-Caveat Lector-

 http://lewrockwell.com
Child Molester On Probation: The Screwed-Up Ethics of Judge Maria Lopez
by Shelley McKinney

If this world were perfect, there would be perfect justice. Bad deeds – if
there ever were any – would be accordingly punished with a fit sentence and
everybody would look out for the best interests of his fellow man. (If this
life were perfect, there wouldn't be people reading that last sentence and
thinking "She should have written "Everybody would look out for the best
interests of his or her fellow human beings.")

The innocence of children would be cherished and protected, and Judge Maria
Lopez would be working in a Dairy Queen, if this world were perfect. That
way, the worst harm she could inflict would be to put peanuts on someone's
ice cream cone instead of sprinkles.

Since this world isn't perfect, "transgendered" Boston-area resident Charles
Horton was undeterred by whatever remains of his conscience on November 20,
1999 when he – in his female persona – lured a twelve year old boy into his
car under the pretense of needing help in looking for a "lost child." The boy
was forced into the car and driven off.

Horton took the boy to a deserted parking lot where he forced the boy to suck
on one of his fingers. When the boy resisted, Horton intimidated him by
holding a screwdriver at his neck until he complied. According to an account
in the Boston Globe, the child was rescued by patrolling police officers, who
"noticed a head bobbing in the car."

"In a statement he gave police after being read his Miranda rights, Horton
allegedly admitted kissing the child and said that he had used the lot as a
place to perform oral sex on teenagers," stated Globe reporter John Ellement.

Horton was charged with kidnapping, indecent assault and battery, and assault
with intent to rape. His case proceeded to trial and that was where he
unfortunately met up with Superior Court Judge Maria I. Lopez.

After hearing all the evidence, Judge Lopez chose to reward evil. She was
apparently very concerned about Horton's status as a sexually confused person
and asked Assistant District Attorney David Deakin what kind of prison Horton
would be sent to – male or female. When Mr. Deakin replied that either type
of prison could keep Horton in protective custody, Lopez snapped at Deakin,
asking if Horton would be "locked up for 23 hours a day." That's evidently a
problem, right?

On Wednesday, September 6, 2000, Lopez denied David Deakin's request that
Horton be sent to prison for 8-10 years and sentenced him to a probation of
five years. Horton will be monitored by wearing an electronic ankle bracelet
only for the first year of his sentence. He will be permitted to go to church
and attend counseling sessions and university classes. You might be
interested to know that Judge Lopez handed down this sentence knowing that
Horton lives in a housing project that some six hundred children also call
home.

(Incidentally, the child Horton molested is now serving a life sentence of
painful and terrifying memories, but who cares about him?)

Lopez's decision to not jail Horton was based upon the psychological
evaluation which determined that he is not a predator. Huh?!? I find this
inexcusable, since the crime Horton was being tried for was predatory in
nature: he kidnapped, sexually assaulted, and threatened a child with bodily
harm. What more could it possibly take to prove that a person is willing to
prey upon a child? I suppose we should feel grateful that the psychological
assessment did admit that Horton has "impulses." Don't we all? For example,
my own personal impulse at this point is to move to Massachusetts and lobby
long and loud from Governor Paul Cellucci's office to make sure that this
woman and her job are soon parted.

Writes Globe staff reporter Frank Phillips: "Lopez appeared to reject prison
for the transgender Horton not because of any doubts about his guilt, but
because she feared for his safety and emotional well-being behind bars." She
also referred to this crime as a "low-scale" matter. Since Horton expressed
regret for what he had done to the boy, that made everything just peachy
again. All of you who disagree just need to get over yourselves and stop
being so judgmental.

When judges are on the bench in order to assist the villains rather than
support the victims, where does that leave us? As long as judges like Maria
Lopez are dispensing their peculiar form of "justice," we're left with a deep
moral quicksand that threatens to suck the innocent under and denies them
what they deserve: This twelve-year-old boy deserves to know that Charles
Horton is behind bars for a long, long time. What he did was wrong and evil
and there are times when saying "Gee, I'm sure sorry" just doesn't cut it.
This is one of them.

Since Lopez couldn't bring herself to make Horton face the consequences of
his actions, she has become his accessory after the fact. If he has another
"impulse" and violates his probation by molesting another child, maybe these
two girlfriends could share a cozy little cell together. Twenty to thirty
years ought to do it.

That's what would happen if this world were perfect.


September 19, 2000

Shelley McKinney is a political writer whose work regularly appears in
several Internet journals. She takes great pleasure in exposing the
politically correct for their lack of logical thought.


So, does the Government let more criminals roam the streets so when things
get really bad they can "save the day."  This would also give them a reason
to expand government even more with more criminal catching agencies such as
the CIA, ATF & FBI.  Think about it,

Regards,
Bob Stokes

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to