-Caveat Lector-

THE WESLEY CLARK MYTH

NOW THAT establishment favorite Edwards is fading in the Democratic
primaries, there is increasing talk in similar circles of launching a campaign
for General Wesley Clark, some of it so absurd that it compares Clark to
Eisenhower.

But the Clark boosters better do a bit more homework. For example, this from
a piece by Lowell Ponte

"[Clark] was named Commander of the 1st Cavalry Division, III Corps, at
sweltering Fort Hood southwest of Waco, Texas. On a late winter day in 1993,
Texas Governor Ann Richards suddenly called the base, later meeting with
Clark's Number Two to discuss an urgent matter.  Crazies at a Waco compound
had killed Federal agents.  If newly-sworn-in President Bill Clinton signed
a waiver setting aside the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits
the military from using its arms against American citizens within our
borders, could Fort Hood supply tanks and other equipment?

"Clinton did. Wesley Clark's command at Fort Hood "lent" 17 pieces of armor
and 15 active service personnel under his command to the Waco Branch
Davidian operation. It is absolute fact that the military equipment used by
the government at Waco came from Fort Hood and Clark's command.

"The only issue debated by experts is whether Clark was at Waco in person to
help direct the assault against the church compound in a scene remarkably
similar to the incineration of villagers in a church by the British in Mel
Gibson's movie "The Patriot."

"What happened at Waco was the death, mostly by fire, of at least 82 men,
women and children, including two babies who died after being "fire aborted"
from the dying bodies of their pregnant mothers.

"Planning for this final assault involved a meeting between Clinton Attorney
General Janet Reno and two military officers who developed the tactical plan
used but who have never been identified. Some evidence and analysis suggests
that Wesley Clark was one of these two who devised what happened at Waco."

Ponte also reports that "when Russians landed and took over one provincial
airport in the region, General Clark commanded British forces to attack the
Russians. British General Sir Mike Jackson reportedly refused, saying: 'I'm
not going to start the Third World War for you!'"

And this from military writer Col. David Hackworth: "Known by those who've
served with him as the 'Ultimate Perfumed Prince,' he's far more comfortable
in a drawing room discussing political theories than hunkering down in the
trenches where bullets fly and soldiers die."

Clark, by the report of some who have worked with him, is an egocentric,
marginally qualified officer of questionable judgment who made his way to
the top with the help of fellow Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton.


MORE ON CLARK
http://www.counterpunch.org/clark.html

COUNTERPUNCH - "The poster child for everything that is wrong with the GO
(general officer) corps," exclaims one colonel, who has had occasion to
observe Clark in action, citing, among other examples, his command of the
1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood from 1992 to 1994. While Clark's official
Pentagon biography proclaims his triumph in "transitioning the Division into
a rapidly deployable force" this officer describes the "1st Horse Division"
as "easily the worst division I have ever seen in 25 years of doing this
stuff."

Such strong reactions are common. A major in the 3rd Brigade of the 4th
Infantry Division at Fort Carson, Colorado when Clark was in command there
in the early 1980s described him as a man who "regards each and every one of
his subordinates as a potential threat to his career".

While he regards his junior officers with watchful suspicion, he customarily
accords the lower ranks little more than arrogant contempt. A veteran of
Clark's tenure at Fort Hood recalls the general's "massive tantrum because
the privates and sergeants and wives in the crowded (canteen) checkout lines
didn't jump out of the way fast enough to let him through". . .

Observers agree that Clark has always displayed an obsessive concern with
the perquisites and appurtenances of rank. Ever since he acceded to the Nato
command post, the entourage with which he travels has accordingly grown to
gargantuan proportions to the point where even civilians are beginning to
comment. A Senate aide recalls his appearances to testify, prior to which
aides scurry about the room adjusting lights, polishing his chair, testing
the microphone etc prior to the precisely timed and choreographed moment
when the Supreme Allied Commander Europe makes his entrance.

"We are state of the art pomposity and arrogance up here," remarks the aide.
"So when a witness displays those traits so egregiously that even the
senators notice, you know we're in trouble." His NATO subordinates call him,
not with affection, "the Supreme Being".

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to