This should be helpful in gaining an understanding of the bizarre and
fraudulent system called "Fractional Reserve Banking"
     Regards to All
        Nakano


NOTE:  THE  FOLLOWING IS FROM:
http://www.the-moneychanger.com/html/it_s_funny_money.html

"For every $100 depositors place in the banking system, banks can  create at
least F$7,573.00.
Not only can banks create the maximum amount, they will create the maximum,
just as long as any demand for loans exists.  Why?  Banks have every
incentive to loan money and no incentive not to loan up to the utter maximum
- that's the way they make money. When they loan money, they create the
principal out of thin air, then collect back both principal and interest from
the borrower.

Further, banks will actually create more than the maximum amount the
multiplier allows.  Why?  Because reserve requirements differ according to
their categories, and one category requires no reserves at all.
_____________________________________________________________

THE WEIRD WONDERFUL WORLD OF FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


 Scrambling to figure out how much currency and coin exists in the United
States, I bumped into some very interesting figures.  After all, there's no
reason to worry about stocking up on cash now in the event of a Y2K bank
failure if the system is stuffed full of cash.

I am frequently treated pleasure of being derided and ridiculed for my
warnings about the US banking system.  I keep telling folks that the system
is inherently bankrupt, and hence liable to collapse at any time.  Since
three generations have passed since the Federal Reserve system was fixed like
an evil incubus on the back of America and nothing bad has happened (other
than two world wars, two depressions, the death of family farming, and a
Federal debt the size of Montana, Idaho, and Utah combined), they just laugh
back at me.  "Never in our lifetimes have the banks been in trouble.  You're
a Nervous Nelly."

American banks operate on a fractional reserve system.  When a customer
deposits F$100 into his savings account, the bank does not pull down an
envelope, write the depositor's name on it, stick in the F$100 bill, and
place the envelope on a shelf in the vault.  Rather, they credit the
depositor's account and get busy loaning out his deposit to borrowers.   The
banksters know that not every depositor will ask for his money at the same
time, so they only need to keep a fraction of his deposit on reserve.  Most
people think this system is okay.

Until they find out how tiny the reserves are.

Even people who understand the system don't seem to grasp the reserves'
minuteness, measured against the whole system.  If you ask them, they
typically guess that banks must keep a 10% reserve, perhaps 20%, against
deposits.

That isn't even close.

THE REAL RESERVE REQUIREMENT

I love doing this stuff, so I called a helpful economist at the St. Louis
Federal Reserve Bank, and also drew some figures from the St. Louis Fed's web
site at <http://www.stls.frb.org>.  To pinpoint the reserve requirement for
the banking system as a whole, I wanted to know (1) total required reserves,
and (2) total bank deposits.  By dividing (1) by (2), I could arrive at the
total reserve requirement as a percentage of deposits.

Notice that I am a really fair fellow.  I am not twisting the banker's toes
by using a broad definition of money supply that includes money market funds
and pie in the sky stuff like that.  Oh, no, even bankers get a fair shake at
the Moneychanger.  I used the narrow definition of money supply.  Watch.


Total Bank Deposits (billions of bucks)

Demand deposits$407.40

Other M1 checkable deposits245.60

Savings & time deposits (CDs) of  banks & thrifts from M2 & M32,936.70

Total Bank Deposits3,589.70


The helpful economist informed me that total required reserves on April 10,
1998 for all banks was $47.403 billion.  Now we can calculate the system
reserve requirement as $47.403 / $3,589.70 = 1.3205%.

What meaneth this abstruse cipher?  Well, if every depositor lined up at all
the banks tomorrow and demanded all his money, 1.32% of the people would get
all their money.  On the other hand, all the people could get $1.32 for every
$100 they had deposited.

This I call a fragile, inherently bankrupt, and calamity-prone system.  To
make things shakier, I keep reading Y2K articles suggesting that depositors
withdraw a little extra cash, just in case Y2K takes down the banking system.
 Figure it out.  With a measly 1.32% reserve requirement no large portion of
depositors could withdraw cash from the banks without creating a panic and
bank run.  If only 2% of depositors withdrew all their money, the banks would
fail.

If you ever plan to get money out of the bank, you better do it now, while
the getting is good.  In a bank run, the federal government (guardian angel
and loyal slave of the banks) would most certainly declare a moratorium on
withdrawals.  The federal government will do whatever is possible, including
shooting women and children in the streets, to protect the banking system.
It is remotely possible, but still possible, the federal government might
force people who had recently withdrawn large amounts to disgorge the dough
and return it bankward.  They did that in 1933 to folks who had withdrawn
large amounts of gold before the seizure.

WHAT MAKES THE SYSTEM UNSTABLE?

The banking system always tends to expand as fast and as far as possible,
because that is the way it makes money.  Banks loan money the way Venus fly
traps secrete sweet, smelly nectar:  that's the only way they can attract the
flies they eat.

Banks' power to create new money overawes our feeble mortality.  To estimate
just how much money banks can create out of thin air, you need the
"multiplier."  That's the reciprocal of the reserve requirement.  In our
example the reserve requirement is 1.3205%, so the multiplier is 100/1.3205
or 75.73.  For every $100 depositors place in the banking system, banks can
create at least F$7,573.00.

Not only can banks create the maximum amount, they will create the maximum,
just as long as any demand for loans exists.  Why?  Banks have every
incentive to loan money and no incentive not to loan up to the utter maximum
- that's the way they make money. When they loan money, they create the
principal out of thin air, then collect back both principal and interest from
the borrower.

Further, banks will actually create more than the maximum amount the
multiplier allows.  Why?  Because reserve requirements differ according to
their categories, and one category requires no reserves at all.  The reserve
requirements are:





On transaction deposits under 43.3 million, 3%

On transaction deposits over 43.3 million, 10%

On savings & time deposits, reduced in 1991 to ZERO.


There is no limit on the amount of money banks can create on the base of
savings and time deposits because those are subject to no reserve
requirement.  Through that avenue banks can - and will - keep on creating
money.  Thus although the 1.32% system reserve requirement seems to decree a
75.73 multiplier as the maximum level at which banks can create money, that
is actually the minimum level, unless loan demand collapses.

HOW MUCH OF THE RESERVE IS CURRENCY?

Actually, the banks have a little more cash on hand than they are required to
keep as reserves.  I suppose this is the frictional amount necessary to
accommodate daily changing balances and demand.  According to the St. Louis
Fed's helpful economist, most bank reserves are in cash, and some banks
satisfy their entire reserve requirement with cash.  On April 10, 1998, the
banks were not applying all their cash to that requirement.  They had $44.058
billion in cash on hand ("vault cash"), but listed reserves as follows:


Total Reserves in Banks (Billions of bucks)

Vault cash$37.693

Reserve balance deposits with FR Banks11.582

Total on hand reserves$49.275


But you shouldn't interpret this statistic as meaning your bank has plenty of
cash on hand.  Far from it.  Bank branches practice "just in time" inventory
with cash and maintain only the barest minimum on hand.

Now what portion of the total money supply does currency contribute?  For the
six reported weeks beginning 2/23/98 and ending with 3/30/98, currency at
about $432 billion composed about 40% of the M1 money supply.  (M1 = sum of
currency held by the non-bank public, demand deposits, other checkable
deposits, & traveller's checks.)  For the same period, currency formed 10.5%
of the broader M2 money supply.  (M2 = sum of M1, savings - including money
market deposit accounts, small time deposits, & retail money funds.)

CAN 10% DO THE WORK OF 90%?

This much we can conclude:  currency does the work of only 10.5% of the money
supply.  Bank credit supplies the other 89.5%.  If  bank credit were to
disappear suddenly, brought down, for example, by Y2K, then currency would
have to go nine times as far.

WHERE IS THE CURRENCY?

According the Federal Reserve, all Federal Reserve notes in circulation - all
those ever issued and not retired -- amount to F$457.469 billion.

Banks hold only F$44.058 billion.  That's less than 1/10 of all the Federal
Reserve notes theoretically circulating.  Where are the rest?

On a tip from the helpful economist, I called to Dick Porter, an economist
with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington.  How much US
currency circulates outside the US, I asked.  For the past two years and more
he has searched for an answer to that question.

Porter specialises in understatement.  "This is a problem to track," he says.
 In the past decade a lot of currency has flowed out of the US.  Estimates
are that two-thirds (2/3) of US currency circulates overseas.  Russia along
takes F$100 million a day or more, sometimes $200 million a day, 250 business
days a year, $25 billion a year.  "It's a non-trivial thing," Mr. Porter
observes mildly.

If two-thirds of those notes circulate abroad, then one-third ought to be
here, i.e., F$152.49 billion.  If that's so, then the banks are holding
28.95% of that circulation.

The issue of how much dough there is (which is what I'm getting at) is
complicated because the Fed figures don't break out "vault cash" into "coin"
and "currency."  I tried to get a figure on how much coin is in circulation,
but I couldn't penetrate the adamantine barrier of the US Mint's voice mail.
Once before I tried this futile exercise, so I don't think any of them has
the least clue how much coin is circulating.  The Mint folks may be good at
stamping out coins, but don't ask them intricate conceptual questions like,
"How much US coin is in circulation?"  Their answers are simply too bizarre
to recount.

A WARNING

The slice of cash - currency and coin - in the US money system is thinner
than baloney at a cheap delicatessen.  Banks hold less than a third of the
currency, and that would cover only a tee-tiny 1.32% of their deposits if
depositors ever wake from their coma and demand their dough.

More and more people are hearing the recommendation to "withdraw a little
extra cash out of the banks" to prepare for Y2K.  If as many as 1.32% of bank
depositors take their advice and withdraw all their money, the banks will
close their doors.

Y2K threatens to disrupt the electronic bank payments system.  This system
contributes about 90% of the US money supply.  Without it, 10% of the money
supply (the cash & coin) must take over the work of the other 90%.

Conclusion:  Withdraw and stockpile some cash now.  Shoot for at least three
months' cash requirements.  Don't wait.  Start now.

Franklin Sanders

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major
and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to
Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to