-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

http://www.dnai.com/~zap/zpe-fly.htm

THE AIR FORCE ALLOWS A CONVENTIONAL AND PUBLIC APPROACH
We Are Going To Hear Much More About This In The Next Couple Of Years In
A More Sensational Manner Than One Would Expect.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



Paper Hal Puthoff presented at the NASA Breakthrough Propulsion
Physics conference at Lewis Research Center

    Overview of Theory and Experiments
     H. E. Puthoff, Ph.D.
     Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin
     4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 300
     Austin, TX 78759-5329

     Voice (512) 346-9947, Fax (512) 346-3017
     E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------

Can the Vacuum be Engineered for Spaceflight applications?

ABSTRACT
Quantum theory predicts, and experiments verify, that empty space (the
vacuum) contains an enormous residual background energy known as
zero-point energy (ZPE).

Originally thought to be of significance only for such esoteric concerns
as small perturbations to atomic emission processes, it is now known to
play a role in large-scale phenomena of interest to technologists as
well, such as the inhibition of spontaneous emission, the generation of
short-range attractive forces (e.g., the Casimir force), and the
possibility of accounting for sonoluminescence phenomena.

ZPE topics of interest for spaceflight applications range from
fundamental issues (where does inertia come from, can it be
controlled?), through laboratory attempts to extract useful energy from
vacuum fluctuations (can the ZPE be "mined" for practical use?), to
scientifically-grounded extrapolations concerning "engineering the
vacuum" (is "warp- drive" space propulsion a scientific possibility?).
Recent advances in research into the physics of the underlying ZPE
indicate the possibility of potential application in all these areas of
interest.

INTRODUCTION

The concept "engineering the vacuum" was first introduced by Nobel
Laureate T. D. Lee in his book Particle Physics and Introduction to
Field Theory. As stated there: "The experimental method to alter the
properties of the vacuum may be called vacuum engineering.... If indeed
we are able to alter the vacuum, then we may encounter some new
phenomena, totally unexpected." Recent experiments have indeed shown
this to be the case.

With regard to space propulsion, the question of engineering the vacuum
can be put succinctly: "Can empty space itself provide the solution?"

Surprisingly enough, there are hints that potential help may in fact
emerge quite literally out of the vacuum of so-called "empty space."
Quantum theory tells us that empty space is not truly empty, but rather
is the seat of myriad energetic quantum processes that could have
profound implications for future space travel. To understand these
implications it will serve us to review briefly the historical
development of the scientific view of what constitutes empty space.

At the time of the Greek philosophers, Democritus argued that empty
space was truly a void, otherwise there would not be room for the motion
of atoms.

Aristotle, on the other hand, argued equally forcefully that what
appeared to be empty space was in fact a plenum (a background filled
with substance), for did not heat and light travel from place to place
as if carried by some kind of medium?

The argument went back and forth through the centuries until finally
codified by Maxwell's theory of the luminiferous ether, a plenum that
carried electromagnetic waves, including light, much as water carries
waves across its surface. Attempts to measure the properties of this
ether, or to measure the Earth's velocity through the ether (as in the
Michelson- Morley experiment), however, met with failure.

With the rise of special relativity which did not require reference to
such an underlying substrate, Einstein in 1905 effectively banished the
ether in favor of the concept that empty space constitutes a true void.
Ten years later, however, Einstein's own development of the general
theory of relativity with its concept of curved space and distorted
geometry forced him to reverse his stand and opt for a richly- endowed
plenum, under the new label spacetime metric.

It was the advent of modern quantum theory, however, that established
the quantum vacuum, so-called empty space, as a very active place, with
particles arising and disappearing, a virtual plasma, and fields
continuously fluctuating about their zero baseline values. The energy
associated with such processes is called zero-point energy (ZPE),
reflecting the fact that such activity remains even at absolute zero.

THE VACUUM AS A POTENTIAL ENERGY SOURCE

At its most fundamental level, we now recognize that the quantum vacuum
is an enormous reservoir of untapped energy, with energy densities
conservatively estimated by Feynman and others to be on the order of
nuclear energy densities or greater. Therefore, the question is, can the
ZPE be "mined" for practical use? If so, it would constitute a virtually
ubiquitous energy supply, a veritable "Holy Grail" energy source for
space propulsion.

As utopian as such a possibility may seem, physicist Robert Forward at
Hughes Research Laboratories demonstrated proof-of-principle in a paper
published in 1984, "Extracting Electrical Energy from the Vacuum by
Cohesion of Charged Foliated Conductors."

Forward's approach exploited a phenomenon called the Casimir Effect, an
attractive quantum force between closely- spaced metal plates, named for
its discoverer, H. G. B. Casimir of Philips Laboratories in the
Netherlands.

The Casimir force, recently measured with high accuracy by S. K.
Lamoreaux at the University of Washington, derives from partial
shielding of the interior region of the plates from the background
zero-point fluctuations of the vacuum electromagnetic field.

As shown by Los Alamos theorist Milonni and his colleagues, this
shielding results in the plates being pushed together by the unbalanced
ZPE radiation pressures. The result is a corollary conversion of vacuum
energy to some other form such as heat.

Proof that such a process violates neither energy nor thermodynamic
constraints can be found in a paper by D. Cole and myself published in
1993 under the title "Extracting Energy and Heat from the Vacuum."

Attempts to harness the Casimir and related effects for vacuum energy
conversion are ongoing in our laboratory and elsewhere. The fact that
its potential application to space propulsion has not gone unnoticed by
the Air Force can be seen in its request for proposals for the FY-1986
Defense SBIR Program. Under entry AF86-77, Air Force Rocket Propulsion
Laboratory (AFRPL) Topic: Non-Conventional Propulsion Concepts we find
the statement: "Bold, new non-conventional propulsion concepts are
solicited.... The specific areas in which AFRPL is interested
include.... (6) Esoteric energy sources for propulsion including the
zero point quantum dynamic energy of vacuum space."

Several experimental formats for tapping the ZPE for practical use are
under investigation in our laboratory. An early one of interest is based
on the idea of a Casimir pinch effect in non-neutral plasmas, basically
a plasma equivalent of Forward's electromechanical charged-plate
collapse (see Puthoff, 1990). The underlying physics is described in a
paper submitted for publication by myself and M. Piestrup, and it is
illustrative that the first of several patents issued to a consultant to
our laboratory, K.R. Shoulders, contains the descriptive phrase "...
energy is provided... and the ultimate source of this energy appears to
be the zero-point radiation of the vacuum continuum."

Another intriguing possibility is provided by the phenomenon of
sonoluminescence, bubble collapse in an ultrasonically-driven fluid
which is accompanied by intense, sub- nanosecond light radiation.
Although the jury is still out as to the mechanism of light generation,
Nobelist Julian Schwinger has argued for a Casimir interpretation.
Possibly related experimental evidence for excess heat generation in
ultrasonically-driven cavitation in heavy water is claimed in an EPRI
Report by George and Stringham of E-Quest Sciences, although attributed
to a nuclear micro- fusion process. Work is under way in our laboratory
to see if this claim can be replicated.

Yet another proposal for ZPE extraction is described in a patent issued
to Mead and Nachamkin. The approach proposes the use of resonant
dielectric spheres, slightly detuned from each other, to provide a
beat-frequency downshift of the more energetic high-frequency components
of the ZPE to a more easily captured form. We are discussing the
possibility of a collaborative effort between us to determine whether
such an approach is feasible.

Finally, an approach utilizing micro-cavity techniques to perturb the
ground state stability of atomic hydrogen is under consideration in our
lab. It is based on a 1987 paper of mine in which I put forth the
hypothesis that the nonradiative nature of the ground state is due to a
dynamic equilibrium in which radiation emitted due to accelerated
electron ground state motion is compensated by absorption from the ZPE.

If this hypothesis is true, there exists the potential for energy
generation by the application of the techniques of so-called cavity
quantum electrodynamics QED. In cavity QED, excited atoms are passed
through Casimir-like cavities whose structure suppresses electromagnetic
cavity modes at the transition frequency between the atom's excited and
ground states.

The result is that the so-called "spontaneous" emission time is
lengthened considerably (for example, by factors of ten), simply because
spontaneous emission is not so spontaneous after all, but rather is
driven by vacuum fluctuations. Eliminate the modes, and you eliminate
the zero- point fluctuations of the modes, hence suppressing decay of
the excited state.

As stated in an April 1993 Scientific American review article on cavity
QED, "An excited atom that would ordinarily emit a low-frequency photon
cannot do so, because there are no vacuum fluctuations to stimulate its
emission...."

In its application to energy generation, mode suppression would be used
to perturb the hypothesized dynamic ground-state absorption/emission
balance to lead to energy release (patent pending).

An example in which Nature herself may have taken advantage of energetic
vacuum effects is discussed in a model published by ZPE colleagues A.
Rueda of California State University at Long Beach, B. Haisch of
Lockheed-Martin, and D. Cole of IBM. In a paper published in the
Astrophysical Journal in 1995, they propose that the vast reaches of
outer space constitute an ideal environment for ZPE acceleration of
nuclei and thus provide a mechanism for "powering up" cosmic rays.
Details of the model would appear to account for other observed
phenomena as well, such as the formation of cosmic voids.

This raises the possibility of utilizing a "sub- cosmic-ray" approach to
accelerate protons in a cryogenically- cooled, collision-free vacuum
trap and thus extract energy from the vacuum fluctuations by this
mechanism.

THE VACUUM AS THE SOURCE OF GRAVITY AND INERTIA

What of the fundamental forces of gravity and inertia that we seek to
overcome in space travel? We have phenomenological theories that
describe their effects (Newton's Laws and their relativistic
generalizations), but what of their origins?

The first hint that these phenomena might themselves be traceable to
roots in the underlying fluctuations of the vacuum came in a 1967 study
published by the well-known Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov. Searching
to derive Einstein's phenomenological equations for general relativity
from a more fundamental set of assumptions, Sakharov came to the
conclusion that the entire panoply of general relativistic phenomena
could be seen as induced effects brought about by changes in the
quantum-fluctuation energy of the vacuum due to the presence of matter.

In this view the attractive gravitational force is more akin to the
induced Casimir force discussed above, than to the fundamental inverse
square law force between charged particles with which it is often
compared. Although speculative when first introduced by Sakharov, this
hypothesis has led to a rich and ongoing literature (including a
contribution of my own in 1989) on quantum-fluctuation-induced gravity,
a literature that continues to yield deep insight into the role played
by vacuum forces.

Given an apparent deep connection between gravity and the zero-point
fluctuations of the vacuum, a similar connection must exist between
these self-same vacuum fluctuations and inertia. This is because it is
an empirical fact that the gravitational and inertial masses have the
same value, even though the underlying phenomena are quite disparate.

Why, for example, should a measure of the resistance of a body to being
accelerated, even if far from any gravitational field, have the same
value that is associated with the gravitational attraction between
bodies? Indeed, if one is determined by vacuum fluctuations, so must the
other.

To get to the heart of inertia, consider a specific example in which you
are standing on a train in the station. As the train leaves the platform
with a jolt, you could be thrown to the floor. What is this force that
knocks you down, seemingly coming out of nowhere?

This phenomenon, which we conveniently label inertia and go on about our
physics, is a subtle feature of the universe that has perplexed
generations of physicists from Newton to Einstein. Since in this example
the sudden disquieting imbalance results from acceleration "relative to
the fixed stars," in its most provocative form one could say that it was
the "stars" that delivered the punch. This key feature was emphasized by
the Austrian philosopher of science Ernst Mach, and is now known as
Mach's Principle. Nonetheless, the mechanism by which the stars might do
this deed has eluded convincing explication.

Addressing this issue in a 1994 paper entitled "Inertia as a Zero-Point
Field Lorentz Force," Haisch, Rueda and I were successful in tracing the
problem of inertia and its connection to Mach's Principle to the ZPE
properties of the vacuum.

In a sentence, although a uniformly moving body does not experience a
drag force from the (Lorentz-invariant) vacuum fluctuations, an
accelerated body meets a resistance (force) proportional to the
acceleration.

By accelerated we mean, of course, accelerated relative to the fixed
stars. It turns out that an argument can be made that the quantum
fluctuations of distant matter structure the local vacuum-fluctuation
frame of reference (see Puthoff, "Source...," 1989). Thus, in the
example of the train the punch was delivered by the wall of vacuum
fluctuations acting as a proxy for the fixed stars through which one
attempted to accelerate.

The implication for space travel is this: Given the evidence generated
in the field of cavity QED (discussed above), there is experimental
evidence that vacuum fluctuations can be altered by technological means.
This leads to the corollary that, in principle, gravitational and
inertial masses can also be altered.

The possibility of altering mass with a view to easing the energy burden
of future spaceships has been seriously considered by the Advanced
Concepts Office of the Propulsion Directorate of the Phillips Laboratory
at Edwards Air Force Base. Gravity researcher Robert Forward accepted an
assignment to review this concept. His deliverable product was to
recommend a broad, multi-pronged effort involving laboratories from
around the world to investigate the inertia model experimentally.

After a one-year investigation Forward finished his study and submitted
his report to the Air Force, who published it under the title Mass
Modification Experiment Definition Study. The Abstract reads in part:

".... Many researchers see the vacuum as a central ingredient of 21st-
Century physics. Some even believe the vacuum may be harnessed to
provide a limitless supply of energy. This report summarizes an attempt
to find an experiment that would test the Haisch, Rueda and Puthoff
(HRP) conjecture that the mass and inertia of a body are induced effects
brought about by changes in the quantum-fluctuation energy of the
vacuum.... It was possible to find an experiment that might be able to
prove or disprove that the inertial mass of a body can be altered by
making changes in the vacuum surrounding the body."

With regard to action items, Forward in fact recommends a ranked list of
not one but four experiments to be carried out to address the
ZPF-inertia concept and its broad implications. The recommendations
included investigation of the proposed "sub-cosmic-ray energy device"
mentioned earlier, and the investigation of an hypothesized
"inertia-wind" effect proposed by our laboratory and possibly detected
in early experimental work by Forward and Miller, though the latter
possibility is highly speculative at this point.

ENGINEERING THE VACUUM FOR "WARP DRIVE"

Perhaps one of the most speculative, but nonetheless scientifically-
grounded, proposals of all is the so- called Alcubierre Warp Drive.
Taking on the challenge of determining whether Warp Drive a la Star Trek
was a scientific possibility, general relativity theorist Miguel
Alcubierre of the University of Wales set himself the task of
determining whether faster- than-light travel was possible within the
constraints of standard theory.

Although such clearly could not be the case in the flat space of special
relativity, general relativity permits consideration of altered
spacetime metrics where such a possibility is not a priori ruled out.

Alcubierre's further self-imposed constraints on an acceptable solution
included the requirements that no net time distortion should occur
(breakfast on Earth, lunch on Alpha Centauri, and home for dinner with
your wife and children, not your great-great-great grandchildren), and
that the occupants of the spaceship were not to be flattened against the
bulkhead by unconscionable accelerations.

A solution meeting all of the above requirements was found and published
by Alcubierre in Classical and Quantum Gravity in 1994. The solution
discovered by Alcubierre involved the creation of a local distortion of
spacetime such that spacetime is expanded behind the spaceship,
contracted ahead of it, and yields a hypersurfer-like motion faster than
the speed of light as seen by observers outside the disturbed region. In
essence, on the outgoing leg of its journey the spaceship is pushed away
from Earth and pulled towards its distant destination by the engineered
local expansion of spacetime itself.

(For follow-up on the broader aspects of "metric engineering" concepts,
one can refer to a paper published by myself in Physics Essays in 1996.)

Interestingly enough, the engineering requirements rely on the
generation of macroscopic, negative- energy-density, Casimir-like states
in the quantum vacuum of the type discussed earlier. Unfortunately,
meeting such requirements is beyond technological reach without some
unforeseen breakthrough, as emphasized by Pfenning and Ford in a
recently submitted manuscript.

Related, of course, is the knowledge that general relativity permits the
possibility of wormholes, topological tunnels which in principle could
connect distant parts of the universe, a cosmic subway so to speak.

Publishing in the American Journal of Physics in 1988, theorists Morris
and Thorne initially outlined in some detail the requirements for
traversible wormholes and have found that, in principle, the possibility
exists provided one has access to Casimir-like, negative-energy-density
quantum vacuum states. This has led to a rich literature, summarized
recently in a 1996 book by Matt Visser of Washington University, St.
Louis.

Again, the technological requirements appear out of reach for the
foreseeable future, perhaps awaiting new techniques for cohering the ZPE
vacuum fluctuations in order to meet the energy-density requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

We began this discussion with the question: "Can the vacuum be
engineered for spaceflight applications?" The answer is: "In principle,
yes." However, engineering-wise it is clear that there is a long way to
go. Given the cliche "a journey of 1000 miles begins with the first
steps," it is also clear that we can take those first steps now in the
laboratory.

Given that Casimir and related effects indicate the possibility of
tapping the enormous residual energy in the vacuum-fluctuation ZPE, and
the demonstration in cavity QED that portions of the ZPE spectrum can be
manipulated to produce macroscopic technological effects such as the
inhibition of spontaneous emission of excited states in quantum systems,
it would appear that the first steps along this path are visible.

This, combined with newly-emerging concepts of the relationship of
gravity, inertia and warp drive to properties of the vacuum as a
manipulable medium, indicate yet further reaches of possible
technological development, although requiring yet unforeseen
breakthroughs with regard to the possibility of engineering vacuum
fluctuations to produce desired results.

Where does this leave us? As we peer into the heavens from the depth of
our gravity well, hoping for some "magic" solution that will launch our
spacefarers first to the planets and then to the stars, we are reminded
of Arthur C. Clarke's phrase that highly-advanced technology is
essentially indistinguishable from magic. Fortunately, such magic
appears to be waiting in the wings of our deepening understanding of the
quantum vacuum in which we live.





We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/poleshift

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to