-Caveat Lector-

Hi !

Here's part two of the C Gould article.

Sincerely,  Neil Brick


This may be triggering for survivors of RA and MC. All accusations are
alleged.

from http://members.tripod.com/~Curio_5_/gould.html

Notes:

The following is reproduced here with the permission of
the author.

Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
copy remain intact and unedited.

The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.

Editor: Mike Coyle

Survivors of ritual abuse who I have treated, or on whose
cases I have consulted, have also discovered that they have
worked for the cult/perpetrator group as bookkeepers and money
launderers, as drug dealers and couriers, as pornography
subjects, as programmers/torturers of children, as computer
programmers, as investment specialists, as legal advisers, and
even as government agents, always outside the conscious awareness
of their core personalities. Rarely has a case come to my
attention in which the survivor was well paid for her
contributions to the financial advancement of the
cult/perpetrator group which she (unconsciously) served. Most
often as the survivor accesses the memories that are buried under
countless layers of torture trauma, she has to contend not only
with the rude awakening that since birth she has lived a life of
unspeakable pain and horror outside her conscious awareness, but
also that she has been literally enslaved to a perpetrator group,
since her activities have been dictated by others and enacted
outside her own free will, with little or no financial
remuneration. In fact, survivors who have generated sometimes
millions of dollars for their perpetrator groups, often are
virtually penniless when they come to therapy, and are treated
for very low fees.
   When we understand the fact that ritual abuse is usually
perpetrated by groups which are deeply involved in organized
crime, the underlying incentives of these cult/perpetrator groups
becomes clear. While ritual abuse is certainly an integral part
of some kinds of satanism, it is  most likely that the deeper
reason for the prevalence of ritual abuse is that, simply put, it
reliably creates a group of people who function as unpaid slaves
to the perpetrator group. Because their core personalities are
amnestic to their cult activities, these ritual abuse victims
pose little threat to their controllers. Without extensive
therapeutic help, cult victims are usually unaware that they work
for the cult/perpetrator group  and are therefore incapable of
contemplating quitting their cult jobs. Neither can they turn
higher-ups in to the authorities for their criminal activities,
since they have little or no conscious access to information
about what activities they or their superiors are involved in.
   Clearly, the groups who create these unpaid subjugates
have considerable economic incentive to do so. How much money do
these groups actually generate, and is it enough to impact the
culture at the level of, say, media-created public opinion? This,
of course, is the cloudy part of the economic argument for why
ritual abuse is as widespread as it is, in families and in
preschools, and why we as a society have been so slow to
recognize and respond to the seriousness of this problem. It is
by definition difficult to know who belongs to groups whose
membership is highly secretive, especially when many of the
membership themselves are amnestic to their involvement.
Therefore, it is difficult to assess the degree to which members
of these groups influence media accounts of ritual abuse, derail
ritual abuse investigations by law enforcement, are instrumental
in getting children complaining of intrafamilial ritual abuse
sent back to an abusing parent, or hire officials to make public
statements on behalf of a national law enforcement bureau to the
effect that no substantial evidence of ritual abuse exists.
   No doubt it will take serious, well-coordinated efforts
on the part of local and national law enforcement to gather the
data that will be needed to know how powerful and deeply
entrenched these ritually abusing, criminally involved groups
actually are. In the meantime, we as a nation must examine how
deep our commitment to child protection really is. Mothers
Against Sexual Abuse (MASA), headquartered in Los Angeles,
continues to find, despite vigorous efforts at change, that
judges across the country are more likely to award custody to
fathers than to mothers, even when the child has complained of
abuse by the father and those complaints have been substantiated
by psychological or medical findings. I am personally aware of
dozens of cases across the United States in which a child has
disclosed severe maltreatment in the form of ritual abuse in a
preschool, and the case has never been properly investigated,
other parents with children in attendance at the school have
never been notified, the school has not been closed down, and no
charges have been filed. Organizations like Believe The Children
of Chicago are aware of cases like these numbering well into the
hundreds.
   In both intrafamilial and extrafamilial child abuse cases
like those described above, the more extreme and ritualized the
abuse, the less likely the child is to be granted protection and
the perpetrators are to be apprehended. Clearly this has to do
exclusively with cultural bias, not what is in the best interests
of the child, since, as the research makes amply clear, the
negative impact of ritual abuse on the child is extremely grave.
   In my opinion, we in the United States deny the reality
and seriousness of ritual abuse, especially as it impacts on
children, in part because it threatens our images of ourselves as
Americans. The thinking of the skeptic often goes something like
this. Hideous crimes involving torture and mine control "don't
happen here." They happen in third world countries, which do
not have the freedoms "guaranteed" by our democratic form of
government. There would be no purpose served by having a fascist
type of group torture United States Citizens, as this kind of
terrorization is designed to overthrow an existing government,
and ours by its very design cannot be overthrown. And certainly
there would be no purpose served in torturing children. Since
they don't vote and don't form coalitions of any kind, extremist
groups would have no interest in coercing them into
socio-political compliance.
   What this argument misses is the fact that, when mind
control is put into place with very young children, through the
torturous programming that is the essence of ritual abuse, then
reinforced and further developed as the child victims get older,
by the time those children reach adolescence and adulthood they
have become valuable resources for the perpetrator group to
exploit. That exploitation may or may not be political, but it
is certainly economic. To fully grasp this at a cultural level
requires the general public to come to grips with a level of
understanding of human nature still barely comprehended within
the mental health community; that is, that the normative
response to severe trauma, especially in early childhood, is
dissociation and amnesia for the traumatic events, and that this
response can be manipulated by sociopaths and programmed cult
members to create individuals amnestic to both their traumatic
histories and their behaviors in the world of abuse and
criminality into which their alter personalities have been
indoctrinated.
   Until law enforcement personnel, public policy makers,
the judiciary, the child protection system and others who are
involved with the protection of children and the betterment of
society come to understand this new paradigm, ritual abuse is
likely to continue to be minimized in both its scope, its
impact, and the insidious way it has of multiplying when left
unchecked. The paradigm shift which will need to take place in
order to provide truly effective treatment for ritual abuse
victims, and in order to successfully curb this extreme form of
brutality in our culture is certain to be a difficult one to
achieve. (See Gould & Graham-Costain (1994a; 1994b) for an
account of treatment guidelines for ritually abused children). It
calls into question not only the belief most Americans have that
systematic brutality on a large scale does not and cannot exist
in this country, but also our belief that we operate from our
free will, and that that freedom of thought and action is
inviolable.
   To become fully aware of just how vulnerable to utter
violation and manipulation that free will really is when
sociopaths and programmed cult victim members are allowed access
to children demands that we put far greater efforts into
safeguarding our children's welfare than we ever dreamed would be
necessary. The price tag emotionally and financially for putting
that awareness into practice will be very high indeed. But the
price of ignoring or minimizing the impact of ritual abuse on our
children and on our society will surely prove intolerable.

References

Bottoms, B., Shaver, P., & Goodman, G. (1991). Profile of
ritualistic and religion-related abuse allegations in the United
States. Paper presented at the ninety-ninth annual convention of
the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August.

Bottoms, B., Shaver, P., & Goodman, G. (1993). Profile of
ritualistic and religion-related abuse allegations in the United
States. Updated findings provide via personal communication from
B. Bottoms. Cited in  K.C. Faller (1994). Ritual Abuse: A Review
of the Research. The American Professional Society on the Abuse
of Children Advisor. 7(1).

Bybee, D. & Mowbray, C. (1993). An analysis of allegations of
sexual abuse in a multi-victim day-care center case. Child Abuse
and Neglect. 17(6): 767-783.

Faller, K.C. (1988). The spectrum of sexual abuse in day care.
Journal of Family Violence. 3(4): 283-298.

Faller, K.C. (1990). Sexual abuse of children in cults: A medical
health perspective. Roundtable. 2(2).

Faller, K.C. (1994). Ritual Abuse: A Review of the Research. The
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Advisor.
7(1).

Finkelhor, D., Williams, L., & Burns, N. (1988). Nursery
Crimes: Sexual abuse in day care. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage
Publications.

Gould, C., & Graham-Costain, V. (1994a). Play Therapy With
Ritually Abused Children, Part 1. Treating Abuse Today. 4(2):
4-10.

Gould, C., & Graham-Costain, V. (1994b). Play Therapy With
Ritually Abused Children, Part 2. Treating Abuse Today. 4(3):
14-19.

Gould, C. (1992). Diagnosis and Treatment of Ritually Abused
Children. In D.K. Sakheim & S.E. Devine, (Eds.), Out of
Darkness: Exploring Satanism & Ritual Abuse. New York: Lexington
Books. 207-248.

Gould, C., & Cozolino, L. (1992). Ritual Abuse, Multiplicity,
and Mind-Control. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 20(3):
194-196

Jonker, F., & Jonker-Bakker, P. (1991). Experiences with
ritualistic child sexual abuse: A case study from the
Netherlands. Child Abuse and Neglect. 15: 191-196.

Kelly, S. (1988). Ritualistic abuse of children: Dynamics and
impact. Cultic Studies Journal. 5(2): 228-236.

Kelly, S. (1989). Stress responses of children to sexual abuse
and ritualistic abuse in day care centers. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence. 4(4): 502-513.

Kelly, S. (1992a). Ritualistic abuse: Recognition, impact, and
current controversy. Paper presented at the San Diego Conference
on Responding to Child Maltreatment, San Diego, CA.

Kelly, S. (1992b). Stress responses of children and parents to
sexual abuse and ritualistic abuse in day care centers. In A.W.
Burgess, (Ed.), Child trauma I: Issues and research. New York:
Garland Publishing Co., Inc.

Kelly, S. (1993). Ritualistic abuse of children in day care
centers. In M. Langone (Ed.), Recovery from cults. New York:
Norton. 340-351.

Lanning, K. (1991) Ritual Abuse: A law enforcement view or
perspective. Child Abuse and Neglect. 15: 171-173.

Neswald, D., Gould, C., & Graham-Costain, V. (1991). Common
"Programs" Observed in Survivors of Satanic Ritual Abuse. The
California Therapist. September/October: 47-50.

Snow, B. & Sorenson, T. (1990) Ritualistic child abuse in a
neighborhood setting. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 5(4):
474-487.

Summit, R.C. (1994). The Dark Tunnels of McMartin. The Journal of
Psychohistory. 21(4): 397-416.

Tamarkin,  C. (1991). Critical Issues in the Diagnosis and
Treatment of Ritual Abuse. Workshop presented at the Eighth
International Conference on Multiple Personality / Dissociative
States. Chicago,  IL.

Waterman, J., Kelly, R., Oliveri, M.K., & McCord, J. (1993).
Behind the playground walls: Sexual abuse in preschools. New
York: The Guliford Press.

Young, W. Sachs, R., Braun, B., & Watkins, R. (1991).
Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: A clinical
syndrome. Report of 37 cases. Child Abuse and Neglect. 15:
181-189.

Ruben, D. (1994). The Satanism Scare. Parenting. March: 87-91.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to