-Caveat Lector-

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Rothenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.pol
itics,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-lim
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 10:40 PM
Subject: [piml] Government Causes California Energy Crisis


>
>                  "We'd rather have brown-outs than people-outs!"
>
>   That line was delivered about 20 years ago by Tom Hayden, who at the
time was
>   Jane Fonda's husband and a member of the California Legislature,
representing
>                      the "People's Republic of Santa Monica."
>
>   Though his consituents were city people, they kept him in Sacramento to
spout
>     his Luddite, back-to-the-land politics until he was removed from
office by
>   term limits. He and his cronies kept power plants from being built,
while the
>   population of their state climbed, all the while spouting lines such as
that,
>                      to the delight of the environmentalists.
>
>   Now those short-sighted legislators are looking at those
never-really-expected
>    brown-outs, and in true collectivist fashion, they are demanding that
we in
>                     the rest of the West give them OUR power.
>
>   They are guilt-tripping those of us in neighboring states, so that we
will use
>    less electricity in the evening. We are expected to be "neighborly" and
let
>    our homes get cold on zero-degree nights, so that the people in Los
Angeles
>              won't advance on Sacramento with torches and pitchforks.
>
>   The "beautiful people" in California are the perfect example of
irrationality.
>    The same people who demanded long waiting periods for firearm purchases
then
>    turned around and screamed at the gunshop folks, when told that the
waiting
>       period doesn't include exemptions for movie stars, even during
riots.
>
>       However, despite their anti-technology stance, of course, they
exempt
>     themselves. A drive past "Commie Tommy's" place shows no lack of
lights or
>   electronic alarms, and I doubt that he has cut the cords to the
computer, the
>                                HDTV nor DVD player.
>
>     Likewise, the Nefarians demand that we junk "inefficient" older and
larger
>    cars and SUVs, yet I haven't seen them giving up limos or those private
jets
>    which burn as much fuel taxiing to the runway as my Camaro uses driving
from
>                                here to Los Angeles.
>
>        Guilt is the favorite weapon of the Nefarians. They used guilt
about
>   inner-city school quality to force a million schoolkids onto buses
across town
>    in the 1960s, and guilt about the Antarctic "ozone hole" to force a
halt to
>    sales of Freon in the Northern Hemisphere (despite a complete lack of
proof
>                       that the two are related in any way).
>
>   Sometimes they go to ridiculous extreme in their attempts to manipulate,
such
>     as when several entertainers vowed to move to Canada if Duhhh-bya were
to
>     become President. Of course, they are abandoning their promises, but
they
>   truly did expect that we would all vote for Prince Al, rather than risk
having
>     them leave. I'm reminded of Jerry Brown's plaintive bleat that "The
people
>      didn't vote the way we told them to," following a 1974 initiative
fight.
>
>   Alec -- or a thousand Alecs -- is not worth more than a single Tere or a
Toni
>     or a John, people who work to support their families and will never
own a
>                                      Learjet.
>
>    Perhaps these smug, self-important elitists should take the pizzas to
Bosnia
>        themselves . . .then stay there. That would improve both countries.
>
>   It would also give them something to do other than trying to make the
rest of
>         us feel guilty for having had the foresight to build powerplants.
>
>   But then, to a Nefarian, ANY foresight is to be condemned. When an
individual
>   or community prepares for the future, that makes them more difficult to
bring
>                                   under control.
>
>   Two decades ago, during the "survivalist boom," anyone with more than a
couple
>     of days' food on the shelf was painted as a paranoiac and lampooned in
the
>    media and theater. Then came the "Y2K" panic, and suddenly it was
acceptable
>     to throw a couple of extra cans of corn into the shopping cart, until
the
>     crisis evaporated. Now that things are back to (ab)normal, there is
subtle
>                     pressure to draw down the reserves again.
>
>   This winter, we have this new campaign to convince us that the people
who have
>   brought the threat of dark, cold nights to Fresno are not actually
responsible
>    for their actions. It is our GREED, you see. Our selfish desire to use
Utah
>    electricity in Utah is to blame for the current situation (no pun
intended)
>         facing the Golden State, not Californians' willingness to let the
>                        environmentalists push them back to
>                                   the Dark Ages.
>
>    In other words, the needs of those who refused to prepare outweigh the
needs
>    of those who did, courtesy of Sacramento, who has called in the marker
they
>    issued on November 7th. The little pig who built his house of brick is
to be
>     forced to give it up to the one who built with straw, with an order by
the
>                              Clintoon Administration.
>
>    It would be one thing if we were doing this for the good of our
neighbors on
>    the Coast, to help them through a crisis, but the majority of the
population
>     (and power usage) is in the warm southern half of the state, where
lack of
>    electricity isn't likely to result in blocks of ice with people inside
them.
>
>    No, the true casualty of of rolling blackouts would be the Nanny State,
the
>     belief that Sacramento or Washington will kiss it and make it all
better.
>
>     Some of my readers in California may believe that I am attacking them.
In
>             truth, I am simply trying to provide a little perspective.
>
>   It is not necessary to embrace the "Corporate World" to have light, nor
to war
>   against it in the name of ecology. The true ecologist sees the whole
picture,
>    of which mankind is a part, and tries to find the best set of
trade-offs. It
>   is the "envinronmentalist" who sees Man as being at war with Nature. To
these
>    people, other people are a blight which must be kept out of the forest
("No
>   Motor Vehicles"), and considers periodic disastrous floods to be a good
price
>                   to pay for saving the clapper rail's habitat.
>
>   After all, the farmers who lost their homes and livelihoods only have
one vote
>       each, and are outnumbered by the Beautiful People in Santa Monica
and
>                                     Sausalito.
>
>     The big question is whether the power problems will turn on a light in
the
>                       minds of a few million Western voters.
>
_________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>     Keith R. Wood is keeping a light in the window for those who would
like to
>   respond to his columns, either directly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or through the
Mailbag.
>
>                                www.SierraTimes.com
>
>
>
>-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
>Download Net2Phone's free software to make FREE calls anywhere within
>the US from your PC now! Get great low rates on international calls!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/10923/1/_/23432/_/977974834/
>---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
>
>For subscription info, go to:
>http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/piml
>
>For real-time chat, go to:
>http://www.egroups.com/chat/piml
>
>
>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to