On Thursday 15 March 2007 21:28, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:46:09PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
BTW, the toplevel directory of darcs.haskell.org needs some serious
cleanup,
There are plans[0] to get a community server where anyone can come
along and get a project hosted in
On Thursday 15 March 2007 21:34, Ian Lynagh wrote:
hsc2hs gives different output on different platforms, so anyone building
from source needs it, not just those building from darcs.
I came to the same conclusion this morning while standing under the
shower... :-) So things are quite different
Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now I remember. :-) Hmmm, that seems to indicate that splitting
off at least cpphs from the Hugs/nhc98 distributions is the right
way. And because of a similar reasoning, hsc2hs should not be
distributed with nhc98.
But the very reason that cpphs and
Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GHC/Hugs/nhc
should fetch these tools via their darcs-all script and use it for
bootstrapping themselves,
At least nhc98 already does this. :-)
but they should *not* install these tools
along with the compiler/interpreter in question.
Well, perhaps
From: GHC Build Reports [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cvs-ghc@haskell.org
Subject: [nightly] 16-Mar-2007 build of of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-mingw32
(bling)
Build description = of 6.6 branch on i386-unknown-mingw32 (bling)
Build location= /fptools/builds/STABLE
Build config file =
Fri Mar 16 06:38:22 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Comment out debug traces
M ./compiler/iface/IfaceEnv.lhs -2 +2
M ./compiler/iface/LoadIface.lhs -1 +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
Fri Mar 16 06:38:50 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Refactor TcRnDriver, and check exports on hi-boot files
This patch refactors TcRnDriver to make the top-level structure
easier to understand.
The change was driven by Trac #924, and this patch fixes that bug.
When comparing a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:18:21PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
We *do not* install hsc2hs anymore, and make it a standalone project
distributed separately. Same for cpphs.
The only issue I see is that Cabal calls hsc2hs when necessary, but alex
and happy are already in the that situation.
On Friday 16 March 2007 15:45, Ian Lynagh wrote:
The only issue I see is that Cabal calls hsc2hs when necessary, but alex
and happy are already in the that situation. Unfortunately packages
can't depend on tools, they just fail when asked to build. Perhaps there
should be a cabal Tools: field
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:12:49PM +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but they should *not* install these tools
along with the compiler/interpreter in question.
However, nhc98 won't mind in the slightest if somebody else installs
cpphs as well, or over
10 matches
Mail list logo
