-Caveat Lector-

Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave


From: "John M. Novak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject: Letter sent to City Council and Amnesty International
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:16:55 -0800


To the honorable members of the Seattle City Council and Amnesty
International,

I am writing this letter because I have as yet not heard this information in
either the mainstream news coverage, or in the two city council hearings.
This needs your attention because it plays a significant part in any serious
investigation of alleged misconduct of city officials and police force in
Seattle during the WTO protests. This is not an attempt to undermine the
integrity of any office or persons. I am attempting to give you what my own
internet research has uncovered in areas that merit your attention.

On December 2, 1999, 7:21 p.m. EST (0021 GMT), CNN published the following
article found at:
http://www.cnn.com/1999/US/12/02/wto.05/index.html

----------------------------------
Troops sent to Seattle as part of terrorism contingency plan

SEATTLE (CNN) -- In addition to hundreds of very visible Army National Guard
troops called-up because of the civil disturbances in Seattle, more than 160
active duty military personnel, including a small number of Special Forces
troops, were sent to Seattle by the Defense Department for the meeting of
the World Trade Organization.

The military mission, according to the Pentagon, is to "provide support" to
the FBI, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Secret Service and
other government agencies responsible for security there. The military
specialists are in place largely to provide expertise and assist in
coordinating a federal response in the event of a terrorist attack during
such a high-profile event.

According to Defense Department documents obtained by CNN, 131 U.S. Army, 27
U.S. Air Force, and eight U.S. Navy personnel were sent to Seattle to
perform roles from ordnance disposal to standing by for possible chemical or
biological attack by terrorist groups.

Four special forces troops from the Joint Special Operations Task Force were
deployed to Seattle to be on hand to advise FBI "crisis support" agents in
the event of a catastrophic terrorist event involving chemical or biological
weapons or hostage taking. Two of the four special operations experts have
since left the city, according to an informed Pentagon official who spoke on
the condition that he not be named.

Fifty-five military Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) teams, along with 25
explosive-detecting dogs and their handlers, were sent. The soldiers are
"operating in civilian attire -- keeping a low presence," the Defense
Department documents say.

Troops there are from various military fiefdoms including the U.S. Special
Operations Command, the U.S. Forces Command, the U.S. Army
Biological-Chemical Command, the U.S. Air Force Security Forces Command and
the U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Eight divers, making up two Navy dive teams, were sent to provide support to
the Secret Service for President Clinton's visit, which ended Thursday. The
action is not unusual for presidential security.

The Department of Health and Human Services and FEMA have set up a "staging
area" for their operations at the U.S. Naval Reserve Center-Lake Union in
Seattle. Eight military personnel are assigned to that site. The HHS-FEMA
site is pre-positioned to respond to major health catastrophes such as a
biological agent attack, according to a well-informed source.

The "Domestic Military Support," or "DOMS" as it is known at the Pentagon,
is provided through the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Office of
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the request of other federal
agencies.
-------------------------------

Questions that must be answered because of this are:

Who really was in command of all police and military personnel once the city
went into a state of "Civil Emergency"?

Which, if any, of these military personnel and their equipment/munitions
were actively involved in situations dealing with American Citizens?

What specific role did these military personnel and their
equipment/munitions have in situations dealing with American Citizens?

It also raises the very serious question as to why police were allowed to
roam the streets with authority to use deadly force if necessary without
proper identification?

Were some of these unidentifiable police in actuality military personnel and
is this the reason they refused to give proper identification when asked?


Another article of importance comes from the official USAF website's news
section. The article was written by Army Master Sgt. Bob Haskell and
published on December 3rd, 1999.
http://www.af.mil/news/Dec1999/n19991203_992177.html

This article states:

"Sixty-six Air National Guard airmen were among some 425 Guardsmen called to
state active duty to help local police restore order in downtown Seattle.
Additionally, six members of the Wyoming Air National Guard lent a hand by
flying 3,300 pounds of civilian riot control munitions from Casper, Wyo., to
Seattle."

Questions that immediately come to mind on this are:

Exactly what role were the sixty-six airmen here to fill?

In light of allegations of various "strange symptoms" not normally
associated with the effects of tear gas on
people and the possible harm to the environment, a disclosure of the exact
contents of the 3,300 pounds of civilian control munitions from  Casper,
Wyo., to Seattle is indeed in order.

I hope this information helps in the serious investigation of this whole
affair and the implementation of proper protocol in future similar
situations.

Respectfully,

John Novak (registered voter)
Seattle, WA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/deuce42b/wto/

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to