-Caveat Lector-

Mike & Kathy Moxley wrote:
    Was George Washington a Christian?

MJ:
In a word, No.

from Franklin Steiner's The Religious Beliefs of Our President's 19

   Every public man, every office holder and politician
   realizes that organized religion, socially, politically
   and economically, is a factor to be recognized and dealt
   with. Washington, not only as Commander-in-Chief, but
   more so as President, was obliged to have the united
   support of all the people, regardless of his individual
   views. He was careful to warn all these Churches against
   the great vice of the world, religious bigotry, intolerance
   and persecution. Because a motive is inspired by religion,
   it may not always be right, but religion is a powerful
   motive, right or wrong. Washington, in all these addresses,
   had in mind that religious controversy and dissension breed
   discord. At the same time, he realized that to secure
   independence and erect the new government, the cooperation
   of the Churches and the ministers was essential. He wanted
   their support, and to have their enmity would have been
   unfortunate.

   There have been few Clemenceaus, Bradlaughs, Berts and
   Gambettas in public life who openly opposed the Church.
   These did so under extraordinary circumstances. Had Washington
   been as firm an Agnostic as Ingersoll, it would have been to
   his advantage to remain silent on the subject. He is careful
   to refer to religion in general, not to any particular belief
   or Church. He says nice things to them all, but commits himself
   to none. His use of the word "Christian" at times means nothing
   definite. Christianity might mean Roman Catholicism or
   Unitarianism, or "mere morality," just as its user prefers.
   Of course every man must give special homage to the religion
   of the country in which he lives. In the "Farewell Address,"
   he often refers to "religion morality." This might mean any
   religion, and the, other excerpts confirm us in thinking that
   he meant all religions and none in particular.

   Thousands of men today hold that religious institutions should
   be upheld because of the prop they give to morality. They support
   Church for that reason, while they are indifferent to its
   theological teaching. They believe, as did Draper: "The
   tranquility of society depends so much on the stability of its
   religious convictions, that no one can be  justified in wantonly
   disturbing them." They think religion is necessary  for other
   people, while not needed by themselves. It will also be noticed
   that Washington, while he sometimes couples morality and
   religion, stresses the former, and ends by saying that
   "virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government."

   Among the addresses sent to Washington when he became President
   was one from the First Presbytery of the Eastward, which objected
   to the new Constitution because it did not recognize God and the
   Christian religion,  in these words: "We should not have been
   alone in rejoicing to have seen  some explicit acknowledgement
   of the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom he hath sent,
   inserted somewhere in the Magna Charta of our country." To
   this, Washington replied:

     "The path of true piety is so plain as to require but little
      political direction. ... In the progress of morality and
      science, to which our government will give every furtherance,
      we may confidently expect the advancement of true religion and
      the completion of our happiness."

   Here, as on similar occasions he is too canny to say what "true
   piety"  is. His statement that "true piety" will be advanced
   through the "progress of morality and science," would place
   him at the present day in the ranks of Rationalism.

   Washington knew, at the same time, as did Madison, that religion,
   legally united with the state, is no aid either to "virtue or
   morality."  For that reason he said, in the treaty with Tripoli,
   made in 1796, and, ratified by the Senate in 1797: "The
   Government of the United states of America is not, in any
   sense, founded upon the Christian religion." He was too shrewd
   to oppose the orthodoxy of his time, and equally shrewd in not
   committing himself to its teachings. Socially, he conformed to
   the religious customs of his day, just enough to maintain the
   good will of religious people.

   What Was Washington's Belief? It is said that some one asked
   of Lord Beaconsfield his religion. He replied, "The religion
   of wise men."  Thereupon, his interlocutor again ask, "What
   religion is that," and my Lord answered, Wise men never tell."
   Washington was a wise man and never told.

   In classifying these Presidents, placing them in one Church
   or another, whenever they actually were believers in the
   doctrines of that Church, I have had no difficulty in
   securing indubitable evidence,  except in the case of
   President Pierce, whose religious affiliations it required
   some effort to learn. The proofs have been culled when
   possible  from the spoken or written words of the Presidents
   themselves, combined  with their public attitudes, In which
   I could make no mistake.

   Washington never made a statement of his belief, while his
   actions rather prove that if he was not a positive unbeliever,
   he was at best an indifferentist. We have seen that he was not
   a regular attendant at church services -- rather an irregular
   one. I have examined 14 years of his complete Dairies, 13 of
   them when he was at home, with two Episcopal churches within
   eight or 10, miles. One of these years, 1774, was his banner
   year for church attendance, when he went 18 times. Yet we
   find, in these 14 years, his average attendance to have been
   about six times a year -- not a very good record.

   That Washington did not commune is established beyond all
   doubt by reputable witnesses. The evidence of Bishop White,
   the Rev. Dr. Abercrombie and the Rev. Dr. Wilson certainly
   outweighs the very shady assertion that he once took communion
   in a Presbyterian church, which rests upon questionable and
   anonymous evidence, to say nothing of its utter improbability.

   Bishop White says Washington did not kneel in prayer. Nellie
   Custis says he stood during the devotional service. She also
   admits that she never saw him pray, but that someone long
   dead had told her that he had seen him praying many years
   before. The Valley Forge prayer is a myth of even a weaker
   type, than the Presbyterian communion story. The "Prayer for
   the United, States" is a demonstrated fabrication. These
   fictions would not be necessary were there true evidence
   that Washington was religious. During the Revolution,
   forged letters were published in London attacking his
   personal moral character. It has been said that letters
   written by Washington were in existence that cast reflections
   upon him, but no one has ever been able to produce them.
   Between the fictions, forgeries and falsehoods told to
   make Washington either a plaster saint or a rake, it is
   difficult to say which would have disgusted him the more.

   Jared Sparks says:

      "After a long and minute examination of the writings of
       Washington, Public and private, in print and in
       manuscript, I can affirm, that I have never seen a
       single hint, or expression, from which it could be
       inferred, that he had any doubt of the Christian
       revelation, or  that he thought with indifference
       or unconcern of that subject. On the contrary, wherever
       he approaches it, and indeed wherever he alludes in any
       manner to religion, it is done with seriousness and
       reverence." (Life of 'Washington,' p. 525.)

   If Dr. Sparks found from Washington's writings that he never
   had a  "doubt of the Christian revelation," neither could he
   find among them anything proven, his belief in the same. He
   may have thought about it and it is likely that he did, but
   as to expressing his views, he surely was indifferent and
   unconcerned. The truth is that the majority of unbelievers,
   especially men of prominence in political or social life,
   make no statement of their unbelief. True, when Washington
   spoke of religion, he spoke with "seriousness and reverence,"
   but he so spoke of all religions and not of any particular
   one. That an unbeliever is necessarily flippant, it is the
   prerogative of Mr. Sparks to assert. Scholarly Freethinkers
   consider religion an important subject, even though they
   reject its orthodox interpretation. While not necessarily
   reverent in their attitude, they discuss it seriously from
   the standpoint of science logic and history. [NOTE: That I
    may not be justly accused of unfairness, I reproduce in
   entirety, in the Appendix, the chapter in Sparks's 'Life of
   Washington' that deals with his religious views.]

   Most important of all, there stands out the fact that while
   in Washington's writings there is nothing affirming or denying
   the truth of Christian revelation, there is also nothing
   inconsistent with Deism.  Deists of the time believed in
   God and his Providence. They accepted all of moral value
   in the Christian Bible and in all other sacred books, holding
   it to be a part of natural religion. They held in high esteem
   the moral teachings and character of Jesus. Even the orthodox
   never tire of quoting complimentary things said about him by
   Paine and Rousseau. Many Deists prayed and believed in prayer.

   Nor can Dr. Sparks find anything in the writings of Washington
   tending to prove that he believed in Jesus as the Christ and
   the son of God. Nor will he find anything which will prove
   that a future existence had any firm place in his calculations,
   though Deists, as a rule, hope for "happiness beyond this
   life." During Washington's sickness and death religion was
   not mentioned. No minister was called in, though three
   doctors were present.

     Dr. Moncure D. Conway says:

     "When the end was near, Washington said to a physician
      present -- an ancestor of the writer of these notes -- 'I
      am not afraid to go.'  With his right fingers on his left
      wrist, he counted his own pulses, which beat his funeral
      march to the grave. 'He bore his distress with astonishing
      fortitude, and conscious as he declared, several hours
      before his death, of his approaching dissolution, he
      resigned his breath with the greatest composure, having
      the full possession of his reason to the last moment,'
      so next day wrote one present. [NOTE: See Appendix for
      the account of Washington's sickness and death as written
      by his secretary, Tobias Lear, from whom Dr. Conway quotes.]
      Mrs. Washington knelt beside his bed, but no word passed on
      religious matters. With the sublime taciturnity which
      marked his life he passed out of existence, leaving no
      word or act which can be turned to the service of
      superstition, cant or bigotry."

   He died like an ancient pagan Greek or Roman. This has puzzled
   many who have tried to fit Washington with orthodox garments.

   In his letters to young people, particularly to his adopted
   children, he urges upon them truth, character, honesty, but
   in no case does he advise going to church, reading the Bible,
   belief in Christ, or any other item of religious faith or
   practice, once he wanted mechanics for his estate. He did
   not demand that they be Christians, but he wrote to his
   agent, "If they be good workmen, they may be from Asia,
   Africa, or Europe; they may be Mohammedans, Jews, or Christians
   of any sect, or they may be Atheists."

   Except the legal phrase, "In the name of God, Amen," there
   are no religious references in Washington's will, something
   unusual in wills made at that time. While he liberally
   recognizes his relatives he leaves nothing to churches or
   for other religious purposes, but he does remember the
   cause of education.

   We have already quoted Bishop White to the effect that when
   the vestry of Christ Church waited upon Washington with an
   address, he expressed gratification at some things he had
   heard from their pulpit, but said not a word that would
   indicate his own religious views. Just before he left the
   Presidency, all the ministers of Philadelphia waited upon
   him, also bearing an address. We will let Thomas Jefferson
   tell the story, as he wrote it in his Diary, for February 1,
   1800, just six weeks after Washington's death:

      "Feb. 1. Dr. Rush tells me that he had it from Asa Green
       that when the clergy addressed General Washington on his
       departure from the Government, it was observed in their
       consultation that he had never on any occasion said a
       word to the public which showed a belief in the Christian
       religion and they thought they should so pen their
       address as to force him at length to declare publicly
       whether he was a Christian or not. They did so. However,
       he observed, the old fox was too cunning for them. He
       answered every article in their address particularly
       except that, which he passed over without notice.
       Rush observes he never did say a word on the subject
       in any of his public papers except in his valedictory
       address to the governors of the States when he resigned
       his commission in the army, wherein he speaks of the
       benign influence of the Christian religion.

       "I know that Gouverneur Morris, who pretended to be in
       his secrets and believed himself to be so, has often
       told me that General Washington believed no more in
       the system (Christianity) than he did." (The Writings
       of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 1, p. 284.)


Regard$,
--MJ

In the Enlightened Age and in this Land of equal Liberty it is
our boast, that a man's religious tenets will not forfeit the
protection of the Laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining
and holding the highest Offices that are known in the United
States.
-- George Washington, letter to the members of the New
                           Church in Baltimore, January 27, 1793.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to