On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
>
> With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying. That
means you do queries like
apropos -s
Updating src tree:
P src/crypto/external/bsd/openssl/lib/libcrypto/Makefile
P src/external/mit/ctwm/bin/ctwm/Makefile
P src/external/mit/xorg/bin/bitmap/bmtoa/Makefile
P src/external/mit/xorg/bin/xman/Makefile
P src/external/mit/xorg/bin/xrdb/Makefile
P src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
P
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying. That
means you do queries like
apropos -s 9lua systm
apropos -s n foo bar
To be able to use this feature, you need to regenerate the database.
You can do this by
On 2016/04/13 16:56, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 04/13/16 08:15, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Nick Hudson wrote:
Hi,
I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
I've put some kernels for testing
Hi All,
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying. That
means you do queries like
apropos -s 9lua systm
apropos -s n foo bar
To be able to use this feature, you need to regenerate the database.
You can do
On 04/13/16 11:58, Dave Tyson wrote:
On Wednesday 13 Apr 2016 07:59:20 Nick Hudson wrote:
Hi,
I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
I've put some kernels for testing here:
On Wednesday 13 Apr 2016 07:59:20 Nick Hudson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
> merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
> I've put some kernels for testing here:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~skrll/nick-nhusb
>
>
On 04/13/16 08:15, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Nick Hudson wrote:
Hi,
I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
I've put some kernels for testing here:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:59:20AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
> merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
> I've put some kernels for testing here:
>
>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Nick Hudson wrote:
Hi,
I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
I've put some kernels for testing here:
http://www.netbsd.org/~skrll/nick-nhusb
Please test and report
Hi,
I think the first phase of nick-nhusb is in a state ready to be
merged. I'd like to merge it in the next few days, but in the meantime
I've put some kernels for testing here:
http://www.netbsd.org/~skrll/nick-nhusb
Please test and report success or failure.
I can provide kernels to
13 matches
Mail list logo