' of newly discovered artifacts in
a book it published in 1993. The newspaper has been investigating the museum's
collections with the help of classical scholars and art experts.

It said it found that only 10 of the 71 items in the Greek and Roman
collection had any recorded ownership or provenance.

The remaining artifacts, including the three vases mentioned in the book, have
no pedigree at all--strong circumstantial evidence that most were recently
unearthed by grave-robbers, the Globe said.

The accusations added to the museum's woes.

Its ``Monet in the 20th Century'' exhibit, which closes this weekend before
moving next month to the Royal Academy of Arts in London, was accused of
failing to note clearly that one of the artist's works had been looted by the
Nazis.

And that was not the only Monet to cause problems for the institution.

Claude Monet's ``Fields of Poppies at Giverny,'' which hangs in another
gallery, has become the subject of a struggle. The painting was loaned to the
museum in 1911 by the Right Rev. William Wolcott of Lawrence, Massachusetts,
but the city of Lawrence now wants it back, so it can be sold to raise
much-needed funds.

Museum of Fine Arts Director Malcolm Rogers said in an earlier interview that
if that was what Wolcott had had in mind, he could have sold the painting
himself and donated the proceeds to Lawrence.

A year ago, the Museum of Fine Arts turned aside a public demand from the
government of Guatemala that it return scores of pre-Columbian artifacts
looted from ancient Mayan grave sites in that country.

The museum argued that the artifacts had entered the United States legally
between 1974 and 1981. It was only in 1983 that the museum committed itself to
international standards designed to curb the widespread plundering of
antiquities.

The museum declined to comment immediately on the Globe's investigation
and suggested that reporters call its press office Monday.


=
Robert F. Tatman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed 
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included 
information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND UNSOLICITED 
COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET ADDRESS. RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL 
RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.


More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Who said the African AIDS crisis is part of a conspiracy?

1998-12-29 Thread Scramjet1

 -Caveat Lector-

Faulty Condoms Thwart AIDS Fight in Africa

 By DONALD G. McNEIL JR.


  JOHANNESBURG, South Africa -- Out of the depths of the AIDS epidemic
sweeping Africa, an ugly truth is emerging: Some condom makers have been
dumping their substandard wares here and Africans have been risking their
lives on brittle, leaky or ill-fitting condoms.

  The problem has been particularly bad here in South Africa, where, until
last August, government officials were using a procurement system that almost
invited manufacturers to ship their castoffs here.

  There is no question that a scarcity of condoms and the refusal of many men
to use them are to blame for far more of Africa's 23 million HIV infections
than faulty condoms are. And experts say most condoms are perfectly good and
that the influx of bad ones may finally have been stemmed. But the deviousness
or sloppiness of some manufacturers and the failure of inspectors to catch
them have contributed to the disease's spread.

  As a result, couples who do practice safe sex have been left helpless.

  Elizabeth Chidonza, an AIDS-education worker in Cape Town, said she has
twice had condoms break during sex. Her boyfriend is not infected with the
AIDS virus, but she is. She is both afraid of infecting him and afraid he
would beat her if she did.

  In the West, condoms are not necessarily thought of as life-saving medical
devices. Here, however, infection with the human immunodeficiency virus, which
causes AIDS, is rampant, and virtually everyone infected will die of it
because almost no one in Africa can afford thousands of dollars for AIDS
"cocktails" that enable people to live with the disease. Condoms also prevent
the spread of venereal diseases and urinary tract infections, which can
produce sores that speed HIV transmission.

  Hundreds of millions of condoms are handed out free on this continent each
year, paid for -- and tested -- by international aid agencies.

  Even now, though, more than 4 million Kenzo brand condoms from Polo Latex
Co. of Calcutta are on their way back to India. They were not tested before
distribution, and complaints from Cape Town prostitutes flooded in to SWEAT,
the Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task Force, a community aid agency,
which had handed thousands out free.

  When they were checked, the results were shocking: As many as 48 out of 200
in some test batches broke.

  "Some of them had sand inside the foil packets," said Andrew Crichton, a
national Health Department consultant. "How do you even do that? You
practically have to have a guy inside the factory throwing dirt into the
machine. The cartons had water marks and were disintegrating. They looked like
they'd been around the world twice."

  Thiru Moopen, assistant director of Inbeco, a Pretoria company that imported
the condoms, said her "fingers were burnt" in the deal. Polo Latex "claimed
its factory was sabotaged," she said, but it agreed to replace the goods.

  A consignment of Twin Lotus condoms from China is also being recalled, and
there have been problems with other brands.

  There has been no worldwide study of faulty condoms, said Bunmi Makinwa, a
distribution expert for UNAIDS in Geneva, but anecdotal reports crop up. There
have been occasional problems in Zimbabwe, Cameroon, Rwanda, Zambia and
Malawi. In 1993 in Zimbabwe, 24 million condoms made in Malaysia by Dongkuk
Techo Rubber and paid for by the British government failed tests. Fortunately,
the results came in before any were distributed, but fearing they would be
stolen and end up on the black market, Zimbabwe burned them.

  In a country where 25 percent of adults are now infected, it took 18 months
and $157,000 to replace them, even though Durex, a London-based company making
a high-quality, slightly more expensive brand, sent "emergency shipments."

  Dongkuk later said its goods were rejected only because the standards were
raised after they were made. A British Embassy AIDS educator denied that,
calling it "an excuse," but acknowledged that Dongkuk now sells condoms
elsewhere without problems.

  The incident was so embarrassing -- British aid officials were "nearly
court-martialed" by Parliament, one expert joked -- that the British aid
agencies adopted far stricter testing rules, which are now used in the many
English-speaking countries for which they buy condoms.

  Condoms are made all over the world, but most factories are in India,
Malaysia, Thailand and China, where latex rubber and cheap labor are
available.

  Dennis Blairman, a British condom-quality consultant, has toured dozens of
factories. "The industry is a jungle," he said. "Some makers have very
science-based companies with excellent laboratories, and others are awful,
staggering along with broken-down machinery. Latex goes in one end, something
comes out at the other, and the buyer doesn't know the difference."

  As a result, he said, "I don't think there's a plot to dump substandard
goods on Africa, but I'm 

[CTRL] The Dubious Achievement Awards

1998-12-29 Thread Hilary Thomas





DECEMBER 28, 07:37 
EST
The Dubious Achievement Awards 
By LARRY BLASKOAssociated 
Press Writer 
For journalists, year's end is a time of reflection, which takes much less 
energy than actually reporting something. That leaves time for other worthy 
pursuits, such as celebrating at holiday parties. 
In that spirit, a glass or two is hereby raised to this year's winners of the 
CompuBug Dubious Achievement awards for Determined Dumbness in software and 
hardware. 
The Practice Makes Perfect award goes to Microsoft for Windows 98, which 
fixed some of Windows 95's bugs and introduced a swarm of its own. 
The I Knew I Forgot Something award goes to Apple Computer, which introduced 
its much-touted iMac without a floppy disk drive. Clearly, the ``Think 
Different'' crowd never takes work home. Of course, for $150, you can add an 
external floppy drive, just like you could 20 years ago, before it became 
standard equipment. 
With the minimum system requirements for everything from games to 
productivity software roaring past the 166-megahertz Pentium/32 megabytes of RAM 
mark, the Immoderation in All Things award is shared by the entire software 
industry. While we all would like to upgrade our machines every six months, many 
of us have other financial obligations, including children, a mortgage and such. 

The software industry also wins the Punishing Profligate Packaging award for 
surrounding 5-inch-wide CD-ROMs with enough cardboard to deforest Canada, much 
of it inside in sadistic origami creations that aren't going to let go of the 
software without inflicting at least a paper cut. And we really needed the 
latest trend: box-cover flaps, some with multiple pages, touting the product. 
Quick, go hug a tree while there are still some left. 
The Yes, We Have No Bananas award goes to software manufacturers whose only 
installation and help instructions are online. If we could get the doggone stuff 
to install, we wouldn't need the help! 
The Chicken Little Marketing award goes to those who raise the grim vision of 
the end of computing in Year 2000 unless you do a ``system audit'' with a 
product that, coincidentally, they sell. 
The Al Capone Financing Genius award goes to those computer manufacturers 
that are pushing leasing programs to increase their market share, thereby making 
it possible for consumers to pay much more for a computer than it would cost to 
buy one. Manufacturers say it makes computers available to those who can't 
afford to buy one  in the same way loan sharks give high-risk lenders 
``access to financial services.'' 
Finally, the Tolerance Beyond Belief award goes to publicists, editors and, 
most of all, CompuBug's readers, who have endured with me this year  and 
for the past 15 years  and keep coming back for more. 
 
Questions and comments are welcome. Mail to: CompuBug, P.O. Box 626, Summit, 
N.J. 07901. Or e-mail via the Internet: LarryBlasko(at)ap.org. 

=

Together We Create Heaven on Earth[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=

Come join exploration - a discussion list dedicated to 
keeping up-to-date on new technologies, advancements in medicine, environmental 
concerns, 'conspiracy theories' and, of course, UFO stuff. Discussion is 
encouraged. Bashing and soapboxing will get you bounced off the 
list.

To subscribe to exploration send a blank email 
to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Moderator: Hilary A. Thomas








[CTRL] A Different Approach to the Impeachment of President Clinton

1998-12-29 Thread Scramjet1

 -Caveat Lector-

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: December 21, 1998 8:59 AM

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: A Different Approach to the Impeachment of President Clinton







December 21, 1998



To:  Congressman Harold E. Ford, Jr.

9th Congressional District Representative



From:  Dr. Bill Adkins

Senior Pastor-Founder, Greater Imani Church  Christian Center

Memphis, Tennessee



My Dear Congressman,



   In lieu of the recent developments surrounding the impeachment of

President

Clinton, I propose this unique response.  Since the president was impeached

on

articles of perjury and obstruction of justice please consider the

following:


The posthumous impeachment of the first fifteen Presidents of the United

States of America on the charge of lying under oath and obstruction of

justice.


  These charges are based on each President's sworn oath to uphold

and

the defend the Constitution of the United States.  In its  preamble that

instrument clearly calls on the President of the United States to "Secure

the

Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity."  By its own language

the

Constitution voided the institution of slavery, however, nine of these

Presidents personally owned slaves and the others openly disregarded their

sworn oath to protect the freedom of all Americans.  It was only because of

the differing opinions of interpretation of the language that clarity was

needed to deal with such sensitive matters, therefore, numerous amendments

were added to offer such clarity.  Abolitionists argued that the

Constitution

was clear, however, the 13th Amendment was needed to outlaw slavery,

December

18, 1865.  The 14th Amendment was needed to define citizenship, so it was

passed on July 28th, 1868.  The 15th Amendment was needed to offer

franchisment and voting rights, so it was passed on March 30th, 1870.  The

right to vote for women was needed because for some, "men" mentioned in the

Constitution only meant "men."  That was passed August 26th, 1920.  Finally,

the Poll Taxes of the South had to be eliminated so the 24th Amendment was

passed on February 4th, 1964.



The amendments to the Constitution questioned the validity of the original

organ, according to Tocqueville.  I conclude that the original writing was

exact and succinct.  Therefore 15 Presidents, prior to Lincoln and the

Emancipation Proclamation were in contempt of their sworn oath.  We should

consider posthumous impeachment of:



George Washington

John Adams

Thomas Jefferson

James Madison

James Monroe

John Quincy Adams

Andrew Jackson

Martin Van Buren

William H. Harrison

James Knox Polk

Zachary Taylor

Milliard Filmore

Franklin Pierce

James Buchanan

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Oklahoma Bomb Jury to Issue Report

1998-12-29 Thread Hilary Thomas





DECEMBER 29, 15:38 
EST
Oklahoma Bomb Jury To Issue Report 

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP)  Eighteen months and 117 witnesses after it began 
its work, a grand jury investigating allegations of a wider conspiracy and a 
government cover-up in the Oklahoma bombing is expected to release its findings 
Wednesday. 
The Oklahoma County grand jury was convened by way of a petition drive over 
the objections of state Attorney General Drew Edmondson, who called it ``the 
worst kind of conspiracy pandering.'' And both he and the chief federal 
prosecutor in Oklahoma expressed doubt anything would come out of the 
investigation. 
Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols have already been convicted on federal 
charges in the bombing. McVeigh received a death sentence, Nichols life in 
prison. An Army buddy, Michael Fortier, pleaded guilty to knowing about the 
attack beforehand but telling no one. He got 12 years in prison. 
Former state Rep. Charles Key, one of the leaders of the petition drive to 
empanel the grand jury, has said he believes that the federal government knew 
about the bombing beforehand and that others were involved but have not been 
arrested. The government has denied any prior knowledge. 
Key said his efforts were worth it no matter what the outcome. 
``It's always worth it to do the right thing. That's what I and the rest of 
us who have worked on this feel. We've done the right thing for the right 
reason,'' the former legislator said. 
The grand jury has the power to indict, but Bob Macy, the district attorney 
in Oklahoma City, has already said he will bring murder charges against McVeigh 
and Nichols, and the grand jury focused instead on other possible figures. 
U.S. Attorney Patrick Ryan, who prosecuted McVeigh and Nichols, has said that 
the government had ``no credible evidence to suggest that others were 
involved.'' 
And Edmondson said he believes the odds are slim the grand jury investigation 
will shed any additional light on the April 19, 1995, attack that killed 168 
people and injured more than 500 others. 
``I will be amazed if they suggest by name any people involved in the bombing 
that are not even known,'' Edmondson said. 
As of October, the cost of the grand jury was put at nearly $414,000. 
In October, the grand jury complained of attempts to contact members at home 
and of erroneous claims about what some witnesses would say. 
=

Together We Create Heaven on Earth[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=

Come join exploration - a discussion list dedicated to 
keeping up-to-date on new technologies, advancements in medicine, environmental 
concerns, 'conspiracy theories' and, of course, UFO stuff. Discussion is 
encouraged. Bashing and soapboxing will get you bounced off the 
list.

To subscribe to exploration send a blank email 
to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Moderator: Hilary A. Thomas








[CTRL] Bank Sues Hubbell for Overdue Money

1998-12-29 Thread Hilary Thomas





DECEMBER 29, 11:14 
EST
Bank Sues Hubbell for Overdue Money 

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP)  Presidential friend Webster Hubbell has been 
sued by the Bank of Little Rock, which claims he owes at least $43,604 on a 1997 
promissory note. 
Frederick S. Wetzel III, attorney for Bank of Little Rock, said the money 
stems from a second mortgage on the Hubbells' Little Rock home. 
The total owed by Hubbell and his wife, Suzanna, was calculated through Dec. 
15, according to the lawsuit filed Monday in Pulaski County Circuit Court. Each 
day they fail to pay adds $11.95 in interest, the lawsuit said. 
Hubbell, a former top Justice Department official, was indicted by a federal 
grand jury for a third time in November on charges that he covered up his and 
Hillary Rodham Clinton's roles in a fraudulent Arkansas real estate development 
deal. They were partners at the Rose Law Firm at the time. 
The indictment accuses Hubbell of perjury before a congressional committee, 
fraud, false statements and impeding two federal regulatory agencies. 
A federal judge in July threw out a 10-count tax-evasion indictment against 
Hubbell. Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr has appealed that dismissal. 
Hubbell pleaded guilty to tax evasion and mail fraud in December 1994 after 
admitting to overbilling his clients at the Rose Law Firm. He served 19 months 
in prison before his release in February 1997. 
=

Together We Create Heaven on Earth[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=

Come join exploration - a discussion list dedicated to 
keeping up-to-date on new technologies, advancements in medicine, environmental 
concerns, 'conspiracy theories' and, of course, UFO stuff. Discussion is 
encouraged. Bashing and soapboxing will get you bounced off the 
list.

To subscribe to exploration send a blank email 
to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe send a blank email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Moderator: Hilary A. Thomas








[CTRL] Critics Cite Iran Weapons Loophole

1998-12-29 Thread Hilary Thomas





DECEMBER 28, 12:48 
EST
Critics Cite Iran Weapons Loophole 
By GEORGE GEDDAAssociated 
Press Writer 
WASHINGTON (AP)  Recent statements by an Iranian official have critics 
worried that Iran may exploit a loophole in the chemical weapons convention 
treaty approved last year  one insisted on by conservative U.S. senators. 

Citing these recent statements, some disarmament experts say the Tehran 
government could take advantage of conditions that were meant to protect U.S. 
interests. 
``We have provided Iran a loophole to cheat,'' said Amy Smithson, a weapons 
expert at the Henry L. Stimson Institute. 
U.S. officials had hoped the August 1997 inauguration of President Mohammad 
Khatami, widely perceived as a moderate, could lead to an Iranian reassessment 
of its weapons programs. Not long after Khatami took office, in November 1997, 
Iran ratified the chemical weapons convention. 
The treaty bans the use, development, production and stockpiling of all 
chemical warfare agents and requires the destruction of existing stockpiles over 
10 years. 
The U.S. Senate ratified the treaty in April 1997, only after Sen. Jesse 
Helms, R-N.C. and his allies set conditions for U.S. participation, including 
giving the president the right to veto inspections at suspect sites and barring 
inspectors from taking soil or other types of samples from U.S. chemical 
facilities out of the country. 
Marc Thiessen, a Helms spokesman, said, ``The provisions are designed to stop 
the treaty from being used for corporate espionage and other forms of 
espionage.'' 
Some arms control advocates believe the administration gave away too much to 
Helms in the negotiations. 
Iran had remained largely silent on the issue until a few weeks ago, when 
Iranian diplomat Mohammad R. Alborozi spoke in the Netherlands at a conference 
of states that are members of the convention. 
Alborozi quickly took aim at the conditions imposed by the U.S. Senate. 
Expressing regret over the measures, he said ``that the spillover effect of such 
an exercise ... can open the door for legislative bodies of other countries to 
seek derogation from the convention is a matter of serious concern for all state 
parties. 
``If other states follow this pattern, then any outlook for full and 
unconditional implementation of the provisions of the convention will be in 
jeopardy. This we regard as a seriously alarming matter.'' 
At the same time, Alborozi said his government has decided to ``exercise and 
demonstrate maximum transparency and determination for full compliance with the 
provisions of the Convention.'' 
Alborozi did not say whether Iran currently retains a chemical weapons 
production capability. 
Smithson said the Iranian comments were not reassuring, and that by taking a 
cue from Washington, Iran is in effect saying it too could block a challenge 
inspection on the basis of national security interests. 
Spurgeon Keeny, of the Arms Control Association, agreed: ``When we exempt 
ourselves from certain provisions, we're inviting Iran or other countries to 
question our seriousness.'' 
A Clinton administration official acknowledged that the conditions leave 
Washington ill-positioned to argue that other states don't have the same right. 
Despite the conditions, the official said, the United States believes it can 
faithfully comply with the treaty and will do so. 
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Iran's willingness to 
abide by the treaty has been in doubt since the beginning. He said Iran's 
membership in the Non-Proliferation Treaty has not prevented it from trying to 
develop nuclear weapons and that Iran also is pursuing a biological weapons 
capacity despite a treaty commitment not to do so. 
Iran has denied it is trying to develop nuclear or biological weapons. 
A 1997 Pentagon report issued at the time Iran ratified the convention said 
chemical weapons were a high priority for Iran because of its inability to 
respond in kind to Iraq's attacks during their war in the 1980s. Iran also was 
motivated by evidence, the report said, that Iraq was developing advanced agents 
such as VX, a substance of which one or two drops can be lethal. 
Helms, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman, says that since no 
weapons inspection regime is foolproof, the ban will not help the situation or 
enhance American security anyway. 
He argues the United States has little to fear from most countries that 
ratify the treaty. The concern is with those that ratify and cheat and those 
that don't join the treaty at all. Indeed, five of the seven nations on the 
State Department list of countries accused of promoting international terrorism 
have neither signed nor ratified the treaty: Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria and 
Sudan. The two remaining countries are Iran and Cuba. 
=

Together We Create Heaven on Earth[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=

Come join exploration - a discussion list 

Re: [CTRL] [prj] Incredible Newsweek cover--European Union Tower ...

1998-12-29 Thread EASTERISLE

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/28/98 8:40:03 PM, you wrote:

Lloyd is a fellow member of the long, boring, bombastic, legalistic posters
club that seems to thrive on this list.  Here he is at least brief but in
being so he has exposed his know nothing fundamentalist philosophy with great
clarity.

Jerry

All right now, we can always learn from each other's views, even if all we
learn is that we disagree vehemently  ;-)

Peace out,
Charles

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Linux: 12-29

1998-12-29 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

From Nando / AP

Even with open source, Red Hat is red hot.

Copyright © 1998 Nando Media
Copyright © 1998 Associated Press








DURHAM (December 29, 1998 12:22 a.m. EST http://www.nandotimes.com) - It's
not exactly time to tell Windows to step aside, but Durham's Red Hat - and
the Linux operating system it distributes - are on a roll.

The buzz started building in September when Silicon Valley darlings
Netscape Communications and Intel invested in Red Hat.

Since then, Red Hat has received the kind of national hype that has long
been the dream of technology companies based in the Triangle.

The attention gave the previously obscure Linux operating system - the
basic software that manages all the other programs and files in a computer
- new legitimacy. Some in the industry even tout it as a potential threat
to Microsoft's Windows.

Microsoft attorneys recently cited Red Hat's product as proof the Redmond,
Wash., giant is not a monopoly.

After ducking the spotlight for most of its three years of existence, Red
Hat was suddenly the rage. Last month, when some of its executives attended
Comdex, the industry's biggest trade show, they were mobbed by reporters
and industry leaders looking to strike deals.

The publicity has generated tremendous momentum and opportunity for its 85
employees. But while the ride has been thrilling, now comes the hard part:
fulfilling the promise.

"When you get as much publicity as we get, you end up setting a lot of
expectations," said Bob Young, Red Hat's chief executive officer. "What
worries me is that we've got a lot of work to do to meet those
expectations."

Red Hat, located in Research Commons near Research Triangle Park, is
largely in the business of providing an alternative to Microsoft for
programmers and computer geeks.

The alternative is Linux, which it distributes.

Linux was developed in the early 1990s by a Finnish student named Linus
Torvalds. He wanted to create an operating system for PCs that worked like
the high-powered operating system Unix, the main system used on the big
computers that run most of the Internet.

But rather than start a company and market the system, Torvalds did
something that captured the imagination of programmers around the world.
Torvalds posted the Linux source code - the blueprints for the software -
on the Internet. Anyone can suggest improvements or download Linux and use
it for free. Microsoft closely guards the Windows source code and charges
about $90 for its operating system.

"We don't own Linux," said Jon "Mad Dog" Hall, executive director of Linux
International, a trade association which promotes Linux. "It's owned by the
community of programmers who have contributed to it over the years."

Red Hat makes its money by testing versions of Linux, adding its own tools,
manuals and technical support and then selling the whole thing in a
shrink-wrapped box for $50 and up - still less than Windows 98.

Last month, someone posted a memo on the Internet written by two Microsoft
engineers that called Linux a challenge to company revenue. And Nov. 18, in
a Washington, D.C., courtroom where Microsoft is on trial for anti-trust
violations, a company attorney held up a package of Red Hat software and
cited it as proof that Microsoft had a tenuous grasp on the operating
system market.

While it has been popular among hackers and back-room techies, some
observers wondered whether large companies would ever seriously accept a
product not backed by a company like Microsoft.

That's where Red Hat comes in. In 1994, a local IBM employee named Marc
Ewing discovered the wonders of Linux and started his own company to market
Linux products. Ewing later merged with a company started by Young to
create Red Hat.

The company purposefully maintained a low profile.

"Our goal is to build a successful software company for the next 20 years,"
Young said.

But all the attention has forced Red Hat to revisit its growth plans. It
leased new, bigger offices and has grown from 50 to 85 employees in just a
few months. And Young expects sales - projected to be $10 million in 1998 -
and employment to double annually in the coming years.

AER

The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes
but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


Re: [CTRL] Religious Right,Religious Rights: an interview with A

1998-12-29 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

I, too, am subject to researching my recollection for specificity within
the myth and legend of the settling of North America ... as much as I
wouldn't seek out K. Starr (the Indie Counselor, not the songstress) for
any reason, I can't help but admire the polysyllabic Snoopy dance he did
(without laughing at himself) for the J Committee.  Anyway, more myth 
legend on the Pilgrims:

From http://www.athensnewspapers.com/1997/112697/1126.a3pilgrims.html

American detective work brings
alive Pilgrims' forgotten years

By William J. Kole
Associated Press

Picture: jeremy bangsHistorian Jeremy Bangs sits in the 17th-century
house that will become the Leiden American Pilgrim Museum, which opens on
Thursday in the Netherlands.
AP PhotoLEIDEN, Netherlands - Pilgrims once trod Leiden's cobblestones,
back when they were the latest ragtag refugees in town. Now this city is
reviving memories of a pious people who eventually found Dutch tolerance
too much to bear.
   On Thanksgiving Day, the Leiden American Pilgrim Museum opens to the
public, born of one man's lifelong passion to illuminate the Pilgrims'
largely forgotten 11 years in exile in Holland.
   For American historian Jeremy Bangs, it's a chance to remind the world
anew of the hope and heartache the future colonists endured long before
they even boarded the Mayflower.
   "Anyone who really wants to understand American society needs to know
about the Pilgrims," said Bangs, a leading Pilgrim scholar and the former
chief curator at Plimoth Plantation in Plymouth, Mass.
   The 100 Pilgrims who settled in Leiden after a brief stay in Amsterdam
left an indelible mark on this medieval town, which welcomed them in 1609
with a declaration that it "refuses no honest people free entry."
   Capt. Myles Standish served in the Dutch army. In Leiden, William
Brewster published books forbidden in England. Their pastor, John Robinson,
participated in theological disputes that would later split the
Netherlands; he's buried in a nearby church.
   But the Pilgrims grew disenchanted with their lives here. Though they
had fled religious persecution in their native England, they tired on the
tolerance that lured them to the Netherlands. Many anguished over their
hosts' ambivalence about observing the Sabbath.
   The Pilgrims also left for reasons that still trouble expatriates today:
They fretted over the loss of their traditions as their children grew up
more Dutch than English.
   Slaving away as immigrants in low-paying menial jobs, they found
themselves haunted anew by their original dream of a place of their own in
which to worship and prosper.
   Though only a few dozen opted to leave on the Mayflower in 1620, more
followed over the next few years. Some never left - such as the wives and
children whose husbands and fathers went before them to the New World, only
to perish in that first bitter winter.
   But the ancient ties still bind. On Thursday, the people of Leiden -
including several hundred now thoroughly Dutch descendants of Pilgrims -
will gather in church in remembrance of their neighbors who changed the
world.
   The museum, funded with help from the Mayflower Society, the Pilgrim
Society and the New England Historic Genealogical Society, is in a typical
Pilgrim-style 16th century one-room house.
   The place is packed with Pilgrim-era tools, pottery and furniture,
including a cabinet containing tobacco pipes, coins, buttons and toys.
   "We'll take these items out and have conversations," said Bangs, 51, who
has authored 10 books about the Pilgrims. "People will learn in this
intimate way."
   The Pilgrims brought with them to Plymouth Colony many Dutch ways, such
as the civil registration of marriages. John Quincy Adams would later hail
their Mayflower Compact as the foundation for the U.S. Constitution.
   Bangs originally came to Leiden, the birthplace of Rembrandt 25 miles
southwest of Amsterdam, to study Dutch art and architecture. He ended up
running the city's Pilgrim archives, and when it closed a few years ago, he
decided to stay.
   His own home betrays his passion. Original engravings of Pilgrim life
clutter a coffee table; a Pilgrim-era ladderback chair occupies a corner of
his kitchen.
   "We really don't know much about what Pilgrim family life was like," he
said. "That's the goal of this house museum - to give some sense of how
they lived."


Picture: online athens
News | Sports | Opinions | Marquee | DogBytes
Home | Interact | Archives | Links | Classifieds | Gallery | Search
TheWIRE | Yellow Pages Plus | Datelines | AutoMall | GameStorm
Food | Athens Magazine | Discover Athens | Education | Survey | Subscribe!
The FAQ | Ad Rates  Site Design | Feedback | PressCard


Picture: Athens Daily News/Banner Herald
©opyright 1998 Athens Newspapers Inc.


AER

The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes
but in having new 

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] Religious Right,Religious Rights: an interview with A]

1998-12-29 Thread Robert Tatman

 -Caveat Lector-

Alamaine Ratliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-
 Anyway, more myth  legend on the Pilgrims:

 From http://www.athensnewspapers.com/1997/112697/1126.a3pilgrims.html

 American detective work brings
 alive Pilgrims' forgotten years

 By William J. Kole
 Associated Press
snip

An update on Jeremy Bangs...

Dutch border tightens on American historian


By William J. Kole
ASSOCIATED PRESS


AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- Nearly four centuries after it took in the Pilgrims,
the Netherlands has ordered America's foremost Pilgrim expert to leave.

Jeremy Bangs, founder of a new Pilgrim museum in the medieval city of Leiden,
has been caught in the Dutch government's immigration crackdown, a response to
an unprecedented wave of refugees.

For Bangs, the order to leave by Jan. 15 is thick with irony. He has been
chronicling how the Pilgrims, before boarding the Mayflower, spent 11 years in
a Holland that proudly declared in 1609 that it "refuses no honest people free
entry."

The Netherlands' refusal to grant him a residency permit, Bangs contends, will
force the closure of the only museum focusing on the Pilgrims'
little-knownexile here.

"I'm not a refugee; I'm a historian," Bangs, 52, said yesterday. "They can
expel me. They can just appear and deport me. It's incredible. People are
shocked, and my own mood is souring."

The Justice Ministry, which oversees immigration policy, this month rejected
Bangs' application for new residency papers, saying the historian needed a
work permit.

Officials also have refused to recognize Bangs' financial support, expenses
and health insurance through the New England Historic Genealogical Society as
an adequate source of income.

Bangs, who has written 10 books about the Pilgrims, was told that he could not
apply for a work permit because he was officially considered an employee of
the museum he opened on Thanksgiving Day 1997 and only employers can apply.

"The whole thing just makes me furious," said Jane Fiske, editor of the
Register of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, which publishes
Bangs' research.

Bangs' Leiden American Pilgrim Museum is in a typical Pilgrim-style,
16th-century, one-room house in the heart of Leiden, 25 miles southwest of
Amsterdam. It was an instant hit in the town that offered refuge to 100
Pilgrims and that still holds yearly Thanksgiving Day services in the main
church. More than 2,600 people have visited the cramped museum cluttered with
Pilgrim-era tools, pottery and furniture.

Supporters worldwide are writing letters to Queen Beatrix and cabinet
ministers on behalf of Bangs and his wife. Even the Ministry of Culture has
issued a statement that Bangs' work "serves an essential interest of the
Netherlands."

But the Justice Ministry has refused to budge. It is struggling to contain a
record of nearly 50,000 illegal immigrants this year from Afghanistan, Turkey
and the former Yugoslavia.

"Nobody could be more politically harmless than Jeremy," Fiske said. "You
know, I used to be proud of my own Dutch heritage but not anymore."


© 1998 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc.



=
Robert F. Tatman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed 
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included 
information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND UNSOLICITED 
COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET ADDRESS. RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL 
RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.


More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Irak protest: how voices are silenced in France

1998-12-29 Thread EASTERISLE

Some interesting info forwarded by an activist in France...

--Charles





Equilibre was one of the most famous humanitarian association. It became
famous during the
Bosnian War being one of the only organisation courageous enought to
force the blocus imposed
by the Serb (with the passivity of the West and the complicity of
several countries, especially
France -this was Mr Mitterand- and England). In February 1998 in Le
Monde, the most famous
French newspaper, thepresident of Equilibre Mr Gilbert, back from Irak,
stated that the embargo
killed more than one million Irakian, mainly children, and suggested to
put a claim on international
court for Genocide.
Today, Equilibre is bankrupted. I have no data that can allow to put
this two fact in relation.
But I think it is that we have to do. Mr Clinton being a sexual maniac
is possibly not enought a
reason to impeach him. But Irak definitely is. 1.500 000 deaths, not
soldiers mainly children and eldery
people and because of total embargo sanctions (slightly released in
1995) is a CRIME.
This has to be investigated by competent and independant jurits,
document and testimony has to be studdied
and a law process has to be held.
Are our leaders not possibly better than Nazi. Did they commited a
genocide by means of imposing an embargo on food
against a desertic country because they did not like Saddam hussein ?
There is no time limit for judging a genocide crime. Together with
trying to have this useless and cruel embargo lifted
American patriots should quietly gather facts and data, collect monney
and work with lawyers to inculp our leader
of genocide facing the same tribunal that are now facing the Bosno
Serbian butcher.
It is my belief  that in no country in the world today but the USA,
there is the drive and the energy to do that.


HTML
Equilibre was one of the most famous humanitarian association. It became
famous during the
BRBosnian War being one of the only organisation courageous enought to
force the blocus imposed
BRby the Serb (with the passivity of the West and the complicity of several
countries, especially
BRFrance -this was Mr Mitterand- and England). In February 1998 in Le
Monde, the most famous
BRFrench newspaper, thepresident of Equilibre Mr Gilbert, back from Irak,
stated that the embargo
BRkilled more than one million Irakian, mainly children, and suggested
to put a claim on international
BRcourt for BGenocide./B
BRToday, Equilibre is bankrupted. I have no data that can allow to put
this two fact in relation.
BRBut I think it is that we have to do. Mr Clinton being a sexual maniac
is possibly not enought a
BRreason to impeach him. But Irak definitely is. 1.500 000 deaths, not
soldiers mainly children and eldery
BRpeople and because of total embargo sanctions (slightly released in
1995) is a CRIME.
BRThis has to be investigated by competent and independant jurits, document
and testimony has to be studdied
BRand a law process has to be held.
BRAre our leaders not possibly better than Nazi. Did they commited a
genocide by means of imposing an embargo on food
BRagainst a desertic country because they did not like Saddam hussein
?
BRThere is no time limit for judging a genocide crime. Together with
trying to have this useless and cruel embargo lifted
BRAmerican patriots should quietly gather facts and data, collect monney
and work with lawyers to inculp our leader
BRof genocide facing the same tribunal that are now facing the Bosno
Serbian butcher.
BRIt is my beliefnbsp; that in no country in the world today but the
USA, there is the drive and the energy to do that./HTML




Re: [CTRL] (no subject)

1998-12-29 Thread KA

 -Caveat Lector-

On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lilke it, I like it !!
For once can say, no way !  hehehe !  Okay, so I'm a rebel at heart
but then spent (lived) in Maine too long.  Suits the downeast Yankee part of
itvbg
Go for the gusto

Uhhh...care to elucidate?

(For the rest of the list, THIS New England Yankee has NO idea what Lynne
is babbling about.)


June

 ===
   Ring out the old, ring in the new,
 Ring happy bells, across the snow;
 The year is going, let him go;
   Ring out the false, ring in the true.

 -- Tennyson:  In Memoriam
 ===

*---*
revcoal AT connix DOT com
*---*
 It is UNLAWFUL to send unsolicited commercial email to this email
 address per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227.  I assess a fee of
 $500.00 US currency for reading and deleting such unsolicited commercial
 email.  Sending such email to this address denotes acceptance of these
 terms.  My posting messages to Usenet neither grants consent to receive
 unsolicited commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial
 email.
**

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Re: [EWAR] Re: [MC] Re: HAARP Re:Persinger

1998-12-29 Thread RoadsEnd





I have to disagree on Edison, he was a firm believer in DC voltage (maybe
he had some other ideas before his time.)  It was Tesla who was a proponent
of Alternating Current.

There are without a doubt natural rythms to music that can "stir the soul".
 In the filming of "Doctor Zhivago", Spanish authorities under Franco, were
dispatched to monitor the filming of several marching scenes and take notes
on who was singing "Das Kapital" with the vigor of marxists, or their
allies.  Music is primal, it can to some extent manipulate a crowd, or
influence mood, but not on a scale that some technology can potentially
perform.

Advanced special effects in movies have evolved as our society has moved
from a visceral- seperation from the movies, to actually being a
"bystander" in the action.  For example the progression from Psycho, where
the violence was inferred, to A Nightmare on Elm Street, or Halloween-
where the violence is gruesome for soley a gratuitus reason, BUT IT SELLS.
Imagination is gone in the group we call- Generation X; how many of them
can find humor in a non-colorized version of Laurel and Hardy.

Ever have an MRI?  there are a LOT of people who suffer panic attacks when
inside of one.  I just got irritated at them bothering me all of the time
when they were asking me.

Brain implants wander into a gray area that really needs close scrutiny,
because there may come a time when it is routine for a kid who may be
diagnosed with A.D.D. (incorrectly at that), who has an implant to control
his behavior.  Why not routinely implant the same devices into all children
who are not of the "chosen class" so that they will be able to be controlled?

Sex sells, it just does.  Is this harmful manipulation?  Some would say so
based on the fact that what our perceptions of beauty seem to be, like Kate
Moss- "heroin druggie chic".

Often it is not a matter of ethics of the researcher, as many of them see
research as just that- research, neither good, nor bad.  The larger
question would regard those who would administer it, or arbitrarily decree it.




At 12:18 PM 12/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
Gordon Tibbles wrote:

 Read my original post.  That he would recognize the danger and still
conduct
 experimentation is unconscionable.  There is no "safe" level and even if
there were,
 the modulation to set up a specific field pattern within the brain has
wider
 application to initiate and sustain MC.

Is this true of Edison's programs for wiring countries for electricity?

Is this true of the marches of John P. Sousa?

Is this true of Wagner's "Ring Series" operatic works?

Is this true of advanced *special effects* in motion pictures?

Is this true of the developers of diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Is this true of the physicians developing brain implants to improve the
lives and function
of
those suffering from Parkinson's disease?

Is this true of advertisers using sexual iconography to sell their products?

Could you give us some examples of several neuroscientists who study brain
function whose
work and personal ethics you would not attack?

If you were asked to advise a committee that
approves research projects that involve brain stimulation of human
subjects, could you lay
out
a set of criteria that should be followed?

Gene Johnson





   MINDCONTROL-L Mind Control and Psyops Mailing List
   To unsubscribe or subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   the following text: "unsubscribe MINDCONTROL-L" or "subscribe
   MINDCONTROL-L". Post to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wes Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED], list moderator
  ***
  EWAR-L Electronic Warfare Mailing List
  To unsubscribe or subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with the following text: unsubscribe EWAR-L or subscribe EWAR-L.
  To post messages, send to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Previous posts:
  http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/digest.htm. EWAR Web site:
  http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/ewar.htm.
  -Wes Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED], list owner




***
EWAR-L Electronic Warfare Mailing List
To unsubscribe or subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the following text: unsubscribe EWAR-L or subscribe EWAR-L.
To post messages, send to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Previous posts:
http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/digest.htm. EWAR Web site:
http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/ewar.htm.
-Wes Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED], list owner



***
EWAR-L Electronic Warfare Mailing List
To unsubscribe or subscribe: send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the following text: unsubscribe EWAR-L or subscribe EWAR-L.
To post messages, send to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Previous posts:
http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/digest.htm. EWAR Web site:
http://www.sonic.net/~west/ewar/ewar.htm.
-Wes Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED], list owner




[CTRL] Euro Pathologies

1998-12-29 Thread flw

 -Caveat Lector-

Eurosociololgical Conniptions.
flw

FROM ROGER BOYES IN BERLIN

PROPERTY developers are at work throughout the Brandenburg lake district
grafting new housing estates on to run-down villages, putting up
hypermarkets, creating a dozen satellite townships in a web around the once
and future German capital of Berlin.
The political effects of this building boom are well known. Construction
companies can only meet their tight deadlines if they run round-the-clock
shifts. German workers are too expensive, so the environs of Berlin are
being pieced together by cheap Ukrainians, Poles, the British and the Irish.
The local youth, with official unemployment rates of 20 or more per cent -
and real rates at 30 per cent - are turning on the foreigners. Black Britons
in particular have been beaten up, even crippled by these resentful thugs.
Vietnamese, shrewd traders who are making fortunes selling cheap cigarettes,
have been set on fire. This is no longer the region celebrated by the
novelist, Theodor Fontane, or Johann Sebastian Bach: today the Brandenburg
concertos resonate to dark chords.
All this anger, bottled in over the winter like a potent home brew, is
likely to explode next year. The critical questions are whether and when the
anger will be directed at the euro, whether the far-right parties will be
able to mop up the discontent in the east and channel it, in time perhaps
for June's European elections, against the new currency.
The National Party of Germany, the Republicans and the German People's
Union - which whipped up more than 13 per cent of the vote in Saxony Anhalt
last autumn after a mere three-week campaign - are positioning themselves
for a euro protest. For the past year their demonstrators have brandished
"save the mark" placards along with a more obvious "foreign criminals go
home".
Partly this is tactical: it is more respectable in German political culture
to be patriotically in favour of the mark than to be openly racist. Partly
it reflects a genuine division within German society. Popular approval for
the euro is creeping up - it has just edged above 50 per cent - but in the
east nobody is budging. More than half of east Germans are firmly against
the euro, only a third are in favour.
The mark was a symbol of unity. It was a promise from the west that it would
share its prosperity with the east. The decision to adopt the euro is
regarded as western diktat. Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, of the Allensbach
opinion survey institute, gives a clue as to how disenchantment with the
west has taken root.
Her latest poll, conducted last September, asks Germans: "Do you believe
that west Germans want to help the east?" Only 32 per cent of east Germans
held this opinion and 47 per cent firmly disagreed. Eastern Germans are
probably right to be wary of the euro.
The new common currency will expose the inefficiency of rustbelt industries.
Naturally old communist plants have been closed down or remodelled and
modernised - but shipyards and heavy industry can still barely survive
without heavy subsidies from Bonn and Brussels.
It is reasonable to assume that the first, or at least a significant, victim
of economic and monetary union will be Germany, saddled with its high labour
and welfare costs. East Germans know exactly what is coming: foreign direct
investment has been leap-frogging over eastern Germany into western Poland,
which is growing visibly richer by the day.
Here, then, is the witches' brew. There will be a tension between a Germany
perceived by its neighours as being rich - and obliged in a full monetary
union to make transfer payments to the impoverished south - and yet
perceiving itself as a land of spreading poverty.
This is a classic trawling ground for the fishermen of the far Right,
comparable to the recruiting atmosphere of the 1930s. And so, at precisely
the moment when Europe is supposed to be integrating more closely, the
divisions between East and West will become more apparent.
Even the proponents of the euro see it as a modernising device - look how it
helped to keep budgets under control - and accept that monetary union could
become a scapegoat. Necessary reforms of Germany's labour costs will be
blamed squarely on EMU institutions rather than on the German Government.
The German resistance to the euro is not confined to the east. Nor is it the
exclusive catchment area of the far Right. Pensioners remain nervous -
though notably less so since the accession of a Social Democratic
Government - and so do small businesses. It is precisely the small and
medium-sized company, making up the so-called Mittelstand, which is supposed
to generate jobs, specially in the east.
The trend of big business in "euroland" is already clear: towards mega
mergers that end up with job cuts. Yet small business in the east was led to
believe that the euro would be as strong as the mark. The new Government
preaches a soft euro, the European Central Bank a hard one: the confusion is
destroying 

[CTRL] Catch 22 Is Tentative Reply From Finland

1998-12-29 Thread Brian Redman

 -Caveat Lector-

"CATCH 22" IS TENTATIVE REPLY FROM FINLAND
==

(CNNS, 12/29/98) -- In early  November  of 1998 this news service
sent an urgent "S.O.S." to Finland, requesting  political  asylum
for  the editor in that northern land.  Many good Finlanders have
responded to the request, offering assistance.

This news service has  received  information  that no less august
personages than Bill and Hillary  Clinton,  president  and  first
lady  of  the  United  States,  had  noticed our previous "S.O.S.
Finland" with some interest.

Many readers of CONSPIRACY NATION NEWS SERVICE (CNNS) had quietly
contacted us.  Citizens of the USA, they were most interested  in
the  progress  of  the  appeal;  they also thought along the same
lines:  that the opportunity to flee the United States would soon
disappear.

The tentative, apparently unofficial response  from  Finland  has
been enigmatic, much like the Finns themselves.

Communiques received from Finland thus far are reminiscent of the
tautology expressed in Joseph Heller's  novel,  "Catch  22".   In
that  novel,  Captain  Yossarian  wanted  to  get  a  psychiatric
deferment  so  he  could  avoid  further  dangerous  World War II
bombing missions.   But  the  "catch"  was  that  since Yossarian
wanted to get out of it, then *ipso facto* he must not really  be
"crazy."  If, on the other hand, Yossarian =did= want to continue
endangering  his life with more missions, then that would mean he
=was= "crazy."  Yet Yossarian would never request deferment if he
wished to continue his hazardous  duty, hence his deferment could
not be processed.  That was the CATCH:  "Catch 22."

The tentative, apparently unofficial response  from  Finland  has
invoked  a  similar tautology:  (1) since the editor has not been
rounded up and sent  to  a  concentration  camp, then there is no
need to extend political asylum; (2) if the editor is rounded  up
and  put in a concentration camp, then he qualifies for political
asylum in Finland (but since he's in a concentration camp, he has
no way to emigrate to Finland.)

The  editor of CNNS is seeking to convince the Finns that if they
were to grant political asylum to him, such a good act would have
positive  benefits  to  the  nation  of  Finland.   The  implicit
connection in such an event would be:  What nation is BETTER than
the USA?  Finland.  The CNNS editor escaped to there.  This would
be good worldwide public relations for Finland.

The Finns need not fear that, were they to grant political asylum
to the CNNS  editor,  they  would  be  besieged  by requests from
others for similar political asylum.  Finland could merely  claim
that  the  CNNS  editor,  a  pioneering crusader with a worldwide
audience, was a special instance.

To  restate  the case:  This editor has made vigorous attempts to
inform the American people about  the incessant operations of the
U.S. MILTARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.   Over  $500  million  worth  of
missiles  was  recently rained on Iraq.  That attack accomplished
nothing  and  even  worsened  the  situation  --  except  for one
all-important accomplishment:  depletion of weapons  inventories.
In  fact,  the whole purpose of the IRAQIANA DRAMA was none other
than to deplete said weapons inventories  so as to churn out more
orders  for  more  weapons,   thereby   profiting   the   weapons
manufacturers.  Yet despite my efforts, the American people sleep
and  care  nothing except for "Furby" toys.  This editor believes
that a  dramatic  ESCAPE  TO  FINLAND  will  serve a HUMANITARIAN
interest.  Continued reports  by  this  news  service,  based  in
Finland, could add sufficient leverage that the people of America
would  finally  "get  it"  and ask, "WHY NO QUESTION ON IF WE CAN
AFFORD A $500 MILLION  MISSILE  EXTRAVAGANZA?"  It's worth a try,
Finland.  The effect of a political emigrant,  divorcing  himself
from the USA "land of milk and honey," would inherently call into
question  a mythology that "no one escapes from America" and thus
undermine  a  political  hegemony  that  threatens  even  FINLAND
HERSELF.

There is no need to fear that the CNNS  editor,  as  a  political
emigrant,  would  bother  to criticize Finland herself.  His true
love -- first, last, and always -- is the United States.  How can
it be that the CNNS  editor  loves America yet criticizes her and
wishes to escape from her?  Read Nelson Algren's book,  "Chicago:
City  on the Make."  The CNNS editor is not in the same league as
Nelson Algren.  But read what Algren says.  Algren loved Chicago.
He wrote that it was because  he loved Chicago that he criticized
her.  And Algren finally left Chicago for good -- but  his  heart
never  left  the  city he loved.  The CNNS editor will be a "good
citizen" of Finland, but he can  never love her like he loves his
former homeland. And so, Finland will not be criticized.

Please respond, Finland. Time grows short.

 +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  +  

Re: [CTRL] CHRISTMAS WISHES

1998-12-29 Thread nurev

 -Caveat Lector-

"Jim Condit Jr." wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 On Sunday, December 27, 1998 9:39 AM, KA [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
   -Caveat Lector-
 
  On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Jim Condit Jr. wrote:
  over by the Roman Catholic Church . . . with the result that the world
  became civilized.
 
  THAT's debatable!

 Debatable, yes, but I submit we're coasting on the civilization brought to
 the world by the Roman Catholic Church between 4th and 14th century (one
 hundred years or so before Apostate priest Luther started changing the
 Bible which the Catholic monks of the Middle ages had preserved after the
 Catholic Popes (Damascus I to Gregory the Great) compiled and St. Jerome
 translated.)

I wouldn't brag about this if I were you. Non Catholics ( most people
)don't
exactly see this as a good thing.

  Are you telling us you are against birth control pills, too?

 Absolutely. Better to call them birth prevention pills, or anti-baby pills.
 They do tremendous harm to women, too. This is where the many Protestant
 religions bit the dust (again) in following the demonic Margaret Sanger,
 while the Roman Catholic Church has been consistent and held firm.

They don't do tremendous harm to women at all. You do tremendous harm
to
women by spreading primitive unscientific superstitious bullshit.


 OK. I should have said that Adam and Eve were promised a Savior, and that
 the promise they passed on got distorted in many cultures up to the time of
 Noah -- but you have to sometimes try to cut these posts short when you
 think you've made the essential point.

There were no such persons as Adam and Eve for sure, and the existence
of
Noah is highly doubtfull. How do you feel about Mickey Mouse and
Donald
Duck? How about the tooth fairy?

  And those who believe that Jesus is a myth, might try to explain the
 Shoud
  of Turin, which still defies all explanations despite Ruling Elite
 attempts

The Jesus of your religion is mythological, but there was a real
Jesus.
So what do you do? You try to prove the myhological instead of the
real.
How absurd is that?
 
  There are as many scientific studies debunking the shroud as supporting
  the theory that it's Jesus' actual shroud...it all boils down to FAITH...

 I don't think so. They can't reproduce the shroud today, despite much
 high-falutin bunk that hopes you infer that they can. Also, the Shroud had
 certain pollens in it that were only found in the Mid-east area.

Superstition is a wonderful thing. It makes it possible to argue about
how
many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

 
  It is by FAITH alone that one is saved, not by turning THINGS into icons
  and worshipping them...

People don't need to be saved for being born. They need to be saved
from the
insanity of people like you. Your glorious history is an example of
that.

 It is blasphemy to believe that the Holy Ghost
 inspires dozens of "churches" which contradict themselves on the most basic
 points, such as what it takes to be saved. God is truth, and not a bundle
 of contradictions. One Faith, one Church, one magisterial voice, one flock,
 one Shepherd.

And one crock.


  Incorruptibles, (see book by Joan Carroll), etc. and so on. As Joe
 Sobran
  said, if you think that Jesus was a hoax, consider that His words are
 still
  be quoted 2000 years later ---

They weren't his words. They are words made up by some guys who wanted
to
invent a religion, and attributed them to him.

 
  And how long have the Buddha's words been quoted...or those of the
  Hindus...or of Confuscius, or Lao-Tze?  All those religions have been
  around much longer than Christianity...
 
 Good point. But I believe all those religions are based on real men, not on
 hoaxes. It's only Christ that claims to have risen from the dead. The
 others didn't dare, or didn't think to make such claims. :^)Jim Condit
 Jr.

 
  June

Because they weren't so stupid as to claim the impossible as was done
for the mythological Jesus.

--
"And it came to pass that in the last days catatonics
roamed the earth, and great monsters ruled the masses."
  Joshua II 

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.


To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy 

[CTRL] If HIV really causes AIDS, where's the evidence? / Medical fascism

1998-12-29 Thread RoadsEnd

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.registerguard.com/news/19981229/ed.col.tyson.1229.html
A HREF="http://www.registerguard.com/news/19981229/ed.col.tyson.1229.html"
The Register-Guard: Opinion: If HIV really caus /A
-
December 29, 1998
Opinion: If HIV really causes AIDS, where's the evidence?
By DAVID TYSON
WHEN MY WIFE, KATHLEEN, tested positive for HIV in October, the sixth
month of her pregnancy, we were both stunned. Even more confusing was
that my blood tested negative for HIV. We have been married for more
than 10 years, monogamous, and never received blood transfusions. Our
calculations indicate that we have had 300 percent more sessions of
unprotected sex than the literature suggests is required for
transmission.
Kathleen is and always has been a robust specimen. Neither of us is an
intravenous drug user. It was clear that what we had heard about HIV and
what we were observing in our own bodies raised profound questions.

On our doctor's advice, Kathleen started a regimen of a protease
inhibitor and AZT.

I hit the books, motivated to get a grasp on the science of our
situation and, as it turns out, the politics of the plague warriors.
After several weeks reviewing the ``literature'' disseminated by the
National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, I was angry. Nowhere was there any elucidation on a
causative link between HIV and AIDS. There were assumptions aplenty,
some obscure lab reports, but nothing resembling the precise elucidation
that I associate with scientific thinking.

I was not, I discovered, alone in my frustration.

Dr. Kary Mullis, recipient of the 1993 Nobel Prize for chemistry for his
invention of the polymerase chain reaction, someone eminently more
qualified than I am to discover such a document, was unable to do so
either. Dr. Mullis reports:

``I did computer searches. Neither Montagnier, Gallo, nor anyone else
had published papers describing experiments which led to the conclusion
that HIV probably caused AIDS. I read the papers in Science for which
they had become well known as AIDS doctors, but all they had said there
was that they had found evidence of a past infection by something which
was probably HIV in some AIDS patients. They found antibodies.
Antibodies to viruses had always been considered evidence of past
disease, not present disease. Antibodies signaled that the virus had
been defeated. The patient had saved himself. There was no indication in
these papers that this virus caused a disease. They didn't show that
everybody with the antibodies had the disease. In fact they found some
healthy people with antibodies.'' (``The Medical Establishment vs. the
Truth,'' Penthouse magazine, September 1998.)

Mullis goes on to note that to obtain satisfaction in matters pertaining
to HIV and AIDS one can do no better than review the literature
developed by Peter Duesberg, professor of microbiology at the University
of California, Berkeley. Duesberg has studied retroviruses for 25 years
and is considered by some to have the most brilliant mind in the field
today.

Duesberg, it turns out, has argued all along that HIV cannot possibly
cause AIDS. His arguments take on the cadence and power of mathematical
certainty. Perhaps the most compelling strategy he uses to arrive at his
conclusion is the well known scientific principle which states that a
theory, in order to be useful, must accurately predict observed
phenomena. It can be demonstrated that the infectious HIV/AIDS theory
predicts none of the observed phenomena. (My own highly personal
observation corroborates this.)

There came a point in my research where I started to doubt our medical
establishment. Science and conventional wisdom appear to take divergent
paths. If Duesberg is correct, the American medical establishment and
particularly the Centers for Disease Control should start to notice a
substance significantly more repugnant than egg on its collective face.

We have an epidemic on our hands all right, an epidemic of bad science -
with legions of duped and/or unquestioning doctors of medicine as
co-conspiritors. This affair seen in all its stark ramifications is
nothing short of murderous fraud on a vast, global scale.

But I should perhaps return to my own story.

My failure to find any elucidation of the mechanism of pathogenicity for
the HIV/AIDS hypothesis, and my success in discovering conclusive
evidence of the powerful toxicity associated with anti-retroviral drugs,
persuaded my wife and me to abandon her therapy.

Compelling arguments put forth by John Yiamouyiannis, Ph.D., Dr. Eleni
Papadopulos, a biophysicist, and Dr. Roberto Giraldo, an infectious
disease specialist, which indicate that HIV is, at worst, a harmless
endogenous retrovirus, diminished our health concerns considerably.

So it was that our baby, Felix Hugh, was born at 9:55 p.m. on Dec. 7. He
weighed 7 pounds, 7 ounces and was as perfect a little boy as anyone
could possibly hope.

We 

[CTRL] Fwd: [priory-of-sion] CIA,POS, intelligence gathering

1998-12-29 Thread RoadsEnd





From: "ANTHONY" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jack wrote:
"Please note that Ct. Guelfi started his PoS activities at age 21 by
"gathering
intelligence."  While some intelligence gathering might be of religious or
at
least nonclassified information, he gave us no assurance that the PoS does
not
engage in illegal espionage."


In reference to this an interesting book recently re-released by the
Croatians and written by Henri Pozzi in the early part of this century
titled "The Black Hand Over Europe" is worth looking at. Many threads to be
found here.There is a web site at :

Black Hand info: http://vukovar.unm.edu/~vuksan/blackhand/index.html

and another at :http://cronet.com/cic/blackh/index.htm
both have the same information. I suggest looking at The Constitution of the
Serbian Black Hand .

I posted this information earlier this month, Pozzi was a chief intelligence
officer for the UK during WW1  2. He seems to have keep tabs on secret
societies, the Mafia, political groups, ect. and their connections. Have not
read his book, but perhaps he mentions the POS or related facets.

regards




To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.

http://www.albino.com/circle/pos - - list of priory-related books,
associations, and websites





[CTRL] Fwd: CFR National Security Council Members

1998-12-29 Thread RoadsEnd





On Friday December 25, 1998 Reuters reported:

Clinton Names USAID Head Atwood Envoy To Brazil

 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Clinton has named U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) administrator Brian Atwood as ambassador
to Brazil, the White House said Thursday.

 The nomination is subject to U.S. Senate approval.

 Atwood has led USAID, the agency that administers U.S. economic
assistance around the world, since 1993. Previously, he served as a
diplomat in Ivory Coast and Spain, and as Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional relations.

What Reuters didn't report is President Clinton and Brian Atwood are
Council on Foreign Relations members and the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) is part of the Council on Foreign Relations run United
States Psycho-Political Operations organization.

Hadley Cantril and Lloyd Free were Princeton University Social
Psychologists, researchers, and members of the intelligence community.
Council on Foreign Relations Member Nelson Rockefeller funded them to
develop psycho-political policy strategies and techniques. Council on
Foreign Relations Member Edward R. Murrow, would, with Rockefeller
Foundation Funding conduct a research project to perform a systematic
analysis of Nazi radio propaganda techniques and the political use of
radio. This study would result in a world wide monitoring and broadcasting
Government agency called the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS).

FBIS would become the United States Information Agency (USIA). The USIA was
established to achieve US foreign policy by influencing public attitude at
home and abroad using psycho-political policy strategies. The USIA Office
of Research and reference service prepares data on psychological factors
and propaganda problems considered by the Policy Planning Board in
formulating psycho-political information policies for the National Security
Council (NSC).

The USIA advises the Agency for International Development (AID)on the
implications of foreign public opinion for AID programs. Both in Washington
and at posts abroad, the two agencies work together to assure USIA's
effective support for US assistance programs, and conversely, to insure
that AID programs support US psychological objectives. US psychological
operations are  scripted, directed, and controlled by Council on Foreign
Relations members in the State Department, National Security Council,
Central Intelligence Agency(CIA), United States Information Agency, and
Agency for International Development.

The Council on Foreign Relations has only 3000 members yet controls over
three-quarters of the nations wealth.  Council on Foreign Relations members
make up a "Secret Team" that occupy the top positions in the executive,
legislative, and judicial branches of government; who control the
broadcasting and news agencies; who head the largest law firms; who direct
the largest private foundations and universities; and who hold top commands
in the military.

The Council on Foreign Relations has placed 100 Council on Foreign
Relations "Secret Team"  members in every Presidential Administration since
Woodrow Wilson. They work together to misinform and disinform the President
to act in the best interest of the Council on Foreign Relations not the
best interest of the American People. The "Secret Team" help carry out
psycho-political operations scripted by Council on Foreign Relations
members in the state department and the Intelligence Organizations.

The Council on Foreign Relations "Secret Team" is structured as circles
within circles. The psycho-political operations are coordinated by an inner
circle of Council on Foreign Relations members called the Special Group.
The Special Group evolved from the Psychological Strategy Board. The
Psychological Strategy Board was designed and run by Council on Foreign
Relations members Gordon Gray and Henry Kissinger. The Psychological
Strategy Board was established by an Executive Order written by President
Harry Truman.

Psycho-political operations are structured so  Council on Foreign Relations
sponsorship of an operation can be kept secret. The part played by a
"Secret Team" member is often kept secret from "Secret Team" members. This
allows the  "Secret Team" member to deny  participation in the operation.

The National Security Council was established by the National Security Act
of 1947. The National Security Council advises the president with respect
to the integration of domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to
national security. The National Security Council is the principal forum for
the consideration of national security policy issues requiring a
presidential decision.

The National Security Council is chaired by the President. Its statutory
members, in addition to the President, are the Vice President and the
Secretaries of State and Defense. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
is the statutory military advisor to the Council, and the Director of