-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- Omega Agency 6/6 "Omega Agency: Final Words" by Anonymous November 1997 This will be my final posting on the information I have on that group of people, that entity known as the Omega Agency. I will no longer be communicating with my source person, known in these postings as "Robert". A perplexing set of circumstances, almost a comedy of errors, if you will, has led to this breakdown in communication. And after careful thought and soul searching, I have reached the reluctant conclusion that I can no longer be the outlet to the Internet for information on Omega. Robert has been my sole face-to-face contact within the ranks of Omega. But the price of continued personal association with Robert is too high. In the beginning, almost a year ago, my understanding was that Robert told me the things he did, showed me the things he did, for the purpose of setting to rest doubts and confusion within my own mind. He not only fed the obsession within me to know the truth to this whole ufo/alien phenomenon, but he took an emotionally battered, psychologically abused, frightened woman and befriended her. He gave to me what I needed at that time - someone who cared, and who showed that in his actions. I gave him what he needed - someone to alleviate his loneliness and get him back out into the world, showing him how to take joy in something as simple as digging in the dirt to find pretty rocks. A very close personal relationship developed, with Robert and I spending virtually all of our free time together. We got to know each other extremely well. Because of this relationship, I overlooked certain things that didn't add up in the information he gave me on Omega. I allowed my emotional attachment to my friend to blind me to the "glitches" in the information he passed to me. In the past month, our relationship has deteriorated rapidly, and these same inconsistencies have cropped up again. They have not been overlooked this time, and therein lies the "rub", as best I can tell. I do not think that Robert lied to me about the existance of Omega. I have found and witnessed too much that verifies its existance. I do, however, think he "sugar-coated" the nature of the organization. I will state, for the record here, that I do agree with the ideals on which Omega appears to be founded - the unification of the people of this Earth as a global society, with each culture supporting the other in an atmosphere of acceptance of us all as humans first. I do agree that a global governing system is what is needed to move us as a race, the human race, out into the universal neighborhood that awaits us. I do agree that the negativity that pulses through the minds of so many needs to change. What I don't agree with, and have always questioned, is the method that is being used to bring about these changes. Much to Robert's consternation, I continually asked him this question: "What gives you the right?" He has never answered that question fully or satisfactorily. I have had no direct, face-to-face contact with any of the other members of the 15, that group of which Robert is a part. I have had no face-to- face contact with anyone else who admits to being involved with Omega or has knowledge of its existance and workings. I have had telephone conversations and mail exchanges with others that I believe have at least a working knowledge of this organization. The majority of my experience with Omega has been through Robert, and thus, he is the only example I have as to what type of person is chosen or recruited to participate at such a high level within the Omega power structure. As it was explained to me, there will be no direct voting by the populous as to who sits on the Ruling Council for Omega's global governing body. These people will be selected by those already seated on the Council. Robert has often told me that Omega, put simply, adheres to the principle of the "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." Omega seems to interpret that philosophy to mean that the majority of the population of this world is insignificant, categorizing them as "sheep" that will follow where they are led. This may be a true statement, but that does not make it right to perpetuate that mind set. He advised me on more than one occasion to focus my attention on reaching the 1% of the population that Omega considered important. I found this impossible for me to do, because I consider all people to be of value. I cannot write off such a large portion of the population, regardless of Omega's wishes in that area. Omega has claimed to be the "good guys" in this silent war for the people of and the planet we call Earth. Many of the OA ideals are, indeed, very "good". Crime must stop. War must stop. Child abuse, rape, murder ....all of these must stop. We cannot continue to prey upon each other and hope to survive in the galactic neighborhood. Inflationary taxation, destruction of the environment, government preying upon the weaknesses of its own people, must stop. Hatred of another based on nothing more than the color of one's skin, or the religious beliefs one holds, must stop. A scenario Robert was fond of using as an example was this: "Can you imagine a world where you can go to bed at night with your window open, and not have to worry about someone coming in and raping you?" Under Omega rulership, that is the type of world that is proposed. It will be a world in which one is free to pursue his or her life's work, raise a family, and feel secure within the walls of his or her own home. Another question that was never fully answered: "But at what price?" Yet, the inconsistencies remain. Again, I can speak only from my personal experience with this man and the organization he represents. Omega is responsible for some of the abductions that occur. Robert tells me I have been abducted 7 times, and that my father was also abducted. I have no conscious memory of these experiences. Omega employs the services of those popularly known as "MIBs". This I have seen, waking to find one standing in my bedroom. Recent postings to the Internet that I have made have caused concern in the ranks of the 15. Their concern, again based on what Robert related to me, was that I was currently displaying a somewhat "negative" attitude toward Omega. The options being considered as to how Omega would deal with my attitude, as outlined to me by Robert in a phone conversation on Thursday, October 23, 1997, were as follows: he stated that one of the members of the 15 asked Robert if he wanted me "taken out". action will be taken to totally discredit these writings and any past or future writings I do relating to the ufo field, thus eliminating me as a possible voice of disagreement with Omega's now publicly known ideals and goals. use of techniques known to Omega that would "blank" my memory of any and all recall of my involvement with Robert, Omega, or my search for the truth in the ufo/alien phenomenon. bringing me into the underground facility beneath Albuquerque, New Mexico, and keeping me there for an indefinite period of time, until my attitude could be "swayed" toward a more positive stance. I attempted to talk to Robert about these "options" that night, and again the following Monday night. He informed me that the decision lay in the hands of the other members of the 15, that he and the others had decided that Robert's position on my fate would remain neutral. Speaking strictly from a human standpoint, I find this most difficult to understand. Betrayal and abandonment are not "good" qualities by socially accepted standards in human society in general. Yet the one man who has spent time with me personally, face to face; who has laughed with me and held me when I cried, who I helped on more than one occasion when he needed help, speaks no words of defense on my behalf with his co-workers. Nor does he allow me to offer a defense on my own behalf. Is this a character flaw in Robert that I never knew existed in the year I've known him, or is it a reflection of the mentality of the high ranking members of Omega? I don't know the answer to that question, and don't know if I ever will. In fact, I don't know if I would want to know, for the implications of the latter are far too frightening. There are those forces that oppose Omega and its plan for the betterment of the world. I have named these forces in previous essays on Omega. I know that I have attracted the attention of a few who pledge their loyalty to these opposing forces. Two people that I associate with, and who know my identity, have been threatened. And though Robert did not specifically state that a government agency-affiliated individual was here in town to assassinate me, he implied it heavily. This man was dealt with, according to Robert, by members of Omega within a few blocks of my home. I have no way to verify the validity of this information. But valid or not, the result is the same. It is normal to be frightened when it is implied that others want one killed. If this information is true, then I owe Omega my life. If it is not true, then only Robert knows why he would desire to terrorize and torture me in such a way. My phone conversations are monitored, my computer has been tampered with, my emails, public and private, are monitored. All activity I do on the Internet is monitored, including what websites I visit. I do not know the names of those who do this monitoring, nor what agency or group they are affiliated with. What I can attest to is that Robert has quoted me from private emails I sent to others, he has criticized my research techniques based on websites I have visited, he has stated to me the name of someone I spoke to on the phone, giving me the length of time I spoke to this person. In our phone conversation of Monday night, October 27, 1997, Robert strongly urged that I stop my investigation into ufo related matters, and concentrate on the job Omega wants me to do. Although the original agreement between us was that I would do what they wanted me to do, but I would do it in my own way, Robert is now finding fault with my methods and what he perceives as my negative attitude toward Omega. Efforts on my part to discuss this with him, to plead my side of this situation, have thus far fallen on deaf ears. And I grow weary of the trying. I regret the loss of a friendship. I regret the loss of access to information that many are asking about, that many are craving. I feel as though I am letting people down by my plan to disassociate myself from the only avenue of access to Omega's inner workings that I am consciously aware of. But I see no other choice for me at this point in time, given the current situation and the above stated options that are being considered. Those who know me personally know that I will not release Robert's real name. That decision is not based in fear of reprisal from him, or someone he may be associated with. That decision is based in personal honor. I gave my word that I would not reveal his name to anyone. And personal honor is something that, once lost, is very hard to regain. In the last two years, I have undergone massive changes in my personal life. It has been a most difficult and traumatic time for me, and Robert was aware of this before he met me in person. I have learned that decisions I made were often times "suggested" by employees of the Omega organization. Minor manipulation of my life to "steer" me in the direction they believed my life should take. While I personally consider this sort of action to be wrong and a violation of basic human rights, Omega's professed position of the "ends justify the means" in most cases has won out in regard to me. Omega has the potential to bring great changes to the world, changes that I do believe will be in the best interest of all of us. It has the ability to introduce us to the varied and wonderous worlds of the Visitors, and all the mysteries and excitement of their cultures. It has the power to move the world forward technologically by leaps and bounds. But it seems to lack heart, and compassion, and empathy for the people it would govern. And that concerns me. I have to wonder how long a house, united or not, will stand on an uncertain foundation. I cannot give the answers to the many questions that remain, for the price of my continued active association with this group is too high. I do not think that Omega alone is responsible for the invasions into my life of late. I have reason to believe that the opposing forces are equally as interested in where my loyalties lie. My loyalties lie where they always have: with the side of right, the side that offers the best hope for all of us, not just me alone. Omega was honest in stating what it is that they want from me. I apparently misunderstood or was mislead as to how they wanted that accomplished, though. I was also not told what the price for involvement with them would be. In this, however, Omega is ahead of the opposing side. The motives of those on that side are unclear, and their methods of operation far more secretive. Robert, at least, told me what my fate may be. I can do nothing now but sit and wonder what tomorrow will bring for me. Robert offers me no indication of when a decision will be made concerning me, or what that decision is likely to be. The tone of this writing is far more personal than any of the other essays on Omega I have written and posted to the Internet. The reason for this is I am human, and I have emotions, and cannot and will not deny them, though it has been suggested more than once that I drop my emotions. And right now, the strongest emotion I feel is fear. I know there are many who doubt the validity of these writings, who question the motives behind them, and who suspect it is nothing more than, at best, a hoax. At the worst, disinformation designed to further muddy the waters of the ufo field. As one person that I introduced to Robert said, "It sounds too good to be true, Robert. Show me." He did show me. I do not doubt the reality of this organization or its connection to the Visitors, with all of their technology and their abilities. Neither do I doubt that the 15 will carry out whatever decree they determine is appropriate in my case. Perhaps I am considered the experiment that went wrong, or the project that failed. I don't really know what I am considered by Omega. Robert told me that it was never meant for him to be a direct source of information to me. It was never meant that we were to develop a close personal relationship. It was never meant for me to get so deeply involved in ufo/alien research. When I asked Robert why he did these things, why he fed the hunger for information that he knew I possessed, and why he allowed the relationship between us to develop on a personal level, if he was never meant as an active part of the plan for me, his only reply was "You were there, you were nice. It just happened." What I suspect is happening now, based on things that Robert has said to me over the past month, is that I am paying the price for his mistake. But I don't blame him alone. I knew from the beginning that Omega had the potential to be dangerous, as did Robert. And I persisted in my efforts to get to the truth anyway. To remain in Omega's "good graces", if I must change what I am, if I must sacrifice my personal integrity, my right to privacy in my phone conversations, my emails, my computer, within my own home, and in my very dreams, if I must betray people that I've come to see as friends, then the price is too high for me to pay. Perhaps if I understood the reasoning behind the actions, I would feel differently. But, as I have said, the one question that constantly resurfaced and was never answered, keeps me from adopting the attitude that others seem to desire in me. Where Robert seems to view the question as nothing more than emotional reaction to impending change, I view it as a valid and necessary point that should be addressed if Omega is to be openly accepted as the best hope for the survival of the human race and planet Earth. What gives you the right? - ©Copyright 1996, 1997 MultiMedia Magic, Inc. and R. Dan Woolman The information you receive on-line from the entire In Search Of web site [www.in-search-of.com/] is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material. Please send all comments and questions about this site to: R. Dan Woolman ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Created: Created: Tuesday, September 23, 1997 -- Last update: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
