-Caveat Lector-

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:36:06 +1100
From: Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ParanoidTimes] 9/11 - ISRAEL'S AMBIGUOUS ROLE

9/11 - ISRAEL'S AMBIGUOUS ROLE
FOX NEWS POINTS TO AN OMINOUS CONCLUSION

By: Justin Raimondo
Published in the December 24, 2001 issue of Ether Zone

When is American foreign policy going to start putting America first? The
US had nothing to gain, and everything to lose, by vetoing a UN resolution
condemning violence on all sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The
resolution condemned all terrorism, called for the creation of a
"monitoring mechanism" to prevent violence, denounced executions without
trial, and said the destruction of property must cease. You gotta problem
with that?  NEGROPONTE'S VETO This administration does: John Negroponte,
American ambassador to the UN, justified the US veto by averring that the
resolution aimed to "isolate politically one of the parties to the
conflict through an attempt to throw the weight of the Council behind the
other party.'' The resolution, said Negroponte, was unsatisfactory because
it didn't specifically mention "recent acts of terrorism'' against
Israelis. Naturally, this scuttled the whole thing, as it was intended to
do.

THE VICTIMOLOGICAL OLYMPICS For this argument, if carried on long enough,
would lead to an infinite regression of victimological examples: the
pro-Arab bloc would insist on specifically mentioning the supposedly
accidental killing of five Palestinian children by an Israeli booby-trap
bomb planted near a school. This would be the cue for the Israeli side to
come up with a Hamas-Hizbollah atrocity that merits inclusion - and,
before you know it, we're all the way back to 1948 with the pro-Arabists
demanding the inclusion of the massacre at Deir Yassein, and, naturally,
the Zionist bloc doing them one better by moving for some mention of the
Roman conquest and persecution of the Jews.

THE WAR AGAINST THE WORLD The US veto undermines the war effort, and makes
the Americans seems as if they are waging a war not only on Islam, but
against the entire world on behalf of Israel. After decades of trying to
prove its bona fides as an honest broker of peace in the region, it is the
US that is effectively isolated. The resolution was cosponsored (or
amended) by France and the Security Council vote was 12-1, with Britain
and Norway abstaining. Whatever credibility the US had in the Arab world -
very little, I'm afraid - was lost with that one arrogant gesture. So much
for the grand "coalition" that Colin Powell has been building: the Israeli
lobby in the US has demolished it with a single blow.

THE LAST LAUGH Is that the demonic laughter of the Mad Sheik I hear,
chortling in his cave at this act of American self-sabotage? It seems
Osama bin Laden may not be long for this world. Yet he will die happy in
the knowledge that the US is sowing the seeds of his future warrior army,
who will spring like Muslim Myrmidons out of Palestine's blood-soaked
earth.

BATTLEGROUND AMERICA Speaking of sabotage, the story of the gigantic
Israeli spy operation in the US - and its mysterious activities in the
weeks prior to 9/11 - continues to amaze and shock even me. When I wrote,
a few weeks ago, that the detention of some 60 Israelis in connection with
9/11 was "ominous" little did I realize just how much of an understatement
that would turn out to be. It is often said that, post-9/11, the US is
going through what the Israelis have had to endure for decades. The series
of Fox News special reports on Israeli penetration of US intelligence
assets puts this insight in an entirely new light. For it appears, from
what we are learning, that the struggle between two desert tribes in a far
away land has truly been brought home to the US: America, we are
discovering to our horror, has become a battleground for both sides in
that ancient conflict.

ENDS & MEANS As I related last week, the first part of this astonishing
four-part series by Fox News reporter Carl Cameron presents credible
evidence suggesting Israeli intelligence had foreknowledge of the 9/11
attacks. The second and third parts show they had the means to acquire
this knowledge. According to Cameron,

"Fox News has learned that some American terrorist investigators fear
certain suspects in the Sept. 11 attacks may have managed to stay ahead of
them, by knowing who and when investigators are calling on the telephone."

ALL ROADS LEAD TO AMDOCS Cameron takes us through an explanation of how
and why virtually all telephone calls in the US are billed by a single
company, Amdocs Ltd., which just happens to be headquartered in Israel.
Chances are that when you make a call, the record of the call and the
billing is done through Amdocs. With a virtual monopoly in the US, and
tentacles worldwide, Cameron reports that "it is virtually impossible to
make a call on normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of it."
Amdocs denies any wrongdoing, but sources tell Fox News that, in 1999,

"The super secret national security agency, headquartered in northern
Maryland, issued what's called a Top Secret sensitive compartmentalized
information report, TS/SCI, warning that records of calls in the United
States were getting into foreign hands - in Israel, in particular."

SPIES IN THE WOODWORK It's not that anyone is listening in on all these
calls, but that these methods are a way to know who is calling whom, when,
and for how long - vital information in and of itself. Cameron assures us
that the White House and the Pentagon are immune from such surveillance,
but an article in Insight, the magazine put out by the Washington Times,
showed how Israeli intelligence had thoroughly penetrated the
communications system at the Clinton White House. According to co-authors
J. Michael Waller and Paul M. Rodriguez, writing in May of last year, the
FBI was

"Probing an explosive foreign-espionage operation that could dwarf the
other spy scandals plaguing the U.S. government. Insight has learned that
FBI counterintelligence is tracking a daring operation to spy on
high-level US officials by hacking into supposedly secure telephone
networks. The espionage was facilitated, federal officials say, by lax
telephone-security procedures at the White House, State Department and
other high-level government offices and by a Justice Department
unwillingness to seek an indictment against a suspect."

"The espionage operation may have serious ramifications," wrote Waller and
Rodriguez, "because the FBI has identified Israel as the culprit."

MONICA TELLS ALL Dozens of officials confirmed the story, telling the
authors of this fascinating piece how the Israelis had managed to
penetrate not only State Department telephone lines, but also those in the
White House, the Defense Department, and the Justice Department. That the
President knew this at the time is beyond doubt; it came out, you'll
remember, during l'affaire Lewinsky, when Monica testified that on March
29, 1997, she and Clinton were desecrating the Oval Office and she
specifically remembered it because, as the Starr Report put it:

"He suspected that a foreign embassy was tapping his telephones, and he
proposed cover stories. If ever questioned, she should say that the two of
them were just friends. If anyone ever asked about their phone sex, she
should say that they knew their calls were being monitored all along, and
the phone sex was just a put on."

LITTLE DID THEY KNOW That "foreign embassy" was the Israelis'. It is
spooky, in retrospect, to read the comments of the American intelligence
and law enforcement officials who sourced this pioneering Insight piece
(which, for some reason, is no longer available on their website but is
still available, thanks to the miracle of Google). "It's a huge security
nightmare," said one senior US official. "The implications are severe,"
another unnamed official chimed in. "We're not even sure we know the
extent of it," said a third high-ranking intelligence official. "All I can
tell you is that we think we know how it was done. That alone is serious
enough, but it's the unknown that has such deep consequences."

OUT OF THE MURK Ah, but the deepness of these consequences is just
beginning to be known. As the Fox News revelations make all too clear,
they are a lot deeper than anyone, including Waller and Rodriguez, could
possibly have imagined last year. The picture that is beginning to emerge
out of the murk is this: the Israelis were watching the hijackers and/or
their associates, and they very possibly had access to a complete set of
the conspirators' phone records, if not direct access to the content of
their conversations. In the months prior to the attacks, the Israelis did
indeed issue a warning of "massive" terrorist attacks, but, in an effort
to protect both their sources and methods, their warning gave no details
and was therefore practically useless.

THE COMVERSE CONNECTION The third part of the Fox series shows how the
Israelis had access, not only to phone records, but also to the wiretaps
being conducted by US law enforcement agencies. This access could have
easily been provided, Cameron points out, by yet another hi-tech Israeli
communications company, Comverse, which operates as practically a branch
of the Israeli government, and enjoys near monopolistic status.

When you place a call, it goes through a complicated network of routers
and switchers. The way wiretapping works is that customized computers are
linked to that network via specialized software, and the system
intercepts, records, and stores wiretapped calls. But this system has a
"back door" that could have easily been opened by Israeli intelligence.
Comverse maintains a link to the wiretapping computers, on the grounds
that it is necessary for system "maintenance." Over the opposition of some
honest law enforcement officers, this process was authorized by the 1994
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). But that wasn't
the end of it. According to Fox News,

"Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were both
warned Oct. 18 in a hand-delivered letter from 15 local, state and federal
law enforcement officials, who complained that 'law enforcement's current
electronic surveillance capabilities are less effective today than they
were at the time CALEA was enacted.'"

ASHCROFT'S COMPLICITY But Ashcroft is too busy rounding up Arabs and
closing down their organizations to worry about the wholesale penetration
of our communications system - including "secure" networks at the White
House, the Defense Department, and elsewhere - by our wonderful allies,
the Israelis. Cameron cites several unnamed law enforcement agents -
concerned about the ominous implications of the Israeli penetration in
light of 9/11 - who say that even raising the issue is "career suicide."

I HOPE YOU'RE SITTING DOWN Okay, so the Israelis have the phone lines over
at the White House, the Defense Department, the Justice Department, and,
for all we know, your local dogcatcher's office bugged to the max. So they
have the capability to know where and when practically every phone call in
the US, and large sections of the rest of the world, is made, and to whom.
As fantastic as it sounds, given the advance of technology and the
reputation of the Mossad, I'm willing to believe it. What's really
alarming, however, is that, as Cameron reports:

"On a number of cases, suspects that they had sought to wiretap and survey
immediately changed their telecommunications processes. They started
acting much differently as soon as those supposedly secret wiretaps went
into place."

BEYOND THE BEGUINE The implications of this stunning news go far beyond my
original contention: that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the 9/11
attacks and simply failed to let us know the details. For it all depends
on the intended target of the wiretaps: was it the Israelis, or Bin
Laden's agents? If the former were acting differently after wiretaps were
put in place, it means only that the Israelis were using their sources and
methods to protect their own: if the latter, it means the Israelis were
using their sources and methods to protect the Bin Ladenites. That is a
possibility no one - including me - wants to contemplate, and, in all
truthfulness, I must confess I cannot believe it. I am forced to concede,
however, that, given what we now know, it is possible.

INVESTIGATE THE ISRAELI CONNECTION At the end of his second report, Carl
Cameron remarked to Brit Hume that the question of the Israeli connection
to 9/11 "came up in select intelligence committee on Capitol Hill today,"
and "they intend to look into what we reported last night." Naturally, all
this is occurring in secret, with the likelihood of a cover-up all but
certain. What is needed is a public investigation, and full disclosure of
the Israeli role, if any, in 9/11.

WHERE IS THE MEDIA? That, of course, is the role of the media - and, in
this regard, it is interesting to note that Cameron's explosive
investigation has not been picked up by a single news outlet, as far as I
know (although I would be happy to be proved wrong) or discussed by a
single "mainstream" columnist. Yet Fox News is hardly a marginal new
source. In a business where scandal and especially spy stories are hot,
you would think that a story like this, with its tie-in to 9/11, would
have the other networks and the major media falling all over themselves to
get a piece of the action. But not this time, at least so far.

FAN MAIL FROM SOME CRANKY FLOUNDER It's funny, but when I wrote my first
column on this subject, I got a whole bunch of nutball letters from
anti-Semitic cranks who told me that "the Jews" would never let me get
away with it, and that I am now a "marked man." This story, wrote one
correspondent, "will go nowhere," because "the Jews" control the media,
blah blah blah. I laughed, reading these perfervid notes, most of them
WRITTEN IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, wondering at the infinite capacity of
people to fit reality into ideological categories rather than the other
way 'round. After all, the mere fact that the story was broadcast on Fox
News, a major media organization, appears to contradict the self-evidently
absurd thesis that the "Elders of Zion," sitting in a control room
somewhere, determine what news we're allowed to read.

THE ANTI-SEMITIC FALLACY I can only hope, for Mr. Cameron's sake, that
what amounts to "career suicide" in law enforcement doesn't hold true at
Fox News. Israel certainly has many vocal and very active supporters, who
are quick to make their opinions known. But it is false to posit a
"Jewish-controlled" media, no matter what the ethnicity or political
persuasion of editors, owners, or whatever: these media companies are
beholden to their shareholders, and to the market. Reporting the news is
an intensely competitive business: there is no way to enforce an embargo
on certain information, not in this day and age. There is no "Jewish
conspiracy" - only the machinations of a particular foreign government and
its uncritical supporters in this country, who span the ethnic and
religious as well as the political spectrum.

THE TRUTH, AT LAST It is too soon to say whether or not this story has
"legs," as they say, and is going anywhere soon. But one thing's for sure:
Fox News has blown the mystery of 9/11 wide open. This isn't going to just
go away. On September 11, the American people looked on in disbelief at
the sight of not only the World Trade Center going down but the Pentagon -
the Pentagon, fer chrissake! - under attack and apparently defenseless. My
first thought, at any rate, was: How could this happen? With these latest
surprising developments - pointing to an ambiguous Israeli role, at best,
in all this - I fear we are just beginning to discover the answer to that
question.

http://etherzone.com/raim122401.shtml

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to