-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

Fundamentalists and world peace

By John M. Swomley
There was a time, during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, when millions of
Americans supported preparation for nuclear war — but only as a deterrent.
Many of them would have been glad to engage in disarmament.

However, throughout the Cold War and to this day, the religious right wing
has strongly opposed any disarmament measures. According to its Armageddon
theology, war is not only inevitable but ordained by God.

Although the Jesus of the Gospels had a message of peace and repudiated the
idea of a military messiah, right wing Christian broadcasters such as Jerry
Falwell, Pat Robertson, and, before them, Hal Lindsey (in his The Late Great
Planet Earth and There's A New World Coming) have insisted that the Bible
predicts the ending of the world in a fierce battle of Armageddon.

Those who predict the battle of Armageddon — which is mentioned only in
Revelation 16:16 — also refer to other biblical passages as part of their
prophecy. Ezekiel 38 and 39 refer to God of the country Magog, which is far
to the north and is therefore assumed to be Russia. One passage, 38:15-16,
speaks of many people, "all of them riding on horses, a great host, a mighty
army... [who] will come up against my people Israel." A few verses later, God
says, "I will rain upon him and his hordes and the many people that are with
him, torrential rains and hailstones, fire and brimstone." According to
Armageddon theology, this is a description of a nuclear holocaust.

This prophecy is obviously an anachronism in the twentieth century, because
the weapons in Chapter 39 are not bombs, missiles, tanks, and artillery, but
"shields and bucklers, bows and arrows, handpikes and spears." Nevertheless,
these religious fundamentalists, who believe every word in the Bible to be
inerrant, are somehow comfortable assuming that Ezekiel's exact catalogue is
a description of modern war.

Zechariah 13:8-9 says that two-thirds of all the Jews living at the time of a
prophesied disaster will be killed. The Jews that remain, according to
Armageddon theology, must acknowledge Jesus as their lord or be sacrificed.

In a Los Angeles Times interview published March 4, 1981, reporter Robert
Scheer said to Jerry Falwell, "In your pamphlet on Armageddon you prophesy
nuclear war with Russia." Falwell replied, "We believe that Russia, because
of her need for oil...is going to move in on the Middle East, and
particularly Israel, because of their hatred of the Jews.... And it is at
that time when I believe there will be some nuclear holocaust on this earth,
because it [the Bible] says that blood shall flow up to the bridles of the
horses in the Valley of Esdraelon for some 200 miles. And it speaks of
horrible happenings that one can only relate, in Second Peter 3, to the
melting of the elements, to nuclear warfare."

When Falwell said that Russia will be "totally destroyed," Scheer said,
"Well, the whole world will, won't it?" Falwell said, "No, not the whole
world, because then our Lord is coming back to the earth...and the church is
coming with him, to rule and reign with Christ on the earth for a thousand
years.... Most of us believe in the imminent return of Jesus Christ. We
believe we're living in those days just prior to the Lord's coming.... I do
not think we have fifty years left."

Pat Robertson, in his "The 700 Club" Christian Broadcasting Network program,
said on June 9, 1982, "This whole thing [the battle of Armageddon] is now in
place. It can happen anytime to fulfill Ezekiel. It is ready to happen....
The United States is in that Ezekiel passage, and...we are standing by." In
1995 he wrote in a sixteen-page booklet, "The Harvest Begins With You," that
God gave him five years to take the gospel to the world. Then it would be all
over. In Robertson's recently published novel, The End of the Age, he
describes how he believes the world will end.

In Prophecy and Politics, author Grace Halsell describes the influence of
Armageddon theology on Ronald Reagan. She quotes James Mill (former president
pro tem of the California State Senate) who said of Reagan, "Certainly his
attitudes relative to military spending, and his coolness to all proposals
for nuclear disarmament, are consistent with such apocalyptic views.
Armageddon, as foreseen in the books of Ezekiel and Revelation, cannot take
place in a world that has been disarmed. Anyone who believes it will come to
pass cannot expect that disarmament will ever come about. It is contrary to
God's plan as set forth in His word."

Mills continued, "The President's domestic and monetary polities, too, are in
harmony with a literal interpretation of biblical prophecies. There is no
reason to get wrought up about the national debt if God is soon going to
foreclose on the whole world." Reagan's support of his Interior Secretary
James Watt "makes sense if seen in that way, too. Why be concerned about
conservation? Why waste time and money preserving things for future
generations when everything is going to come to a fiery end with this one?"

This reasoning that Armageddon "cannot take place in a world that has been
disarmed" is crucial to the religious right's entire perspective on world
affairs. None of the right wing religious organizations has a doctrine of
peace or reconciliation with its enemies. Its concept of Jesus is one of
military messiah, not Prince of Peace.

The mainline churches do not accept Armageddon theology. Armageddon theology
and fundamentalist violence, wherever it exists, must be challenged not only
by Christians, but by those of other faiths and of none, as a repudiation of
the whole idea of a peaceful and disarmed world. Without major united
religious opposition, there is little hope of world peace.

John Swomley, former professor of social ethics at St. Paul School of
Theology, lives in Kansas City, Missouri. This piece was adapted from his
article published in Fellowship (July/August 1996).

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to