On 16/03/2010 19:34, Henrique Ferreiro wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to make cost centre profiling work in the threaded rts
build in order to use that information to better understand parallel
behaviour.
Currently I am learning about the internals of GHC and I am thinking
about how this could be
On 15/03/2010 18:35, David Peixotto wrote:
I have some questions after starting to look at implementing an
optimization in the GHC back end related to Trac ticket #1498[1,2]. The
goal of the optimization is to eliminate unnecessary heap checks in
recursive functions.
Great!
Now we have a
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +1100, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
I've a patch which removes DPH from ghc-head, and a merge which
removes it from ghc-6.12, and I could successfully build
Unfortunately, we can't remove DPH from the boot packages yet.
However, as I suggested in my previous
On 17/03/2010, at 23:40, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +1100, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
I've a patch which removes DPH from ghc-head, and a merge which
removes it from ghc-6.12, and I could successfully build
Unfortunately, we can't remove DPH from the boot
David
It would indeed be good to work on this. Moreover, I know exactly how! Indeed
a Cambridge undergrad, Krzysztof Wos, may do this very thing in his undergrad
project. If he has time, which is not certain. I'm ccing him.
I've just dumped in some notes about the new back end status here
Wed Mar 17 05:35:19 PDT 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Fix Trac #3920: Template Haskell kinds
Fix two places where we were doing foldl instead of foldr
after decomposing a Kind. Strange that the same bug appears
in two quite different places!
M ./compiler/deSugar/DsMeta.hs -1 +1
Wed Mar 17 05:37:57 PDT 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Add test for Trac #3920
A ./tests/ghc-regress/th/T3920.hs
A ./tests/ghc-regress/th/T3920.stdout
M ./tests/ghc-regress/th/all.T +1
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
Wed Mar 17 06:34:05 PDT 2010 simo...@microsoft.com
* Accept change in inline pragma format
M ./tests/ghc-regress/simplCore/should_compile/spec-inline.stderr -2 +2
___
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +1100, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
DPH is already built by stage 2. You were getting errors from the
stage 2 compiler which didn't support ghci. Here is the error
message from your original posting:
Oh, then I got confused by my different builds here.
In this
On 16/03/2010 22:01, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:50:41AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Does anyone here care about portability? Some time ago (about three
years) someone told me that portability is an imporant goal for
ghc. Given that you now even need ghci to build ghc, this
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Ben Lippmeier wrote:
On 17/03/2010, at 12:15 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:43:46PM +1100, Ben Lippmeier wrote:
A boatload of tests are now failing for me under OSX
Is your testsuite repo up-to-date?
Yep.
Do you
Tue Mar 16 16:33:57 PDT 2010 Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li
* Don't use -Bsymbolic when linking the RTS
This makes the RTS hooks work when doing dynamic linking
M ./compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs -1 +10
M ./rts/ghc.mk -2 +2
___
Cvs-ghc mailing
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:44:06PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 03/15/10 05:42, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 13/03/2010 20:14, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Sat Mar 13 07:45:55 PST 2010 Ian Lynaghig...@earth.li
* Add a link-time flag to en/disable the RTS options
If RTS options are disabled then:
* The
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:53:28AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 16/03/2010 01:07, GHC Build Reports wrote:
Unexpected failures:
2047(dyn)
[...]
most of these failures are because -rtsopts appears to not be working
with -dynamic. Ian, any idea what the problem is there?
Should be
Hi All,
I've been experimenting with an idea to allow matching instances by
context. The basic idea is to allow duplicate instance declarations,
then select the best instance during simplification (in
typecheck/Inst.lhs:lookupPred specifically). I'm not sure I have the
right vocabulary to
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the response. I have a few comments below.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 15/03/2010 18:35, David Peixotto wrote:
1) Does it still make sense to pursue these optimizations in the native
code generator?
Well, this transformation is something that
Build description = HEAD on x86_64-unknown-linux
(cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Wed Mar 17 19:00:02 GMT 2010.
Build description = STABLE on x86_64-unknown-linux
(cam-04-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /64playpen/simonmar/nightly/STABLE-cam-04-unx
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-STABLE-cam-04-unx
Nightly build started on cam-04-unx at Wed Mar 17 19:10:01 GMT
Build description = HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
(cam-02-unx.europe.corp.microsoft.com)
Build location= /playpen/simonmar/nightly/HEAD
Build config file = /home/simonmar/nightly/site/msrc/conf-HEAD-cam-02-unx
Nightly build started on cam-02-unx at Wed Mar 17 18:00:02 GMT 2010.
checking
19 matches
Mail list logo
