-Caveat Lector-
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Sno0wl wrote:
I keep hearing the media saying that as far as Clinton goes, it's all
over. He's as good as impeached and politically dead. Any opinion
that counters that view is given short shrift in passing.
If the media IS doing this (and you seem to
-Caveat Lector-
There is a slight change in the coverage of Clinton, who has always been
totally at the mercy of the big networks. Quick re-cap: In late 1997,
Act I: Clinton refused to see Netanyahu twice, once when they were both on
the same airfield. This is a guess, but I have a feeling
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 9:51:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All:
Has anyone besides myself noticed a slight--but nonetheless
palpable--change in the media's approach to covering the Clinton
impeachment proceedings? I could be wrong, but I am
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 9:51:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone besides myself noticed a slight--but nonetheless
palpable--change in the media's approach to covering the Clinton
impeachment proceedings? I could be wrong, but I am
-Caveat Lector-
All:
Has anyone besides myself noticed a slight--but nonetheless
palpable--change in the media's approach to covering the Clinton
impeachment proceedings? I could be wrong, but I am beginning to detect a
certain "hostile abandonment" concerning Clinton's plight.
My only
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 9:51:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All:
Has anyone besides myself noticed a slight--but nonetheless
palpable--change in the media's approach to covering the Clinton
impeachment proceedings? I could be wrong, but I
