-Caveat Lector-
I agree. The same for Brazil.
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 02:50:56 -0500, YnrChyldzWyld wrote:
This country was FOUNDED via violence, and emerged as a world power via
violence...
Every major political and social change in this country only came about
as a result of violence...
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-12-03 02:51:06 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, nessie wrote:
The task is not to join them at the table but to overturn the table.
If violence is not a wholly appropriate method for dealing with people who
exploit slave labor, then the
-Caveat Lector-
Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave
SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE
It will never be the same for the bulimic boomers of brutal capitalism. The
serial rapists of the planet's economy and environment still retain their
power but they have finally lost their cover of
-Caveat Lector-
The task is not to join them at the table but to overturn the table.
If violence is not a wholly appropriate method for dealing with people who
exploit slave labor, then the American Civil War was a mistake.
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and
-Caveat Lector-
nessie wrote:
If violence is not a wholly appropriate method for dealing with people who
exploit slave labor, then the American Civil War was a mistake.
The pretense that the "abolition of slavery" was either
a motive or justification for the war, is a fraud
-Caveat Lector-
And why did these men abolish slavery?
The key word here is "these." Spooner is talking about politicians and the
men who owned them. About them, he is absolutely right. However, Spooner
errs in his assumption that these were the men who abolished slavery and
that it was
-Caveat Lector-
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, nessie wrote:
The task is not to join them at the table but to overturn the table.
If violence is not a wholly appropriate method for dealing with people who
exploit slave labor, then the American Civil War was a mistake.
This country was FOUNDED via
