Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-05 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Bob Stokes wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 3/3/01 9:39:01 AM Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Since it is safe and rational to assume that the ONLY military which
  used nuclear weapons to wipe out  two entire cities for the purpose
  of propaganda does not really give a damn about human life, why are
  they pouring so much money into non-lethal weapons.

 You have a very warped view of history, but maybe that's the way our Statist
 government wants people to view WWII.  Maybe they want to turn everyone into
 pacifists so we won't fight back when they try to enslave us totally.  You
 seem to forget that the Japanese wiped out Pearl Harbor and murdered
 thousands of people both military and civilian.  You seem to forget that we
 dropped leaflets on Hiroshima and Nagasaki telling the population to run for
 the hills because we were going to decimate their town if the Emperor didn't
 surrender.  You also seem to forget the military is under civilian control;
 the President ordered the bombings.  Just where do you get this hypothesis
 that the bombings of these two cities were propaganda?  It was to prevent an
 invasion of Honshu which would have resulted in millions of deaths on both
 sides.

I'm afraid that YOU are the one who has been mis-educated by the ' gubment'.
There are several good sources from that era as well as more recent ones
which make it quite clear that Roosevelt forced the Japanese to attack us
so that he could get us into a war.

  Answer: To use domestically against civilians.

 All the more reason to be armed, to protect against such tyranny and
 governmental abuse,

You are INSANE if you think you can stand up to the US Gov if it decides to
take your guns, or anything else it wants to do to you. INSANE!

 but if you have your way we will be disarmed and
 helpless.  You should learn that fabian socialism/communism/fascism's goals
 includes disarming of citizens so they will be helpless against the "Mother"
 State.  Government is not your friend.  Government is raw force that needs to
 be controlled, not set free to run amuck.

I agree 1000%. But dead gun nuts will just create another health hazard as they
lay rotting in the streets.


  Answer: To sell the technology to other countries for the same purpose. 

 If we stop these weapons from being used successfully here, maybe other
 countries wouldn't want to buy these weapons to use against their own
 citizens.

This is a very important point. We, as American citizens can do much to
prevent the misery our economic and political systems are foisting upon the
rest of the world.

CONTROL YOUR ELITES!

 The second amendment is the most important part of the
 Constitution for the only defense against and armed force is a bigger armed
 force and the armed citizens of this country outnumber the military in
 overwhelming numbers at this time.

Ridiculous. But Darwin has a way of dealing with people afflicted with
ideological brain damage.

Joshua2

 Regards,
 Bob Stokes

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-05 Thread Bob Stokes

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 3/5/01 6:39:12 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm afraid that YOU are the one who has been mis-educated by the '
gubment'.
 There are several good sources from that era as well as more recent ones
 which make it quite clear that Roosevelt forced the Japanese to attack us
 so that he could get us into a war.

During the time this was happening the general consensus of the US public was
that Japan attacked the United States.  They did not have the information
that FDR goaded Japan to instigate a war.  FDR also did not order the use of
atomic weapons against Japan ... He was dead, Truman ordered the bombing.
Nankato may have hit the nail on the head when he mentioned the revenge
factor, which may have been the real reason the bombs were dropped.

By saying the bombing was "propaganda" do you mean it was done to have other
nations fear us because we had a weapon that was more devastating than any
other nation had at the time?  This I could believe.

   Answer: To use domestically against civilians.
 
  All the more reason to be armed, to protect against such tyranny and
  governmental abuse,
 J2 wrote:
 "You are INSANE if you think you can stand up to the US Gov if it decides to
 take your guns, or anything else it wants to do to you. INSANE!"

No, not insane, I just want to protect what few rights I have left.  You
pro-confiscation people are highly misled.  What if every Jew in Germany had
been armed.  Maybe the Nazi's would have been able to round them up
eventually or kill them all while they were resisting, but the Nazi's would
have paid a price.  How about if the Russians were armed when all
anti-Communists were rounded up and sent to the Gulag to die, would 20
million have died?  And how about Red China when they rounded up their
anti-Communists and murdered 20 million or so ... had they met with 20
million armed people ready to resist things would have been much different.
Just because it hasn't happened here doesn't mean that it couldn't and some
would say it has happened before and may be happening now, especially if you
look at minorities - Indians, African-Americans, Japanese-Americans.


  but if you have your way we will be disarmed and
  helpless.  You should learn that fabian socialism/communism/fascism's goals
  includes disarming of citizens so they will be helpless against the
"Mother"
  State.  Government is not your friend.  Government is raw force that needs
to
  be controlled, not set free to run amuck.

 I agree 1000%. But dead gun nuts will just create another health hazard as
they
 lay rotting in the streets.

I'm not a gun nut, but I can see the writing on the wall.  I grew up in a
home that had no guns at all and I myself didn't own a gun till I was 48
years old.  I don't take it out and play with it, it is a tool, a very
dangerous tool.  Funny how the little piss-ant pro-confiscation nuts will
never define what constitutes a gun nut. When this government tries to round
me up because I'm an anticomminist/socialist/fascist I won't go like a lamb
to the slaughter.  Maybe I can only take out 2-3 of them, but if every gun
owner does the same as I do, then there won't be any left to carry out the
orders of the government elites and there will still be many gun owners left.
 Can't you see that removing guns from the public is a very high priority of
the elites.  Why else do you think they spread so much disinformation and
outright lies about guns.  Why do they insist that guns kill people and not
the people using the gun?  The gun is a tool and the person using the gun to
kill an innocent person is the criminal.  The government is so full of shit
when they talk about the right to own a gun for hunting purposes, the second
amendment was written to protect us from the tyranny of government. If you
think that all the antigun propaganda isn't full of lies and distortions you
should read the facts and not from Handgun Control Incorporated or the NRA
(themselves an anti-second amendment group).  The facts have been posted many
times on this list with data from the justice department, FBI etc. - even the
government can't hide the facts - they depend on people being too ignorant to
think for themselves and look up the data. A good rule of thumb is that if
the government wants it, you should be against it.  The propaganda is raised
every time there is a school shooting, so expect it to rise to new levels
since this newest school shooting spree in Santana high school in Santee
California.  Funny that there were very few school shootings before there
became this need to disarm (mid 1960's) law-abiding gun owners ... ever think
about that?  California has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation, but
all those laws didn't prevent this kid from shooting up the high school.
Could an armed teacher have stopped this kid?  Maybe another couple of dozen
laws would have prevented this tragedy ... not hardly.


J2 wrote:
 "This is a very 

Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-04 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

John Cone wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 --- Bob Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Synopsis)
  You have a very warped view of history.
  You seem to forget that the Japanese wiped out
  Pearl Harbor and murdered thousands of people both
  military and civilian.
  Just where do you get this hypothesis
  that the bombings of these two cities were
  propaganda?  It was to prevent an
  invasion of Honshu which would have resulted in
  millions of deaths on both sides."
 ___

 Nakano comments:
 A few historical facts.
 Franklin Roosevelt ran as the "peace candidate"
 in the 1940 election. He said: "I have said it before,
 and I say it again and againI am not about to
 send your sons to fight and die in another European
 war."  The American People were strongly against
 the U.S. entering World War 2.
 Something dramatic and shocking was needed to turn
 public opinion around.
 In about June of 1941 Roosevelt halted U.S. oil
 exports to Japan. (Denial of a strategic resource)
 Japan has no oil of its own. They were getting about
 half of their imports from the U.S. when FDR cut off
 their supply.
 That same summer or early fall, Roosevelt closed
 the Panama Canal to Japanese ships. The U.S. had
 guaranteed canal access to all nations, but FDR
 ignored that promise.
 In November of 1941, Roosevelt gave Japan an
 ultimatum to get their military forces out of
 Manchuria.

 Roosevelt was shoving and pushing Japandaring
 the Japanese to take a swing at us.
 They finally did on December 7th, 1941.
 Indeed it was a "day of infamy".
 2,500 U.S. military personnel died in the attack
 on Pearl Harbor.
 They were sacrificed by Roosevelt in order to
 reverse public opinion about America entering
 the war.
 It worked.
 In 1 day, the American People went from 80 percent
 opposed to the warto demanding that the U.S.
 declare war.  An entire generation of young American
 men lined up at the draft board offices to enlist.
 So much for the so-called "unprovoked sneak-attack".

 As for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan.
 It was unnecessary.
 Nor would an invasion of Japan been necessary.
 The Japanese navy was on the bottom of the ocean.
 Every Japanese city of any consequence was in ruins.
 More people were killed in the conventional firebomb
 raids on Tokyo than were killed at either Nagasaki
 or Hiroshima.
 American naval and airpower had Japan in an
 inescapable stranglehold.
 Japan is an island nation lacking in many resources
 such as iron ore, coal, and oil.
 All we had to do was keep Japan encircled
 and wait.
 The surrender was inevitable.

 Instead, we became the only nation in history
 to use atomic weapons against another country.
 Truman ordered those bombs dropped on an already
 beatenand virtually defenseless people.
 The fact is, not a single japanese aircraft
 rose in the sky to challenge the Enola Gay B-29
 that dropped the bomb.
 They were helpless and we bombed them anyway.

 Nakano

Ditto.

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-03 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

3/3/01

Since it is safe and rational to assume that the ONLY military which
used nuclear weapons to wipe out  two entire cities for the purpose
of propaganda does not really give a damn about human life, why are
they pouring so much money into non-lethal weapons.

Answer: To use domestically against civilians.

Answer: To sell the technology to other countries for the same purpose.

Joshua2


Picture:
http://uk.fc.yahoo.com/010302/80/b947l.htm

U.S. military developing new "non-lethal" weapon

Friday March 2, 04:00 AM
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010302/80/b93ut.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military has said it is developing a
new non-lethal weapon which uses electromagnetic energy to cause a
burning sensation on the skin and turn back enemy troops from long
range.

Officials said the "millimetre-wave" pulses, which might one day be
fired from a dish- shaped device similar to a radar, could be mounted
on military jeeps and possibly be used in peacekeeping and cases
where innocent civilians are mixed with enemy troops.

"In conflicts, targeted adversaries are expected to simply flee," the
Marine Corps said of the new weapon.

After 10 years and $40 million in research by the corps and the Air
Force, the Marines said at a briefing for reporters that pulses from
the weapon travel at the speed of light to penetrate less than 1/64
of an inch into the skin, causing immediate discomfort like touching
a hot light bulb.

"Within seconds, an individual feels an intense heating sensation
that stops when the transmitter is shut off or when the individual
moves out of the beam," the corps added in a news release.

"Despite the sensation, the technology does not cause injury because
of the low energy levels used," it added. "The sensation is nearly
identical to the sensation experienced by briefly touching an
ordinary light bulb that has been left on for a while."

The Marine Corps is managing the project for the military, but there
has been no decision by the Defence Department to build or field the
proposed weapon.

The Marines said the beam weapon, which is being developed by the
Marine Corps and Air Force in cooperation with defence firms, "causes
a repellent response, but not physical damage to the body."

"Research on this technology has shown there are no harmful health
effects," the Marine Corps said. "The beam only needs to be on for a
few seconds to achieve its purpose."

Copyright  2001 Reuters Limited.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-03 Thread Bob Stokes

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 3/3/01 9:39:01 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Since it is safe and rational to assume that the ONLY military which
 used nuclear weapons to wipe out  two entire cities for the purpose
 of propaganda does not really give a damn about human life, why are
 they pouring so much money into non-lethal weapons.

You have a very warped view of history, but maybe that's the way our Statist
government wants people to view WWII.  Maybe they want to turn everyone into
pacifists so we won't fight back when they try to enslave us totally.  You
seem to forget that the Japanese wiped out Pearl Harbor and murdered
thousands of people both military and civilian.  You seem to forget that we
dropped leaflets on Hiroshima and Nagasaki telling the population to run for
the hills because we were going to decimate their town if the Emperor didn't
surrender.  You also seem to forget the military is under civilian control;
the President ordered the bombings.  Just where do you get this hypothesis
that the bombings of these two cities were propaganda?  It was to prevent an
invasion of Honshu which would have resulted in millions of deaths on both
sides.

 Answer: To use domestically against civilians.

All the more reason to be armed, to protect against such tyranny and
governmental abuse, but if you have your way we will be disarmed and
helpless.  You should learn that fabian socialism/communism/fascism's goals
includes disarming of citizens so they will be helpless against the "Mother"
State.  Government is not your friend.  Government is raw force that needs to
be controlled, not set free to run amuck.

 Answer: To sell the technology to other countries for the same purpose. 

If we stop these weapons from being used successfully here, maybe other
countries wouldn't want to buy these weapons to use against their own
citizens.  The second amendment is the most important part of the
Constitution for the only defense against and armed force is a bigger armed
force and the armed citizens of this country outnumber the military in
overwhelming numbers at this time.

Regards,
Bob Stokes

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-03 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Bob Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Synopsis)
 You have a very warped view of history.
 You seem to forget that the Japanese wiped out
 Pearl Harbor and murdered thousands of people both
 military and civilian.
 Just where do you get this hypothesis
 that the bombings of these two cities were
 propaganda?  It was to prevent an
 invasion of Honshu which would have resulted in
 millions of deaths on both sides."
___

Nakano comments:
A few historical facts.
Franklin Roosevelt ran as the "peace candidate"
in the 1940 election. He said: "I have said it before,
and I say it again and againI am not about to
send your sons to fight and die in another European
war."  The American People were strongly against
the U.S. entering World War 2.
Something dramatic and shocking was needed to turn
public opinion around.
In about June of 1941 Roosevelt halted U.S. oil
exports to Japan. (Denial of a strategic resource)
Japan has no oil of its own. They were getting about
half of their imports from the U.S. when FDR cut off
their supply.
That same summer or early fall, Roosevelt closed
the Panama Canal to Japanese ships. The U.S. had
guaranteed canal access to all nations, but FDR
ignored that promise.
In November of 1941, Roosevelt gave Japan an
ultimatum to get their military forces out of
Manchuria.

Roosevelt was shoving and pushing Japandaring
the Japanese to take a swing at us.
They finally did on December 7th, 1941.
Indeed it was a "day of infamy".
2,500 U.S. military personnel died in the attack
on Pearl Harbor.
They were sacrificed by Roosevelt in order to
reverse public opinion about America entering
the war.
It worked.
In 1 day, the American People went from 80 percent
opposed to the warto demanding that the U.S.
declare war.  An entire generation of young American
men lined up at the draft board offices to enlist.
So much for the so-called "unprovoked sneak-attack".

As for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan.
It was unnecessary.
Nor would an invasion of Japan been necessary.
The Japanese navy was on the bottom of the ocean.
Every Japanese city of any consequence was in ruins.
More people were killed in the conventional firebomb
raids on Tokyo than were killed at either Nagasaki
or Hiroshima.
American naval and airpower had Japan in an
inescapable stranglehold.
Japan is an island nation lacking in many resources
such as iron ore, coal, and oil.
All we had to do was keep Japan encircled
and wait.
The surrender was inevitable.

Instead, we became the only nation in history
to use atomic weapons against another country.
Truman ordered those bombs dropped on an already
beatenand virtually defenseless people.
The fact is, not a single japanese aircraft
rose in the sky to challenge the Enola Gay B-29
that dropped the bomb.
They were helpless and we bombed them anyway.

Nakano


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-03 Thread Bob Stokes

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 3/3/01 9:35:54 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Nakano comments:
 A few historical facts.
 Franklin Roosevelt ran as the "peace candidate"
 in the 1940 election. He said: "I have said it before,
 and I say it again and againI am not about to
 send your sons to fight and die in another European
 war."  The American People were strongly against
 the U.S. entering World War 2.

True, FDR was a liar.

 Something dramatic and shocking was needed to turn
 public opinion around.
 In about June of 1941 Roosevelt halted U.S. oil
 exports to Japan. (Denial of a strategic resource)
 Japan has no oil of its own. They were getting about
 half of their imports from the U.S. when FDR cut off
 their supply.

We did not attack Japan.  It is not our fault that Japan has no oil.  We are
not obligated to service Japanese needs.

 That same summer or early fall, Roosevelt closed
 the Panama Canal to Japanese ships. The U.S. had
 guaranteed canal access to all nations, but FDR
 ignored that promise.

FDR had no right to close the canal to Japan.  The Congress ignored what was
the right thing to do and let FDR have his way.  The US built the canal; we
should have some control over it's usage, but I see your point.

 In November of 1941, Roosevelt gave Japan an
 ultimatum to get their military forces out of
 Manchuria.

I don't like FDR, however he was right that Japan had no right to invade
China, Korea, etc.  Just because Japan has few natural resources does not
give it a right to invade other countries to steal their natural resources.

 Roosevelt was shoving and pushing Japandaring
 the Japanese to take a swing at us.
 They finally did on December 7th, 1941.
 Indeed it was a "day of infamy".
 2,500 U.S. military personnel died in the attack
 on Pearl Harbor.
 They were sacrificed by Roosevelt in order to
 reverse public opinion about America entering
 the war.
 It worked.
 In 1 day, the American People went from 80 percent
 opposed to the warto demanding that the U.S.
 declare war.  An entire generation of young American
 men lined up at the draft board offices to enlist.
 So much for the so-called "unprovoked sneak-attack".

The fact is that we did not attack Japan.  Of course the American public is
going to want war against another country that attacked us.  FDR wanted to
get us in the European war, Japan was a backdoor to doing this, Why was Japan
pissed off because we didn't sell them petroleum or allow them access to the
Panama Canal ... could it be because they wanted these resources to enslave
all of Asia?  We did not attack Japan; Japan attacked the US.

 As for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan.
 It was unnecessary.
 Nor would an invasion of Japan been necessary.
 The Japanese navy was on the bottom of the ocean.
 Every Japanese city of any consequence was in ruins.
 More people were killed in the conventional firebomb
 raids on Tokyo than were killed at either Nagasaki
 or Hiroshima.
 American naval and airpower had Japan in an
 inescapable stranglehold.
 Japan is an island nation lacking in many resources
 such as iron ore, coal, and oil.
 All we had to do was keep Japan encircled
 and wait.
 The surrender was inevitable.

 Instead, we became the only nation in history
 to use atomic weapons against another country.
 Truman ordered those bombs dropped on an already
 beatenand virtually defenseless people.
 The fact is, not a single japanese aircraft
 rose in the sky to challenge the Enola Gay B-29
 that dropped the bomb.
 They were helpless and we bombed them anyway.  

What you say here has a lot of merit.  It would have made more sense to
starve them into surrender.  However, the taking of Okinawa was no easy task
and if as you say Japan was already defeated maybe we should not have invaded
Okinawa and just let them surrender, but they did not surrender.  I lived in
Japan for over four years.  The Japanese are much like people in the US, they
don't like to give up in a fight.  The only way to force Japan to surrender
was to use the bomb or to invade the main island.  They would have fought off
the invasion to the best of their ability and it would have cost millions of
lives on both sides.  The Japanese would have fought the same as Americans
would fight if our country was invaded.  The only way the war would have
ended would be to decimate Japan as much or more than Germany was decimated.

 I do see your point clearly, FDR railroaded the US into WW2.  Japan
overreacted to FDR's pushing and shoving by pulling a gun and we reacted in
kind.  I do not agree that Japan was utterly defeated.  The bomb was probably
the only way to make the Emperor surrender.  Just like FDR, the emperor did
not fight in the war and therefore he could be "tough" against any blockade,
it is a different matter when citizens are being incinerated by the tens of
thousands.  I hope you can see my point.

Regards,
Bob Stokes

A 

Re: [CTRL] WARNING: US military developing non-lethal weapons.

2001-03-03 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Bob Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We did not attack Japan; Japan attacked the US.
 The Japanese are much like people in the US, they
 don't like to give up in a fight.  The only way to
 force Japan to surrender was to use the bomb or to
 invade the main island.
 They would have fought off the invasion to the best
 of their ability and it would have cost millions of
 lives on both sides.
 The bomb was probably the only way to make the
 Emperor surrender.  I hope you can see my point.

 Regards,
 Bob Stokes
___

Hello Bob,
  I appreciate your response and I do see your point.
You make a good one.
The American People wanted the war to end and
the "boys to come home".  It had already ended
in Europe and the national attitude was to get
it over with in the Pacific.  This atmosphere
made it more politically palatable to end it
with a quick decisive strike.
In his autobiography, "Mission With LeMay",
Air Force General Curtis LeMay paints a grim
picture of the situation in Japan during the last
days of the war.  U.S. heavy bombers flew virtually
unchallenged in the skies over Japan.  We conducted
incendiary bomb strikes on Tokyo which produced a
firestorm which lasted several days.  More people
were killed in that destruction of Tokyo than
were killed by either atomic blast in Hiroshima
or Nagasaki. LeMay clearly makes the point that
The U.S. Army Air Force (as it was then called),
had destroyed the Japanese air defense fighter
forces and we had complete control of the airspace
over Japan. We also had the strategic long-range
bomber force capable of pulverizing Japanese cities
into rubble.  In fact, most of them were rubble.
It was difficult to find relatively undamaged
target cities on which to target the atomic bombs.

Japan's industry required raw materials to sustain
their war effort.  Many of those vital raw materials
had to be imported by sea.
But the U.S. Navy had absolute mastery of the sea.
The Japanese Navy and much of their merchant marine
fleet had been destroyed.
From a purely strategic military viewpoint,
we did not have to invade the Japanese homeland.
With absolute control of the airspace and the
sealanes, we could have simply backed off, denied
them any imports or commerce, and their industries
would have ground to a halt. (They were already
very seriously crippled).
I agree that such a solution would not have satisfied
the American public's need for "retribution".

 Regards
Nakano



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om